Services A-Z     Pricing

Corporate Crime

'A team with strength from top to bottom.'

Legal 500 2025

"They navigate a crisis environment really well."

Chambers UK 2025

"They're an outstanding team with fantastic expertise within the group from the very top down."

Chambers UK 2025

'The team at Kingsley Napley is at the absolute top of its game. The corporate crime team deals with some of the most serious cases of bribery, corruption and money laundering.'

Legal 500 2025

“They have a wealth of experience that it becomes ingrained. The house style of how to do the job is imbued in them - people trust them.”

Chambers and Partners 2024

"I absolutely recommend them."

Chambers and Partners, Crisis & Risk Management, 2024

"We have a really high view of them as a firm. They work on a range of matters and have a real depth in their bench. They have quality across such a range of points.”

Chambers and Partners 2024

"They are proper criminal lawyers with commercial edge."

Legal 500 UK 2024

"They are a known leader in corporate investigation related work and it shows. Superb knowledge of the law and excellent with pragmatic and practicable advice. Given the sensitivity of the engagement, they provided reassurance throughout and managed well difficult and complex areas without wavering."

Legal 500 UK 2024

"This is a wonderful firm with committed individuals who are imaginative and professional in everything they do."

Legal 500 UK 2023

Our heritage as criminal law experts makes us a natural go-to firm for companies which find themselves at risk of criminal investigation and prosecution.

Like individuals, companies are subject to the criminal law and can be prosecuted. The last few years have seen a trend in prosecutors targeting companies, both in the UK and overseas. Prosecutors have been assisted in doing so by the so-called failure to prevent model, introduced into our law by the Bribery Act 2010, and extended to include the failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion offence contained in the Criminal Finances Act 2017.  

The investigation and prosecution of a company will often run in parallel with proceedings against individuals, which may include the most senior personnel. On conviction, companies can expect a significant fine, as well as being ordered to make confiscation and costs payments. If the company reaches a settlement with the authorities in the form of a deferred prosecution agreement, it will have to make payments to cover a penalty, compensation and costs and it will also have to demonstrate that it is reforming itself. This may lead to the appointment of an independent monitor to assess and report on the effectiveness of a company’s compliance and ethics policies and procedures. However the criminal case is disposed of the company will almost inevitably face risks of debarment from public contracts, follow-on civil claims and reputational fall-out, all of which need to be mitigated and contained.

Frequently, jurisdictional issues arise and a company may find itself subject to investigations based on the same or similar facts but conducted by different investigators, prosecutors and regulators, both from within the UK and abroad.

Having worked on landmark cases in this field, we are well placed to advise on corporate criminal liability issues and we are trusted to guide companies through the process of investigations, self-reporting and negotiating with prosecutors to achieve the most favourable outcome. Our diverse client base spans FTSE and other listed or international companies to traditional smaller enterprises.

How we can help

  • We conduct internal investigations to identify issues and scope risks, advising on whether and, if so, how best to self-report to the authorities given the SFO’s recent corporate cooperation guidance.
  • Our lawyers have un-rivalled experience of deferred prosecution agreements, and we can advise you on the process, your best strategy for achieving one and then negotiate the agreement.
  • We can steer you through complex cases where the same or similar conduct is investigated by multiple agencies, including from overseas. In such cases, we partner with experts around the world to provide the best possible joined-up advice.
  • We are specialist criminal litigators and, if a settlement is not on offer or is not acceptable, we can ensure you are properly defended.
  • We advise directors and officers on their duties and on specific compliance/governance obligations and issues.

Our approach

We understand the law in this area is complex and can sometimes lead to unpredictable outcomes. We can guide companies through the rules and help them position themselves to their maximum advantage.  

We are happy to work alongside other corporate law firms to bring our specialist criminal expertise to bear, or to work independently to secure the best possible outcome for corporate clients.

We also work closely with our colleagues in Reputation Management, Civil Fraud, Regulatory and Corporate and Commercial, as required, to offer a comprehensive service.

If your company has concerns about the risk of potential criminal misconduct, please contact one of our specialist corporate crime lawyers.

WHAT CLIENTS AND DIRECTORIES HAVE SAID

They are at the top of their game: incredibly professional, client-focused, diligent and very easy to work with."

They provide really good support in handling an investigation and managing all the different moving parts. I absolutely recommend them." 

Chambers and Partners, Crisis & Risk Management, 2024

I like Kingsley Napley for the way they can pull together partners from various areas and coordinate big projects well. They know how to work collaboratively to create a symbiotic relationship." 

Chambers and Partners, Crisis & Risk Management, 2024

Too many law firms lack the actual experience of criminal litigation to underpin their investigations team. That cannot be said about Kingsley Napley. They are proper criminal lawyers with commercial edge. There’s a reason why Kingsley Napley alumni populate the white-collar departments in the magic circle and US firms. I’ve seen first-hand their ability to turn around major corporate investigations under ridiculous time pressure, with a focus on what really matters. And they know what really matters, because they’ve been there and litigated it before."

Legal 500 UK 2024

A very strong team at all levels - they are in the top tier."

Legal 500 UK 2023

The client service provided was fantastic throughout and I felt that the team went out of its way to ensure that my needs were proactively addressed.”

Chambers UK 2023

They are at the top of their game: incredibly professional, client-focused, diligent and very easy to work with."

Chambers UK

Their legal work was thorough and insightful. They kept us informed of their progress throughout, and were highly responsive to our questions and comments at all times."

Legal 500 UK

Kingsley Napley’s corporate crime team is small but perfectly formed! They have a superb presence in this area and are widely regarded as a go-to firm for complex, high-profile litigation. They have partnerships around the globe with excellent teams and are commercially astute to the client’s objectives."

Legal 500 UK 

The firm has very good criminal lawyers with strength and depth throughout the department."

Chambers and Partners

I believe their strength lies in their meticulous attention to detail and the intelligence of the individuals employed by that firm. I could not imagine a better law firm."

Chambers and Partners

This top-tier UK-based firm stands out in the region for its distinguished white-collar crime practice."

Who's Who Legal: Business Crime Defence

They guide you expertly through the criminal and regulatory landscape in a very effective, practical way."

Chambers and Partners

Kingsley Napley are collegiate and easy to work with. You know you could give work to any of the partners, it wouldn't matter because you know they would all give good advice." 

Chambers and Partners

Kingsley Napley LLP’s ‘exceptionally experienced group of solicitors’ has ‘a solid level of experience’ in all areas of corporate crime including serious fraud, reputation management, regulatory liability and compliance, and also has a strong international practice with respect to cross-border tax, MLA and extradition issues."
 Legal 500

They are determined to do the best for their clients at all times and leave absolutely no stone unturned. It is a brilliant defence firm."      

 Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession

The criminal litigation department at Kingsley Napley LLP continues to ‘hold its own against the Magic Circle firms’."

Legal 500

 

Kingsley Napley’s corporate crime team is small but perfectly formed! They have a superb presence in this area and are widely regarded as a go-to firm for complex, high-profile litigation. They have partnerships around the globe with excellent teams and are commercially astute to the client’s objectives."

Recent work

Specific examples of current and recent corporate crime work include:

  • Acting for Tesco plc in the SFO’s investigation into financial irregularities and Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached in April 2017.
  • Advising a computer company, being investigated for the corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act.
  • Advising a global cosmetic group of companies
  • Advising a London brokerage in respect of a s.166 review and other regulatory matters
  • Advising a FCA-regulated institution in respect of internal fraud
  • Acting for a well-known media organisation which was served with a request for information from overseas in respect of criminal proceedings being undertaken in that jurisdiction
  • Instructed by a FTSE 250 company to advise on money laundering / proceeds of crime concerns arising from on-going confiscation proceedings
  • Acting for three emergency plumbing businesses  (and Managing Director) in relation to fraud and consumer protection related offences.
  • We are instructed by a global professional services firm in relation to a private criminal prosecution against two of its staff members (and others), alleging fraud.
  • Acting for corporate group in relation to a police investigation 
  • Our Criminal, Dispute Resolution and Employment teams are advising an asset management company  holding a sovereign wealth fund which is bringing civil proceedings against three individuals, including a former director.
  • Advising a Hedge Fund in connection with an on-going tax investigation commenced in Germany. 
  • Supporting an investigation being conducted on behalf of global bank. 
  • Acting for a multi-national film company involved in an alleged large VAT fraud. Conducting an investigation and managing VAT liability issues. 

 

Criminal Litigation Partner Alun Milford has co-edited the fifth edition of ‘Serious Fraud, Investigation & Trial’ - a practical guide for practitioners dealing with cases of criminal fraud. For further information, or to order please visit LexisNexis.

Read Louise Hodges' and Caroline Day's Chapter 'Witness Interviews in Internal Investigations: The UK Perspective'  in GIR's Practitioner's Guide to Global Investigations

 

A very strong team at all levels - they are in the top tier."

Legal 500 UK 2023

The client service provided was fantastic throughout and I felt that the team went out of its way to ensure that my needs were proactively addressed.”

Chambers UK 2023

 

Corporate Crime blogs

Focusing on Prosecuting Corporates: joint SFO – CPS Guidance released

On 18 August 2025, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) published their Joint SFO-CPS Corporate Prosecution Guidance, intended for prosecutors who will make decisions about whether or not to prosecute a corporation.

Time to comply: failure to prevent fraud is a reality

The government has published official guidance on reasonable fraud prevention procedures, setting the deadline of 1 September 2025 for large organisations to make sure they are compliant

What to do after a raid by the Serious Fraud Office?

Many of the SFO’s most notable recent investigations have begun with dawn raids, so-called because they normally occur very early in the morning. These raids can be a disorientating and uncomfortable experience in themselves, but as we explain further below, unfortunately they normally signal the beginning of a major SFO investigation. The period between arrest and charge – which can be lengthy in complex white-collar crime investigations – is absolutely critical. So, what should you and your legal team be doing in this period?

Introduction to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act

The passage of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) on 26 October 2023 represents one of the most important developments in the criminal law for UK corporates, their senior management, and their advisers, since the Bribery Act was introduced.

What are political parties saying about fraud and corruption?

The proliferation of fraud in the UK over the past decade has been widely publicised and discussed. We have already written regularly on the topic, including in March, when we explored the link between economic decline and increasing fraud offences; and in May 2023 when we discussed new statistics revealing the everyday reality for businesses operating in the “fraud capital of the world”.

Government announces independent review of disclosure and fraud offences

The government has announced the establishment of an Independent Review of Disclosure and Fraud Offences (the Review), to be chaired by barrister Jonathan Fisher KC. This is another step towards fulfilling the plans set out earlier in 2023, when the Fraud Strategy was published.

What’s happening with failure to prevent?

Since our last update on the progress of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, Parliament has taken its summer break, and the British weather has been through all its seasons and back again.

But are we any closer to getting new corporate criminal offences on the statute books? The unavoidably non-committal answer is ‘yes and no’.  In this article we chart the progress of the potential new failure to prevent fraud offence, but also the late introduction of amendments to extend the persons who can be the “directing mind and will” of a corporate body in order to establish corporate criminal liability.

Expansion of failure to prevent: The theory is almost reality

For more than a decade, lawyers, academics and business representatives have been discussing the need for a new approach to corporate criminal liability for economic crime. With significant expansion of the tried and tested failure to prevent (FTP) structure now imminent, and further debate on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill scheduled for late March, there are questions still to be answered.

Wet wipes, washing powder and water under the microscope: CMA announces its decision to focus on green claims in the fast moving consumer goods sector

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced a significant expansion of its project to examine misleading green claims. The regulator will be investigating a range of everyday essential items, including food and drink, cleaning products, toiletries, and personal care items, and will be considering whether companies are complying with UK consumer protection law in the environmental claims they are make about those products.

What does failure to prevent mean for the accountancy sector?

A comment made by Minister of State for Security Thomas Tugendhat during a debate on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill (the Bill) on 25th January has sparked a flurry of media reports and speculation. Tugendhat was confirming that the government supported the inclusion of new corporate criminal offences, based on the failure to prevent (FTP) model, in the Bill.

‘Made in China’ as Possible Supply Chain Money Laundering

It is estimated that 30% of the world’s production of cotton originates in China. Of that cotton 85% originates in Xinjiang, which is the centre of the Uyghur atrocities. Recently before the High Court, the World Uyghur Congress (“the WUC”) argued that UK authorities were under a duty to block and/or launch money laundering investigations into the many imports of Xinjiang cotton brought into the UK - many by household names in the clothing industry – because of the high likelihood of prison and forced labour forming the start of the supply chain

Major rise in SARs volume and suspect funds locked – UK FIU report

The latest Annual Report of the NCA’s UK Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU), published this week, makes interesting reading. The UKFIU is responsible for receiving, analysing and disseminating intelligence submitted through the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) regime and its role is to alert law enforcement agencies, both at home and abroad, to potential instances of money laundering and terrorist financing.

The FCA’s growing toolkit to tackle ESG issues

In late October the FCA launched a consultation on CP22/20 a range of new rules that will enhance its regulatory toolkit for dealing with ESG issues.

Greenwashing in the High Street: announcement of an investigation into ASOS, Boohoo and ASDA (George) brings the Green Claims Code into the spotlight

The Competition and Markets Authority (the CMA) has been threatening to investigate companies making misleading environmental claims since it announced the launch of the Green Claims Code in September 2021. On 29 July 2022, having given companies a period of time to get their representations in order, it announced that it had launched investigations into the eco-friendly and sustainability claims made by ASOS, Boohoo and George at Asda about their fashion products, including clothing, footwear, and accessories. These are the first greenwashing investigations to be announced under the Green Claims Code although the fashion industry is a sector the CMA had specifically targeted as a priority area for greenwashing.

Corporate Criminal Liability: The Law Commission’s ten options for reform

On 10th June, the Law Commission launched its “Options Paper” which presents a number of ways in which the law of corporate criminal liability could be reformed. The detailed paper, accompanied by a 14 page summary document, sets out potential options for reform in this area and rules out other possibilities as not viable.

Corporate criminal liability reform – the pressure is on the Law Commission as MPs express their frustration at delay

The spectre of a failure to prevent economic crime offence for corporates once again received attention during a debate in parliament on 13 January 2021 as part of the consideration of the Financial Services Bill.

Deferred Prosecution Agreements - New SFO Guidance

The SFO’s entered into its ninth deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) earlier today, this time reaching a resolution of bribery allegations with a company called Airline Services Limited. With other corporate cases still on its books, we can expect to see more DPAs as these cases work through the system. So, what does that mean for companies which might be caught up in an investigation?

The SFO's confirmation of a DPA in principle with Airline Services Ltd illustrates the balance between confidentiality and transparency in the DPA process

In a press release dated 22 October 2020, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that it had reached an agreement in principle regarding a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Airline Services Ltd (ASL). This agreement is subject to approval from the Court, which will be sought from Mrs Justice May at a public hearing at Southwark Crown Court, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice, on 30 October 2020. Subject to the approval, the SFO have stated that the DPA will conclude its investigation into ASL and its conduct.

Will the Economic Crime Levy bring much needed investment in the fight against economic crime?

The Government announced its intention to introduce an Economic Crime Levy in the Budget 2020. This is designed to fund government action to tackle money laundering and help deliver the reforms committed to in the Economic Crime plan 2019-2020. It has since followed up on this - on 21 July - with the launch of a consultation as to how such a levy would operate.

AML: HMRC flexes enforcement muscle to the tune of £7.8 million

In September 2019, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) published its list of businesses that have not complied with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLR 2017) for the tax year 2019 to 2020. Within this, it revealed that it has fined Touma Foreign Exchange Ltd £7.8 million for a wide range of serious failures under the Money Laundering Regulations. 

Corporate Crime Insights

View all

Blogs

Focusing on Prosecuting Corporates: joint SFO – CPS Guidance released

Greenwashing enforcement is not going away

Fraud case roundup

Introduction to the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act

What are political parties saying about fraud and corruption?

Government announces independent review of disclosure and fraud offences

What’s happening with failure to prevent?

Expansion of failure to prevent: The theory is almost reality

What does failure to prevent mean for the accountancy sector?

Corporate Criminal Liability: The Law Commission’s ten options for reform

The Territorial Reach of the SFO - The Supreme Court Decides

Corporate criminal liability reform – the pressure is on the Law Commission as MPs express their frustration at delay

Deferred Prosecution Agreements - New SFO Guidance

The SFO's confirmation of a DPA in principle with Airline Services Ltd illustrates the balance between confidentiality and transparency in the DPA process

Will the Economic Crime Levy bring much needed investment in the fight against economic crime?

Recycling firm charged with corporate manslaughter

Fraud in the time of COVID-19

In-house lawyers and general counsel take note: will your communications be privileged?

The Corporate Offence of Failure to Prevent the Facilitation of Tax Evasion: Two years on

SFO guidance on co-operation: more carrot than stick?

Crunching the numbers: is the National Crime Agency right to seek additional funding?

HMRC turns to companies to police tax evasion

SFO v ENRC: what did the Court of Appeal decide and what does it mean for lawyers?

Tackling economic crime 2018-19

Corporate and individual accountability for international crimes: Kingsley Napley hosts second International Criminal Law Conference

Reform of corporate liability – renewed calls for change

The UK’s new National Economic Crime Centre

What is a Cartel?

FCA to regulate Claims Management Companies and caps on fees introduced

Corporates in the spotlight: NCA and SFO confirm tackling money laundering a strategic priority

Guest blog: Corporate criminal liability under international law

Gambling Commission imposes record fine on William Hill for anti-money laundering failures

Litigation privilege: the Court of Appeal endorses ENRC

Guest blog: Should companies have a duty to prevent human rights abuses?

Business and Human Rights: Magnitsky clause now in force

HMRC takes on off-shore tax evasion

Will the new corporate offence of failure to prevent tax evasion and enhanced international tax transparency change the landscape for tax investigations?

Failure to prevent tax evasion? Responsibility shifted from HMRC onto companies

Holding Corporates to Account: Criminal Liability for Failure to Prevent Facilitation of Tax Evasion

Corporate Crime Q&A: The new corporate offence of failure to prevent tax evasion

New Guidance on Financial Sanctions – OFSI approach to compliance and enforcement

Privilege, Confidentiality and the Challenge of Modern Technology

The Magnitsky Clause Part 2: Profiting from the suppression of those who seek to assert their human rights?

The Magnitsky Clause Part 1: Profiting from the suppression of whistleblowers – what does it mean for business?

Anti-Money Laundering: new rules and regulations in play

Three companies convicted of corporate manslaughter in a week

Health and Safety Sentencing a year on from the new guidelines – What’s changed?

SRA NOT SFO: Professional obligations and s2 interviews - Law Society says do not compromise

A new criminal offence for corporates that fail to prevent human rights abuses?

FCA guidance on how firms should deal with PEPs: a proportionate approach

Internal investigations and legal professional privilege: an increasingly tricky area

Close Load more

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility