Public Law

Recognised experts in judicial review, public inquiries, inquests and information law.

Find out how we can help

"Clients are ‘very impressed with the degree of care’ Kingsley Napley LLP has in handling judicial reviews, public inquiries, inquests and regulatory matters."

Legal 500 UK, 2017

Our team of public law solicitors has over twenty-five years of experience acting in 'sensitive, high profile and politically inflected' matters. We act for individuals (including senior professionals and public figures), companies and business groups, charities and pressure groups as well as government and public bodies themselves.

Whether you are contemplating or defending a judicial review challenge, appearing before a public inquirymajor inquest or select committee, or concerned about protecting personal information, we understand that you have wider interests at stake, be they organisational, financial, commercial, reputational or business and human rights.

Public law solicitors

We are a leading public law team in the UK, consistently top-ranked in Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. We are recognised for our "exceptional capabilities" and "enormous strengths'' acting on behalf of public and private sector clients.

As one of the only dedicated public law teams in the country, we rapidly get to the heart of the issue, providing realistic legal advice so that you can confidently navigate the bigger picture, as well as the litigation or inquiry at hand.

Our team is led by the ‘simply exceptional’  Adam Chapman who before joining Kingsley Napley was a senior public law litigator in the Treasury Solicitor’s Department, acting for central government departments and senior public figures, alongside other public bodies in the most sensitive and high profile judicial review cases, inquiries and related litigation.

Contact our Public Law Team

"one of the top public law teams."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession, 2020

pragmatic advice which always demonstrates a sensitivity to the concerns and objectives of the client"

Legal 500 UK, 2019

What clients and directories say

"I find them hands-on, engaged and willing to provide feedback for the work we do."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession,  2020

The firm has an amazing engagement with clients and barristers with a real sense of teamwork"

Legal 500 UK, 2020

Provides high-quality public law advice to public and private sector organisations alike"

Legal 500 UK, 2020

One of their main strengths is the personal touch - you get the sense the lawyers really care about the work they undertake and you as a client"

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession,  2019

A real diversity of work. They benefit from experience acting for individuals, companies and public bodies, which gives them a depth and gravitas that sets them apart. Also, they are very friendly and down to earth individuals."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession,  2017

All the people I have come across there are very high quality and know what they are doing."

A client

Client service has been good, always with a quick turnaround to requests for advice. They are responsive and have a good understanding of client needs."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession,  2017

They were very approachable, friendly and responsive, and they provide good value for money." 

A client

They have exceptional capabilities, their strengths are enormous and we have been extremely pleased with the work the public law team has done."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession, 2016

What I like about them is that they are quite a small firm but have extremely good management of big cases. All of their clients get a great deal of attention." 

A client

The ‘fantastic’ team at Kingsley Napley LLP ‘is dedicated and undertakes some of the most highprofile public cases"

Legal 500 UK, 2015

Practice head Adam Chapman’s ‘experience working in government makes him the ideal lawyer for both commercial and claimant judicial review"

Legal 500 UK, 2015

Adam Chapman "is a very wise, astute public law lawyer," according to sources, who add: "He was a Treasury solicitor for a long time, which gives him a very well-rounded judgement."

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession

Stephen Parkinson is an "extremely astute and enormously experienced" former government lawyer who is considered to be one of the leading public law solicitors in the country."

Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK Legal Profession


The team has a strong focus and the determination to achieve what is required"

Legal 500 UK, 2020

experience, willingness to challenge and be challenged, understanding of legislation, regulations and drafting skills."

Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK Legal Profession 2018

Sources praise the group's abilities in 'sensitive, high-profile, politically inflected work' and attest that 'what is really refreshing is their commitment to their clients and the care they take'..." 

Chambers UK, A Clients Guide to the UK Legal Profession


Public Law Insights

View all


Since prorogation ‘never happened’ what happens next?

In deep water: High Court decides on level of compensation for interference with fishing quotas

When politics and law collide: The prorogation judicial reviews

“WhatsApp” with Dominic Grieve’s motion for Brexit communications?

The suspension of parliament increases legal scrutiny of Brexit – and possibly a public inquiry?

High Court finds Mayor’s Congestion Charge decision did not involve unlawful discrimination

“Volaw Trust” - A strengthening of the privilege against self incrimination from requests for pre-existing documents?

London Climate Action Week: Cutting through the London smog - the big question still to be answered about the death of Ella-Kissi Debrah

London Climate Action Week: Saving Londoners from nitrogen dioxide, one judicial review at a time

The grey area between Article 2 and ordinary medical negligence? The High Court considers Parkinson and the deaths of vulnerable people in care homes

‘World-leading’ Modern Slavery Act 2015: review confirms more to be done

What is an 'Article 2 inquest' and why does it matter?

KN Green Week: Can law help save the world?

How to respond to a subject access request: a step by step guide for organisations

Court finds approach by DWP to Universal Credit ‘odd in the extreme’

Over £450,000 for the state and £0 for PC Palmer’s family at the Westminster Bridge Inquest - how the inequality of arms at inquests looks set to continue

Judicial Review costs – a missed opportunity to extend access to justice

“A sorry state of affairs” – Lazarov v Bulgaria and R (Lazarov) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court

Care homes take heed: if you have failed to pay the ICO data protection fee you could be breaking the law

Judicial review and secondary legislation: What power does the court have to fix broken legislation?

How does secondary legislation come into force? The enactment of secondary legislation and the impact on subsequent litigation

Modern Slavery Act 2015: Under Review

Blowing spies’ legal cover? Reprieve threatens judicial review of alleged government misuse of the ‘James Bond clause’

What is secondary legislation and why do we have it?

Kingsley Napley considers statutory instruments and Brexit

Divorced, beheaded, scrutinised? SIs and Henry VIII powers under review

R(Gallaher) v Competition and Markets Authority and the Search for the Principle of Equal Treatment

Data Protection Act 2018 and law enforcement: an introduction

The Data Protection Act 2018: new criminal offences for data breaches

Data breach reporting – the only way is up

Joint data controllers – yet more data protection uncertainty

Some welcomed guidance for data controllers: Court of Appeal confirms the correct test to be applied when considering a SAR concerning mixed data

GDPR: The significance of the new principle of accountability

The ICO’s Regulatory Action Policy: What to expect in the new GDPR era

Coroner’s ‘cab rank queue’ burial policy quashed in successful judicial review claim

Will Your Voice Be Heard? – A Re-Examination of Standing in Judicial Review in the Light of Worboys

‘Enough is enough’ : IPCC delay found to be ‘extraordinary and indefensible’ in case against Sean Rigg officer

Dog walker successfully challenges local authority’s PSPO in High Court

The Data Protection Bill - New Criminal Offences for Data Protection Breaches On Their Way to the Statute Book

Subject Access Requests under the GDPR: What employers need to know

Data protection: A new board room priority

Ordinarily hard to challenge ombudsman’s decision-making marred by illegality, irrationality, procedural unfairness and pre-determination

GDPR & Brexit: Data transfers from the EU and the UK’s new status as a “third country”

Opaque, unpredictable, diminished? Parliamentary committee commentary suggests the human rights consequences of #Brexit withdrawal legislation “appear to be contrary to the Government’s intent”

Has Brexit undermined the UK’s ability to extradite its fugitives?

Legal update: Unlawful Discrimination in Personal Independence Payments

Judicial Review and the Creep of Closed Material Procedures - R (on the application of Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans and another

Legal Update: Revisiting trial in the absence of a defendant

The High Court’s decision is (sometimes) final: the Court of Appeal confirms the decision of a coroner in relation to witnesses and the risk of harm caused by giving evidence

Legal Update: Judicial review of decisions in the Crown Court

The £17 million Question - What will the ICO’s enforcement powers be under the GDPR, and how will they be used?

Close Load more

Let us take it from here.

+44 (0)20 7814 1200

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility