Advice for Regulators and Public Bodies

We have acted for regulatory authorities for several decades, providing advice on all matters concerning their regulatory functions and operations, including fitness to practise schemes, information assurance, compliance, legal challenges and criminal prosecutions.

We have considerable knowledge of all of the major regulatory sectors including health and social care, finance, professional services and education.

The diverse issues often faced by our regulatory clients means that they benefit from the expertise of our public law, criminal litigation, company and commercial, dispute resolution and employment teams. Specialist advice is given seamlessly across these teams providing continuity and the reassurance that every angle has been considered. 

Our clients benefit from our knowledge and experience gained through our work with similar organisations. We provide practical and commercial advice to help regulators better fulfil their public interest objectives, in the knowledge that many are accountable to their stakeholders for the exercise of their regulatory functions.

It is not only large established regulators that require specialist legal advice; small, start-up and voluntary organisations can also benefit. Ensuring that your organisation has good governance arrangements and a suite of policies and procedures that can help guide and achieve compliance, should be seen as a priority. Taking advice once there is a problem is rarely the best strategy.

Whilst each of our client relationships is unique, they bear similar hallmarks. In the initial stages, we spend time working closely with the organisation to understand its priorities and imperatives to determine how we can best work together to meet them. When investigating fitness to practise allegations, we use a robust case management system to monitor and track the progress of cases. We place considerable emphasis on a continuing and open dialogue with our regulatory clients to ensure we are meeting shared objectives and expectations. Through the deployment of a structured process improvement methodology, we also provide our clients with measurable improvements to their processes, resulting in resource savings for all.

Our approach 

We work collaboratively with our regulatory and organisational clients rather than advising from a distance. We take the time at the outset of the relationship to understand their key priorities in the short and long term so that our advice is correct for the moment but also responsive to future changes in the sector.  We mould our communication, meeting and reporting style to meet our clients’ needs and preferences.  We ensure that our clients have direct access to a partner supported by a team of lawyers, providing the reassurance that someone is always on hand to respond when the need arises. 

We understand that our clients are ultimately accountable to their stakeholders for the efficiency and performance of their regulatory operations and we act to enhance and protect their reputation.  We provide cost-effective legal support that is based on our excellent technical skills and legal knowledge and is driven by a desire to help our clients improve their own processes and systems.  Our dedicated process improvement lawyer works closely with our regulatory and organisational clients to deliver processes and legal solutions that are innovative as well as effective for the future.

We provide a personal, supportive and professional service.  Our clients report that they value the mix of approachability, excellent technical skills and the commitment to improving their operations that our team provides.

 

Our clients

We have acted for regulatory authorities for almost 50 years; our expertise in investigating and litigating in disciplinary cases crosses a number of sectors including health and social care, education, finance, security and professional services. We are privileged to have worked with the following bodies:   

  • The Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) 
  • The Security Industry Authority (SIA) 
  • The Architects Registration Board (ARB)
  • Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) 
  • The General Teaching Council (GTC) 
  • The General Optical Council (GOC) 
  • The General Dental Council (GDC) 
  • A voluntary regulator of complementary healthcare providers 
  • The Teaching Agency
  • The National College for Teaching and Leadership (NCTL)
  • Ofgem 
  • Academy for Healthcare Science (AHCS)
  • A voluntary regulator of language professionals
  • National Register for Communication Professionals for Deaf and Deafblind (NRCPD) 
  • UK Board of Healthcare Chaplaincy (UKBHC)
  • The Education Workforce Council for Wales (EWC)
  • The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) 
  • The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) 
  • The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS)

 

“The firm has strength in depth. It benefits from a stable of very effective and hard-working lawyers and a leadership team who are not afraid to innovate and anticipate the needs of the market going forward.”

Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK Legal Profession,  2017

Praise rolls in from all fronts for this team, with sources quick to commend it for "listening and responding, turning cases around quickly" and "providing excellent value for money.

Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK Legal Profession

Advice for Regulators and Public Bodies Comment

View all

Blogs

Case Update: Fitness to Practice panel's failure to find dishonest doctor impaired was not unduly lenient, holds the High Court

Case Update: Clarity urgently required on the test for dishonesty in regulatory proceedings as Administrative Court unable to rule on the issue

Professionals: are you clear on your ethical responsibilities?

Case Update: Court Of Appeal orders rehearing following non disclosure of witness statement by the BSB

Regulators ask banks for better protection for whistleblowers…but can the Regulators maintain it?

Regulatory Press Round-Up: February 2014

Case Update: R (on the application of Leathley and others) v Visitors to the Inns of Court [2013] EWHC 3097 (Admin)

Case Update: R (on the application of D) and General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 2839

Case Update: Ebhogiaye v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2013] EWHC 2445 (Admin)

Case Update: R. (on the application of Jackson) v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 2595 (Admin)

Regulatory Press Round-Up: July 2013

General Medical Council: changes to Fitness to Practice Rules are now in force

Regulatory Press Round-Up: April 2013

Case Update: Dr E.Y. v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 860

Case Update: Ashton v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 943

Case Update: Peter Teong Tatt Chuah v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWHC 894 (Admin)

Case Update: Harford and The Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWHC 696 (Admin)

Case Update: R (Patel) v General Medical Council [2013] EWCA Civ 1938

Case Update: Baker v Police Appeals Tribunal [2013] EWHC 718 (Admin)

Case Update: Ighalo v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2013] EWHC 661

Regulatory Press Round-Up: March 2013

Case Update: Sokunbi v Health Professions Council [2013] EWHC 672

Case Update: Wisson v Health Professions Council

Case Update: McDaid v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWHC 586 (Admin)

Case Update: High Court considers definition of consumer under Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

Case Update: Gillie Christou and Maria Ward v London Borough of Haringey [2013] EWCA Civ 178

Case Update: R (on the application of Dr LI) v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 522

Case Update: Quinn v Bar Standards Board, Visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 February 2013

Case Update: Perry v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWCA Civ 145

Case Update: Okeke v Nursing and Midwifery Council (2013) EWHC (Admin)

Regulatory Press Round-Up: February 2013

Health and Social Care Reform: an analysis of the responses.

Health and Social Care Reform: the responses are in; the possible key features of a new unified system

Case Update: Luthra v GMC [2013] EWCH 240 (Admin)

Case Update: High Court refuses to stay civil proceedings pending extradition proceedings

Case Update: Dutta v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 132 (Admin)

Case Update: R. (on the application of Scholten) v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 173 (Admin)

Mid-Staffordshire Report - impact for professional regulators?

Case Update: Patel v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 3688

Regulatory Press Round-Up: January 2013

Case Update: Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2013] EWCA Civ 11

Case update: R. (T and others) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and others [2013] EWCA Civ 25

Case Update: SRA v Anderson Solicitors [2012] EWHC 3659 (Admin)

Case update: The Queen on the Application of Ahmed -v- General Optical Council [2012] EWHC 3699 (Admin)

Case Update: Tinkler v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 3645 (Admin)

What goes on in the House is reported by Kingsley Napley

Teachers: new measures for trainees to be introduced

General Medical Council sets timing for launch of re-validation

The much anticipated FA Code of Conduct: (not) unveiled…

The Football Association Code of Conduct - “tough” or simply tinkering?

Final decision on Bonhoeffer: the financial legacy for the medical profession?

Close Load more

Let us take it from here.

+44 (0)20 7814 1200

enquiries@kingsleynapley.co.uk

Skip to content Home About Us Comment Services Contact Accessibility