Services A-Z     Pricing

Regulatory

Creating clarity from complexity

Find out how we can help

"What I look for in a solicitor is timeliness, sector understanding and value for money. The team at Kingsley Napley excels in all these areas."

Chambers & Partners, 2024

"The team has its finger on the pulse of professional regulation, enabling it to give clear and nuanced advice."

Chambers & Partners, 2024

"Kingsley Napley is consistently impressive and its team is very strong in legal services."

Chambers & Partners, 2024

"Kingsley Napley is the market leader in professional discipline and regulation."

Chambers & Partners, 2023

"The team is always responsive and approachable."

Chambers & Partners, 2023

"The team is exceptionally experienced in a wide range of regulatory frameworks, which ensures that we always receive well-rounded advice and are kept abreast of developments in other regulatory areas."

Chambers & Partners, 2023

"They provide rigorous and accurate legal support that demonstrates a significant understanding of the regulator, the process and the complaint."

Chambers & Partners, 2022

"They maintained a strong focus on the key issues, provided sound advice and engaged effectively with the regulatory body during a period of severe disruption."

Chambers & Partners, 2022

"It's a really bright set of lawyers who are really down to earth and approachable. They have the experience and the knowledge to pick up anything."

Chambers & Partners, 2022

"A brilliant team at all levels. Excellent lawyers and strategists, and totally committed to their clients. They are my first choice when asked to recommend solicitors."

Legal 500 UK, 2023

"Always so happy to help, provide input and assist with the problem. The lawyers approach matters with a can-do attitude, and bring solutions to the table using their wealth of knowledge of professional regulation."

Legal 500 UK, 2023

"Really professional. Do what they say they will do."

Legal 500 UK, 2023

"Good knowledge of the area, good grasp of commercial realities, and great for their understanding of the needs of their clients and the challenges they face in the regulatory space."

Legal 500 UK 2022

"Incredible depth of knowledge of regulatory law – and, more importantly, up-to-date and practical experience of regulators and their expectations."

Legal 500 UK 2022

The UK regulatory landscape is constantly evolving. Whether you are facing regulatory scrutiny, navigating compliance challenges, or managing governance risks, we provide insightful, commercial advice to prevent problems wherever possible and guide you through them if they occur.
 

Our highly specialist regulatory lawyers are consistently and independently recognised by Chambers UK and Legal 500 as leaders in their field. That’s because we don't just understand regulation. We also understand the world in which you operate.

We advise clients in two critical areas of regulatory law:

Professional services regulation

We support professionals and firms navigating sector-specific obligations and ethical standards, including:

 

Public safety regulation

We work at the intersection of public accountability, compliance and operational delivery in high-scrutiny environments:

 

A multi-disciplinary approach
 

Regulatory challenges rarely exist in isolation. That's why we take a cross-practice approach, drawing on expertise from across the firm - including criminal litigation, employment, corporate and commercial, public law, and dispute resolution, - to analyse your situation from every angle.

Latest blogs & news

Mazur & others v CILEX & others

The Court of Appeal has now handed down judgment in Julia Mazur & others v CILEX & others [2026] EWCA Civ 369 (the “Judgment”) providing welcome clarity on the conduct of litigation as a reserved legal activity.

Sanctions Guidance is not a score sheet – Court of Appeal findings from GMC v Gilbert & PSA

In a judgment handed down on 6 February 2026, the Court of Appeal (CoA) dismissed appeals by both the General Medical Council (GMC) and the Professional Standards Authority (PSA) to overturn the decision to suspend, rather than erase, a consultant surgeon from the medical register.

The judgment arrives at an interesting moment. In November 2025, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) introduced new Sanctions Guidance based on bandings structured around low, medium and high-risk levels, replacing the previous approach that required tribunals to start with the least restrictive sanction. The Court’s findings in Dr Gilbert’s matter should now influence how this guidance is applied.  

Clarity, Consistency, Confidence: HCPC Unveils Key Updates to FTP Decision-Making

On 5 February 2026, the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) published an important update outlining significant changes to its Fitness to Practise (FTP) decision-making framework. The HCPC has said that these changes represent a step forward in enhancing consistency, transparency and public protection within the regulatory process.

Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline – January 2026

In this blog, we cover the press round-up in the regulatory and professional discipline – January 2026

The GPhC issues updated inspection decision making framework: what pharmacy teams need to know

On 13 January 2026, the GPhC published an update to its inspection decision‑making framework, marking an important shift in how pharmacy inspections will be conducted and evaluated going forward. This revised framework seeks to strengthen regulatory clarity, incorporate recent legislative developments, and support more consistent, transparent decision‑making across the sector.

ICAEW’s new Guidance on Disciplinary Sanctions: what accountants and accountancy firms need to know

The regulatory landscape for accountants is progressively evolving, driven by heightened public expectations, increased scrutiny of professional conduct, and a greater push for transparency across regulated professions.

Accountancy regulators confront AI cheating in exams

The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) has confirmed that from March 2026, most exams will return to in-person settings. Remote assessments will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances, such as medical needs or where no exam centre is available. This change reverses the flexibility introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Administrative Court Overturns NMC Strike-Off: Key Lessons for Regulators and Prosecutors

The High Court has quashed a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) decision to strike off a nurse following a review hearing.

What is your duty to co-operate with your regulator?

The Institute of Charted Accounts in England and Wales (‘ICAEW ’) has recently imposed a severe reprimand, a £5000 fine and £6,473 costs on a member who failed to cooperate with them during the investigation process. The tribunal found that the member failed to provide information, explanations and documents requested by the ICAEW Conduct Department, including anti-money laundering policies, share documentation, and other requested materials. It was decided this breached the ICAEW’s Investigation and Disciplinary Regulation 16.1.

Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline – December 2025

This blog contains a Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline for December 2025.

When AI gets it wrong: Responsible use of AI in accountancy firms

A recent Deloitte Australia AI mishap underscores the risks of reliance on Generative AI tools and should be a warning light for accountants in light of new AI usage requirements in the ICAEW Code of Ethics.

Expanded AML remit for the FCA: a good or bad thing?

There was a good deal of surprise last week when the government announced that lawyers, accountants and company service providers will in future be supervised by the FCA for money laundering purposes. 

FRC Launches Consultation on New Routes to Resolution Under the Audit Enforcement Procedure

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has launched a consultation on proposed reforms to its Audit Enforcement Procedure (AEP), aiming to introduce greater flexibility and proportionality in how audit concerns are addressed. Since its inception, the AEP has faced criticism, particularly from mid-tier firms, for its limited adaptability to cases of varying complexity and seriousness. These concerns have been especially pronounced among firms encouraged by the FRC to enter the Public Interest Entity (PIE) audit market to foster competition.

Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline – August and September 2025

Here is the press round-up in the Regulatory and Professional Discipline sector covering the following dates: August and September 2025

Updated Insolvency Code of Ethics: what do insolvency practitioners need to know?

The Joint Insolvency Committee, in collaboration with the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) and the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA), has approved and issued a revised Insolvency Code of Ethics. The updated Code took effect from 1 October 2025.

Director hire to lead new focus on Actuarial services Regulatory Advisory and Defence

Kingsley Napley is pleased to announce that Jenny Higgins has returned to the firm as a Legal Director in its Regulatory practice.

New Diversity, Equity and Inclusion changes to the Actuaries’ Code and Guidance

The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) has introduced new Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) requirements to the Actuaries’ Code and associated Guidance following a lengthy and wide-ranging consultation process with members, employers and other stakeholders.  

These revisions reflect a broader regulatory trend, mirroring developments at bodies such as the SRA and ICAEW, towards strengthening professional ethics and workplace culture, particularly in relation to the fair treatment of others.

Preparing for Martyn’s Law: The Role of the Competent Person in the Workplace (CPiW) Qualification

The UK’s approach to counter terrorism preparedness has taken a significant step forward with the passing of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 (Martyn’s Law).

Fire Safety Awareness: A Shared Responsibility Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005

Fire safety is not just a compliance issue—it is a matter of protecting lives, assets, and reputations. Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO), employers, landlords, and those in control of premises have a legal duty to ensure adequate fire safety measures are in place. Failure to comply can lead to severe legal and financial consequences, but more importantly, it puts people at unnecessary risk.

Workplace risk assessments: understanding legal duties under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

Ensuring the safety and health of employees is a cornerstone of responsible business practice in the UK. At the heart of this responsibility lies the legal requirement to carry out workplace risk assessments—a duty enshrined in the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR). This article sets out the legal framework surrounding risk assessments, outlines practical steps for compliance, and includes expert insights from Andrew Sanderson of Kingsley Napley and Craig Lydiate of Eighty20 Risk Systems.

Regulatory Insights

View all

Blogs

What is your duty to co-operate with your regulator?

When AI gets it wrong: Responsible use of AI in accountancy firms

Expanded AML remit for the FCA: a good or bad thing?

FRC Launches Consultation on New Routes to Resolution Under the Audit Enforcement Procedure

Updated Insolvency Code of Ethics: what do insolvency practitioners need to know?

New Diversity, Equity and Inclusion changes to the Actuaries’ Code and Guidance

Fire Safety Awareness: A Shared Responsibility Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005

Workplace risk assessments: understanding legal duties under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999

Law students: academic misconduct and the SRA early character & suitability assessment

Recent changes to non-disclosure agreements: what do students need to know?

Rethinking enforcement strategy: Key proposals from the BSB's Enforcement Consultation

Tech-Driven, Ethically Bound: New FRC and ICAEW Guidance on AI Use in the Accountancy Sector

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill – historic legislation passes through the commons - A practical guide as to its application

The Care Quality Commission’s Bid to Progress

RICS shines its spotlight on the use of AI: have your say

The time for feedback is today: RICS’ updated Countering Financial Crime Standard

Press Round-Up: Regulatory and Professional Discipline – February and March 2025

Navigating the Green Frontier: Clinicians' Role in the Prescription of Medical Cannabis

Changes for accountancy firms to keep a close eye on in 2025

Festive frolics or regulatory wrongs in accountancy firms?

SRA Guidance – internal investigations and guidance for in-house advisers

Navigating assisted dying in clinical practice: regulatory issues for doctors

Festive frolics or regulatory wrongs in accountancy firms: a three-part podcast series

AI Regulation – where next for law firms?

Top Tips for Handling a Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) Investigation

The Care Quality Commission’s New Inspection and Regulation Regime

AML update for Lawyers and Law Firms

Medical Cannabis – where are we now (part 2)?

ICAEW consults on amending its Code to introduce specific requirements to treat others fairly and with respect

BSB issues new Social Media Guidance

Inappropriate emails - ICAEW case provides helpful guidance on the threshold for discreditable behaviour

Thematic Review on the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements in workplace complaints - SRA reports further room for improvement

Will the rise in students using ChatGPT lead to an increase in academic misconduct proceedings?

New report commissioned by RICS suggests need for significant reform to the real estate valuation sector

What will 2022 bring for audit and accountancy regulation?

Medicinal Cannabis – Where Are We Now?

Care Home sentencing a salutary reminder of the importance of fire safety responsibilities

Costs not recoverable on ‘the nod’ - A warning for private prosecutors R (on the application of T M Eye Ltd) v Southampton Crown Court [2021] EWHC 2624 (Admin)

Mythbusting: Motivation in Starting a Private Prosecution

Harcus Sinclair v Your Lawyers - Another nail in the coffin of solicitors’ undertakings?

The FCA proposes new listing guidance for cannabis-related businesses – a positive step for investors concerned about the Proceeds of Crime Act

Preventing solicitor burn-out: more than ‘just an HR issue’

Audit reviews: the process, pitfalls and published themes – a focus on FRC Audit Quality Reviews

Top tips for managing an accountancy disciplinary investigation

The SRA’s updated NDA warning notice introduces welcome clarity

From good business sense to regulatory need: Future perspectives on how technology will transform regulatory compliance

The use of artificial intelligence: interesting technological developments in the legal and accountancy sectors

The SRA Standards and Regulations – a year on

Victims’ Code set to change

Intractable insight: suspension is not enough

Fit and proper person requirements for directors in the health and care sector – what does this mean and what are service providers required to do?

View all

Talks

Understanding the changes to the ICAEW's Code of Ethics: when and how to report a potential breach of the code

Regulated Professionals

Doctors under Investigation

Understanding the changes to the ICAEW's Code of Ethics: implications for firms

Understanding the changes to the ICAEW's Code of Ethics: key updates to the principle of professional behaviour

Close Load more

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility