Services A-Z     Pricing

Law students: academic misconduct and the SRA early character & suitability assessment

18 August 2025

Pursuing a career in law is already a significant challenge without the added stress of worrying whether past mistakes could block your path to becoming a solicitor. Early-life convictions, cautions, academic disciplinary actions, or financial issues may all impact your eligibility for admission by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).


Fortunately, the SRA offers an early character and suitability assessment which allows prospective solicitors to understand whether their history might pose a barrier to entering the profession.

It is crucial that if you are in the middle of a university disciplinary procedure that consideration is given to the impact that this may have should you wish to pursue a future career as a solicitor.

What is the purpose of the SRA’s early character and suitability assessment

Prior to 2019, students underwent character checks during their training period. These assessments now occur at the point of applying for admission, which can be problematic for those uncertain about their past actions.

To address this, the SRA introduced the Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules in 2019. These rules allow applicants to request an early assessment if they are concerned their history might raise red flags during admission.

Why do you need to think about it in the context of a university disciplinary process?

As explained below, the SRA will take misconduct in an academic setting into account in its assessment of your character and suitability. This can include plagiarism, cheating in exams, misuse of AI tools and sexually inappropriate behaviour and/or other misconduct.

If you are going through a university disciplinary process you must have an eye on the impact that a negative finding may have on your future ability to become a solicitor. In particular, care should be given when you respond to allegations, attend interviews or hearings and make admissions. If in doubt, seek legal advice.

If a disciplinary finding is made against you and you do not want to embark on a lengthy training period without an indication as to whether the SRA will admit you at its completion, the SRA early assessment is available to you.

When and how to apply

You can apply for an early assessment at any time before submitting your admission application. The process starts by completing a screening through your mySRA account, which includes identity verification and a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check.

Once screened, you can submit your application with supporting evidence. This usually includes:

  • A personal statement explaining the incident(s) and demonstrating rehabilitation
  • References from reputable individuals who know about the issue and can vouch for your character
  • Any documentation that helps explain mitigating circumstances, insight or evidence of personal growth

The SRA may request further details or contact third parties. Delays or incomplete submissions can result in rejection.

Types of conduct the SRA considers

The SRA evaluates a wide range of issues, including:

  • Criminal conduct: especially offences involving dishonesty, violence, perjury, or discrimination
  • Academic misconduct: for example, plagiarism, collusion, contract cheating, false declarations, inappropriate behaviour
  • Financial irresponsibility: bankruptcy, failure to manage debts, or company insolvency where you held a position of responsibility

The assessment test

The legal test, based on Jideofo and others v The Law Society [2007], places the burden on the applicant to prove on the balance of probabilities that their admission poses no risk to the public or public confidence in the profession.

The SRA considers aggravating and mitigating factors in its decision-making process.

What the SRA might decide

The SRA can:

  • Confirm that you meet the character and suitability requirements
  • Conclude that you do not
  • Impose conditions on your future authorisation

Is the decision final?

No. The SRA’s decision in an early assessment is not binding on your final admission application. You also have a continuing obligation to inform the SRA of any new developments or changes to previously submitted information, even after qualifying.

Will the outcome be made public?

While the SRA can publish decisions if it serves the public interest, confidentiality concerns make publication unlikely in most early assessment cases.

What if your application is refused?

If the SRA is considering refusing your application, you will be given an opportunity to respond to any draft decision or report before a formal decision is made.

If your application is refused, you have 28 days to apply for a review, providing reasons and supporting evidence for reconsideration.

Following a refusal of an application, you may only make another one where there has been a material change in your circumstances relevant to your application.

further information

If you have questions regarding this blog, please contact Shannett Thompson in our Regulatory team. 

 

about the author

Shannett Thompson is a Partner in the Regulatory team and is the firm’s Training Principal. She trained in the NHS and commenced her career exclusively defending doctors. She provides regulatory advice predominantly in the health and social care and education sectors.

 

Latest blogs & news

Law students: academic misconduct and the SRA early character & suitability assessment

Pursuing a career in law is already a significant challenge without the added stress of worrying whether past mistakes could block your path to becoming a solicitor. Early-life convictions, cautions, academic disciplinary actions, or financial issues may all impact your eligibility for admission by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Mythbusting: Motivation in Starting a Private Prosecution

Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty.  Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences. 

In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether having an ulterior motive in starting a private prosecution can lead to problems down the line.

Mythbusting: Recovery of Costs in Private Prosecutions

Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act.   Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty.  Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences. 

In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions.  In this blog we look at whether the private prosecutor is entitled to recover their full investigation and legal fees at the end of the case.

Harcus Sinclair v Your Lawyers - Another nail in the coffin of solicitors’ undertakings?

Every solicitor knows that an undertaking is serious stuff.   Arguably it is the greatest power available to a solicitor.  A promise, if broken, that will lead to immediate and serious consequences for the giver.  As such it can be relied upon to the ends of the earth.  The power of undertakings has meant that they sit at the heart of every property transaction, bridging the time gap between the sending of money and the receiving of title.  They are also used in other areas of commercial life and as part of litigation.  The “brand” of a solicitor’s undertaking is so powerful that little thought is given as to where their power comes from. 

eSports vs. the Law

Gone are the days of computer gaming being viewed as a secluded activity; gaming is now a thoroughly social experience that attracts a global audience of millions and players can compete for large sums of money and celebrity. This burgeoning industry is largely in a virtual world and has developed in a blockchain, decentralised fashion. Often the UK government talks up the UK gaming industry and how keen the government is to support this sector, and there have been instances that show support, but when it comes to playing games competitively, law and regulations have not yet caught up.

The use of artificial intelligence: interesting technological developments in the legal and accountancy sectors

In this second blog in our technology and innovation series, we look at some recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal and accountancy sectors.

Victims’ Code set to change

On 18 November 2020, the government confirmed that it is proceeding with planned changes to the  Victims' Code, following a consultation that began on 5 March 2020. The changes mean that when the revised Code comes into force, it will be based on a clearly defined set of rights that set out a minimum level of service that can be expected from criminal justice agencies. It is hoped that the changes will mean victims have a greater awareness of their rights, receive the information and support when then need it and have a greater level of satisfaction with the treatment they receive in the criminal justice system. 

Intractable insight: suspension is not enough

On 19 November 2020, the High Court handed down judgment in the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care’s (“PSA”) challenge to a decision of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) to suspend a doctor from practice. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Farbey emphasises the significance of lack of insight to the question of sanction.

Fit and proper person requirements for directors in the health and care sector – what does this mean and what are service providers required to do?

All providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (“CQC) must assure themselves that all directors who are responsible for delivering care to service users are fit and proper – in other words, they must be able to diligently carry out their responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of care. This forms part of the providers’ duty to ensure the service is well-led, which is one of the focus points during an inspection. Not only does the CQC monitor compliance at the point of registration, but it is an on-going duty and can lead to enforcement action where it is not met.

Best practice for organisations using private prosecution powers

The House of Commons Justice Committee has made a series of recommendations in its report published today which are likely to have a significant impact on the future of private prosecutions in England and Wales. 

The call for emergency legislation to protect doctors from GMC investigations for rationing decisions made during the Coronavirus crisis

Although everyone hopes the now much enhanced critical care capacity in the UK will meet the demand from patients, there is a growing concern that the time will come during the COVID-19 pandemic when the NHS will be overwhelmed and the need for lifesaving interventions will exceed available resources.

Best practice guide for charities conducting private prosecutions

The Charities Commission has recently warned that fraudsters are exploiting the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) in order to carry out fraud and cybercrime against charities.  Unfortunately, in our experience, the likelihood of the police taking action against these individuals is low. In the current climate it is easy to understand why the use of private prosecutions is firmly on the rise. In the past, some charities have been criticised for having an overzealous approach to the conduct of their private prosecutions.  In this blog, we highlight the importance of taking a few simple steps to ensure that charities who conduct private prosecutions are beyond reproach.

COVID-19: If you get a fixed penalty notice for non-compliance with lockdown measures – do you have to tell the Solicitors Regulation Authority?

With BBC reports that there have been 178,000 incidents of anti-social behaviour in the last four weeks across England and Wales alone, if a solicitor receives a fixed penalty notice for a non-essential journey away from home - do they have to inform the SRA?

Remote consultations during COVID-19: a doctor’s judgment as to when a face to face appointment is ‘clinically required’

With the COVID-19 lockdown extended in the UK until at least early-May, primary care practitioners and consultants, who have been increasingly turning to remote consultations or telemedicine to treat their patients, will inevitably see an increase in their use to address more complex medical issues. 

Coronavirus Act: updated considerations for healthcare professionals

In our previous blog, we discussed the introduction of the Coronavirus Act and how the emergency legislation impacts healthcare professionals. Understandably however, the situation is constantly evolving and the position must be regularly reassessed. With this in mind, we discuss below some of the recent, key updates impacting the healthcare workforce.

Updates to the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) COVID-19 Guidance

Last week we provided you with detail on the guidance to be aware of as a manager or owner of a care/domiciliary home in light of the current pandemic. The guidance is of course changing given the nature of the outbreak, so please read on for the key updates:

Testing in Testing Times: WADA Anti-Doping Guidance for Athletes in light of COVID-19

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has recently issued guidance to athletes in which acknowledges the difficulties that the Covid-19 pandemic will cause, not just for athletes, but for the entire sporting community who are committed to protecting clean sport

Nursing and related management in the time of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented period of change and rapid adjustment in UK healthcare provision. The work of frontline nurses often goes beyond pure treatment, providing care, support and regular human contact with patients. How is the tension between social distancing and nurses’ obligations to look after patients to be resolved?

CQC guidance and what it means for care providers during the Coronavirus pandemic

The COVID-19 outbreak is new territory, not only for care providers working on the frontline, but also for regulatory bodies. Those that are responsible for caring for vulnerable service users must now do so in an increasingly challenging environment, whilst ensuring that they comply with their professional obligations.

Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Contact us today

Get in touch

Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility