Celebrating Bisexuality Visibility Day!
In this blog, we look at the position for care/domiciliary homes, with the intention of providing some reassurance in these unprecedented times. This is obviously an evolving situation and regulators will undoubtedly review and update their advice in line with the UK government’s guidance as that inevitably changes.
Prior to COVID-19 reaching pandemic status, the Care and Quality Commission (CQC) stated that it would be continuing to carry out inspections. However, on 16 March 2020, the CQC announced that they had suspended all routine inspections until further notice.
The CQC has issued the following guidance in relation to adult social care:
To try and strike a balance between regulating care homes and adapting to the practical reality of the current situation, the CQC will continue to monitor care but also offer support to professionals as they navigate the unchartered waters ahead.
Further guidance on residential care, supporting living and home care provision during the COVID-19 outbreak is available on the government's website.
To assist health and social care providers, the CQC has developed a special COVID-19 registration framework for providers responding to Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) or Clinical Commissioning Group contingency planning.
A COVID-19 registration is any ‘application’ from a health or social care provider where they:
This covers both new registrations and changes to services that can be made by submitting an application online. Although some changes can be made by submitting a notification online and changing your statement of purpose, others may require a change to your existing registration. In those cases, you will need to submit an application. If it relates to COVID-19, the CQC says that it will prioritised. In urgent cases, the CQC is able to increase your capacity as soon as they are notified and can run the registration process at the same time as you make your changes.
The CQC has provided a list of common application types on their website to help you decide whether you need to apply.
If you are making changes that do not require registration, you can notify the CQC about changes to your statement of purpose through their website.
For new providers that are not related to COVID-19, registration applications are continuing as usual and follow the process set out on the CQC website.
Across the world, many have tragically lost their lives to this virus. In the event that someone does pass away, providers must ensure that they comply with their obligations in the same way they would do so before the outbreak of COVID-19. The CQC (Registration) Regulations 2009 continue to be in force and require that notifications are sent to the CQC without delay. Further guidance on this can be found here.
Front line staff are facing unprecedented challenges in the provision of care. Care homes have come under increasing scrutiny after the media has reported incidents of providers in care homes failing to attend work and leaving vulnerable services user alone.
As key workers, and CQC regulated individuals, you remain subject to your core professional obligations at all times. If you do have concerns about the protection of front line workers, such as the availability of Personal Protective Equipment, these should be raised through the formal channels. You remain accountable to the CQC for decisions about care that could have an impact on service users.
It is clear from the advice provided to date that the CQC is committed to transparency during the outbreak and that their ultimate priority is the protection of life. In addition, the regulator has provided assurances that they will update their guidance as the situation progresses. Of course, the suspension of all routine inspections does not mean that standards in care homes should be allowed to deteriorate. The CQC has made it clear that it will continue to regulate practices and take action if standards fall short of what is expected. You must act in the same way you would otherwise do outside of such a crisis. While the CQC has specifically encouraged providers to exercise their discretion to protect life, you remain accountable for the decisions you make, and must be able to evidence the decision-making process in the same way. Internal processes, such as incident reporting, should be used where you are sufficiently concerned about issues which arise. Additionally, in its guidance, the CQC has encouraged providers to raise specific concerns or issues with them directly.
Should you be concerned about your professional practice or care home, please do not hesitate to get in touch.
Shannett Thompson is a Senior Associate in the Regulatory team. She is a highly experienced lawyer taking the lead in defending health professionals before their regulatory bodies including the GMC. She has substantial experience in advising individuals in relation to their regulatory obligations in the wider context.
Peta-Louise Bagott is an Associate in the Regulatory team. She is an experienced advocate in both criminal and regulatory proceedings, including cases involving healthcare practitioners before their regulatory bodies.
Every solicitor knows that an undertaking is serious stuff. Arguably it is the greatest power available to a solicitor. A promise, if broken, that will lead to immediate and serious consequences for the giver. As such it can be relied upon to the ends of the earth. The power of undertakings has meant that they sit at the heart of every property transaction, bridging the time gap between the sending of money and the receiving of title. They are also used in other areas of commercial life and as part of litigation. The “brand” of a solicitor’s undertaking is so powerful that little thought is given as to where their power comes from.
This week, the Government announced that Covid-19 vaccinations will be made compulsory for care home staff, raising strong emotions on both sides of the argument.
Gone are the days of computer gaming being viewed as a secluded activity; gaming is now a thoroughly social experience that attracts a global audience of millions and players can compete for large sums of money and celebrity. This burgeoning industry is largely in a virtual world and has developed in a blockchain, decentralised fashion. Often the UK government talks up the UK gaming industry and how keen the government is to support this sector, and there have been instances that show support, but when it comes to playing games competitively, law and regulations have not yet caught up.
The COVID-19 crisis has forced sports clubs, schools, universities and charities to rapidly change their approaches to coaching, teaching and support work. The regulations on social distancing have forced organisations to innovate; services which had previously been offered mostly or wholly in person were rapidly shifted online during “lockdown 1” and will return online at least for the duration of “lockdown 3”. If the vaccine rollout has the desired effect there will no doubt be some return to “traditional” methods, but it seems very unlikely that the changes brought about by the pandemic will be completely reversed. In this blog, Claire Parry from Kingsley Napley’s Regulatory team and Fred Allen from the Public Law team look at the challenges organisations face engaging with children online.
Last week, the Department of Health and Social Care published a white paper, Integration and Innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all (the ‘White Paper’), setting out legislative proposals for a new Health and Care Bill, planned to come into force in 2022.
Wray v General Osteopathic Council  EWHC 3409 (QB)
Mr Wray (‘Mr W’), an osteopath, appeared before a Panel of the Professional Conduct Committee (‘PCC’) of the General Osteopathic Council (‘GOsC’) after self-reporting a series of events he had been involved in.
In this 3-part tech blog series, we’ve explored how legal and accountancy regulators are driving and responding to changes in technology and innovation in their respective professions. We’ve also considered the commercial perspective, looking at interesting developments in these sectors , particularly around the use of artificial intelligence (AI).
In this second blog in our technology and innovation series, we look at some recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal and accountancy sectors.
On 18 November 2020, the government confirmed that it is proceeding with planned changes to the Victims' Code, following a consultation that began on 5 March 2020. The changes mean that when the revised Code comes into force, it will be based on a clearly defined set of rights that set out a minimum level of service that can be expected from criminal justice agencies. It is hoped that the changes will mean victims have a greater awareness of their rights, receive the information and support when then need it and have a greater level of satisfaction with the treatment they receive in the criminal justice system.
On 19 November 2020, the High Court handed down judgment in the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care’s (“PSA”) challenge to a decision of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) to suspend a doctor from practice. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Farbey emphasises the significance of lack of insight to the question of sanction.
All providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (“CQC) must assure themselves that all directors who are responsible for delivering care to service users are fit and proper – in other words, they must be able to diligently carry out their responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of care. This forms part of the providers’ duty to ensure the service is well-led, which is one of the focus points during an inspection. Not only does the CQC monitor compliance at the point of registration, but it is an on-going duty and can lead to enforcement action where it is not met.
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether the private prosecutor is entitled to recover their full investigation and legal fees at the end of the case.
The House of Commons Justice Committee has made a series of recommendations in its report published today which are likely to have a significant impact on the future of private prosecutions in England and Wales.
Although everyone hopes the now much enhanced critical care capacity in the UK will meet the demand from patients, there is a growing concern that the time will come during the COVID-19 pandemic when the NHS will be overwhelmed and the need for lifesaving interventions will exceed available resources.
The Charities Commission has recently warned that fraudsters are exploiting the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) in order to carry out fraud and cybercrime against charities. Unfortunately, in our experience, the likelihood of the police taking action against these individuals is low. In the current climate it is easy to understand why the use of private prosecutions is firmly on the rise. In the past, some charities have been criticised for having an overzealous approach to the conduct of their private prosecutions. In this blog, we highlight the importance of taking a few simple steps to ensure that charities who conduct private prosecutions are beyond reproach.
With BBC reports that there have been 178,000 incidents of anti-social behaviour in the last four weeks across England and Wales alone, if a solicitor receives a fixed penalty notice for a non-essential journey away from home - do they have to inform the SRA?
With the COVID-19 lockdown extended in the UK until at least early-May, primary care practitioners and consultants, who have been increasingly turning to remote consultations or telemedicine to treat their patients, will inevitably see an increase in their use to address more complex medical issues.
In our previous blog, we discussed the introduction of the Coronavirus Act and how the emergency legislation impacts healthcare professionals. Understandably however, the situation is constantly evolving and the position must be regularly reassessed. With this in mind, we discuss below some of the recent, key updates impacting the healthcare workforce.
Last week we provided you with detail on the guidance to be aware of as a manager or owner of a care/domiciliary home in light of the current pandemic. The guidance is of course changing given the nature of the outbreak, so please read on for the key updates:
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has recently issued guidance to athletes in which acknowledges the difficulties that the Covid-19 pandemic will cause, not just for athletes, but for the entire sporting community who are committed to protecting clean sport
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility