Blog
New Diversity, Equity and Inclusion changes to the Actuaries’ Code and Guidance
Jenny Higgins
The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) has introduced new Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) requirements to the Actuaries’ Code and associated Guidance following a lengthy and wide-ranging consultation process with members, employers and other stakeholders.
These revisions reflect a broader regulatory trend, mirroring developments at bodies such as the SRA and ICAEW, towards strengthening professional ethics and workplace culture, particularly in relation to the fair treatment of others.
Key Changes
1. Clarification of the Respect Requirement (Principle 1: Integrity)
The Actuaries’ Code has always required members to act with integrity and to show respect, however Amplification 1.1 has been amended to read:
“1.1 Members must show respect for everyone” (emphasis added).
This change essentially simplifies the requirement and emphasises that members must show respect to everyone. The accompanying Guidance clarifies that this duty applies to all interactions, not only with clients and users of actuarial advice, but also with colleagues and the wider public. Respect extends beyond words to tone, non-verbal conduct and behaviour such as not taking credit for others’ work or spreading false information.
2. New Prohibition on Bullying, Victimisation and Harassment (Principle 1: Integrity)
A new amplification has been added to the Integrity principle of the Code, which reads:
“1.2 Members must not subject others to bullying, victimisation or harassment.”
The Guidance provides detailed explanations and examples:
Members are expected to consider both the nature of their conduct and its effect on others, applying an objective standard of reasonableness.
3. Speaking Up about Unfair Treatment (Principle 5: Speaking Up)
Another new amplification has been added to the Speaking Up principle of the Code, which reads:
“5.2 Members should speak up if they believe that others are being treated unfairly or excluded unreasonably.”
This addition emphasises that the Speaking Up principle extends beyond technical or professional issues to include fairness, inclusion and workplace culture. The Guidance recognises that speaking up can be difficult and requires judgement. While members are expected to act proportionately, there is no requirement to break the law or put personal safety at risk.
4. Changes to the Actuaries’ Code Guidance
While some subtle changes have been made to the Actuaries’ Code itself, more extensive changes have been made to the Guidance which supports the Code. The changes to the Guidance are intended to explain and provide context for the obligations in the Actuaries’ Code so that IFoA members can better understand how to apply the Code. Although the Guidance is not mandatory, it can be considered by a disciplinary panel as evidence of what the IFoA expects of its members, therefore IFoA members should ensure that they have read and understood both the Actuaries’ Code and Guidance.
What does this mean for IFoA members?
Although the changes to the Actuaries’ Code are less extensive than those initially consulted upon and haven’t gone as far as to require IFoA members to encourage DEI, they do introduce some additional obligations on members. While the changes to the Integrity principle could be seen as a clarification of IFoA members’ existing obligations, the requirement to speak up about unfair treatment and unreasonable exclusion does expand IFoA members’ speaking up obligations. Speaking up can be a challenging area to navigate and IFoA members may wish to seek advice to avoid breaching this new requirement.
IFoA members will also be aware that their obligations under the Code are not limited to their actuarial work; but can also apply to their personal life if their conduct could reasonably be considered to reflect upon the profession. IFoA members should therefore take particular care in circumstances where they are easily identifiable as a member of the IFoA.
Next Steps for Members and Firms
If you have questions regarding this article, or your professional obligations under the Actuaries’ Code, please contact a member of the Regulatory team.
Jenny is a Legal Director in the Regulatory team. She specialises in actuarial, accountancy and financial services regulation, and is experienced in advising regulated individuals and firms as well as acting on behalf of professional regulatory bodies.
Zoe is an Associate in the Regulatory team. Zoe works with the Zacchaeus 200 Trust charity, acting for clients to appeal disability benefit decisions. She also volunteers for Amicus, Queen Mary Legal Advice Clinic and the Schools Consent Project.
The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) has introduced new Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) requirements to the Actuaries’ Code and associated Guidance following a lengthy and wide-ranging consultation process with members, employers and other stakeholders.
These revisions reflect a broader regulatory trend, mirroring developments at bodies such as the SRA and ICAEW, towards strengthening professional ethics and workplace culture, particularly in relation to the fair treatment of others.
Pursuing a career in law is already a significant challenge without the added stress of worrying whether past mistakes could block your path to becoming a solicitor. Early-life convictions, cautions, academic disciplinary actions, or financial issues may all impact your eligibility for admission by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether having an ulterior motive in starting a private prosecution can lead to problems down the line.
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether the private prosecutor is entitled to recover their full investigation and legal fees at the end of the case.
Every solicitor knows that an undertaking is serious stuff. Arguably it is the greatest power available to a solicitor. A promise, if broken, that will lead to immediate and serious consequences for the giver. As such it can be relied upon to the ends of the earth. The power of undertakings has meant that they sit at the heart of every property transaction, bridging the time gap between the sending of money and the receiving of title. They are also used in other areas of commercial life and as part of litigation. The “brand” of a solicitor’s undertaking is so powerful that little thought is given as to where their power comes from.
Gone are the days of computer gaming being viewed as a secluded activity; gaming is now a thoroughly social experience that attracts a global audience of millions and players can compete for large sums of money and celebrity. This burgeoning industry is largely in a virtual world and has developed in a blockchain, decentralised fashion. Often the UK government talks up the UK gaming industry and how keen the government is to support this sector, and there have been instances that show support, but when it comes to playing games competitively, law and regulations have not yet caught up.
In this 3-part tech blog series, we’ve explored how legal and accountancy regulators are driving and responding to changes in technology and innovation in their respective professions. We’ve also considered the commercial perspective, looking at interesting developments in these sectors , particularly around the use of artificial intelligence (AI).
In this second blog in our technology and innovation series, we look at some recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal and accountancy sectors.
On 18 November 2020, the government confirmed that it is proceeding with planned changes to the Victims' Code, following a consultation that began on 5 March 2020. The changes mean that when the revised Code comes into force, it will be based on a clearly defined set of rights that set out a minimum level of service that can be expected from criminal justice agencies. It is hoped that the changes will mean victims have a greater awareness of their rights, receive the information and support when then need it and have a greater level of satisfaction with the treatment they receive in the criminal justice system.
On 19 November 2020, the High Court handed down judgment in the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care’s (“PSA”) challenge to a decision of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) to suspend a doctor from practice. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Farbey emphasises the significance of lack of insight to the question of sanction.
All providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (“CQC) must assure themselves that all directors who are responsible for delivering care to service users are fit and proper – in other words, they must be able to diligently carry out their responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of care. This forms part of the providers’ duty to ensure the service is well-led, which is one of the focus points during an inspection. Not only does the CQC monitor compliance at the point of registration, but it is an on-going duty and can lead to enforcement action where it is not met.
The House of Commons Justice Committee has made a series of recommendations in its report published today which are likely to have a significant impact on the future of private prosecutions in England and Wales.
Although everyone hopes the now much enhanced critical care capacity in the UK will meet the demand from patients, there is a growing concern that the time will come during the COVID-19 pandemic when the NHS will be overwhelmed and the need for lifesaving interventions will exceed available resources.
The Charities Commission has recently warned that fraudsters are exploiting the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) in order to carry out fraud and cybercrime against charities. Unfortunately, in our experience, the likelihood of the police taking action against these individuals is low. In the current climate it is easy to understand why the use of private prosecutions is firmly on the rise. In the past, some charities have been criticised for having an overzealous approach to the conduct of their private prosecutions. In this blog, we highlight the importance of taking a few simple steps to ensure that charities who conduct private prosecutions are beyond reproach.
With BBC reports that there have been 178,000 incidents of anti-social behaviour in the last four weeks across England and Wales alone, if a solicitor receives a fixed penalty notice for a non-essential journey away from home - do they have to inform the SRA?
With the COVID-19 lockdown extended in the UK until at least early-May, primary care practitioners and consultants, who have been increasingly turning to remote consultations or telemedicine to treat their patients, will inevitably see an increase in their use to address more complex medical issues.
In our previous blog, we discussed the introduction of the Coronavirus Act and how the emergency legislation impacts healthcare professionals. Understandably however, the situation is constantly evolving and the position must be regularly reassessed. With this in mind, we discuss below some of the recent, key updates impacting the healthcare workforce.
Last week we provided you with detail on the guidance to be aware of as a manager or owner of a care/domiciliary home in light of the current pandemic. The guidance is of course changing given the nature of the outbreak, so please read on for the key updates:
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has recently issued guidance to athletes in which acknowledges the difficulties that the Covid-19 pandemic will cause, not just for athletes, but for the entire sporting community who are committed to protecting clean sport
The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented period of change and rapid adjustment in UK healthcare provision. The work of frontline nurses often goes beyond pure treatment, providing care, support and regular human contact with patients. How is the tension between social distancing and nurses’ obligations to look after patients to be resolved?
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Jenny Higgins
Andrew Sanderson
Andrew Sanderson
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print