Services A-Z     Pricing

Civil Recovery (Part 5 of POCA)

"They are very innovative and forward-thinking. The team has a very good understanding of nuances that crypto presents."

Chambers UK 2025

"It's an outstanding team. There is fantastic expertise within the group, from the very top down."

Chambers UK 2025

“They easily grasp the matter in hand and provide straightforward, easy to understand and commercial advice.”

Chambers and Partners 2024

“Kingsley Napley have been doing this for so long meaning that as a firm they've got that wealth of heritage experience and it becomes ingrained.”

Chambers and Partners 2024

“Kingsley Napley is at the very top of all types of commercial and financial crime defence work. The team are hugely competent and hard-working lawyers.”

Chambers UK 2022

"It is a really strong POCA firm with good client handling and determination to get a result.”

Chambers UK 2022

“It is a brilliant firm with a truly outstanding retinue of lawyers who work exceptionally well as a team. They are strategic, sharp and dedicated.”

Chambers UK 2022

Under Part 5 of POCA, law enforcement authorities are able to bring civil proceedings in the High Court in order to recover property obtained through unlawful conduct.

Such proceedings can be time-consuming and stressful for those caught up in them. Our cross-departmental team has extensive experience advising those who are respondents or third parties to civil recovery proceedings. We can advise at all stages of the process to ensure your rights are fully protected, and limit the impact of proceedings as far as possible.

Frequently Asked Questions relating to Civil Recovery
 

What is the civil recovery scheme?

Sections 243 to 288 of POCA sets out a procedure by which specified enforcement authorities can bring proceedings in the High Court to recover property that is or represents property obtained through unlawful conduct.

 

Who can bring civil recovery proceedings?

The following enforcement authorities are enabled by POCA to bring civil recovery proceedings:

  • National Crime Agency
  • Director of Public Prosecutions
  • HMRC, by way of the power granted to the Director for Revenue and Customs Prosecutions
  • SFO, by way of the power granted to the Director of the Serious Fraud Office

 

What property can civil recovery proceedings relate to?

For the purpose of civil recovery, all property is relevant, including money, real property, personal property, things in action, and other intangible property.

 

What does the enforcement authority need to show?

The enforcement authority bringing recovery proceedings must show that the property in question represents the proceeds of crime.

It must persuade the court that, on the balance of probabilities, unlawful conduct has occurred and property has been obtained through that conduct. However, there is no prerequisite for a conviction to have been obtained, and the applicant authority does not have to show who committed the crime.

 

What kind of conduct is relevant in relation to civil recovery?

Unlawful conduct for the purpose of civil recovery means a criminal offence in the UK, or conduct that occurs outside the UK, is unlawful under that country's criminal law, and would be unlawful if it occurred in the UK.

 

What is the effect of a civil recovery order?

If the court grants a civil recovery order (CRO), a number of consequences can result:

  • An interim receiver will be appointed
  • Property may be detained or preserved
  • Any ongoing civil recovery investigation by the relevant Director must cease.
  • No one may deal with property to which the order applies

 

Are there any exemptions to the no-dealing rule?

Yes. There are exclusions for reasonable living expenses and for carrying on a trade, business or profession.

In addition, section 245C(5) of POCA allows for the release of funds to cover legal expenses in relation to interim recovery orders or property freezing orders (but not a defendant’s legal expenses in general).

 

If you would like to discuss any of the issues mentioned above, please contact our specialist civil recovery lawyers.

Click here to visit our new AML Hub

A source describes the team as "on top of its game," thanks to being "exposed to tremendous cases."

Chambers and Partners UK

They are a really outstanding firm - their POCA and asset forfeiture work is absolutely first-class."

Chambers and Partners 

Further commentators praise the group's "extremely professional, experienced, committed and diligent" approach"

Chambers and Partners UK

One of the premier white collar defence teams in London."

Legal 500 UK

Latest blogs & news

SFO Unexplained Wealth Orders – new focus for illicit finance?

On 17 January, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) secured its first Unexplained Wealth Order, in respect of a property believed to have been purchased with the proceeds of a £100 million fraud. 

UK FIU report reveals more efficient and better quality SARs reporting landscape

The NCA’s UK Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU) has published its latest Annual Report (somewhat later in the year than usual). The UKFIU is responsible for receiving, analysing and disseminating intelligence submitted through the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) regime and its role is to alert law enforcement agencies, both at home and abroad, to potential instances of money laundering and terrorist financing.

                                     

What to do after a raid by the Serious Fraud Office?

Many of the SFO’s most notable recent investigations have begun with dawn raids, so-called because they normally occur very early in the morning. These raids can be a disorientating and uncomfortable experience in themselves, but as we explain further below, unfortunately they normally signal the beginning of a major SFO investigation. The period between arrest and charge – which can be lengthy in complex white-collar crime investigations – is absolutely critical. So, what should you and your legal team be doing in this period?

Expansion of failure to prevent: The theory is almost reality

For more than a decade, lawyers, academics and business representatives have been discussing the need for a new approach to corporate criminal liability for economic crime. With significant expansion of the tried and tested failure to prevent (FTP) structure now imminent, and further debate on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill scheduled for late March, there are questions still to be answered.

‘Made in China’ as Possible Supply Chain Money Laundering

It is estimated that 30% of the world’s production of cotton originates in China. Of that cotton 85% originates in Xinjiang, which is the centre of the Uyghur atrocities. Recently before the High Court, the World Uyghur Congress (“the WUC”) argued that UK authorities were under a duty to block and/or launch money laundering investigations into the many imports of Xinjiang cotton brought into the UK - many by household names in the clothing industry – because of the high likelihood of prison and forced labour forming the start of the supply chain

Major rise in SARs volume and suspect funds locked – UK FIU report

The latest Annual Report of the NCA’s UK Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU), published this week, makes interesting reading. The UKFIU is responsible for receiving, analysing and disseminating intelligence submitted through the Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) regime and its role is to alert law enforcement agencies, both at home and abroad, to potential instances of money laundering and terrorist financing.

The Gambling Commission’s focus on AML failings shows no signs of abating with the publication of new regulatory actions

With the back-to-back release of public statements, regulatory actions by the Gambling Commission are coming thick and fast. On 17 January the Commission announced it had agreed a regulatory settlement with the online gaming company, Vivaro Limited trading as Vbet, in respect of its AML and responsible gambling failings. Following swiftly on its heels was the statement of action taken against another online gaming company, TonyBet, for imposing unfair terms and for its AML and responsible gambling failings.

FCA anti-money laundering fines continue to mount up

Over the past few months, the FCA has handed out a string of significant financial penalties relating to anti-money laundering (AML) systems and controls failures at financial institutions in the UK.

Law Commission recommendations for confiscation reform: Is there the will to find a way?

Following a lengthy period of research and consultation, the Law Commission (‘the Commission’) has published its final report and recommendations for the reform of Part 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: the post-conviction confiscation regime (‘the report).

Kingsley Napley contributes to significant Law Commission criminal justice reform project

Kingsley Napley contributes to significant Law Commission criminal justice reform project. The Law Commission has today published its long-awaited recommendations for reform of the UK’s post-conviction confiscation regime. Work on the project began in November 2018, after the Home Office asked the Law Commission to review the regime found in Part 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

First HMRC fine for an Art Market Participant

Since the introduction of the Money Laundering Regulations in 2017, HMRC have maintained a public list of businesses within the regulated sector who have breached their AML obligations. Aside from being a warning of the perils of non-compliance, the identities of the publicly named and shamed businesses offer a glimpse into HMRC’s priorities. The eagle-eyed observer of the latest update to this list will note that it includes for the first time a business within the art market sector.

A new Economic Crime Bill and the accelerated introduction of a Register of Overseas Entities

A new bill will be put forward to parliament tomorrow with the aim of increasing transparency of ownership of property in the UK. The introduction of this new Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill has been expedited following the sanctions announced last week, however the drive for change began over five years ago and that it is finally coming to fruition will be welcomed by many.

 

FCA as gatekeeper of UK crypto AML regime: two years in

On 10 January 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) became the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) supervisor for UK cryptoasset firms. Two years in, how effectively is it performing its role as the gatekeeper of the new registration regime?

Gambling Sector: Compliance and Enforcement Report reveals concerns over weak AML controls

On 9 December the Gambling Commission published its annual Compliance and Enforcement Report for the financial year 2020–2021. This confirmed that the period was particularly active for the Enforcement and Compliance teams, with a record total of £32.1 million being paid by 15 gambling businesses as a result of fines or regulatory settlements. This included over £1.3m being paid by White Hat Gaming Ltd, after a January 2020 review by the Commission of its operating licence revealed inadequate policies and produces in respect of anti-money laundering (“AML”) and safer gambling.

Met Police appetite for Account Freezing Orders undimmed by pandemic

Account Freezing Orders (AFrOs) are a measure introduced by the Criminal Finances Act 2017 and have been available to a wide range of law enforcement agencies since February 2018.

The FCA proposes new listing guidance for cannabis-related businesses – a positive step for investors concerned about the Proceeds of Crime Act

In September 2020 the FCA published a statement regarding the listing of cannabis-related businesses (CRBs) in the UK. Since then several CRBs have been admitted to the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and appetite for investments in the medicinal cannabis industry continues to grow.

AML and the Art Market: HMRC publishes its first risk assessment

Many art dealers, galleries and auction houses are now subject to the UK’s anti-money laundering regime and are defined as art market participants (AMPs) - see our related blog The compulsory embrace of the art market by the UK's Anti-Money Laundering regime. On 28 June HMRC published its first assessment of the key areas that AMPs should consider when conducting their own assessments of the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing to which their business is subject.

Buying property with crypto assets: Can it ever be justified?

A Director at the National Crime Agency recently voiced concern about crypto assets being used to fund property purchases in the UK. The NCA’s Nigel Leary was quoted by The Times as saying: “Anything purchased with crypto assets I’d be slightly sceptical about. I’d like to see why they’re being done in that way and what the requirement is for that anonymity, and why it needed to be done in a crypto transaction.”

Will the CPS’ decision to update its guidance mean an increase in prosecutions for failure to disclose under section 330 of POCA 2002?

Recent guidance issued by the CPS on the offence of ‘failure to disclose’ under section 330 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA 2002’) states that it is now “possible to charge an individual under section 330 even though there is insufficient evidence to establish that money laundering was planned or has taken place.”

To date, there have seldom been prosecutions for this offence but this guidance – effectively removing a significant element of the offence - suggests that the CPS may be looking to bring more charges in the future.

The risks and penalties of money laundering for charities and how to guard against it

Money launderers will look for any opportunity to take advantage of organisations with weak financial controls in order to launder their ill-gotten gains. Charities, trustees, employees and volunteers who knowingly or unwittingly assist money launderers, or who fail to report suspicions, may commit a criminal offence and find themselves liable to prosecution. 

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility