Knock knock knockin’ on hearing’s door - what happens when the press come to the family court?
Liam Hurren
Privacy and confidentiality are often a significant concern for those in the public eye, and this can be a central issue in negotiations of nuptial agreements before or after marriage, or when attempting to reach a financial settlement on divorce. Confidentiality clauses or non-disclosure agreements are increasingly used, and we often assist clients with drafting or negotiating these to strike the right balance and ensure any concerns are addressed.
In the context of relationship breakdown, urgent action is sometimes required to protect a person’s privacy. Increasingly, our clients are finding themselves in difficult situations where a former partner has obtained financial or commercially sensitive information, or is threatening to share intimate photographs or personal details with friends, employers or even the press. Social media has become a significant risk area for many, especially those with a substantial following, and our cross-practice approach to these issues enables us to provide holistic advice, bespoke to your situation.
We can also help to keep family proceedings out of court. Family disputes amongst famous or high net worth individuals are now widely reported by mainstream media and for those who are the subject of this attention, having details of an immensely personal issue publicised in this way inevitably heightens the distress. With the increasing drive for enhanced transparency in the family court, the media will be able to attend hearings and report on what they see, hear and read in court documents, more than they ever have before.
If you are concerned about media attention around your divorce, it is crucial that you obtain advice early on. We can provide strategic and practical guidance, including using non-court dispute resolution, such as mediation and arbitration, to maintain your privacy while we assist with bringing your divorce to a conclusion. We work closely with our Reputation Management team, which has a wealth of experience in managing press attention and issues around publication, including defamation, privacy and data protection.
We also frequently advise clients who have been tracked or bugged without their consent; where their information has been misused; or where embarrassing or harmful information has been posted online. In disputes regarding children, we are seeing the use of covert recordings as evidence more and more. We understand the sensitivities of these situations, and we can advise on the urgent steps which can be taken to protect you.
Our Family and Reputation Management lawyers also work closely with our Criminal Litigation team and can assist in circumstances of blackmail and harassment. Our cross-practice approach allows to manage whatever situation in which you may find yourself, and assist you in navigating the family, civil and criminal court systems.
In recent years, most family court hearings have been heard in private, which meant that the only people in the courtroom were the parties themselves, their lawyers, and the judge. Accredited media representatives have been able to attend certain hearings, but they were only able to see very limited documents and the reporting restrictions were tight. Judgments were also usually anonymous.
The rules and approach towards privacy and transparency in the family court are currently under review and a number of proposals have recently been made, including to reverse the starting position to allow the media to report more widely on divorce and financial proceedings. It is possible that the media will be given greater access to court documents, and be able to quote in their reports from what they read and hear in court. It has however been suggested that anonymisation will remain the norm, so parties will likely not be named, and the protection of the identities of children will also continue to be a key priority. The implementation of these proposals has yet to take place but a pilot is underway in a small number of local courts.
There are a number of ways that a family dispute can be resolved outside of the court process, and crucially these can be private. Many of our clients are already now considering some of these options, such as arbitration and mediation. If you are intending to divorce and are concerned about details of your private life being made public, we can advise on the alternative processes.
A breach of a person’s privacy, by accessing or sharing private information, photographs or documentation without consent can give rise to civil and, in some instances, criminal sanctions. Urgent action can be taken in appropriate cases to prevent a person from sharing the information; or to force them to give the documentation back to its owner.
Often in the context of a family law dispute, situations of this kind may arise where one of the parties has had an affair, or where financial information obtained unlawfully is being relied upon. Social media can often be used to attack or embarrass, which in extreme cases could constitute harassment.
Our Family, Reputation Management and Criminal teams can provide urgent advice where situations like these arise to help you understand the various legal routes available.
With developments in technology in recent decades, covert recordings have increasingly become a feature of family law disputes (particularly those regarding children), where one party seeks to use these as evidence of the other party’s behaviour.
This is an extremely sensitive area because of the potentially harmful consequences such recordings can have on the welfare of the individual who was recorded, particularly where they are a child. The position in terms of breach of privacy and the legality of such recordings can also often be unclear.
Although we do have experience of cases where covert recordings have been permitted as evidence, there is no presumption to this effect. There has been recent guidance in this area and so, before considering making a covert recording, it is very important that you take advice. It is important to consider the relevance, utility and potential repercussions of making recordings, and the deployment of evidence of this kind must be very carefully managed. There may also be costs implications associated with the additional litigation around covert recordings.
Our Family team has experience in this area, supported by our Criminal and Reputation Management team.
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055, examining the importance of disclosure when entering into a pre-nuptial agreement.
On 30 July 2025, Mr Justice Peel handed down a judgment in the case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam), confirming the “sanctity of confidentiality” about Financial Dispute Resolution (‘FDR’) and private FDR (‘pFDR’) hearings.
On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Standish v Standish. Practitioners have been particularly interested to see if, and how, the Court would develop the judicially created principles of ‘needs’, ‘compensation’, and ‘sharing’ which apply to the division of finances on divorce. In particular, what would the Court say in relation to ‘the sharing principle’: should all assets be shared, or only those generated by the parties’ common endeavour during their marriage?
In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.
Whether you consider yourself neurodiverse, you are the loved one of someone who is neurodiverse or you want to support a neurodivergent individual in family proceedings, this blog provides a summary of the best practice which should be used by family lawyers to help neurodivergent individuals navigate the family legal system.
In honour of Pride Month, we are discussing (and celebrating) the diverse paths to parenthood within the LGBTQ+ community. For couples or individuals looking to start a family, there are a number of options available, each with important factors and implications to consider. This short blog touches on some of those considerations.
We are seeing that most HNW advisors regularly signpost clients to the importance of entering into a prenuptial agreement prior to marriage. From our perspective, prenuptial agreements have been rising in popularity, in particular following the 2010 Supreme Court judgment in Radmacher v Granantino, and rightly so. These agreements offer a useful planning tool and can, when drafted appropriately, remove the uncertainty and conflict of contentious divorce proceedings. Alongside the pre-wedding planning, it is important to recognise the need for legal agreements prior to the start of other relationships, or before an international relocation. A prime example of this, which we are seeing more frequently in our practice, is in relation to the French PACS status.
Kingsley Napley represented the applicant parents in the case of Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z [2025] EWHC 927 (Fam). The High Court judgment offers importance guidance for those who are intending on entering into a surrogacy arrangement in the future.
The English Channel, La Manche, is only 350 miles long, separating England from France. When looking at divorce principles however, we have historically been oceans apart from France, with significant differences in outcome depending whether the proceedings have taken place in France or in England. French law is based on a civil code, with divorce law applying property regimes to the division of assets, which is often incompatible with the common law, discretionary system in England. In the early years of my Anglo-French practice, French couples living in England were often taken aback to learn that the property regime they chose when they signed their French marriage contract might not be applied by English judges if they divorced in England.
Following the launch of Nuptial, a new service which provides advice on entering into, amending, or contesting pre or post nuptial agreements, we look at the Law Commission’s Scoping Report and some of the different situations that couples are using nuptial agreements.
Pre-nuptial agreements can inevitably protect one party more than the other. Where does this leave love, romance, and the wedding? If not handled correctly, negotiating a pre-nup can have a huge impact on the relationship and wedding preparations.
As family lawyers, we are used to meeting our clients at a time when they are at their most vulnerable. This is intensified when addiction is present within a family. Divorce or separation places an added burden upon everyone involved and those individuals are likely to have experienced or still be experiencing the destruction that addiction can cause, some of it obvious and some of it less so.
Being alive to the particular challenges which may present themselves in a divorce involving addiction is essential but this should be balanced with an understanding that the issues are likely to be different for each client and for each family.
Emotions can run high in legal disputes, particularly in cases involving succession and inheritance, as well as in a family context. In this blog we explore what happens when allegations are made about parentage (more often than not, paternity) and what can be done about it.
It is now 15 years since the UK Supreme Court gave its judgment in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effect of prenuptial (premarital) contracts.
London has long been a popular city for French expats, and despite the reported drop post- Brexit, is still home to a reported 100,000 French nationals many of whom applied for settled status. There are 9 bilingual French schools in London and with the Eurotunnel celebrating 30 years of operation, London remains an attractive residence for French professionals.
It is now some fifteen years since the UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in the case of Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effectiveness of prenuptial agreements.
It is some 15 years since the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 changed the law on prenuptial agreements.
For those who have current or future wealth to protect or who are marrying for the second or third time perhaps, arranging a prenuptial agreement could be an essential part of the “wedmin” leading up to the big day.
This week marks Children’s Mental Health Week, a mental health awareness week launched by children’s mental health charity, Place2Be. The theme this year is Know Yourself, Grow Yourself, and, through the characters of Pixar’s Inside Out, seeks to explore the importance of self-awareness and expressing emotions.
Tim Whitney and Connie Atkinson are both mediators and members of a Family Law Agreements Group in which they share ideas and expertise in respect of pre and postnuptial and other family agreements. In this blog Tim and Connie explore the use of mediation for couples entering into a prenuptial agreement.
Liam Hurren
Connie Atkinson
Will MacFarlane
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility