Services A-Z     Pricing

How “private” are Private FDRs?

13 August 2025

On 30 July 2025, Mr Justice Peel handed down a judgment in the case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam), confirming the “sanctity of confidentiality” in relation to Financial Dispute Resolution (‘FDR’) and private FDR (‘pFDR’) hearings.

 

What are FDRs and pFDRs?

 

An FDR is a key part of all court proceedings dealing with financial settlements on divorce. The FDR is a hearing at which the judge will consider the available financial information and evidence at a relatively early stage and provide the parties with an indication of the likely outcome of the case, were it to proceed to a final hearing in court. This process aims to provide a yardstick for negotiation, to focus their minds and encourage collaborative settlement without proceeding to a final hearing at great cost.

 

These hearings can also be paid for and provided privately. This is the pFDR (i.e. a private FDR). The role of the judge is taken by a specialist family law barrister or retired judge, and it will take place at a venue such as our offices, rather than at court. The popularity of this private route has increased enormously in recent years due to a number of advantages they have compared to their court-based counterpart. For example, private FDRs allow the parties jointly to select a judge who will be solely dedicated to that case for the duration of the FDR and have had ample time to prepare. By contrast, a judge dealing with an FDR will usually have several other cases on the same day, which can mean that the time and attention they devote to individual cases can be more limited.  

 

Can you disclose anything about a pFDR to a judge in later court proceedings?

 

If you do not settle at pFDR, there are circumstances in which you may wish to tell a judge various things about that pFDR in the later proceedings. For example, you may want to give details of the negotiations, or why you believed they failed, particularly if you think your spouse behaved unreasonably at the pFDR. This happened in the recent case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam).

 

In that case, in the husband’s open proposal following the pFDR, the husband referred to the wife’s “retrograde decision to leave the building… not thirty minutes after receiving [the private FDR evaluator’s] written indication” and her “impulsive decision to end the private FDR process so immediately”. The husband’s legal representatives argued that these statements referred only to logistical details of the private FDR process and were therefore not confidential.

 

However, Mr Justice Peel confirmed that the confidentiality of the FDR process is subject only to the following limited factual exceptions, which parties can disclose:

 

  1. whether or not the FDR took place;
  2. whether both parties attended the FDR;
  3. the length of the FDR;
  4. the identity of the private FDR judge; and
  5. the location of the private FDR.

 

There are also very exceptional circumstances where a party’s statement or actions may be disclosed at the trial of a person for an offence committed at the FDR hearing itself, or where a statement clearly indicates a past or likely future risk of serious harm to a child.

 

Mr Justice Peel ruled that the husband could not disclose these statements because they referred to the wife’s alleged behaviour during the FDR and portrayed her apparent responsibility for their failure to reach a settlement. He made it clear that the confidentiality of the pFDR process extends to anything said or done by either party for the duration of the pFDR hearing.

 

Why does confidentiality matter?

 

As outlined in paragraph 6.2 of FPR 2010 Practice Direction 9A:

 

“In order for the FDR to be effective, both parties must approach the occasion openly and without reserve. Non-disclosure of the content of such meetings is vital and is an essential prerequisite for fruitful discussion directed to the settlement of the dispute between the parties.”

 

The very value of the FDR process lies in its confidentiality and privacy, offering a safe space for both parties to freely discuss their options and priorities without the fear that they may later be held to it by the court. It also allows a subsequent judge to, in Mr Justice Peel’s view, “look behind the litigation posturing…and give a clear robust view” at a later hearing.

 

Bolstered by their confidentiality, both FDRs and private FDRs have facilitated resolutions between parties in a significant number of cases which may have otherwise gone to trial. In turn, saving parties the time, uncertainty, stress and increased costs associated with litigation.” to “Bolstered by their confidentiality, both FDRs and private FDRs have facilitated a resolution in many cases, saving parties the time, uncertainty, stress and litigation cost.

 

further information

If you have any questions regarding this blog, please contact Charlotte Daintith or Hannah Muress in our Family and Divorce team.

 

about the authors

Charlotte is a trainee solicitor at Kingsley Napley and is currently in her second seat with the Family & Divorce team. Charlotte joined the firm in September 2024. Before joining Kingsley Napley, Charlotte worked at the Law Commission of England and Wales in the Criminal Law team where she undertook research on evidence in sexual offence prosecutions and the legislation surrounding contempt of court.

Hannah is responsible for knowledge management and practice development for the family team. She is now a Senior Practice Development Lawyer, having been the team’s Professional Support Lawyer since 2017, and previously working as an Associate in the team.

 

Latest blogs & news

The rise of the cryptoassets in financial remedies

Connie Atkinson was published in the October 2022 edition of ThoughtLeaders4 HNW Divorce magazine discussing the rise of cryptoassets in financial remedies.

Disclosure in pre-nuptial agreements – full and frank, or fraudulent?

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055, examining the importance of disclosure when entering into a pre-nuptial agreement.

How “private” are Private FDRs?

On 30 July 2025, Mr Justice Peel handed down a judgment in the case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam), confirming the “sanctity of confidentiality” about Financial Dispute Resolution (‘FDR’) and private FDR (‘pFDR’) hearings.  

Pre-marital wealth on divorce: What does Standish mean for our clients?

On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Standish v Standish. Practitioners have been particularly interested to see if, and how, the Court would develop the judicially created principles of ‘needs’, ‘compensation’, and ‘sharing’ which apply to the division of finances on divorce. In particular, what would the Court say in relation to ‘the sharing principle’: should all assets be shared, or only those generated by the parties’ common endeavour during their marriage?

Capacity to enter into a prenuptial agreement

In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.

Adjustments for neurodivergent individuals in the family justice system

Whether you consider yourself neurodiverse, you are the loved one of someone who is neurodiverse or you want to support a neurodivergent individual in family proceedings, this blog provides a summary of the best practice which should be used by family lawyers to help neurodivergent individuals navigate the family legal system.

Pride in the paths to parenthood

In honour of Pride Month, we are discussing (and celebrating) the diverse paths to parenthood within the LGBTQ+ community. For couples or individuals looking to start a family, there are a number of options available, each with important factors and implications to consider. This short blog touches on some of those considerations.

Cross border planning: the French PACS

We are seeing that most HNW advisors regularly signpost clients to the importance of entering into a prenuptial agreement prior to marriage. From our perspective, prenuptial agreements have been rising in popularity, in particular following the 2010 Supreme Court judgment in Radmacher v Granantino, and rightly so.  These agreements offer a useful planning tool and can, when drafted appropriately, remove the uncertainty and conflict of contentious divorce proceedings.  Alongside the pre-wedding planning, it is important to recognise the need for legal agreements prior to the start of other relationships, or before an international relocation. A prime example of this, which we are seeing more frequently in our practice, is in relation to the French PACS status.

Further High Court guidance for intended parents embarking on surrogacy arrangements

Kingsley Napley represented the applicant parents in the case of Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z [2025] EWHC 927 (Fam). The High Court judgment offers importance guidance for those who are intending on entering into a surrogacy arrangement in the future. 

French marriage contracts in England – are we finally aligned across the channel?

The English Channel, La Manche, is only 350 miles long, separating England from France.  When looking at divorce principles however, we have historically been oceans apart from France, with significant differences in outcome depending whether the proceedings have taken place in France or in England.  French law is based on a civil code, with divorce law applying property regimes to the division of assets, which is often incompatible with the common law, discretionary system in England.  In the early years of my Anglo-French practice, French couples living in England were often taken aback to learn that the property regime they chose when they signed their French marriage contract might not be applied by English judges if they divorced in England.

When might you want to have a prenuptial agreement?

Following the launch of Nuptial, a new service which provides advice on entering into, amending, or contesting pre or post nuptial agreements, we look at the Law Commission’s Scoping Report and some of the different situations that couples are using nuptial agreements.

 

The emotional impact of prenuptial agreements

Pre-nuptial agreements can inevitably protect one party more than the other. Where does this leave love, romance, and the wedding? If not handled correctly, negotiating a pre-nup can have a huge impact on the relationship and wedding preparations.

Addiction and divorce: challenges for the client and the adviser

As family lawyers, we are used to meeting our clients at a time when they are at their most vulnerable. This is intensified when addiction is present within a family. Divorce or separation places an added burden upon everyone involved and those individuals are likely to have experienced or still be experiencing the destruction that addiction can cause, some of it obvious and some of it less so.

Being alive to the particular challenges which may present themselves in a divorce involving addiction is essential but this should be balanced with an understanding that the issues are likely to be different for each client and for each family.   

Cross Practice Insights Part 2: Disputes About Parentage in Family and Succession Cases

Emotions can run high in legal disputes, particularly in cases involving succession and inheritance, as well as in a family context. In this blog we explore what happens when allegations are made about parentage (more often than not, paternity) and what can be done about it.

Why prenups are taken more seriously

It is now 15 years since the UK Supreme Court gave its judgment in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effect of prenuptial (premarital) contracts.

Filing for a "Eurostar" divorce - Paris or London?

London has long been a popular city for French expats, and despite the reported drop post- Brexit, is still home to a reported 100,000 French nationals many of whom applied for settled status. There are 9 bilingual French schools in London and with the Eurotunnel celebrating 30 years of operation, London remains an attractive residence for French professionals.

Fifteen years on - The impact of Radmacher on UK prenups and divorces

It is now some fifteen years since the UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in the case of Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effectiveness of prenuptial agreements.  

How to enforce a prenuptial agreement

It is some 15 years since the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 changed the law on prenuptial agreements.

10 point guide to prenuptial agreements

For those who have current or future wealth to protect or who are marrying for the second or third time perhaps, arranging a prenuptial agreement could be an essential part of the “wedmin” leading up to the big day. 

Children's Mental Health Week - Giving children a voice in divorce

This week marks Children’s Mental Health Week, a mental health awareness week launched by children’s mental health charity, Place2Be. The theme this year is Know Yourself, Grow Yourself, and, through the characters of Pixar’s Inside Out, seeks to explore the importance of self-awareness and expressing emotions.

Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Questions?

Contact us

or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility