Services A-Z     Pricing

Adjustments for neurodivergent individuals in the family justice system

19 June 2025

Whether you consider yourself neurodiverse, you are the loved one of someone who is neurodiverse or you want to support a neurodivergent individual in family proceedings, this blog provides a summary of the best practice which should be used by family lawyers to help neurodivergent individuals navigate the family legal system.


Neurodivergent users of the Family Justice System face additional barriers to participation in a system which was not designed for them. Failure to recognise and accommodate neurodivergence can lead to parties, witnesses and children not being able to participate fully, hindering equality of access to justice for those individuals.

Recent guidance from the Family Justice Council (or FJC) recognises that we need a more inclusive family justice system, which accommodates the needs of neurodivergent individuals. The FJC’s guidance is rooted in the principle that understanding an individual’s needs leads to better participation, and more effective justice.

This blog looks at some simple changes we, as family lawyers, can make to improve experience and outcomes for neurodivergent clients or those with neurodivergent family members.

1. Looking out for neurodivergence

The first step set out in the FJC’s guidance, is called ‘looking out for neurodivergence’.

It is important that family lawyers understand their clients’ needs.  As part of this, family lawyers should, wherever possible, try to determine whether a client is neurodivergent, so that the right support can be given.

If you have an existing diagnosis, then assuming you feel comfortable to do so, it would be helpful to share details of this with your lawyer.

If you do not have a diagnosis, then your lawyers should still take time to discuss the different challenges or needs you may have. Having this conversation has an additional purpose as it will help your lawyer identify both (i) how they can better help you; and (ii) whether they need to make a request to the court for reasonable adjustments on your behalf should there be litigation.

 

2. Is further information needed?

The second step of the FJC’s best practice guidance involves asking the question ‘is further information needed?’.

It is often the case that even if a client has worked through a toolkit with their lawyer or informed them of an existing diagnosis, the lawyer and client might agree there is a need for further information. This could include getting further information from friends or family, or additional information from health, education or social services.

 

3. What barriers is this person facing?

The third step involves thinking about the different barriers a neurodivergent individual might face whilst navigating the family justice system. This involves a discussion between the lawyer and client focusing on the barriers a person might face both away from, and at, court. This list is likely to need to be kept under review as the individual has more exposure to proceedings and the court environment.

 

4. What adjustment are needed to overcome these barriers?

This stage ensures that both lawyers and clients are thinking about a person’s needs and preferences, and what adjustments are needed to overcome the barriers an individual might be facing.  

There are a wide range of adjustments that can be made for neurodivergent individuals and the right adjustment will depend entirely on the individuals’ needs (as opposed to any labels or diagnoses). The different types of adjustments that can be made fall broadly into the following three categories:

Adjustments to communication

A list of examples of adjustments to communication include:

  • an individual being contacted by email rather than over the phone,
  • screen tinting,
  • use of short sentences,
  • allowing extra time for an individual to consider information and answers, and
  • building strategies to check understanding.

Adjustment to the environment

A list of examples for adjustments to environment include:

  • access to private and quiet waiting areas,
  • changes to lighting,
  • fidget toys or stress balls, and
  • making sure someone feels comfortable to use stimming behaviours if needed.

Adjustment to the structure and timing 

A list of examples for adjustments to structure and timing include:

  • having discussions or giving evidence at a particular time of day,
  • taking regular breaks,
  • sticking to a pre-agreed visual or written timetable, and
  • taking extra steps to make sure someone is clear about what will happen and when.

5. Applying for reasonable adjustment

At Kingsley Napley we will be able to work with you to identify what adjustments are needed to support you. We can then implement these throughout our working relationship with you, and keep the arrangements under review to ensure that they continue to meet your needs. We will also liaise with the court on your behalf to ask for any necessary adjustments to be made during the court process.

 

6. Timing

It should be considered at the earliest possible stage whether adjustments are needed to support a neurodivergent individual. Any adjustments which are identified should be kept under review throughout the case to ensure they evolve to meet an individual’s needs.

 

Conclusion

One of the key quotes from the guidance is that “the right adjustment will always depend on a person’s individual needs as opposed to any label or diagnosis.” While this best practice guidance sets out a particular pathway to support neurodivergent individuals, it is fundamental to improving their experience in the family justice system that all lawyers and other participants adopt an open, inclusive and adaptable approach to their practice. At Kingsley Napley, we work hard to do exactly that.

Read more related blogs

Disclosure in pre-nuptial agreements – full and frank, or fraudulent?

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055, examining the importance of disclosure when entering into a pre-nuptial agreement.

How “private” are Private FDRs?

On 30 July 2025, Mr Justice Peel handed down a judgment in the case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam), confirming the “sanctity of confidentiality” about Financial Dispute Resolution (‘FDR’) and private FDR (‘pFDR’) hearings.  

Pre-marital wealth on divorce: What does Standish mean for our clients?

On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Standish v Standish. Practitioners have been particularly interested to see if, and how, the Court would develop the judicially created principles of ‘needs’, ‘compensation’, and ‘sharing’ which apply to the division of finances on divorce. In particular, what would the Court say in relation to ‘the sharing principle’: should all assets be shared, or only those generated by the parties’ common endeavour during their marriage?

Capacity to enter into a prenuptial agreement

In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.

Adjustments for neurodivergent individuals in the family justice system

Whether you consider yourself neurodiverse, you are the loved one of someone who is neurodiverse or you want to support a neurodivergent individual in family proceedings, this blog provides a summary of the best practice which should be used by family lawyers to help neurodivergent individuals navigate the family legal system.

Pride in the paths to parenthood

In honour of Pride Month, we are discussing (and celebrating) the diverse paths to parenthood within the LGBTQ+ community. For couples or individuals looking to start a family, there are a number of options available, each with important factors and implications to consider. This short blog touches on some of those considerations.

Cross border planning: the French PACS

We are seeing that most HNW advisors regularly signpost clients to the importance of entering into a prenuptial agreement prior to marriage. From our perspective, prenuptial agreements have been rising in popularity, in particular following the 2010 Supreme Court judgment in Radmacher v Granantino, and rightly so.  These agreements offer a useful planning tool and can, when drafted appropriately, remove the uncertainty and conflict of contentious divorce proceedings.  Alongside the pre-wedding planning, it is important to recognise the need for legal agreements prior to the start of other relationships, or before an international relocation. A prime example of this, which we are seeing more frequently in our practice, is in relation to the French PACS status.

Further High Court guidance for intended parents embarking on surrogacy arrangements

Kingsley Napley represented the applicant parents in the case of Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z [2025] EWHC 927 (Fam). The High Court judgment offers importance guidance for those who are intending on entering into a surrogacy arrangement in the future. 

French marriage contracts in England – are we finally aligned across the channel?

The English Channel, La Manche, is only 350 miles long, separating England from France.  When looking at divorce principles however, we have historically been oceans apart from France, with significant differences in outcome depending whether the proceedings have taken place in France or in England.  French law is based on a civil code, with divorce law applying property regimes to the division of assets, which is often incompatible with the common law, discretionary system in England.  In the early years of my Anglo-French practice, French couples living in England were often taken aback to learn that the property regime they chose when they signed their French marriage contract might not be applied by English judges if they divorced in England.

When might you want to have a prenuptial agreement?

Following the launch of Nuptial, a new service which provides advice on entering into, amending, or contesting pre or post nuptial agreements, we look at the Law Commission’s Scoping Report and some of the different situations that couples are using nuptial agreements.

 

The emotional impact of prenuptial agreements

Pre-nuptial agreements can inevitably protect one party more than the other. Where does this leave love, romance, and the wedding? If not handled correctly, negotiating a pre-nup can have a huge impact on the relationship and wedding preparations.

Addiction and divorce: challenges for the client and the adviser

As family lawyers, we are used to meeting our clients at a time when they are at their most vulnerable. This is intensified when addiction is present within a family. Divorce or separation places an added burden upon everyone involved and those individuals are likely to have experienced or still be experiencing the destruction that addiction can cause, some of it obvious and some of it less so.

Being alive to the particular challenges which may present themselves in a divorce involving addiction is essential but this should be balanced with an understanding that the issues are likely to be different for each client and for each family.   

Cross Practice Insights Part 2: Disputes About Parentage in Family and Succession Cases

Emotions can run high in legal disputes, particularly in cases involving succession and inheritance, as well as in a family context. In this blog we explore what happens when allegations are made about parentage (more often than not, paternity) and what can be done about it.

Why prenups are taken more seriously

It is now 15 years since the UK Supreme Court gave its judgment in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effect of prenuptial (premarital) contracts.

Filing for a "Eurostar" divorce - Paris or London?

London has long been a popular city for French expats, and despite the reported drop post- Brexit, is still home to a reported 100,000 French nationals many of whom applied for settled status. There are 9 bilingual French schools in London and with the Eurotunnel celebrating 30 years of operation, London remains an attractive residence for French professionals.

Fifteen years on - The impact of Radmacher on UK prenups and divorces

It is now some fifteen years since the UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in the case of Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effectiveness of prenuptial agreements.  

How to enforce a prenuptial agreement

It is some 15 years since the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 changed the law on prenuptial agreements.

10 point guide to prenuptial agreements

For those who have current or future wealth to protect or who are marrying for the second or third time perhaps, arranging a prenuptial agreement could be an essential part of the “wedmin” leading up to the big day. 

Children's Mental Health Week - Giving children a voice in divorce

This week marks Children’s Mental Health Week, a mental health awareness week launched by children’s mental health charity, Place2Be. The theme this year is Know Yourself, Grow Yourself, and, through the characters of Pixar’s Inside Out, seeks to explore the importance of self-awareness and expressing emotions.

How can mediation help couples discuss prenuptial agreements?

Tim Whitney and Connie Atkinson are both mediators and members of a Family Law Agreements Group in which they share ideas and expertise in respect of pre and postnuptial and other family agreements. In this blog Tim and Connie explore the use of mediation for couples entering into a prenuptial agreement.

Neurodiversity Week blog series

Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Questions?

Contact us

or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility