Blog
Removal of trustees – factors a court will consider
Cally Brosnan
Assets are typically placed in a trust for legitimate purposes, such as safeguarding wealth for future generations. However, arguments that a trust is in fact a “sham” created to hide the true ownership of assets often arise in the context of divorce litigation, bankruptcy/insolvency where a creditor seeks to argue that a trust is a pretence seeking to shield assets from creditors, or in estate disputes, where beneficiaries look to bring assets of the deceased back into an estate.
When is a trust a sham?
The leading case on the definition of a sham remains Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967]
“…it means acts done or documents executed by the parties to the 'sham' which are intended by them to give to third parties or to the court the appearance of creating between the parties legal rights and obligations different from the actual rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intend to create."
Essentially in order to prove that a trust is a sham, a claimant must show:
- That there was no intention to create a trust.
It is necessary to show this lack of intention in relation to all parties involved. It is not enough that the settlor had a shamming intent; it must be proved that the trustee also did or that the trustee was “recklessly indifferent” or the trustee went along with the shammer not knowing or caring what they were signing.
- That there was an intention to give a false impression to third parties.
As such, in order for there to be a sham, there has to be some level of pretence. Usually the document said to evidence the trust, the trust deed, will on its face be valid but the person seeking to show sham will need to prove that the document was essentially only there as façade.
In terms of the evidence a court will likely take into account, it will look at all of the factual circumstances around the trust, including:
- The day-to-day administration of the trust including the reasons for any trustee decisions;
- The terms of the trust, for example, does the person who set up the trust still retain significant control;
- Whether in reality the settlor has retained control over the assets and/or treats them as their own;
- Whether the trust was kept secret.
Consequences
If a trust is found to be a sham, then there is in effect no trust and so the assets in question will be found to still be held by the person who sought to create the trust.
If a claimant has a valid claim against that person, those assets will therefore in theory be available to enforce against and/or to be taken into account in any claim. In determining whether there is a sham trust the same legal principles apply whatever the context.
Sham in divorce context
A classic example of a sham trust is someone who, facing marital difficulties and wishing to avoid their spouse obtaining their assets on divorce, creates a trust document under which his/her assets are purportedly placed on trust for their children, but in reality, he/she retains the beneficial interest in and control over those assets.
The Family Court has repeatedly shown its willingness to examine the truth of an arrangement where there is evidence to suggest that a trust document may not reflect reality, to ensure that fairness can be achieved on divorce. The benefits of proving sham can be significant where it results in assets which would otherwise have been excluded being treated as part of the ‘matrimonial pot’ and subject to division on divorce.
The decision to make a claim of sham in divorce proceedings is not one to be taken lightly given the difficulty in securing a finding, which essentially involves proving an intention to mislead. The prospects of success very much depend on the circumstances and available evidence. This can often be limited, particularly where arrangements exist between family members who are unlikely to have maintained formal records.
Making an allegation of sham is also likely to result in additional costs, particularly if third parties who purportedly have an interest in the trust property are joined to the proceedings. Therefore, before advancing a claim, it is important to consider whether it is proportionate to do so, the risk of being required to pay another party’s costs if unsuccessful, and the potential tax implications arising from the true ownership position.
Recent ruling
Kingsley Napley’s Family team recently obtained judgment in our client’s favour from the Family Division in the case of Michael v Michael (No 1) [2024] where the Court made two significant findings of sham.
The Court found that a trust said to hold the majority of the shareholding in property investment and development businesses operated by the husband was in fact a sham, and made the following findings of fact in relation to the alleged trust:
- The alleged settlor had “nothing whatever to do with the creation” of the purported trust and all of the assets transferred into it “came from the husband”.
- The trust deed was created “to give a false impression” and neither the husband nor the professional trustees intended it to create the legal rights and obligations it asserted to do.
- The husband retained the beneficial interest in the assets purportedly held in the trust at all times and treated the assets as “money to do with what he wanted”.
The Court also found that declarations of trust which asserted to transfer the beneficial interest in the husband’s shares and interest in a separate family-owned property investment company and partnership to his sisters were “a fake presentation” to support the husband’s case in the financial proceedings on divorce.
Whether an individual is facing a challenge to the validity of a trust on the basis of sham, or considering advancing such a claim, specialist advice should always be sought at an early stage to minimise the risk of a costly and lengthy dispute.
about the authors
Sophie is a Senior Associate in the Dispute Resolution team. She specialises in trust, estate and court of protection disputes, often acting in high value and complex cases.
Hannah is a Senior Associate in the Family Team. She advises UK and international clients in relation to all aspects of family law, with a particular focus on complex financial cases.
Latest blogs & news
Keeping the peace at Christmas – top tips for shared parenting over the festive season
For separated or divorced families, Christmas time is often an emotionally charged time of year, fraught with practical challenges as parents try to agree contact time and arrangements for Christmas events. Claire Wood shares some tips on how best to prepare for the issues which may arise at Christmas.
From Separation to Succession: Protecting your Pets
According to the PDSA’s 2024 report on pet populations, over 51% of UK adults currently own a pet. To many their pets are not “just pets”, but beloved family members and a core part of their family unit. If something unforeseen should happen in the future, most would want the best for their pets. Often, however, when an unplanned major live event happens, such as a divorce or the death of a pet owner, thought has not been given to what should happen to the pets.
Hang on to your Hockney – Protecting art in prenuptial agreements
It is 16 May 2022. Sotherby’s, New York. A collection is being auctioned, achieving the highest total from a single sale in the auction house’s 277-year history. $922.2 million. The culmination of a bitter divorce between Harry Macklowe (property mogul) and Linda Macklowe (prominent art curator).
Rings, Rolexes and Renoirs - What happens to the engagement ring and other gifts made during the marriage when a couple gets divorced?
When a party sits down to prepare their financial disclosure on divorce, thoughts can turn to the valuable or sentimental items which may have been gifted between spouses or received from family members during the marriage. The idea of having to share or relinquish such items to a soon-to-be-ex-spouse can leave some people clutching their pearls (quite literally), but is this ever actually required in financial proceedings on divorce?
It was all a sham
Assets are typically placed in a trust for legitimate purposes, such as safeguarding wealth for future generations. However, arguments that a trust is in fact a “sham” created to hide the true ownership of assets often arise in the context of divorce litigation, bankruptcy/insolvency where a creditor seeks to argue that a trust is a pretence seeking to shield assets from creditors, or in estate disputes, where beneficiaries look to bring assets of the deceased back into an estate.
National Fertility Awareness Week 2025 - Every Voice, Every Journey
It is National Fertility Awareness Week and, this year, the campaign is “Every Voice, Every Journey”.
Parlez-vous pre-nup? A guide to English prenuptial agreements for Francophone couples
Francophone couples living in England or those who own assets here may be surprised at the differences between a standard English prenuptial agreement and the ‘contrats de mariage’ which are so common across continental Europe.
Franco-British Family Relationships: Top Tips à savoir
Family relationships involving international couples can be complex and the need for cross-border planning and an understanding of other jurisdictions is critical for family lawyers working in London. Claire Wood helps clients to understand some of the differences in approach across the channel.
The rise of the cryptoassets in financial remedies
Connie Atkinson was published in the October 2022 edition of ThoughtLeaders4 HNW Divorce magazine discussing the rise of cryptoassets in financial remedies.
Disclosure in pre-nuptial agreements – full and frank, or fraudulent?
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Helliwell v Entwistle [2025] EWCA Civ 1055, examining the importance of disclosure when entering into a pre-nuptial agreement.
How “private” are Private FDRs?
On 30 July 2025, Mr Justice Peel handed down a judgment in the case of BC v BC [2025] EWHC 2016 (Fam), confirming the “sanctity of confidentiality” about Financial Dispute Resolution (‘FDR’) and private FDR (‘pFDR’) hearings.
Pre-marital wealth on divorce: What does Standish mean for our clients?
On 2 July 2025 the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited judgment in the case of Standish v Standish. Practitioners have been particularly interested to see if, and how, the Court would develop the judicially created principles of ‘needs’, ‘compensation’, and ‘sharing’ which apply to the division of finances on divorce. In particular, what would the Court say in relation to ‘the sharing principle’: should all assets be shared, or only those generated by the parties’ common endeavour during their marriage?
The future of will disputes part 4: Challenging validity based on capacity
For a will to be valid, the testator must have had testamentary capacity at the time it was made. Testamentary capacity refers to the mental ability of the testator to make a valid will.
Capacity to enter into a prenuptial agreement
In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.
The future of will disputes part three: challenging validity based on forgery and fraud
When a loved one dies, the terms of their will can sometimes surprise surviving family members, with unexpected beneficiaries or unequal distribution of the estate. In England and Wales, individuals have the freedom to leave their estate to anyone, with no legal obligation to provide for specific family members. Even if the will seems unfair, the law generally upholds the testator's wishes, if the will has been validly made. However, certain family members and dependants may be able to bring a claim against the estate (under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975), if adequate provision has not been made for them under a will.
Adjustments for neurodivergent individuals in the family justice system
Whether you consider yourself neurodiverse, you are the loved one of someone who is neurodiverse or you want to support a neurodivergent individual in family proceedings, this blog provides a summary of the best practice which should be used by family lawyers to help neurodivergent individuals navigate the family legal system.
The future of will disputes part 2: Challenging validity based on issues with execution
In order for a will to be validly executed it must comply with the requirements set out at Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837.
Pride in the paths to parenthood
In honour of Pride Month, we are discussing (and celebrating) the diverse paths to parenthood within the LGBTQ+ community. For couples or individuals looking to start a family, there are a number of options available, each with important factors and implications to consider. This short blog touches on some of those considerations.
Cross border planning: the French PACS
We are seeing that most HNW advisors regularly signpost clients to the importance of entering into a prenuptial agreement prior to marriage. From our perspective, prenuptial agreements have been rising in popularity, in particular following the 2010 Supreme Court judgment in Radmacher v Granantino, and rightly so. These agreements offer a useful planning tool and can, when drafted appropriately, remove the uncertainty and conflict of contentious divorce proceedings. Alongside the pre-wedding planning, it is important to recognise the need for legal agreements prior to the start of other relationships, or before an international relocation. A prime example of this, which we are seeing more frequently in our practice, is in relation to the French PACS status.
Further High Court guidance for intended parents embarking on surrogacy arrangements
Kingsley Napley represented the applicant parents in the case of Mr and Mrs K v Mr and Mrs Z [2025] EWHC 927 (Fam). The High Court judgment offers importance guidance for those who are intending on entering into a surrogacy arrangement in the future.
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print