<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Dispute Resolution Law Blog</title><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog</link><generator>KohanaPHP</generator><item><title>Civil Fraud Case Update: Q1 2026</title><author>Mary Young</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/civil-fraud-case-update-q1-2026</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>This quarterly civil fraud update provides a summary of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period of January - March 2026.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/civil-fraud-case-update-q1-2026</guid></item><item><title>Cross-border tax scrutiny: what non-residents need to know about UK tax investigations</title><author>Waqar Shah</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/cross-border-tax-scrutiny-what-non-residents-need-to-know-about-uk-tax-investigations</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Many people mistakenly believe that once they&amp;#39;ve established residency outside the UK, HMRC&amp;#39;s authority over their tax affairs ceases to exist. However, HMRC retains the power to examine historical matters stretching back up to two decades in the most serious cases, and UK-situated assets remain within their jurisdiction regardless of where the owner physically resides. </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/cross-border-tax-scrutiny-what-non-residents-need-to-know-about-uk-tax-investigations</guid></item><item><title>When does tax litigation cross the line? Indemnity costs outcome in the First-tier Tax Tribunal</title><author>Tabassum Zahedi and Holly Shaw</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/when-does-tax-litigation-cross-the-line-indemnity-costs-outcome-in-the-first-tier-tax-tribunal</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Costs in tax litigation often catch even experienced advisors off guard. Unlike other areas of civil litigation, where costs consequences are ever-present and a continuous strategic consideration, proceedings before the First-tier Tax Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (“FTT”) are often approached with less emphasis on potential costs exposure.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/when-does-tax-litigation-cross-the-line-indemnity-costs-outcome-in-the-first-tier-tax-tribunal</guid></item><item><title>Managing reputation in tax disputes</title><author>Krishna Mahajan and Ben Atkin</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/managing-reputation-in-tax-disputes</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Privacy and confidentiality in tax cases have always been important, particularly where the taxpayer is someone in the public eye. Whilst a tax enquiry, or indeed litigation, does not mean that the taxpayer has ‘done something wrong’, there are certain negative inferences made by the public and media which could impact future opportunities for the individual or corporate involved.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/managing-reputation-in-tax-disputes</guid></item><item><title>Court of Appeal confirms strict approach to late tax appeals: What taxpayers need to know</title><author>Waqar Shah</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/court-of-appeal-confirms-strict-approach-to-late-tax-appeals-what-taxpayers-need-to-know</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>One of the benefits of an appeal before the First-tier Tax Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) is that it is seen as less formal than an appeal in the Higher Courts.  However, the Court of Appeal&amp;#39;s recent ruling in HMRC v Medpro Healthcare [2026] is a reminder in case it was needed that deadlines matter in tax disputes and securing permission for a late appeal is not guaranteed.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/court-of-appeal-confirms-strict-approach-to-late-tax-appeals-what-taxpayers-need-to-know</guid></item><item><title>No time limit on shareholders’ rights to petition for unfair prejudice</title><author>Fiona Simpson and Charlotte Dormon</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/no-time-limit-on-shareholders-rights-to-petition-for-unfair-prejudice</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 provides one of the most important protections available for shareholders - allowing a shareholder to apply to the court by petition for relief where “the company’s affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members generally or of some part of its members (including at least himself),…”. These claims are often termed as “corporate divorce”.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/no-time-limit-on-shareholders-rights-to-petition-for-unfair-prejudice</guid></item><item><title>The Olympic Games: Swift justice through the CAS Ad Hoc Division</title><author>Tim Lowles</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/the-olympic-games-swift-justice-through-the-cas-ad-hoc-division</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The 2026 Winter Olympic Games in Italy are in full swing, showcasing athletic excellence on the world stage. At the time of writing, British hopes remain high despite some agonisingly close finishes, with Kirsty Muir, Mia Brookes, Jen Dodds and Bruce Mouat all delivering thrilling performances that placed them just outside the medals.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/the-olympic-games-swift-justice-through-the-cas-ad-hoc-division</guid></item><item><title>2025 in review: International arbitration</title><author>Francesca Parker</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-international-arbitration</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>2025 was a notable year for arbitration in England &amp; Wales, marked by legislative change, technological advances, and significant judicial developments that continue to shape the arbitration landscape.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-international-arbitration</guid></item><item><title>2025 in review: Trust and estate disputes</title><author>Sophie Mass</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-trust-and-estate-disputes</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>2025 produced many interesting decisions in trust and estate disputes in the courts of England &amp; Wales. We consider just a few of those key decisions below, which illustrate that the outcome in cases of this nature remains highly dependent on the particular facts of the case and available evidence.  </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-trust-and-estate-disputes</guid></item><item><title>Data protection v defamation as a means to protect reputation – where are we now and what can we expect in 2026?</title><author>Jessica Cattrall</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/data-protection-v-defamation-as-a-means-to-protect-reputation-where-are-we-now-and-what-can-we-expect-in-2026</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>There has been a trend in recent years of seeking to use data protection claims as a means of obtaining redress for reputational harm, which would traditionally have been sought through defamation proceedings.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/data-protection-v-defamation-as-a-means-to-protect-reputation-where-are-we-now-and-what-can-we-expect-in-2026</guid></item><item><title>Civil Fraud Quarterly Round-Up: Q4 2025</title><author>Mary Young</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/civil-fraud-quarterly-round-up-q4-2025</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>This quarterly civil fraud update provides a summary of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period of October - December 2025.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/civil-fraud-quarterly-round-up-q4-2025</guid></item><item><title>2025 in review: Under construction - Tax investigations</title><author>Krishna Mahajan</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-under-construction-tax-investigations</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>In Rachel Reeve’s Budget on 26 November 2025, the Chancellor set out plans, among other things a to tackle fraud within the Construction Industry Scheme (“CIS”) and announced a technical consultation “aimed at simplifying and improving the administration of the scheme”.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-under-construction-tax-investigations</guid></item><item><title>Under construction: Tax investigations</title><author>Krishna Mahajan</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/under-construction-tax-investigations</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>In Rachel Reeve’s Budget on 26 November 2025, the Chancellor set out plans, among other things a to tackle fraud within the Construction Industry Scheme (“CIS”) and announced a technical consultation “aimed at simplifying and improving the administration of the scheme”.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/under-construction-tax-investigations</guid></item><item><title>No more deemed fulfilment: The Supreme Court decision in King Crude Carriers SA v Ridgebury November LLC</title><author>Elliot Grosvenor-Taylor</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/no-more-deemed-fulfilment-the-supreme-court-decision-in-king-crude-carriers-sa-v-ridgebury-november-llc</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The recent Supreme Court judgment in King Crude Carriers SA and others v Ridgebury November LLC marks a significant development in English contract law.

The decision arose from an appeal against an arbitration award and addresses the fundamental question of whether the so called “deemed fulfilment” principle established by the 1881 Scottish Appeal case of Mackay v Dick exists in English Law.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/no-more-deemed-fulfilment-the-supreme-court-decision-in-king-crude-carriers-sa-v-ridgebury-november-llc</guid></item><item><title>2025 in Review: Civil fraud</title><author>Abigail Hall and Harvey Benjamin-Laing</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-civil-fraud</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>In 2025, two High Court rulings, Apollo XI Ltd v Nexedge Markets Ltd and J&amp;J Snack Foods Corp &amp; ICEE Corp v Ralph Peters &amp; Sons Ltd highlighted the strict nature of the duty of full and frank disclosure in without notice applications.

In both cases, the court discharged freezing injunctions after finding that the applicants had failed to meet the requisite standard of candour and fair presentation. These decisions serve as a clear reminder that when seeking urgent relief without notifying the other party, applicants must present all material facts - including those that may undermine their case, and ensure the court receives a balanced and accurate account.              </description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/2025-in-review-civil-fraud</guid></item><item><title>“But you gave it to me” – Is there a way to ungive a gift?</title><author>Laura Phillips TEP and Ananta Singh</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/but-you-gave-it-to-me-is-there-a-way-to-ungive-a-gift</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>We sometimes receive enquiries from people asking whether it is possible to challenge a gift which has been made previously.

Of course, giving someone a ‘lifetime gift’ (i.e. where money or assets are given away during a person’s lifetime) can be an efficient estate planning mechanism but, may be subject to challenge if the donor lacked the capacity to make an informed choice or, has been unduly influenced into making a gift.

We usually see this within the scope of a gift of money or a property, but similar principals apply to collectables and other chattels.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/but-you-gave-it-to-me-is-there-a-way-to-ungive-a-gift</guid></item><item><title>Victims of Fraud Series Part 4: Tracing issues in crypto assets cases</title><author>Dispute Resolution Law Team</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/victims-of-fraud-series-part-4-tracing-issues-in-crypto-assets-cases</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Claims involving digital assets (including crypto assets) have become relatively common in the English Courts over the last five years and, as a result, the main areas of disagreement between the parties to those disputes are starting to emerge. A major theme is the methodology that should be applied to the tracing and following of digital assets.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/victims-of-fraud-series-part-4-tracing-issues-in-crypto-assets-cases</guid></item><item><title>It was all a sham</title><author>Sophie Mass and Hannah Butcher</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/it-was-all-a-sham</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Assets are typically placed in a trust for legitimate purposes, such as safeguarding wealth for future generations. However, arguments that a trust is in fact a “sham” created to hide the true ownership of assets often arise in the context of divorce litigation, bankruptcy/insolvency where a creditor seeks to argue that a trust is a pretence seeking to shield assets from creditors, or in estate disputes, where beneficiaries look to bring assets of the deceased back into an estate.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/it-was-all-a-sham</guid></item><item><title>Victims of Fraud Series Part 3: “What can I do if the fraudster has disappeared?” - Persons Unknown Injunctions</title><author>Elliot Grosvenor-Taylor</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/victims-of-fraud-series-part-3-what-can-i-do-if-the-fraudster-has-disappeared-persons-unknown-injunctions</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Where the identity of a person or group of people responsible for a fraud is not known, the courts have recognised that it may be appropriate in certain circumstances to allow a claimant to issue proceedings and obtain an injunction (both interim and final) against such individuals. These injunctions are referred to as “persons unknown injunctions” and they have become increasingly prominent in recent years.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/victims-of-fraud-series-part-3-what-can-i-do-if-the-fraudster-has-disappeared-persons-unknown-injunctions</guid></item><item><title>Landmark High Court ruling confirms availability of civil remedies for criminally sanctioned Companies Act breaches</title><author>Richard Clayman and Katie Allard</author><link>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/landmark-high-court-ruling-confirms-availability-of-civil-remedies-for-criminally-sanctioned-companies-act-breaches</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Kingsley Napley is pleased to have acted for the successful claimants in proceedings before the High Court. The decision addresses a long-standing uncertainty in company law: if a provision of the Companies Act 2006 (“CA 06”) carries a criminal penalty for breach, does that mean no civil remedy is available? The court’s ruling sheds light on how such provisions should be understood and what consequences companies and directors may face when compliance falls short.</description><guid>https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/dispute-resolution-law-blog/landmark-high-court-ruling-confirms-availability-of-civil-remedies-for-criminally-sanctioned-companies-act-breaches</guid></item></channel></rss>
