Blog
The ripple effect: the family law consequences of allegations of sexual misconduct in the workplace
Cate Maguire
Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK's Legal Profession
A single allegation may immediately give rise to interwoven questions about the future of the employment relationship; criminal liability; regulatory responsibilities; and reputation management. For a suspected employee, an allegation alone may be sufficient to cause significant and lasting career and reputational damage. A mishandled process can also expose an employer to legal risk and reputational damage. Sexual misconduct allegations can range from sex or sexual harassment to work place relationships with an imbalance of power or status and/or issues of consent.
The steps taken by an employer and a suspected employee in these pressured circumstances can reverberate far beyond the initial examination of a complaint. Accounts provided in an employment context, whether “informally” or as part of an investigation or disciplinary process, may become admissible in later criminal proceedings. Conversely, an incorrectly conducted investigation may fatally infect evidence which would otherwise have formed the basis of an independent criminal investigation.
For a suspected employee, the decision as to whether to engage with an investigation can be complex, especially for regulated professionals, where considerations may include:
Employers have the difficult task of navigating an investigation, and possibly a disciplinary process, with potentially wide ranging ramifications, alongside the original grievance raised by the complainant. The organisation needs to consider its legal obligations to all the employees involved, whether the suspect or the complainant(s), and the requirements of any regulator.
Our top ranked Employment, Regulatory and Criminal Litigation lawyers work seamlessly in investigating and advising both organisations and individuals dealing with these issues. Reputation management can also be a key consideration when there are allegations of sexual misconduct, as press interest is common, especially where the individual and/or the organisation are high profile. Our team of Reputation Management lawyers can quickly assess the situation and give strategic advice on courses of action to take in respect of privacy, defamation and data protection issues.
If you have any questions or require advice concerning allegations of sexual misconduct in the workplace, please email a member of our team in confidence.
Partner
Sandra Paul discusses the complexities and challenges of dealing with allegations of sexual misconduct in the workplace
Paper - Non-Disclosure Agreements: One year on
"Their commitment, preparation and tenacity set them apart. They are a strong firm. Their various departments work in harmony and deliver the same high-quality work."
Chambers UK, A Client's Guide to the UK's Legal Profession
"Kingsley Napley LLP’s ‘extremely good and highly professional’ reputation management team frequently supports its criminal and regulatory practice in cases involving high-profile individuals."
Legal 500 UK
Employers and HR managers have a myriad of issues to think about in the wake of Covid-19 and understandably may even have postulated that #metoo related challenges might fall down the list. In fact, however, misconduct and harassment risks have not entirely disappeared. They have merely morphed into another form, now largely online.
The confusion must be cleared away and guidance established if these deals are to remain trusted and useful, writes Iain Miller for The Brief.
Read moreTwo years on from the start of the #MeToo movement, many of those involved in the often high profile harassment cases which came to light as a result are continuing to see repercussions, including beyond the complainant and accused when marriages are impacted and it can have significant relevance to the financial aspects of the divorce proceedings.
Read moreFacing any accusation of misconduct at work is difficult, but allegations of sexual misconduct are particularly distressing. In this blog, Kirsty Churm and Matthew Hardcastle address the importance of an employee's first account and how to prepare if given advanced warning.
Read moreThe current discussion around the dismissal of McDonald's boss, Steve Easterbrook has focused attention on a very important point. Just what should employers be doing to ensure their workplaces reflect the current mood and culture around banishing sexual misconduct and sexual harassment?
Read moreThe news that Stephen Jones, head of UK Finance, has quit over "thoroughly unpleasant" personal comments he made in 2008 is a stark reminder to executives that their past behaviour may one day come back to haunt them. Corinne Aldridge looks at the case and highlights to employers the new norms that apply to sexist remarks in the workplace.
Read moreUniversities need to consider fairness to all parties during investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct and not fall into a post #metoo trap of focusing solely on those bringing complaints.
Read moreThe temptation to approach the adjudication of a student complaint as merely an ‘internal process’, is one of the most common errors made by some higher education institutions. The process adopted must be capable of examination by an independent and external eye to ensure that at each stage of the process, the rights of all individuals involved are protected.
Read moreOnce an allegation is made against a student (or member of academic staff), either by another student, a member of staff or someone outside the university, it is important that the University takes stock of the issue and acts carefully to ensure fairness to all parties. Things go wrong when institutions form a quick visceral judgement, and cease to be impartial.
Read moreThe Cliff Richard privacy judgment was thought to be a landmark case when it comes to press reporting of a police investigation. We explore whether the ruling is taken into account when reporting on other types of investigations.
Read moreFrom June 2019, complainants in trials for sex offences selected Crown Courts will be eligible to have their cross-examination pre-recorded. Will it actually make any real difference and what about the impact on the rights of defendants?
Read moreUniversity providers owe a duty of care towards staff members and students; this duty takes on particular significance during a disciplinary process and it is essential that Universities provide appropriate and relevant information and support to all parties involved in allegations of misconduct.
Read moreKingsley Napley has partnered with four of the of most experienced barristers acting in this space to provide a series of six blogs, taking a detailed look into the systems and processes that (should) sit behind the resolution of student misconduct allegations in Universities.
Read moreWith the arrival of the new academic year comes the need, perhaps more than ever before, for universities to ensure they have robust processes in place for dealing with complaints of sexual misconduct.
Read moreRichard Fox explores the recent Government paper and looks at what it says, what it commits to, and whether they have made any missteps, and if it could they have gone further?
Read moreNDAs and Brexit have this in common. Whilst many may be unhappy and confused with the current position, consensus on the way forward has thus far proved elusive. That may now be changing.
Read moreThe instance of Ted Baker offers some important lessons to other employers as they seek to update their approach in a post-#MeToo era.
Read moreCate Maguire
Iain Miller
Kirsty Churm
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility