"In dealing with the firm, every aspect was outstanding and of the highest quality."
Chambers UK 2021
For those new to the criminal justice system, the structure and proceedings at court can be opaque and intimidating. Our team, who are experienced in dealing with matters at all levels of the court structure, can guide you through the process.
Below is a brief guide to the court system.
Types of offences
In the law of England and Wales, offences are categorised according to their seriousness. They are labelled as either ‘summary only’, ‘either way’, or ‘indictable only’ offences.
The less serious offences, which can only be heard in the Magistrates’ Court (the lowest criminal court) are summary only offences. Examples of this type of offence include common assault or fare evasion.
Either way offences are ones where the seriousness of the offence and, therefore, which court should deal with it, can vary according to the circumstances. Examples of either way offences include theft, fraud and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. For these offences, the Magistrates’ Court will first decide whether or not it is willing to hear the case in its entirety. This will be on the basis of both the complexity of the case and the likely appropriate sentence. If the Magistrates’ Court decides that they can hear a case, then the defendant can decide whether the case will be heard in the Magistrates’ Court or the Crown Court. If the Magistrates’ Court declines to deal with the matter however, then the case will have to be heard in the Crown Court.
Indictable only offences are ones that can only be dealt with in the Crown Court because they are so serious. Neither the defendant nor the Magistrates’ Court has any choice in the matter. Indictable only offences include murder, rape and blackmail.
The Youth Court can deal with summary, either way, and indictable offences where the defendant is under 18 years old at the time of the first court hearing.
Should you appear in court as a defendant, the choice (where available) of venue where your case is to be heard is an important one. Your solicitor will advise you, taking into account all your circumstances and the facts of your case.
The Magistrates’ Court
All adult cases start in the Magistrates’ Court. Indictable only cases will simply have an administrative hearing here before the case is transferred to the Crown Court.
The Magistrates’ Court deals with either summary only or either way offences. The court’s sentencing powers are generally limited to six months for each offence with the power to impose up to a total of 12 months’ imprisonment. The magistrates can, however, impose unlimited fines.
Decisions in the Magistrates’ Court are made either by a District Judge or up to three magistrates who will hear a case with the assistance of a legal adviser. Magistrates are members of the local community who are trained to dispense justice. The legal adviser will be legally trained and provides the magistrates with guidance on the law. District Judges (full time judges) or Deputy District Judges (part-time judges who are also practising lawyers) are themselves legally qualified.
Magistrates, and judges at every level in the court system, are bound by established legal principles, the Criminal Procedure Rules and published Sentencing Guidelines.
The Youth Court
The Youth Court is usually housed in a private area of the Magistrates’ Court, to limit access to the court. Unlike adult hearings in the Magistrates’ Court, Youth Court hearings are not held in public. The court is staffed in the same way as the Magistrates’ Court but the magistrates, judges and legal advisers have undertaken additional training in order to deal with the specific issues that arise for young people in the criminal justice system.
The aim of the Youth Court is to prevent young people from reoffending. It is less formal than the Magistrates’ Court, and designed to enable young people to engage in the court process more easily.
The Youth Court can deal with offences in any category of seriousness. However, cases can be sent from the Youth Court to the Crown Court if they concern offences that are considered ‘grave’, or where the Youth Court believes that there is a real possibility that the sentence likely to be imposed on conviction is more than two years in custody.
The Crown Court
The Crown Court is staffed by judges. A part–time judge (who is also a practising lawyer) is called a Recorder. Trials are heard by a judge and jury. The judge determines the principles of law. The jury decide on guilt or innocence, having heard the facts of the case and received guidance on the law from the judge. If a defendant is convicted in the Crown Court, the judge decides what sentence should be imposed.
Appeals against decisions in the Magistrates’ Court are generally heard in the Crown Court. Any appeal must be lodged within 21 days of the date of sentence.
Appeals against sentence or conviction in the Crown Court are heard in the Court of Appeal. The opportunities for appealing against Crown Court decisions are more restricted and you will need a solicitor to assist you. Any appeal from the Crown Court must be lodged within 28 days of the decision you are appealing.
Appeals submitted outside of the time limits will only be considered if you successfully apply for an extension of time.
On hearing an appeal, the Court of Appeal can give permission for proceedings to go to the Supreme Court if there is an arguable point of law which is of public importance. Matters such as this however are quite rare.
How we can help you
If you find yourself charged with an offence and facing the prospect of a court appearance, or need representation or guidance in relation to court proceedings which are already in motion, please contact a member of our criminal litigation team. Wherever you are in the court system, we will be able to advise you.
What clients and directories have said
The lawyers on the crime team are relentlessly good at what they do. They have a collaborative approach and are incredibly thorough and detailed in their work."
Chambers UK 2021
KN are exceptional in almost all categories! They are streaks ahead of everyone else and provide a very high level of service. If I were in trouble that’s where I would go. I like the fact they are genuinely committed to providing excellence even on less lucrative cases or on cases of less seriousness. They completely get how serious every case is for a client . They unfailing do the very best for their clients."
Legal 500 UK 2021
The general crime department is the best I have ever worked with. They are unsurpassed in the way they work as a team on their cases - it's a very well-drilled, slick operation."
Chambers UK 2020 - A Client’s Guide to the UK Legal Profession
They are able to draw on expertise across the firm to provide a seamless service - if you are facing criminal allegations they can also handle the media, as well as any employment issues or regulatory proceedings that may arise."
Chambers UK 2020 - A Client’s Guide to the UK Legal Profession
Kingsley Napley has real strength and expertise at all levels of the crime group. The team is hard-working, focused on getting results and yet maintains the human touch."
Legal 500 UK 2020
They stand out because of their ability to stop a case before it gets started. Their commitment, preparation and tenacity set them apart. They are a strong firm. Their various departments work in harmony and deliver the same high-quality work."
Chambers UK, 2019
They pick up some fantastic work, they have some fantastic clients and they have a skill of trying to get rid of matters before they go too far."
Chambers High Net Worth Guide, 2018
The crime team is first-rate. They are dedicated, hard-working and tireless in their preparation of cases."
Chambers UK, 2017
Partner and Head of Department
Senior Practice Development Lawyer
Michael Caplan QC
Senior Associate (Barrister)
Senior Associate (Barrister)
The KN team are one of the best known, oldest and highly regarded teams in this area of work. They get first rate work and deliver excellent results."
Legal 500 UK 2021
A dynamic team that shows good attention to detail."
Chambers UK 2021
Highly collaborative and team based in everything they do. Friendly and down to earth while also being world class. Uniquely able to bring together the brightest and the best but without being pompous or superior in their attitude. Great listeners, hard workers and tactically the best in the business."
Legal 500 UK 2021
Latest blogs & news
On 13 May 2022, the FCA published a final refusing Alexander Jon Compliance Consulting Ltd.’s (“AJCC”) application for authorisation to provide regulatory hosting services. There is no specific definition of what a regulatory host is, but the FCA generally regards it as a commercial arrangement whereby an authorised Principal firm appoints and oversees a number of unconnected Appointed Representatives (“ARs”) which operate across a range of markets.
We are delighted to present, as a guest blog, the thoughts and views of Dr Valentyn Gvozdiy, managing partner of Golaw in Kyiv. Dr Gvozdiy outlines the significant changes to criminal procedure that have been heralded by the Russian invasion of his country and the subsequent adoption of martial law.
Cross-Border Criminal Law Conference 2022: Individual and Corporate Accountability for International Crimes
On Thursday 5 May, Kingsley Napley hosted the 4th annual Cross-Border Criminal Law Conference, which focused on individual and corporate accountability for international crimes.
This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection number of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions, published in the period January - March 2022.
Whilst it is anticipated that prosecutions under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (‘the Act’) will be exceptionally rare, the criminal sanctions set out in it are explicitly framed to create a “sufficiently robust deterrent to ensure compliance.” The provisions punish corporates and individual officers who connive or consent to commit an offence, as well as individual officers who are negligent (s.36). In addition, they are also extra-territorial (s.52), meaning that the scope of liability is particularly wide-ranging.
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories in the period January 2022 – March 2022
KN's Cross Border Criminal Law Conference on 5 May 2022 | Panel Discussion: 20 years since the Pinochet case – the current state of universal jurisdiction in the UK
The Prime Minister recently committed the UK’s support to achieving justice in respect of the war crimes allegations arising out of the Ukraine conflict. The conflict and associated allegations raise questions over the UK’s commitment and ability to bring prosecutions under the doctrine of “universal jurisdiction”. Universal jurisdiction describes the jurisdiction that is available in the national courts of many countries to prosecute individuals for the most serious international crimes, even if those crimes occurred abroad and neither the defendants nor victims have any connection to that country. Why only a few such prosecutions have taken place in the UK will be the topic of one of two panel discussions at Kingsley Napley’s Cross Border Criminal Law Conference on 5 May 2022.
This quarterly international criminal law update provides a summary of the news stories in the period January – March 2022. The relevance of international criminal law has been tragically highlighted by the current events in the Ukraine. This fast moving event has been covered below, along with a number of other international criminal law updates.
US rap artists are backing legislation to keep lyrics out of courtrooms –is it time for UK artists to do the same?
News broke last month that megastars Jay-Z, Meek Mill, Big Sean, Kelly Rowland and Fat Joe (among others) were supporting the introduction of a New York state law that aims to prevent the prosecution using rap lyrics in criminal trials.
On 28 February 2022, the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel announced to parliament that the UK would be ‘leading all international efforts’ to suspend Russia’s membership of INTERPOL.
This came moments before the Ukrainian minister of internal affairs, Denis Monastyrsky, made a public statement demanding Russia’s immediate expulsion from the organisation for “violating its basic principles and massive misuse of tools and services to cover up its crimes and persecute political enemies, particularly in Ukraine.”
The news is never short of horror stories involving travellers who find themselves detained in a foreign country. This is sadly a reality for thousands of British citizens who, for a variety of reasons, are being held in a prison abroad.
A new bill will be put forward to parliament tomorrow with the aim of increasing transparency of ownership of property in the UK. The introduction of this new Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill has been expedited following the sanctions announced last week, however the drive for change began over five years ago and that it is finally coming to fruition will be welcomed by many.
On 16 November the CJEU delivered its judgment following the publication of the Advocate General’s opinion on the UK-Ireland extradition questions which we wrote about here. The decision concerned the mechanisms for extradition to the UK from Ireland in two scenarios (1) under the terms of the withdrawal agreement from 1 February to 31 December 2020 and (2) under the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (“TCA”) from 1 January 2021.
The judgment confirms the AG’s Opinion that Ireland is bound by the withdrawal agreement and the TCA (“the agreements”) in respect of extradition arrangements with the UK and accordingly extradition from Ireland to the UK post-Brexit will continue under those terms.
This blogs considers the recent corporate manslaughter conviction of Deco-Pak and two other recent corporate manslaughter cases, Bosley Mill and Aster Healthcare and what they tell us about the current approach to this offence. In January 2022 a garden supplies firm, Deco-Pak was found guilty of corporate manslaughter following a fatal accident at the Deco-Pak premises in Hipperholme, West Yorkshire on 14 April 2017.
The Medical Cannabis (Access) Bill (the ‘Bill’) aims to enable patients in England to access cannabis-based medicinal products (‘CBMPs’), such as nabiximols, more freely on the NHS. Although English law was changed in November 2018 to allow specialist doctors to prescribe cannabis (we have blogged about this here), very few people have been able to access NHS prescriptions which has left patients paying thousands of pounds a month for private prescriptions or unable to obtain treatment altogether. There are approximately 10,000 private prescriptions for CBMPs in the UK. In a paper published by BMJ Open in 2020, Professor David Nutt et. al. reported that thousands of UK patients were self-medicating with illicit cannabis-based products.
On 10 January 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) became the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) supervisor for UK cryptoasset firms. Two years in, how effectively is it performing its role as the gatekeeper of the new registration regime?
This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories published in the period October – December 2021.
On 9 December the Gambling Commission published its annual Compliance and Enforcement Report for the financial year 2020–2021. This confirmed that the period was particularly active for the Enforcement and Compliance teams, with a record total of £32.1 million being paid by 15 gambling businesses as a result of fines or regulatory settlements. This included over £1.3m being paid by White Hat Gaming Ltd, after a January 2020 review by the Commission of its operating licence revealed inadequate policies and produces in respect of anti-money laundering (“AML”) and safer gambling.
On 9 November 2021 Advocate General Kokott handed down her opinion in respect of Case C-479/21 concerning Mr Sn and Mr Sd following a reference from the Irish Supreme Court which was made on 3 August 2021. Her opinion stated that the provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement and TCA which ensure the continuation of the European arrest warrant regime in respect of warrants issued by the United Kingdom (“UK”) during the transition period are binding on Ireland.