Blog
From Certificates to Belief Statements: The CPS and the Limits of Forum Bar Intervention
Rebecca Niblock
I specialise in defending children as a criminal lawyer and regularly witness the parents of my clients struggling to come to terms with the fact that arrest, investigation or in extreme cases prosecution is “happening to them”. It is easy to assume that your child, who is the apple of your eye and who has perhaps benefited from good schooling or a privileged upbringing, would never become involved with the police. Surely that only happens to children who haven’t been so fortunate? Our experience is that wealth and privilege do not protect your child from being in conflict with the law. A criminal allegation can be made against anyone at any time, no matter what their circumstances.
In a world where it is impossible to completely control what our children are exposed to online and where we are all encouraged to speak up for our individual rights, the risk of criminal complaints being made by children against other children in schools, playgrounds, chatrooms, gaming communities, sports teams (the possibilities are endless) is rife. I frequently watch parents blame themselves for the fact that their child is facing a criminal allegation - “We should have seen the signs”, “should have had more rules”, “should have had better internet security” are common refrains. The truth is, it is rare that I have thought my client would have avoided a police station situation, if their parents had only done something differently. There are too many risk factors in the climate we live in today, to be able to control and prevent all of them.
The teasers shared for Adolescence suggests that it will deal with “the ordinary family’s worst nightmare”, and how the police appear to disregard the fact that the defendant who is the subject of the drama, is a 13-year-old child. It is not uncommon for the police to appear to disregard the permanent detrimental impact a criminal investigation can have on a child. From the moment a child is arrested their future, their parents' livelihoods and even their siblings’ futures are at stake.
The Police should consider whether an arrest is necessary and proportionate in each case. Indeed, if the legislation, case law and guidance were properly applied on every occasion, it would be rare that children are arrested at all. However, time and time again I have to remind the police that the arrest of a child is rarely necessary or fair and can easily be avoided by using voluntary interviews, or diversions away from the criminal justice system.
There are a number of protective measures available for children in the criminal justice system which I anticipate we will see throughout the series. A non-exhaustive list includes; An Appropriate Adult should be at the police station (an adult who helps protect their rights and facilitates communication with the police, in addition to a solicitor at the police station). Court proceedings are not open to the public, children are automatically entitled to anonymity in press reporting. The sentences available are significantly lower than the comparative sentences for adults (rarely imposing a custodial sentence) and Judges and prosecutors must be “youth ticketed”.
Most importantly, in making all decisions involving children, the police and CPS are required to make the best interests of the child a primary consideration[1]. Unfortunately, this does not always happen. Particularly when children appear more mature than they are, or the offence is particularly serious. In those circumstances parents and their children are forced to view the police through a new lens; an agency who had previously been their protectors, become the antithesis of this, tearing the sanctity of their family life apart. This sometimes appears to be done with very little, if any, regard to the long-term consequences police decision making will have on the young child and their family. Having said that, there are police officers and supportive agencies who do a brilliant job at supporting children through the criminal justice system, I have worked with many of them. However, their supportive and considered approach is sadly not universal in my experience.
There will of course be some occasions where it is appropriate for the criminal justice system to criminalise and imprison a child, if they genuinely pose a risk to the public which cannot be managed in any other way. However, those occasions are extraordinarily rare and I hope that this series makes the wider public aware that even in such circumstances there is good reason to want the initial experience of contact with the police and investigation to be as child friendly as possible.
Imagine if this happened to your family. We each would want and need a youth justice system which recognises and respects that your child is just that, a child.
The Guardian’s review, “the closest thing to TV perfection” can be found here – Guardian Review.
[1] United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 3(1)
Rebecca is a senior associate in the criminal litigation department, with a reputation as a tenacious criminal defence lawyer who thrives on the legal and strategic challenge involved in preparing a case for trial.
As we await the release of the Netflix series Adolescence this evening by award winning writer Jack Thorne, I am interested to see how the series will deal with very real, yet often publicly unheard problems of how our criminal justice system, in particular the police, manage children who are alleged to have committed serious offences.
Research reveals overwhelmingly negative experiences of the care system for victims and perpetrators of youth violence.
In March 2023, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) commissioned research on the lived experiences of those who have committed – or experienced – serious youth violence. The findings were published alongside HMICFRS’s report into the policing of these issues and as cross-disciplinary calls increase for a rethink of how serious youth violence is tackled. In a follow-up to his previous blog, Paul Egunjobi looks at the findings.
On 8th March 2023, His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) published a report examining how well the police tackle serious youth violence. We look at the report and one of the issues it has highlighted: how Violence Reduction Units (VRUs) are used, and how effectively the police work with VRUs and other partner organisations.
Long delays are an all-too familiar part of the criminal justice system. As highlighted in the recent case of BH v Norwich Youth Court, those delays can have a significant impact on young people, particularly when a defendant turns 18 during the long process. An imminent change in the law may improve the situation but there are wider issues to be solved, too. Partner Sandra Paul and paralegal Emma McGrath look at the issues.
Channel 4’s, Consent, appeared to be a show with something to say; a show that would draw attention to the complexity of sexual allegations involving school aged children as well as the emotional trauma for all caught in its wake.
The Online Safety Bill hit the headlines last week, following its third and final reading in the House of Commons on 17 January 2023. Since its early stages the Bill has provoked an ongoing debate between social media safety groups, who call for the law to do more to protect children, and civil liberties campaigners, who argue that the proposed legislation impinges on the freedom of speech. The latest proposed amendment would make senior managers criminally liable for platforms’ persistent failure to protect children online. Magda Zima considers the potentially wide-ranging impact of this amendment on both companies and senior individuals.
This blog follows the virtual launch of the Youth Justice Legal Centre Legal Guide on children facing sexual offences. During this event, Maeve Keenan discussed Kingsley Napley's contribution to the report, including recommendations on how to appropriately handle these complex cases and protect the child's welfare.
It’s the knock on the door that parent fear, or is it just me? Thankfully, the Courts have provided some valuable guidance about this nightmare scenario.
There are many reasons the police may want to speak to your child, but few occasions where the reason might be urgent enough to justify an unannounced visit and an arrest.
In this blog, we discuss what new police data reveals about the use of Outcome 22 three years after its introduction and the startling disparity of its use by different forces.
As a criminal defence solicitor specialising in defending allegations of sexual misconduct and representing children, the perfect storm that has erupted since the launch of Everyone’s Invited has made me privy to some of the saddest and most distraught children I have ever advised.
The head of the Youth Justice Board has rightly criticised the Government’s plans to raise child custodial sentences. At a time when England and Wales falls behind most European countries in protecting children with the lowest age of criminal responsibility (10), it is inexplicable that the Government is taking a further regressive step by seeking to increase the length of time that children must spend in prison.
Children under 18 years old are afforded a number of special protections by virtue of the fact that they are children in the eyes of the law. These protections fall away when an individual turns 18 and they are legally considered an ‘adult’. For defendants who cross the threshold into adulthood during the criminal process, the impact of reaching this milestone can be profound.
Today JUSTICE has published the latest working party report ‘Tackling Racial Injustice: Children and the Youth Justice System’. I am delighted to have had the opportunity to chair the working party that produced this report. The report makes practical recommendations to reduce BAME disproportionality in the Youth Justice System (YJS) of England and Wales.
David Lammy’s landmark review of racial bias in the Criminal Justice System (‘CJS’), made many key recommendations to help improve trust and fairness in the CJS when it was published in 2017. One of which was to expand the use of the deferred prosecution for adults and young offenders.
The temptation to approach the adjudication of a student complaint as merely an ‘internal process’, is one of the most common errors made by some higher education institutions. The process adopted must be capable of examination by an independent and external eye to ensure that at each stage of the process, the rights of all individuals involved are protected.
Once an allegation is made against a student (or member of academic staff), either by another student, a member of staff or someone outside the university, it is important that that the University takes stock of the issue and acts carefully to ensure fairness to all parties.
University providers owe a duty of care towards staff members and students; this duty takes on particular significance during a disciplinary process and it is essential that Universities provide appropriate and relevant information and support to all parties involved in allegations of misconduct.
What happens when a complaint is made to a University about the conduct of a student or a member of academic staff? What should the procedures for the resolution of these complaints look like and how can all parties be reassured that such allegations will be resolved fairly?
This blog series examines some of the sexual offences encountered by the main characters in the explosive 12-part BBC series, ‘I May Destroy You’. This final instalment focuses on a character called Theo and the events that occurred when she was a youth, during her high school years.
The impact of Coronavirus is significant and far-reaching for all children and young adults. For a youth justice system creaking under strain with serious delays, the lockdown has only compounded the problems and brings a raft of serious consequences. Timely justice is ever more important.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Rebecca Niblock
Alun Milford
Louise Hodges
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print