Coronavirus Act: how the emergency legislation will impact healthcare professionals
The latest guidance, Support and guidance for SME’s, confirms that RICS has taken the decision to suspend all Red Book valuation audits due to concerns that many firms may not currently be able to comply with the requirements on a practical level. For SME’s that are currently bringing forward difficult decisions to close their businesses either temporarily or permanently, RICS has issued specific guidance to help members do that in a way which complies with the Rules of Conduct. This includes a closing down checklist and guidance about agreeing a closure date, the ethical and legal considerations surrounding insolvency, staff, informing clients, handling client money and professional indemnity insurance.
One of the most significant of the challenges for members is economic uncertainty and in responding to that, RICS has issued guidance on valuation in the form of a RICS’ Valuation Practice Alert. This reminds the profession that it should be transparent and professional about the challenges they face. In particular RICS has said:
RICS members must agree at the outset with their clients any changes to the way they would normally proceed with instructions and record in writing the agreed changes. RICS would strongly encourage members to make detailed file notes to support the rational that underpinned the changes”
It has long been recognised that market disruption can reduce the level of certainty that can be attached to a valuation. Market disruption can arise due to unforeseen financial, macro-economic, legal, political and natural events, such as COVID-19. Whether that uncertainty arises from inconsistent empirical data, the absence of such data or unprecedented circumstances, a surveyor must use their best judgment and express it clearly without producing a report that misleads or creates a false impression.
It is these kinds of events that can lead to uncertainty which is to such a degree that it falls outside any parameters that might normally be expected and amounts to a ‘material uncertainty’.
The Valuation Practice Guidance Applications (VPGA) recognises that in most cases, material uncertainty need not be reflected in the valuation figure quantitatively, but should instead be expressed in qualitative terms. Helpfully and in response to recent events, the Valuation Practice Alert issued by RCIS suggests a form of words to be used where material uncertainty is declared which specifically refers to the COVID-19 outbreak and the consequent impact it has had on global financial markets.
The suggested wording includes:
Market activity is being impacted in many sectors. As at the valuation date, we consider that we can attach less weight to previous market evidence for comparison purposes, to inform opinions of value. Indeed, the current response to COVID-19 means that we are faced with an unprecedented set of circumstances on which to base a judgment.
Our valuation(s) is / are therefore reported on the basis of ‘material valuation uncertainty’ as per VPS 3 and VPGA 10 of the RICS Red Book Global. Consequently, less certainty – and a higher degree of caution –should be attached to our valuation than would normally be the case. Given the unknown future impact that COVID-19 might have on the real estate market, we recommend that you keep the valuation of [this property] under frequent review.”
This reminds surveyors that in the current climate much less weight can be attached to previous market evidence for comparison purposes and a higher degree of caution needs to be attached to valuations.
The Valuation Practice Alert encouraging the use of material uncertainty declarations due to the economic climate is to be welcomed. It is plainly more helpful for a regulator to provide its profession with meaningful and relevant guidance, than later discipline members who have made a mistake or misjudgement in such unusual times without the benefit of any proper guidance.
The latest guidance issued by RICS, Support and guidance for SME’s, sets out the approach they will take to handling any regulatory cases. Importantly it confirms that they are still committed to regulation and upholding professional standards but they will be adopting a risk-based approach, which is balanced and proportionate to a firm’s size, scope and complexity and the unprecedented conditions we find ourselves in. RICS has also said that this important context “will be considered in regulatory cases, along with mitigating and aggravating factors, when assessing seriousness and any regulatory outcome.”
This ought to be somewhat reassuring to regulated members and firms that are facing difficult ethical, regulatory or professional judgments as a result of COVID-19 and its fall out. We advise anyone adopting a revised approach as a result of the current situation to record their reasoning in a file note, so that it can be referred back to later if necessary in the event of any regulatory interest.
Julie Norris is a partner in the Regulatory Team. She specialises in advising in the health, professional services, legal and financial fields, advising professionals, businesses and regulators on regulatory compliance, investigations, adjudication, enforcement and prosecutions. Clients come to Julie for advice on regulatory issues that affect their ability to practice or run their organisations, as well as those regulatory issues that may affect their reputation or professional standing.
Sian Jones is an Associate in the Regulatory team. She specialises in defending professionals across a number of different sectors. In the professional services sector she advises surveyors facing regulatory proceedings brought by RICS and advises regulated firms on their wider regulatory obligations such as reporting requirements and carrying out internal investigations into employee misconduct. Sian also advises professionals such as lawyers, doctors, accountants and talking therapists.
This week, the Government announced that Covid-19 vaccinations will be made compulsory for care home staff, raising strong emotions on both sides of the argument.
Gone are the days of computer gaming being viewed as a secluded activity; gaming is now a thoroughly social experience that attracts a global audience of millions and players can compete for large sums of money and celebrity. This burgeoning industry is largely in a virtual world and has developed in a blockchain, decentralised fashion. Often the UK government talks up the UK gaming industry and how keen the government is to support this sector, and there have been instances that show support, but when it comes to playing games competitively, law and regulations have not yet caught up.
The COVID-19 crisis has forced sports clubs, schools, universities and charities to rapidly change their approaches to coaching, teaching and support work. The regulations on social distancing have forced organisations to innovate; services which had previously been offered mostly or wholly in person were rapidly shifted online during “lockdown 1” and will return online at least for the duration of “lockdown 3”. If the vaccine rollout has the desired effect there will no doubt be some return to “traditional” methods, but it seems very unlikely that the changes brought about by the pandemic will be completely reversed. In this blog, Claire Parry from Kingsley Napley’s Regulatory team and Fred Allen from the Public Law team look at the challenges organisations face engaging with children online.
In this 3-part tech blog series, we’ve explored how legal and accountancy regulators are driving and responding to changes in technology and innovation in their respective professions. We’ve also considered the commercial perspective, looking at interesting developments in these sectors , particularly around the use of artificial intelligence (AI).
In this second blog in our technology and innovation series, we look at some recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal and accountancy sectors.
On 18 November 2020, the government confirmed that it is proceeding with planned changes to the Victims' Code, following a consultation that began on 5 March 2020. The changes mean that when the revised Code comes into force, it will be based on a clearly defined set of rights that set out a minimum level of service that can be expected from criminal justice agencies. It is hoped that the changes will mean victims have a greater awareness of their rights, receive the information and support when then need it and have a greater level of satisfaction with the treatment they receive in the criminal justice system.
On 19 November 2020, the High Court handed down judgment in the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care’s (“PSA”) challenge to a decision of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (“MPT”) to suspend a doctor from practice. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Farbey emphasises the significance of lack of insight to the question of sanction.
All providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (“CQC) must assure themselves that all directors who are responsible for delivering care to service users are fit and proper – in other words, they must be able to diligently carry out their responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of care. This forms part of the providers’ duty to ensure the service is well-led, which is one of the focus points during an inspection. Not only does the CQC monitor compliance at the point of registration, but it is an on-going duty and can lead to enforcement action where it is not met.
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether the private prosecutor is entitled to recover their full investigation and legal fees at the end of the case.
The House of Commons Justice Committee has made a series of recommendations in its report published today which are likely to have a significant impact on the future of private prosecutions in England and Wales.
Although everyone hopes the now much enhanced critical care capacity in the UK will meet the demand from patients, there is a growing concern that the time will come during the COVID-19 pandemic when the NHS will be overwhelmed and the need for lifesaving interventions will exceed available resources.
The Charities Commission has recently warned that fraudsters are exploiting the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) in order to carry out fraud and cybercrime against charities. Unfortunately, in our experience, the likelihood of the police taking action against these individuals is low. In the current climate it is easy to understand why the use of private prosecutions is firmly on the rise. In the past, some charities have been criticised for having an overzealous approach to the conduct of their private prosecutions. In this blog, we highlight the importance of taking a few simple steps to ensure that charities who conduct private prosecutions are beyond reproach.
With BBC reports that there have been 178,000 incidents of anti-social behaviour in the last four weeks across England and Wales alone, if a solicitor receives a fixed penalty notice for a non-essential journey away from home - do they have to inform the SRA?
With the COVID-19 lockdown extended in the UK until at least early-May, primary care practitioners and consultants, who have been increasingly turning to remote consultations or telemedicine to treat their patients, will inevitably see an increase in their use to address more complex medical issues.
In our previous blog, we discussed the introduction of the Coronavirus Act and how the emergency legislation impacts healthcare professionals. Understandably however, the situation is constantly evolving and the position must be regularly reassessed. With this in mind, we discuss below some of the recent, key updates impacting the healthcare workforce.
Last week we provided you with detail on the guidance to be aware of as a manager or owner of a care/domiciliary home in light of the current pandemic. The guidance is of course changing given the nature of the outbreak, so please read on for the key updates:
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has recently issued guidance to athletes in which acknowledges the difficulties that the Covid-19 pandemic will cause, not just for athletes, but for the entire sporting community who are committed to protecting clean sport
The COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented period of change and rapid adjustment in UK healthcare provision. The work of frontline nurses often goes beyond pure treatment, providing care, support and regular human contact with patients. How is the tension between social distancing and nurses’ obligations to look after patients to be resolved?
The COVID-19 outbreak is new territory, not only for care providers working on the frontline, but also for regulatory bodies. Those that are responsible for caring for vulnerable service users must now do so in an increasingly challenging environment, whilst ensuring that they comply with their professional obligations.
The outbreak of COVID-19 has caused unprecedented disruption and uncertainty in all reaches of our professional and personal lives. The legal profession is not immune to that uncertainty- particularly as measures have been put in place to ensure that both justice continues to be delivered and businesses can continue to provide services to their clients in these extraordinary times.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility