Blog
Keeping the peace at Christmas – top tips for shared parenting over the festive season
Lauren Evans
It is now twenty years since the landmark White v White decision which saw a move forwards for a divorcing party who was the home-maker and child-carer. White v White introduced a starting point, that “equality should be departed from only if, and to the extent that, there is good reason for doing so”. As Lord Nicholls summarised; “There should be no bias in favour of the money-earner and against the home-maker and the child-carer”.
We need to move away from legal disputes for separating families to help to build better relationships and cause less harm. Society’s approach to divorce and separation has to change. A report published today by the Family Solutions Group calls for a rethink.
Last month marked 25 years since I qualified as a family lawyer which, as a criminal colleague kindly remarked, ‘is less than some people get for murder’. In the current turbulent time with the pandemic, which has prompted a time of reflection for many of us, the anniversary has made me think about the seismic (and the not so fast) changes for family lawyers over the last quarter of a century and how my personal experiences throughout this time have run in tandem.
The motion for the recent Kingsley Napley debate: “This House believes remote hearings are not remotely fair” was carried with a fairly balanced 56% in favour and 44% against.
Farming divorces hold a special place in the heart of family lawyers as the landmark divorce case of White v White [2000] was that of a farming family.
Lauren Evans
Roberta Draper
Christopher Perrin
Legal Notices | Privacy Notice | Fraud Warning | Modern Slavery Statement | Complaints | Website Terms | Cookie Policy | Accessibility | Site Map
© 2026 Kingsley Napley LLP. All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, registration number 500046.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility