Blog
Covid 19 Crisis - Can we afford (not) to invest in equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives?
Melinka Berridge
On sitting down to write this blog, I was a little embarrassed. When you actually take the time to think about drafting legal documents in a way that is gender neutral, it seems to me that the question isn’t why do this, but why not?
Traditionally, masculine pronouns have been used by professionals throughout the legal sector when drafting. Corporate and commercial contracts usually use male pronouns to refer to any party, irrespective of their singular or collective genders. The word ‘chairman’ was, and still is, used in a variety of company agreements and constitutional documentation to describe the chair of a board or general meeting (I would note that I use ‘chairperson’ when drafting). Many letters start ‘Dear Sirs’.
This was recognised as being an outdated practice which reinforced historic gender-specific stereotypes by law makers in 2007. In fact, on International Women’s Day in 2007, Jack Straw, a former Leader of the House of Commons, delivered a written statement announcing that the Government had asked Parliamentary Counsel to henceforth adopt gender-neutral drafting.
Jack Straw’s announcement was the first time that the Government signalled a change in the use of masculine pronouns for the universal purpose of identifying individuals in legislation and legal drafting. Up until this point the Government had been relying upon and using principles laid out in section 6 of the Interpretation Act 1978 for legislative drafting, whereby any word importing the use of the masculine gender included the feminine, and vice versa.
This change hasn’t been reflected across the legal profession though. I remember very early in my career spending ages amending a contract because our client was a woman. I then felt foolish when I was told that was unnecessary and that I should have just relied on the quite standard provision in contracts which reads along the lines “Unless the context otherwise requires, a reference to one gender shall include a reference to the other genders”, but it felt strange and a little rude when I knew my client was a woman.
Since 2007 it has been government policy to write legislation in gender-neutral language, so shouldn’t we as a profession make (arguably a late) but concerted effort to use language that does not solely refer to the male and female genders, in order to reflect our diverse society?
I think the answer must be, unequivocally, yes. Because, why wouldn’t we?
There is an argument that gender neutral drafting distorts the English language and that ‘they’ should not be used as a singular pronoun. My view is that our language is a living, ever-evolving thing, and should reflect how we communicate with one another and the society we live in. There is another argument that gender neutral drafting can create confusion or uncertainty in legal documents, which by their very nature need to be clear and unambiguous. Part of a lawyer’s craft however, is to produce clearly drafted documents which deal with all sorts of complexities, so it should not be beyond the profession to draft in a gender neutral way. The argument ‘this is the way it has always been done’ frankly holds no sway. This is the case especially in the context of the current global pandemic. Look how much has changed and how quickly it has changed – most of the legal profession has been working effectively from home for the last 12 weeks, causing an unprecedented shift in attitude to home and flexible working which is likely to transform the workplace as we know it. And we have adapted.
For anyone who wants to find out more, the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel, the Government Legal Department and InterLaw Diversity Forum have produced a Guide to Gender-Neutral Drafting. Its message is simple, avoid gender-specific pronouns and adjectives (‘he/him/his’) and avoid nouns that might appear to assume that a person of a particular gender will do a particular job or perform a particular role. Use the passive tense and a few more definitions if you need to.
I should say that gender neutral drafting is being used by many already within the profession. The challenge for law firms and busy fee earners is to always apply this consistently, in practice. This involves agreeing on a consistent approach across teams, across departments and across the profession and most likely an overhaul of any precedent banks.
So, my conclusion? Frankly, I’m embarrassed I haven’t paid more attention to this and will be aiming to draft in a gender neutral way going forward.
About the author
Roberta advises startup founders, angel investors and established businesses on a variety of corporate and commercial legal matters. She advises on early stage investments, share option schemes, shareholder agreements, share buybacks and company sales and acquisitions.
Latest blogs and news
#PrideInside in 2020 and reflections on allyship at Kingsley Napley
Tomorrow, global organisations across the world are celebrating Global Pride, and I wanted to write to say how much it means to us at Kingsley Napley to celebrate Pride and to support our LGBTQ colleagues.
Gender neutral legal drafting – not why, but why not?
On sitting down to write this blog, I was a little embarrassed. When you actually take the time to think about drafting legal documents in a way that is gender neutral, it seems to me that the question isn’t why do this, but why not?
Covid 19 Crisis - Can we afford (not) to invest in equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives?
In 2012 we formed an LGBTQ* & Allies network at Kingsley Napley (KN). I’m ashamed to say that the impetus to form this network came not from within, but from Scott, a new joiner who upon his arrival was surprised, and critical (rightly so) to find that no such network existed at KN.
The Home Office welcomes same sex couples, but only those lucky enough to live in a liberal state
The UK spouse visa has been the subject of frequent criticism and has rarely been out of the news since the rules surrounding it were completely changed in 2012. This is predominantly as a result of the stringent and often exclusionary financial requirements imposed. However, when you take a look at the basic relationship requirements imposed by this route, it is exclusionary in an unexpectedly discriminatory way.
IDAHOBIT Day 2020: I am an Ally
This Sunday marks International Day against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia. On this day, over 130 countries around the world draw attention to the various forms of discrimination and violence that the LGBTQ community continue to experience. It serves as a reminder each year of the work which is still needed to achieve LGBTQ equality. David Sleight, a Partner and ally, at Kingsley Napley shares his experience below.
Calling all managers and senior executives – the importance of being a visible LGBTQ ally
Now is a more important time than ever to be a visible ally to LGBTQ people in the workplace. Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation continues to take place, often with disastrous ramifications for individuals and businesses.
Buying a house: the pitfalls for unmarried same-sex couples
The current government lockdown is making everyone aware of their living arrangements. Relationships are being put under new pressures and the current emotional and financial impact of the virus may be causing additional stresses in a relationship. It is a sensible time to make sure you understand how you own your property and the implications of such ownership.
Disregarding Convictions – the Turing Law and its limitations
There are countless instances of LGBT+ individuals being stigmatised and discriminated against throughout history, including in criminal law. In particular, a number of sexual acts between men have historically been criminalised. This homophobic legislation was compounded by an insidious approach to investigations, which targeted men who were believed to be gay, leading to a large number of men being criminalised, with all of the consequences that a conviction brings, for behaviour that should never have been illegal in the first place.
“Love comes first”: The journey to equal partnerships and marriage in the UK
On the eve of the new decade, 31 December 2019, the first mixed-sex couples officially entered into civil partnerships, granting them the same legal protections as in marriage.
The lionesses: how female footballers are tackling equality with pride
When you cast your mind back to last summer, you may have hazy memories of enjoying an aperol spritz during the heat wave, listening to Lewis Capaldi on every radio station, or your attempts to desperately avoid buying plastic bottles and single use cups.
Challenging hidden assumptions
Recent social progress in LGBT+ issues in the UK is a cause for celebration but it is not the end of the story. Heteronormative stereotypes persist and can be harmful.
Equal civil partnerships finally allow equal access to tax and inheritance perks
Legal recognition of relationships has dramatically changed in the UK and across most western countries. With an urge for equality and to recognise same-sex relationships, the government first introduced civil partnerships for same-sex couples in 2005 and subsequently same sex-couples could legally marry from 2014.
Same Sex Relationships and Probate Disputes
In 2011, research commissioned by the well-known charity Stonewall concluded that people over 55 who were in a same sex relationship were less likely to see biological family members on a regular basis. Over half of the people surveyed felt that their sexual orientation had, or would have, a negative effect on getting older and would make life more complicated.
Letter to a Homophobe
We are marking each day in the week leading up to London Pride with a blog highlighting LGBTQ+ issues from home and abroad.
Hidden Flags
This time last year I wrote about why language matters and how as an LGBTQ ally it was my duty to speak up. What I’ve been thinking about this year in the run up to Pride 2019 is how much the ability to speak openly and freely is itself an important privilege.
Teach them young – the importance of shaking up the national curriculum
We are marking each day in the week leading up to London Pride with a blog highlighting LGBTQ+ issues from home and abroad.
Ban on gay and bisexual men giving blood is lifted, but there’s still work to do
The ban on gay and bisexual men giving blood was introduced in 1985, in response to the HIV and AIDs crisis impacting on the gay community. At the same time, techniques for testing for HIV were not as advanced as they are now, so it was felt it was simply too risky for gay and bisexual men to give blood. Despite there being significant advancements in HIV testing, unfortunately there are still limitations with gay and bisexual men giving blood.
Pray the gay away: cull conversion therapy worldwide
Whilst Pride month is a time to celebrate, not everyone feels able to do so. There are people across the world, including in the UK, going through conversion therapy also known as reparative treatment.
More rainbows, but also more hate crime: why Pride is still so important in 2019
We are marking each day in the week leading up to London Pride with a blog highlighting LGBTQ+ issues from home and abroad.
Two thirds of LGBTQ people still being harassed at work: IDAHOBIT is a timely reminder of the work that still needs to be done
On this day, over 130 countries around the world draw attention to the various forms of discrimination and violence that the LGBTQ community continue to experience. It serves as a reminder each year of the work which is still needed to achieve LGBTQ equality.
Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print