Clients sometimes choose to transfer their personal injury or medical negligence claim to Kingsley Napley from another firm of solicitors.
This may be because they did not realise at the outset how complicated their case would be, or, that they would need specialist solicitors.
Other clients prefer to have their case dealt with by us because we also offer Court of Protection and Deputyship services, which help manage the financial affairs of a child or an adult who does have ‘mental capacity’. This may be particularly important if a substantial amount of compensation is being claimed.
To understand some of the circumstances in which clients consider transferring a case to us and the practicalities of doing so, please see below.
- You have been advised that you do not have a case
- You would like to transfer a case to us because of our specialist expertise
- You would like us to deal with the claim and management of an injured person’s financial affairs (Deputyship)
- How does transferring a case work?
- When to contact us
Whatever your injury or medical condition, we will fight your case and support you throughout the legal process.
We are sometimes contacted by people who have been advised by another lawyer that they will not win their case.
We are happy to consider your case, and represent you, if it appears that further investigation of the claim might lead to a successful outcome.
We have achieved settlements in difficult cases and for clients who had previously been told their case would not succeed.
Our team of specialist solicitors are very experienced in personal injury and clinical negligence cases, including claims for adults and children who have suffered catastrophic injuries or have lost a loved one.
These claims can be legally complicated. It is important that they are investigated thoroughly to maximise the likelihood of success. Every one of our cases is handled by a specialist lawyer and led by a partner. We are always mindful of our clients’ needs and the potentially life enhancing effects of an appropriate package of compensation.
We support organisations that represent injured people including the Spinal Injuries Association (SIA), Headway (the brain injury association), Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) and the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL)
Our expertise in medical negligence is also recognised by high rankings in the legal directories Legal 500 and Chambers UK.
You would like us to deal with the claim and management of an injured person’s financial affairs (Deputyship)
We are able to provide an all-round service. Our Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team will handle the compensation claim, whilst working closely with our Deputyship team. That team assists in managing the financial affairs of the injured person, if they are unable to do so themselves. This ensures that the compensation is safeguarded and spent in accordance with the injured person’s best interests. Our aim is to ensure that their needs can be met throughout their lifetime.
To find out more about the role of the Deputy and our Deputyship team, see our Court of Protection and Deputyship page.
Once you decide to transfer a case to us, we will usually take the following steps:
- Funding arrangements. We will agree with you how the case will be funded going forwards. There is a range of funding options available for claims. We are usually able to agree a similar funding arrangement to the one in place with your previous solicitors.
- Transfer of files. We will make contact with your previous solicitors and give them the necessary undertakings. Your files will then be transferred to us.
- Representing you. We will familiarise ourselves with the details of your case and represent you going forwards.
- Dealing with costs. At the end of your case, we will liaise with your previous solicitors to ensure that they receive any costs owed to them at that stage. This is often paid from the costs we recover, on your behalf, from the Defendant.
We believe that it is important for clients to have a good relationship with their solicitors and feel confident that their claim is in the best hands. We would be happy to talk to or meet you, so that you can get to know us, before deciding whether to entrust us with your case.
If you would like further information regarding transferring your case, please contact us. We will discuss how we can help. If you do not want to take things further with us, there will be no charge.
Partner and Head of Department
Eurydice Cote (Français)
“There’s no comparison here. Kingsley Napley is by far the best law firm I have ever got involved with.”
A clinical negligence client
Latest blogs & news
Today the Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in this long-running case, and in plain terms, Lady Brownlie has won the Appeal.
On 6 July 2021, the Health and Social Care Committee published its report into maternity care in England. The report looks at maternity care across the country and analyses the progress of the Government so far in its commitments to improving maternity care.
Proposed changes to the Highway Code: will they improve safety for cyclists and other vulnerable road users?
Over the summer, the government suggested changes to the Highway Code to improve road safety for vulnerable road users. If the proposals are approved, they will change how pedestrians, cyclists and motorists are expected to behave on Britain’s roads.
According to the Urology Foundation, one in two of us will be affected by a urological condition in our lifetime.
10th September is World Suicide Prevention Day. Each year, on the same date, communities and organisations campaign on a global scale to raise awareness of the tragedy of suicide and explore ways in which we can all help to prevent it.
When a loved one dies, grief is difficult and there can be a lot to deal with. If someone dies as a result of medical negligence or personal injury, then it’s important to consider who can bring a claim.
Whether the claimant or defendant, successful parties to civil litigation can be disappointed to hear that they are highly unlikely to recover all of their legal spend. The losing party is only required to pay what is considered reasonable and proportionate. A key feature in what is recovered is the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged by the successful litigant’s solicitors.
An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, classic symptoms are often misdiagnosed or dismissed, which quickly lead to the patient’s death. We have experience of successfully investigating claims of this nature.
Much has been said about the 2020 Court of Appeal judgment in Swift dealing with the disputed method by which claims for the cost of special accommodation following severe injuries are calculated, and rightly so; it was a privilege for one of the authors of this article to work on a case of such wide application and with such benefit for so many Claimants.
The recent decision in the case of Malik -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provides a further example of this approach. Mr Malik required emergency spinal surgery in the form of a laminectomy and discectomy at T10/11. No criticism was made of the performance of the surgery. Post-operatively Mr Malik experienced ongoing numbness and weakness in his left leg. His surgeon recommended further revision decompression surgery which unfortunately left Mr Malik with an incomplete paraparesis. He was classified as a T7 ASIA D paraplegic.
The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?
On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?
July is International Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Awareness Month. As medical negligence specialists at Kingsley Napley, we have acted for many families who have been affected due to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of a GBS infection.
The Nursing Times recently published an article on blame culture within midwifery, which is apparently affecting staff retention. The article discussed a hearing of the Health and Social Care Select Committee which has been leading an Inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England
The FCA has launched a consultation on a technical note setting out guidance for companies applying for listing which have cannabis-related businesses. As with all companies applying for listing, those with cannabis related businesses must be assessed for eligibility for listing under the Listing Rules. Because of the legal complexities around cannabis businesses the FCA applies additional due diligence requirements to them.
June is Sands (Stillbirth and Neonatal death) Awareness Month. We are blogging to raise awareness of the work carried out by Sands and their contribution to improving bereavement care and funding research into saving babies’ lives.
This week is Cervical Screening Awareness Week which is run by Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust. This week aims to reduce confusion about human papillomavirus (HPV), de-mystify cervical screening results and highlight the importance of attending cervical screening appointments.
We’ve been running trials of E-Scooters in various parts of the UK for nearly a year and London finally followed suit this week in four boroughs with Canary Wharf to follow a little later.
It often takes many years for victims of sexual abuse to come forward. Claimants often feel embarrassed, and sometimes even partially responsible, for the abuse suffered. The Truth Project was set up in 2015 as part of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse to help victims come forwards. Over 5,000 individuals have since disclosed instances of sexual abuse as part of the Project.
Kirsty Allen discusses the report produced by The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) which finds that improvements need to be made in outpatient clinics to avoid healthcare teams confusing patients