Our Clinicial Negligence team, led by Laura Sylvester, were able to secure a life-changing settlement for a client who had suffered loss of eyesight due to misdiagnosis.
After suddenly developing jaw pain and headaches our client visited her GP who correctly suspected a case of Giant Cell Arteritis (“GCA”)/Temporal Arteritis, where the arteries at the side of the head become inflamed. This can be very serious and requires urgent attention.
Our client was prescribed a high dose of prednisolone steroids and was referred to her local NHS hospital. However, at the appointment the doctor negligently ruled out GCA/Temporal Arteritis and advised her to stop taking the prednisolone.
Her symptoms quickly worsened and she awoke one morning to discover that she had lost complete vision in her right eye. The hospital then confirmed that GCA/Temporal Arteritis had caused irreversible damage to her right eye and a permanent loss of vision.
From the outset of the claim the Hospital Trust admitted liability and complied fully with the Duty of Candour. Throughout our discussions they were open and honest about what went wrong with her care.
The claim therefore centred on “quantum”. This is the legal term which seeks to calculate the level of compensation, or “damages”, which would return the client, as far as possible, to the position they would have been in but for the negligence.
This meant that we needed to determine the point at which our client would have naturally required more assistance or a move to residential care, rather than an accelerated need for care due to the hospital’s negligence.
We successfully argued that our client’s need for residential care had been brought forward by several years and so we included a significant future loss claim for accommodation and care/therapies.
As a result of our representation the parties agreed a six figure settlement which compensated our client for her loss of vision, past losses (including adaptations made to the family home) and her future care and equipment needs.
This ensured that she could meet her future care needs, as well as any expenses incurred as she adjusts to life with injury.
If you have any questions or concerns about the topics raised in this case study please contact a member of the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team at email@example.com or call us on 020 7814 1200.
Medical Negligence & Personal Injury
Securing a life-changing settlement for a client who had suffered loss of eyesight due to misdiagnosis
Latest blogs and news
This blog summarises the position when a Defendant submits an application to commit a Claimant’s Litigation Friend for contempt of Court for false statements made in a document verified by a statement of truth.
On 2 February 2022 Mr Justice Richie gave Judgment on Cojanu, a clinical negligence claim where the Defendant advanced a defence of fundamental dishonesty.
Losing a loved one when you think it may be because they received poor medical care is incredibly stressful at a time when family and friends are grieving their loss. Often, people want to see a written record of the final days of their loved one and what happened to them, or they might want to go through years of records to ascertain whether there was diagnosis that may have been missed, such as cancer.
Ockenden Report: inadequate investigations into deaths of mothers and babies and a culture of silence
Last week the Ockenden report was finally published. A team of Midwives and Doctors, headed by Midwife, Donna Ockenden reviewed the maternity care given to 1,148 families between 2000 – 2019. The report made for shocking reading.
Breast cancer accounts for almost 15% of all new cancer cases and affects both men and women. There are an estimated 150 new cases every day. Sarah Harding’s death earlier this year was a tragic reminder that breast cancer also affects young and premenopausal women.
Today the Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in this long-running case, and in plain terms, Lady Brownlie has won the Appeal.
On 6 July 2021, the Health and Social Care Committee published its report into maternity care in England. The report looks at maternity care across the country and analyses the progress of the Government so far in its commitments to improving maternity care.
Proposed changes to the Highway Code: will they improve safety for cyclists and other vulnerable road users?
Over the summer, the government suggested changes to the Highway Code to improve road safety for vulnerable road users. If the proposals are approved, they will change how pedestrians, cyclists and motorists are expected to behave on Britain’s roads.
According to the Urology Foundation, one in two of us will be affected by a urological condition in our lifetime.
10th September is World Suicide Prevention Day. Each year, on the same date, communities and organisations campaign on a global scale to raise awareness of the tragedy of suicide and explore ways in which we can all help to prevent it.
When a loved one dies, grief is difficult and there can be a lot to deal with. If someone dies as a result of medical negligence or personal injury, then it’s important to consider who can bring a claim.
Whether the claimant or defendant, successful parties to civil litigation can be disappointed to hear that they are highly unlikely to recover all of their legal spend. The losing party is only required to pay what is considered reasonable and proportionate. A key feature in what is recovered is the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged by the successful litigant’s solicitors.
An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, classic symptoms are often misdiagnosed or dismissed, which quickly lead to the patient’s death. We have experience of successfully investigating claims of this nature.
Much has been said about the 2020 Court of Appeal judgment in Swift dealing with the disputed method by which claims for the cost of special accommodation following severe injuries are calculated, and rightly so; it was a privilege for one of the authors of this article to work on a case of such wide application and with such benefit for so many Claimants.
The recent decision in the case of Malik -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provides a further example of this approach. Mr Malik required emergency spinal surgery in the form of a laminectomy and discectomy at T10/11. No criticism was made of the performance of the surgery. Post-operatively Mr Malik experienced ongoing numbness and weakness in his left leg. His surgeon recommended further revision decompression surgery which unfortunately left Mr Malik with an incomplete paraparesis. He was classified as a T7 ASIA D paraplegic.
The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?
On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?
July is International Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Awareness Month. As medical negligence specialists at Kingsley Napley, we have acted for many families who have been affected due to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of a GBS infection.
The Nursing Times recently published an article on blame culture within midwifery, which is apparently affecting staff retention. The article discussed a hearing of the Health and Social Care Select Committee which has been leading an Inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England
The FCA has launched a consultation on a technical note setting out guidance for companies applying for listing which have cannabis-related businesses. As with all companies applying for listing, those with cannabis related businesses must be assessed for eligibility for listing under the Listing Rules. Because of the legal complexities around cannabis businesses the FCA applies additional due diligence requirements to them.