Services A-Z     Pricing

Travel Claim FAQs

On 20 October 2021 The Supreme Court of England & Wales ruled that a claim of liability against an international hotel group following a tragic holiday accident could be heard by the High Court.

This decision has significant implications for others who find themselves in similarly difficult circumstances.

You can read more about the case here, and find below the answers to some common questions raised by this ruling.

What is a travel claim, and does the phrase have a precise meaning in law?


There is no precise definition in law, and a travel claim can include everything from reimbursement for the cost of a holiday that is ruined because the accommodation is substandard to serious personal injuries arising as a result of things like car accidents, workplace injuries or clinical negligence in a foreign hospital.

 

What sort of travel claims do you deal with?


At Kingsley Napley we specialise in only serious personal injury and clinical negligence cases, and the travel cases that we deal with reflect that.  As in this particular case where our client suffered serious injury in a road accident in Egypt and her husband was killed.

 

Can I bring a travel claim if I don’t have travel insurance?


Yes. The claims that we deal with are those where you are suing a third party, so it is their insurance company that has to pay. That said, if you have travel insurance, you may also be entitled to no-fault compensation from your own insurers.

 

What does this case mean for people who have the misfortune to be killed or injured in foreign accidents?


The Supreme Court’s decision has made it easier for them to bring claims in the English Courts. The rules have always allowed this, but the Defendants, in this case, brought an Appeal which said that the rules had been misapplied in some of the previous cases and that it should in fact be much more difficult to get a claim into the English Courts.

 

 So does that mean that there is a new law?


No. The purpose of the Supreme Court is to have a clearer interpretation of the law as it stands. It has said that if an English person is injured or killed in a foreign accident (outside of the former EU) and suffers physical or financial damage in this country, then the “jurisdictional gateway” will be open to them, and they can bring their claim in the English Courts.

 

Are there different rules for European and non-European countries?


Yes. The answer to this is complicated, because of the transitional arrangements involving Britain’s departure from the European Union, but in essence, European cases still have different rules. This particular only applies to those arising elsewhere in the world.

 

If I have an accident abroad, who do I sue?

The simple answer is that you sue the person or company responsible. As with a claim in the UK, you will need to make sure that that person either has the means to pay your compensation or legal costs or has an insurance policy for that purpose. Typically that means that the claim either has to be against a big company, such as a hotel chain, or a driver with full car insurance.

 

 Is it ever possible to bring a claim against an English Travel Company?


Yes it is. For many of us, our holidays are “package holidays of one sort or another, and this means that claims are covered by the Package Travel Regulations of 1992. In essence, these regulations say that if you book a holiday through a package tour company like Thomsons, and something goes wrong on that holiday, you don’t have to worry about suing your hotel, you just sue Thomsons in the UK and their insurers have to meet any claim.

 

Do I have to check the fine print before I book a holiday?


Yes you should, and when you book a package holiday you will often find that the conditions make it very clear that the UK tour company is simply acting as an agent for a foreign hotel, so it is not a true package holiday and any claim will still have to be against the hotel.

 

You are a lawyer who deals with travel claims.  Has it put you off going on holiday?


No, not at all. I would though advise you to follow some common-sense measures, which are as follows:-

  • Wherever possible purchase a “package holiday” from a reputable UK operator.
  • Check the terms and conditions to make sure that the package includes flights, accommodation and any activities during the holiday.
  • Ensure that your holiday provider is backed by an ABTA guarantee.
  • Be wary of finding the cheapest possible deals online, and of booking directly with individuals in other countries, or small companies. If you do, enquire about their insurance arrangements.
  • Take out travel insurance, and make sure that it is still valid at the time of your holiday, and that it covers the country and/or activities that you will be taking part in on holiday. Not all insurance policies are the same, and it can be a mistake to go for the cheapest.
  • If you are injured whilst on holiday then try to gather as much evidence as possible at the time, or ask a family member to do this on your behalf. For example, take photographs, and make notes of the time and place. You should also report the accident to the local authorities as quickly as possible.
  • When you have returned to England you will need to speak to a specialist travel lawyer as soon as possible.
  • Although you will be planning to bring a claim in the English Court you should think about whether you might be better to sue in the country in which the accident happened. Therefore, either you or your English lawyer on your behalf will need to check the time limits and any special rules that apply in those countries.

 

 

If you would like any further information or advice about the topic discussed in this blog, please contact our Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team at claims@kingsleynapley.co.uk 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Terrence Donovan is the Head of the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Department. He has a national reputation and is one of the most respected and senior solicitors in the field.

 

 

Latest blogs and news

HSSIB contributes to the national investigation into maternity and neonatal services – but will change ever be implemented?

The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) has shared insights into safety concerns raised by women and families and other stakeholders about maternity and neonatal care within NHS England, highlighting once again the need for meaningful change.

NHS Patient Safety Investigations: Have I got a Legal Claim?

Where there has been a concern surrounding medical care at an NHS Hospital, an internal investigation may be carried out and a written report produced to assist with learning from the incident. From a patient perspective, the report can be helpful in understanding more about the event and what, if anything, went wrong.

Problems with glaucoma care at the George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust

We are extremely concerned to read reports that treatment guidelines relating to glaucoma allegedly have not been followed at the George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust in Warwickshire, leading to patients’ sight being harmed. Some patients are said to have suffered permanent visual damage.

 

NHSR Annual Report: Clinical Negligence under the spotlight

Each year NHS Resolution, the body dealing with legal claims against the NHS, produces a report which provides insights into what is happening with clinical negligence claims. This year the picture is very mixed. It shows that claims for clinical negligence are on the rise although more cases are being settled without the need for Court proceedings. Nonetheless, despite Government efforts, high levels of maternity cases and associated costs persist.

 

Providing Medical Treatment to a Non-English-Speaking Patient

In this blog, Richard Lodge talks about providing medical treatment to a non-english speaking patient

Outdated, Failing and in Short Supply: NHS Equipment Crisis Putting Patients at Risk

According to a recent article in The Guardian NHS England has confirmed that since 2022, equipment failures within the NHS have been responsible for:

  • 87 patient deaths
  • 68 patients severely harmed who suffered permanent damage or reduced life expectancy
  • 522 patients moderately harmed whose independence was subsequently limited for up to 6 months

James Bell published in the APIL PI Focus Magazine

Kingsley Napley’s head of Medical Negligence and Personal Injury has had an article published in this month’s APIL PI Focus magazine which includes a collection of articles examining the topic of birth injury. James’ piece deals with causation and the doctrine of material contribution in legal claims for hypoxic brain injuries during birth.

When metal hip replacements go wrong

Hip replacement surgery is very common, restoring mobility and quality of life to thousands every year in the UK. It is recognised to be the most cost effective for the NHS in returning patients to productive lives. The components wearing surfaces may be metal, ceramic or plastic, and will often last over 20 to 25 years, or even longer for some people. 

Is this the turning point for maternity care?

Concerns over NHS maternity care are very sadly seldom out of the news. As a lawyer who has specialised in birth injury claims over many years, it has been all too clear to me for a long time, that far too many women and babies, fail to receive anywhere close to adequate maternity care leading in some instances to devastating outcomes.

Why Fatigue of NHS Staff Matters and the Risk it Poses to Patient Safety

Fatigue within the NHS presents a significant risk to patient safety, yet in healthcare its consequences remain largely unrecognised despite the increasing demands on NHS workforces.

Litigation Friends

While we mostly associate dementia with the affect it can have on our memory, it can also affect our ability to think and communicate and our capacity to manage our own affairs.  When undertaking legal proceedings, as solicitors, we have a duty to ensure that our clients have the mental capacity to give proper instructions to bring, or defend, a claim.  Where our client does not have the necessary capacity, a Litigation Friend may be appointed

Brain injuries: the good, the bad and the inspiring

We are now in Action for Brain Injury week, run annually by the charity Headway to raise awareness and understanding of the different aspects of brain injury. The theme this year is ‘On a good day’ which aims to highlight the fluctuating and unpredictable nature of brain injury and the gap that can arise between someone’s capabilities on a good day versus a bad day. Headway wants people to see both sides of the story. It seeks to change behaviours and opinions towards those who might be having an ‘all-too-common bad day’.

 

Women’s Health Series 4: Cancer Claims

New research suggests that UK cancer cases have risen in women but fallen in men. Women’s cancers include gynaecological cancer (i.e. cervical, ovarian and vaginal cancers) and breast cancer. Here I look at the impacts of delays in diagnosis and treatment failures, provide some guidance on bringing a medical negligence claim and consider why there is hope for the future with new technologies.

Women’s Health Series: 3. Hysterectomy Claims

A lack of awareness and understanding appears to exist when it comes to women’s reproductive health conditions, and the diagnosis and treatment of hysterectomies is no exception to this.

In this blog we will be discussing where negligence can occur in relation to the treatment of hysterectomies, from initial misdiagnoses to surgical errors.

Women’s Health Series: 2. Endometriosis, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Fertility Claims

Endometriosis and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) are two conditions which affect a large number of women every year, and can have devastating effects on fertility and well-being, but frustratingly continue to experience long delays in diagnosis.

Women’s Health Series: 1. Gynaecology Care Crisis

As a lawyer specialising in women’s health claims, I am increasingly concerned about the challenges facing those seeking access to care for issues around gynaecology and reproductive health. Problems in this area are rife. They include very long waiting times, delays in diagnosis, a lack of understanding by some medical professionals, instances of discrimination as well as women reporting feelings of being dismissed.

Missed screening for life threatening conditions

We are extremely concerned that it has been revealed thousands of patients have not been invited for routine screening for certain cancers and for abdominal aortic aneurism as a result of failings in their GP registration process. The full impact of this is not yet known but records indicate that among those not screened, some people have been diagnosed with a relevant cancer and some may have died.

Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy and Brain Damage Claims

Our Medical Negligence team at Kingsley Napley has recently been supporting pioneering charity Peeps HIE as a Corporate Friend. Globally, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a leading cause of disability, affecting around three million babies each year.  This fantastic charity – the only one in the UK dedicated to supporting those affected by HIE – provides essential help to parents, families and friends.

 

Gestational Diabetes – The Case for Early Diagnosis

Gestational diabetes affects 1 in 20 pregnancies in the UK, according to Diabetes UK. The condition involves high blood sugar levels, resulting from the body not being able to produce sufficient insulin because of hormone changes, and can occur at any point during pregnancy. Being diagnosed with gestational diabetes can be worrying, but with proper management, most women diagnosed with gestational diabetes will have a healthy baby and a normal pregnancy. However, the condition can pose risks to both mother and baby. Early detection and proper management and support are vital to reduce the risks and new research suggests there would be benefits from changing the way the condition is diagnosed. 

Landmark reform: no time limit for Child Sexual Abuse claims

Today the Government announced landmark reform to child sexual abuse personal injury claims. In legislation expected to be put before parliament next year, the 3-year time limit to bring such claims, which begins to run from a Claimant’s 18th birthday, will be abolished. The burden of proof on determining whether there can be a fair hearing will also shift, from the Claimant to the Defendant.  

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility