On 20 October 2021 The Supreme Court of England & Wales ruled that a claim of liability against an international hotel group following a tragic holiday accident could be heard by the High Court.
This decision has significant implications for others who find themselves in similarly difficult circumstances.
You can read more about the case here, and find below the answers to some common questions raised by this ruling.
What is a travel claim, and does the phrase have a precise meaning in law?
There is no precise definition in law, and a travel claim can include everything from reimbursement for the cost of a holiday that is ruined because the accommodation is substandard to serious personal injuries arising as a result of things like car accidents, workplace injuries or clinical negligence in a foreign hospital.
What sort of travel claims do you deal with?
At Kingsley Napley we specialise in only serious personal injury and clinical negligence cases, and the travel cases that we deal with reflect that. As in this particular case where our client suffered serious injury in a road accident in Egypt and her husband was killed.
Can I bring a travel claim if I don’t have travel insurance?
Yes. The claims that we deal with are those where you are suing a third party, so it is their insurance company that has to pay. That said, if you have travel insurance, you may also be entitled to no-fault compensation from your own insurers.
What does this case mean for people who have the misfortune to be killed or injured in foreign accidents?
The Supreme Court’s decision has made it easier for them to bring claims in the English Courts. The rules have always allowed this, but the Defendants, in this case, brought an Appeal which said that the rules had been misapplied in some of the previous cases and that it should in fact be much more difficult to get a claim into the English Courts.
So does that mean that there is a new law?
No. The purpose of the Supreme Court is to have a clearer interpretation of the law as it stands. It has said that if an English person is injured or killed in a foreign accident (outside of the former EU) and suffers physical or financial damage in this country, then the “jurisdictional gateway” will be open to them, and they can bring their claim in the English Courts.
Are there different rules for European and non-European countries?
Yes. The answer to this is complicated, because of the transitional arrangements involving Britain’s departure from the European Union, but in essence, European cases still have different rules. This particular only applies to those arising elsewhere in the world.
If I have an accident abroad, who do I sue?
The simple answer is that you sue the person or company responsible. As with a claim in the UK, you will need to make sure that that person either has the means to pay your compensation or legal costs or has an insurance policy for that purpose. Typically that means that the claim either has to be against a big company, such as a hotel chain, or a driver with full car insurance.
Is it ever possible to bring a claim against an English Travel Company?
Yes it is. For many of us, our holidays are “package holidays of one sort or another, and this means that claims are covered by the Package Travel Regulations of 1992. In essence, these regulations say that if you book a holiday through a package tour company like Thomsons, and something goes wrong on that holiday, you don’t have to worry about suing your hotel, you just sue Thomsons in the UK and their insurers have to meet any claim.
Do I have to check the fine print before I book a holiday?
Yes you should, and when you book a package holiday you will often find that the conditions make it very clear that the UK tour company is simply acting as an agent for a foreign hotel, so it is not a true package holiday and any claim will still have to be against the hotel.
You are a lawyer who deals with travel claims. Has it put you off going on holiday?
No, not at all. I would though advise you to follow some common-sense measures, which are as follows:-
- Wherever possible purchase a “package holiday” from a reputable UK operator.
- Check the terms and conditions to make sure that the package includes flights, accommodation and any activities during the holiday.
- Ensure that your holiday provider is backed by an ABTA guarantee.
- Be wary of finding the cheapest possible deals online, and of booking directly with individuals in other countries, or small companies. If you do, enquire about their insurance arrangements.
- Take out travel insurance, and make sure that it is still valid at the time of your holiday, and that it covers the country and/or activities that you will be taking part in on holiday. Not all insurance policies are the same, and it can be a mistake to go for the cheapest.
- If you are injured whilst on holiday then try to gather as much evidence as possible at the time, or ask a family member to do this on your behalf. For example, take photographs, and make notes of the time and place. You should also report the accident to the local authorities as quickly as possible.
- When you have returned to England you will need to speak to a specialist travel lawyer as soon as possible.
- Although you will be planning to bring a claim in the English Court you should think about whether you might be better to sue in the country in which the accident happened. Therefore, either you or your English lawyer on your behalf will need to check the time limits and any special rules that apply in those countries.
If you would like any further information or advice about the topic discussed in this blog, please contact our Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team at firstname.lastname@example.org
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Terrence Donovan is the Head of the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Department. He has a national reputation and is one of the most respected and senior solicitors in the field.
Partner and Head of Department
Eurydice Cote (Français)
Latest blogs and news
This blog summarises the position when a Defendant submits an application to commit a Claimant’s Litigation Friend for contempt of Court for false statements made in a document verified by a statement of truth.
On 2 February 2022 Mr Justice Richie gave Judgment on Cojanu, a clinical negligence claim where the Defendant advanced a defence of fundamental dishonesty.
Losing a loved one when you think it may be because they received poor medical care is incredibly stressful at a time when family and friends are grieving their loss. Often, people want to see a written record of the final days of their loved one and what happened to them, or they might want to go through years of records to ascertain whether there was diagnosis that may have been missed, such as cancer.
Ockenden Report: inadequate investigations into deaths of mothers and babies and a culture of silence
Last week the Ockenden report was finally published. A team of Midwives and Doctors, headed by Midwife, Donna Ockenden reviewed the maternity care given to 1,148 families between 2000 – 2019. The report made for shocking reading.
Breast cancer accounts for almost 15% of all new cancer cases and affects both men and women. There are an estimated 150 new cases every day. Sarah Harding’s death earlier this year was a tragic reminder that breast cancer also affects young and premenopausal women.
Today the Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in this long-running case, and in plain terms, Lady Brownlie has won the Appeal.
On 6 July 2021, the Health and Social Care Committee published its report into maternity care in England. The report looks at maternity care across the country and analyses the progress of the Government so far in its commitments to improving maternity care.
Proposed changes to the Highway Code: will they improve safety for cyclists and other vulnerable road users?
Over the summer, the government suggested changes to the Highway Code to improve road safety for vulnerable road users. If the proposals are approved, they will change how pedestrians, cyclists and motorists are expected to behave on Britain’s roads.
According to the Urology Foundation, one in two of us will be affected by a urological condition in our lifetime.
10th September is World Suicide Prevention Day. Each year, on the same date, communities and organisations campaign on a global scale to raise awareness of the tragedy of suicide and explore ways in which we can all help to prevent it.
When a loved one dies, grief is difficult and there can be a lot to deal with. If someone dies as a result of medical negligence or personal injury, then it’s important to consider who can bring a claim.
Whether the claimant or defendant, successful parties to civil litigation can be disappointed to hear that they are highly unlikely to recover all of their legal spend. The losing party is only required to pay what is considered reasonable and proportionate. A key feature in what is recovered is the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged by the successful litigant’s solicitors.
An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, classic symptoms are often misdiagnosed or dismissed, which quickly lead to the patient’s death. We have experience of successfully investigating claims of this nature.
Much has been said about the 2020 Court of Appeal judgment in Swift dealing with the disputed method by which claims for the cost of special accommodation following severe injuries are calculated, and rightly so; it was a privilege for one of the authors of this article to work on a case of such wide application and with such benefit for so many Claimants.
The recent decision in the case of Malik -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provides a further example of this approach. Mr Malik required emergency spinal surgery in the form of a laminectomy and discectomy at T10/11. No criticism was made of the performance of the surgery. Post-operatively Mr Malik experienced ongoing numbness and weakness in his left leg. His surgeon recommended further revision decompression surgery which unfortunately left Mr Malik with an incomplete paraparesis. He was classified as a T7 ASIA D paraplegic.
The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?
On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?
July is International Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Awareness Month. As medical negligence specialists at Kingsley Napley, we have acted for many families who have been affected due to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of a GBS infection.
The Nursing Times recently published an article on blame culture within midwifery, which is apparently affecting staff retention. The article discussed a hearing of the Health and Social Care Select Committee which has been leading an Inquiry into the safety of maternity services in England
The FCA has launched a consultation on a technical note setting out guidance for companies applying for listing which have cannabis-related businesses. As with all companies applying for listing, those with cannabis related businesses must be assessed for eligibility for listing under the Listing Rules. Because of the legal complexities around cannabis businesses the FCA applies additional due diligence requirements to them.