FCA sharpens focus on crypto cowboys
The Government has now launched a consultation seeking views on its proposal to bring certain types of cryptoassets within the scope of the financial promotions regulation regime, in recognition that promotions and advertising play an important role in financial decisions made by individuals. This consultation is being run alongside a second consultation on proposed amendments to the regulatory framework for the approval of financial promotions generally.
The restriction on financial promotions is contained within section 21 of Financial Services and Market Act (FSMA) 2000 which provides that:
A person will be engaging in ‘investment activity’ for the purposes of section 21 FSMA if they:
The list of controlled activities and investments are contained in Schedule 1 to the FSMA 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Financial Promotion Order).
There are exemptions to the restriction on financial promotions; including promotions by authorised people or promotions by unauthorised people which are approved by an authorised person. Failure to comply with section 21 FSMA is a criminal offence which carries a maximum sentence of two years’ imprisonment.
In the UK the FCA regulate cryptoassets in two ways: they are the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing supervisor for businesses carrying out certain cryptoasset activities and they are also the conduct regulator for businesses which carry out activities involving certain types of cryptoassets.
As of January this year, businesses which carry on cryptoasset activity must now ensure they comply with the UK’s anti-money laundering regime as other financial institutions do. This includes exchanges, ATMs, peer-to-peer providers, issuers of new cryptoassets (for example Initial Coin Offerings), publishers of certain open-source software (for example non-custodian wallet providers) and custodian wallet providers. Please see our blog ‘The (quiet) extension of the AML regime: an overview’ for details of the new regulations.
Related to this, on 22 July, the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group (JMLSG) updated its sectoral guidance on prevention of money laundering / combating terrorist financing for the financial services sector to include cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers.
At present the only categories of cryptoassets which fall within the FCA’s regulatory perimeter and therefore require a business to obtain authorisation are security tokens and e-money tokens. Some investment products such as derivative contracts that reference cryptoassets are likely to also fall within the perimeter (even if the underlying cryptoassets are unregulated as below).
Security tokens and e-money tokens are already subject to the financial promotions regime by virtue of their regulated status. The Government now proposes to place other unregulated cryptoassets within the grasp of the restrictions on promotion by adding the category of ‘qualifying cryptoassets’ to the list of controlled investments under the Financial Promotion Order. A ‘qualifying cryptoasset’ would be defined as:
“any cryptographically secured digital representation of value or contractual rights that uses a form of distributed ledger technology and which —
(a) is fungible; (this means it is freely replaceable by another of a similar nature or kind);
(b) is transferable or confers transferable rights, or is promoted as being transferable or as conferring transferable rights;
(c) is not any other controlled investment as described in this Part;
(d) is not electronic money within the meaning given in the Electronic Money Regulations 2011; and
(e) is not currency issued by a central bank or other public authority.”
The list of controlled activities under the Financial Promotions Order would also be amended to include activities in relation to the buying, selling, subscribing for or underwriting of these ‘qualifying cryptoassets’.
Finally the Government proposes to add a new exemption to the Financial Promotions Order which would ensure vendors merely offering to accept cryptoassets in exchange for their goods or services, and buyers merely offering cryptoassets to pay for goods and services, in the same manner as they would accept pound sterling payments, are not captured under the regime.
In its 2020 budget the Government committed to consulting on the UK’s broader regulatory approach to the cryptoasset market later in the year. This could include expansion of the scope of the Regulated Activities Order in order to bring further types of cryptoasset within the FCA’s regulatory perimeter. The Government however has been careful to emphasise the need for ‘further analysis of the market to fully assess its distinctive and still-evolving technological features and risks.’
In any event the growing interest in cryptoassets (in the last week alone Bitcoin has risen over 11% in value and Mastercard has expanded its cryptocurrency programme) can only lead to greater regulation.
Our team of specialist cryptoasset lawyers bring together legal expertise from multiple disciplines across the firm, including our corporate and commercial, regulatory, dispute resolution, criminal, family and employment practices. Please contact us if you require any further information or assistance, or read further blogs on cryptoassets here.
Jill Lorimer is a Partner in the Criminal Litigation team and has an extensive track record in advising firms and individuals facing regulatory and criminal investigations by the FCA. Jill has particular expertise in advising firms who are, or who may be, under the scrutiny of the FCA and in taking a proactive approach to head off potentially adverse action.
With the price of crypto assets generally making a good recovery from the Covid-19 related decline of 2019 contrasted with the very recent volatility following issues with the adoption of the cryptocurrency as legal tender in El Salvador, investors in cryptocurrencies might be considering realising some of their gains to try to help minimise any further instability.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), in its annual business plan published today, sets out its areas of focus for the year ahead. It is, as ever, essential reading for all those in the regulated sector.
For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.
A Director at the National Crime Agency recently voiced concern about crypto assets being used to fund property purchases in the UK. The NCA’s Nigel Leary was quoted by The Times as saying: “Anything purchased with crypto assets I’d be slightly sceptical about. I’d like to see why they’re being done in that way and what the requirement is for that anonymity, and why it needed to be done in a crypto transaction.”
Despite the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 was an incredible year for crypto assets. Largely driven by the increased demand from institutional investors, Bitcoin shattered its previous price records. However, its pseudonymous nature and the ease with which it allows users to instantly send funds anywhere in the world makes crypto assets appealing to criminals.
Hot on the heels of its consultation on bringing cryptoasset inside the scope of the financial promotions regime at the tail end of last year, the FCA has launched a further consultation on the UK’s regulatory approach to cryptoassets and stablecoins.
As of 10 January 2021, all cryptoasset firms are required to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Money Laundering Regulations.
Research recently undertaken by the FCA has found that 5.35% of the UK population hold (or have previously held) cryptoassets where in 2019 this figure was 3%. For several years now the Government, the Bank of England and the FCA have been consulting on and considering how best to regulate this burgeoning market.
The year 2019 started with plenty of optimism regarding the growth of Security Token Offerings (STOs). Many articles at the start of the year suggested, like one on TokenMarket, that “it’s looking very likely that 2019 will be the year of the security token offering”. In this blog we look back on some of the key moments of 2019 with regard to STOs and consider whether 2019 really was the dawning of a new era worthy of the revolutionary hype back at the start of the year. However, if you would first like to take a step back and digest a user-friendly introduction to the concept of security tokens, please listen to our podcast or read our earlier crypto assets blog.
In just ten years, cryptoassets have become a £100 billion industry. We now face the alarming prospect that millions of pounds can be hidden behind a few lines of computer code without ever touching a bank account. If your soon-to-be ex-partner has made a fortune with Bitcoin, how do you get a share?
The tenth anniversary of the first ever BitCoin transaction will fall in April 2020. Not many people are using cryptoassets for everyday transactions, such as a takeaway pizza order and as such Satoshi Nakamoto’s vision of a stateless peer to peer electronic currency is yet to be realised, but in the last few years cryptoassets have certainly entered the public consciousness, even if that does mostly relate to the huge spike in the value of BitCoin in December 2017.
Security tokens are a digital representation of ownership rights in real world assets (such as property or shares) and have captured the curiosity of entrepreneurs, startups and investors. This blog summarises the potential benefits and pitfalls of security tokens and is part of our wider crypto assets blog.
The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) case of B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd  SGHC(I) 03 considers how the law relating to mistake could apply to contracts formed on an automated basis by computers using algorithmic software.
Whether you are in the market for short-term profit or making long-term investments, adequate planning is certainly a worthwhile (and small) investment of your time and money. If you’ve been savyy enough to successfully invest in crypto-assets, make sure you are smart enough to ensure your loved ones can benefit, should the worst happen.
“Cryptoassets have attracted significant and growing attention from consumers, markets, governments and regulators globally”, stated the FCA earlier this year in launching its consultation on its Guidance on Cryptoassests. Jill Lorimer has previously commented on the Cryptoassests guidance.
The aim of the Guidance is to “provide regulatory clarity for market participants carrying on activities in this space” and it appears to do just that.
The recent confirmation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that it is investigating 18 firms involved in the sale of crypto assets, such as Bitcoin, indicates a ramping up of regulatory focus on the controversial sector.
The Treasury Committee’s inquiry into economic crime is one of the most wide-ranging of the committee’s current workstreams, and its conclusions are keenly awaited.
As well as assessing the effectiveness of the anti-money laundering regime in the UK, MPs have been examining the impact of economic crime on consumers.
Earlier this month, the Lord Chancellor David Gauke confirmed that a new 18 courtroom legal centre is to be built on the site of Fleetbank House in London which will focus on issues such as economic crime (including fraud) and cyber crime. Due to be established in 2025, this “state-of-the-art court” is to give the message to the world that Britain “stands ready to deal with the changing nature of 21st century crime”.
On 11 June, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a “Dear CEO” letter on how banks should deal with the financial crime risks associated with “cryptoassets”. The FCA defines cryptoassets as publicly available mediums of exchange that feature a distributed ledger and decentralised system for exchanging value, such as Bitcoin and Ether. These assets are more commonly known as cryptocurrencies.
Regulators around the world are calling for cryptocurrencies to be brought within the remit of financial regulation. To date, the focus has largely been on Bitcoin, which was the predominant cryptocurrency traded on some of the largest dark web markets. However, in light of the call for better oversight, the value of Bitcoin plummeted and evidence suggests that users are moving towards alternatives that afford greater anonymity.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility