FCA signals streamlining of its own processes and toughening up of the regulatory gateway

15 July 2021

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), in its annual business plan published today, sets out its areas of focus for the year ahead. It is, as ever, essential reading for all those in the regulated sector.

Some of the key headlines include the following:

Streamlining FCA decision-making

The business plan confirms the FCA’s intention to streamline its own decision-making process in respect of authorisation and certain supervisory and enforcement actions by 'changing the balance' of decisions taken by the FCA Executive and the Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC). This, it explains, is to allow the organisation to make decisions faster to protect consumers and market integrity. This signals a likely rationalisation of current RDC processes but also a potential shift away from the RDC for certain types of decisions currently reserved to it.

Of course, few would argue against measures to expedite the FCA’s internal decision-making processes which can seem interminable for those caught up in the process. However, regulated firms and individuals will be concerned that these changes may reduce the role of the RDC, and the welcome degree of independence which it brings, as an increasing number of decisions are effectively rubber-stamped by wholly internal committees without any degree of independent scrutiny.

Toughening the authorisations regime

Another key theme is the proposed strengthening of the authorisations gateway to make it more difficult for firms to gain authorised status.  Standards, we are told, will be higher and applications for authorisation will be more intensively scrutinised.

Once authorised, firms will be subject to a greater degree of scrutiny to ensure that high standards are maintained. In recognition of the fact that authorisation decisions are based on business plans submitted by the firm which can evolve significantly in the early stages, a greater degree of oversight will be applied to new firms to ensure rules are complied with and potential harms identified. While some may take comfort from the phrase ‘regulatory nursery’, it will be interesting to see how the balance will actually lie between effective support on one hand and an elevated threat of supervisory intervention on the other. New firms experiencing significant growth will be a particular area of focus to ensure that any rapid scaling-up is appropriate and sustainable.

The FCA anticipates that there will be an initial increase in refusal / withdrawal / rejection rates to reflect the higher barrier to entry. It also anticipates a reduction in complaints to the Financial Ombudsman regarding newly-authorised firms in light of these changes.

At the other end of the life-cycle, the FCA is currently conducting a ‘use it or lose it’ review and piloting the removal of firms’ permissions where they are not carrying out the regulated activities to which these relate. The purpose of this exercise is to drive out ‘the halo effect’, or the practice of firms using the regulatory oversight of one activity to add unwarranted credibility to its other, unregulated activities.

Appointed Representatives under scrutiny

The Appointed Representative (AR) regime – under which unauthorised firms carry out certain regulated activities with authorised firms bearing ultimate responsibility for these activities – has come under increasing attention in recent years due to a perceived lack of due diligence and oversight being exercised by the principal firms. The AR system is increasingly viewed as a weak spot in the regulatory perimeter which has allowed regulated activities to be conducted by those who would not meet current, let alone what are likely to be increasing, authorisation standards in their own right with inadequate supervision from their principal firms.

The FCA intends to increase the level of targeted supervision with a focus on ARs in wholesale markets. It also intends to consult later this year on wider, cross-sector changes to strengthen the regime. Significantly, the business plan alludes to the potential need for changes to the applicable legislation - the Financial Markets and Services Act 2000 - to bring about more fundamental changes to the regime. Firms whose business models rely on the AR structure will wish to closely follow developments in this area as a fundamental overhaul of the AR system could be in prospect.

Changes to the financial promotions regime

Financial promotions have been a particular area of focus for the regulator following the recently-concluded independent review into its regulation of London Capital & Finance plc. The business plan highlights the measures already taken by the organisation to fast-track its supervisory and enforcement response to breaches of financial promotions rules in light of the findings of the review.

Looking ahead, the FCA intends to consult on its proposed strengthening of the applicable rules and the authorised firms which approve these promotions. It will also work closely with the Treasury in respect of the proposed new legislation which will require authorised firms to pass through a new regulatory gateway prior to approving financial promotions for unauthorised persons, as well as on the proposed extension of financial promotion rules to investment in cryptoassets.

Focus on fraud

The business plan identifies fraud as one the most important cross-market issues which the FCA intends to address over the coming year. Much of this builds on work already underway and emphasises themes which have been for many years at the heart of the organisation’s anti-fraud strategy: there is therefore a strong sense of ‘more of the same’ in this year’s business plan.

This year’s plan recognises the need for proactive surveillance, triage and intervention and the increasing role played by online platforms in exposing customers to risk from fraudulent or high-risk schemes. It also highlights the FCA’s work with partner agencies to remove fraudsters from within the regulated perimeter, such as its collaboration with the Payment Systems Regulator on Authorised Push Payment fraud.

Further information

For more information on any issues raised in this blog post, please contact a member of our FCA Investigation team.


About the author

Jill Lorimer is a Partner in our Criminal Litigation team and has an extensive track record in advising firms and individuals facing regulatory and criminal investigations by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Jill has particular expertise in advising firms who are, or who may be, under the scrutiny of the FCA and in taking a proactive approach to head off potentially adverse action. She also advises individuals applying to be FCA approved persons as well as those whose approved status is at risk.


Latest Blogs & News

The FCA – Transformation to Assertive Supervision

There can be little doubt that the failure of London Capital & Finance Plc, and the subsequent report by Dame Elizabeth Gloster, have significantly changed the FCA’s approach to the supervision of regulated firms and protection of consumers in an increasingly complex financial environment. 

Overseas Production Orders: Companies should prepare for new powers to gather electronic data

The Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Act 2019 (COPOA) was enacted three years ago to give law enforcement agencies the power to directly obtain electronic data from service providers based outside the UK for the purpose of preventing, detecting and investigating serious crimes through the use of Overseas Production Orders (OPOs).

Acting to stop harm: the FCA and Appointed Representatives

On 13 May 2022, the FCA published a final refusing Alexander Jon Compliance Consulting Ltd.’s (“AJCC”) application for authorisation to provide regulatory hosting services. There is no specific definition of what a regulatory host is, but the FCA generally regards it as a commercial arrangement whereby an authorised Principal firm appoints and oversees a number of unconnected Appointed Representatives (“ARs”) which operate across a range of markets. 

The rule of law in Ukraine during martial law: Review of changes to the criminal process

We are delighted to present, as a guest blog, the thoughts and views of Dr Valentyn Gvozdiy, managing partner of Golaw in Kyiv. Dr Gvozdiy outlines the significant changes to criminal procedure that have been heralded by the Russian invasion of his country and the subsequent adoption of martial law.

Cross-Border Criminal Law Conference 2022: Individual and Corporate Accountability for International Crimes

On Thursday 5 May, Kingsley Napley hosted the 4th annual Cross-Border Criminal Law Conference, which focused on individual and corporate accountability for international crimes.

Health and Safety Quarterly Update – Q1 2022

This quarterly update provides a summary of a selection number of news stories relating to health and safety investigations and prosecutions, published in the period January - March 2022.

National Security and Investment Act 2021 – an expansive approach to liability

Whilst it is anticipated that prosecutions under the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (‘the Act’) will be exceptionally rare, the criminal sanctions set out in it are explicitly framed to create a “sufficiently robust deterrent to ensure compliance.” The provisions punish corporates and individual officers who connive or consent to commit an offence, as well as individual officers who are negligent (s.36). In addition, they are also extra-territorial (s.52), meaning that the scope of liability is particularly wide-ranging.

Environmental Law Quarterly Update Q1 - 2022

This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories in the period January 2022 – March 2022

KN's Cross Border Criminal Law Conference on 5 May 2022 | Panel Discussion: 20 years since the Pinochet case – the current state of universal jurisdiction in the UK

The Prime Minister recently committed the UK’s support to achieving justice in respect of the war crimes allegations arising out of the Ukraine conflict. The conflict and associated allegations raise questions over the UK’s commitment and ability to bring prosecutions under the doctrine of “universal jurisdiction”. Universal jurisdiction describes the jurisdiction that is available in the national courts of many countries to prosecute individuals for the most serious international crimes, even if those crimes occurred abroad and neither the defendants nor victims have any connection to that country. Why only a few such prosecutions have taken place in the UK will be the topic of one of two panel discussions at Kingsley Napley’s Cross Border Criminal Law Conference on 5 May 2022.

International Criminal Law Quarterly Round-Up: Q1 2022

This quarterly international criminal law update provides a summary of the news stories in the period January – March 2022. The relevance of international criminal law has been tragically highlighted by the current events in the Ukraine. This fast moving event has been covered below, along with a number of other international criminal law updates.

US rap artists are backing legislation to keep lyrics out of courtrooms –is it time for UK artists to do the same?

News broke last month that megastars Jay-Z, Meek Mill, Big Sean, Kelly Rowland and Fat Joe (among others) were supporting the introduction of a New York state law that aims to prevent the prosecution using rap lyrics in criminal trials.

Is Russia now facing suspension from INTERPOL?

On 28 February 2022, the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel announced to parliament that the UK would be ‘leading all international efforts’ to suspend Russia’s membership of INTERPOL.  

This came moments before the Ukrainian minister of internal affairs, Denis Monastyrsky, made a public statement demanding Russia’s immediate expulsion from the organisation for “violating its basic principles and massive misuse of tools and services to cover up its crimes and persecute political enemies, particularly in Ukraine.”

International prisoner transfer: serving a sentence back in the UK

The news is never short of horror stories involving travellers who find themselves detained in a foreign country. This is sadly a reality for thousands of British citizens who, for a variety of reasons, are being held in a prison abroad.

A new Economic Crime Bill and the accelerated introduction of a Register of Overseas Entities

A new bill will be put forward to parliament tomorrow with the aim of increasing transparency of ownership of property in the UK. The introduction of this new Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill has been expedited following the sanctions announced last week, however the drive for change began over five years ago and that it is finally coming to fruition will be welcomed by many.


Extradition post-Brexit: the Irish questions answered

On 16 November the CJEU delivered its judgment following the publication of the Advocate General’s opinion on the UK-Ireland extradition questions which we wrote about here. The decision concerned the mechanisms for extradition to the UK from Ireland in two scenarios (1) under the terms of the withdrawal agreement from 1 February to 31 December 2020 and (2) under the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (“TCA”) from 1 January 2021.

The judgment confirms the AG’s Opinion that Ireland is bound by the withdrawal agreement and the TCA (“the agreements”) in respect of extradition arrangements with the UK and accordingly extradition from Ireland to the UK post-Brexit will continue under those terms.

Review of recent corporate manslaughter cases: Deco-Pak, Bosley Mill, Aster Healthcare

This blogs considers the recent corporate manslaughter conviction of Deco-Pak and two other recent corporate manslaughter cases, Bosley Mill and Aster Healthcare and what they tell us about the current approach to this offence. In January 2022 a garden supplies firm, Deco-Pak was found guilty of corporate manslaughter following a fatal accident at the Deco-Pak premises in Hipperholme, West Yorkshire on 14 April 2017.

What is the Medical Cannabis (Access) Bill?

The Medical Cannabis (Access) Bill (the ‘Bill’) aims to enable patients in England to access cannabis-based medicinal products (‘CBMPs’), such as nabiximols, more freely on the NHS. Although English law was changed in November 2018 to allow specialist doctors to prescribe cannabis (we have blogged about this here), very few people have been able to access NHS prescriptions which has left patients paying thousands of pounds a month for private prescriptions or unable to obtain treatment altogether. There are approximately 10,000 private prescriptions for CBMPs in the UK. In a paper published by BMJ Open in 2020, Professor David Nutt et. al. reported that thousands of UK patients were self-medicating with illicit cannabis-based products.

FCA as gatekeeper of UK crypto AML regime: two years in

On 10 January 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) became the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) supervisor for UK cryptoasset firms. Two years in, how effectively is it performing its role as the gatekeeper of the new registration regime?

Medicinal Cannabis – Where Are We Now?

Guest author Edward Henry QC, of Mountford Chambers, considers the ongoing issues regarding access to medicinal cannabis, specifically relating to the treatment of children, in the United Kingdom (UK).

Environmental Law Quarterly Update - Q4 2021

This quarterly environmental law update provides a summary of news stories published in the period October – December 2021.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility