The year 2019 started with plenty of optimism regarding the growth of Security Token Offerings (STOs). Many articles at the start of the year suggested, like 2019 Will Be the Year of the Security Token Offering on TokenMarket, that “it’s looking very likely that 2019 will be the year of the security token offering”. In this blog we look back on some of the key moments of 2019 with regard to STOs and consider whether 2019 really was the dawning of a new era worthy of the revolutionary hype back at the start of the year. However, if you would first like to take a step back and digest a user-friendly introduction to the concept of security tokens, please listen to our podcast Tech in Two Minutes - Episode 1 - Security Tokens or read our earlier crypto assets blog Security tokens: a new class of crypto assets.
Crypto assets building credibility
In January 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) launched a consultation on the regulatory perimeter for crypto assets which culminated in its feedback and final guidance being issued in July for the benefit of firms dealing in crypto assets as well as professional advisers, investment managers and consumers participating in the market. Broadly speaking, security tokens are considered as being equivalent to traditional financial assets such as shares or bonds. As such, security tokens do fall within the FCA’s regulatory remit.
The FCA’s guidance is an important development in the UK because with clarity comes a greater understanding of risk and potentially confidence for investment and growth. The crypto assets market is fast moving and the FCA has acknowledged the need to work with other regulators to ensure consistent treatment of these assets across national borders as securities markets and legal regulatory frameworks vary between jurisdictions.
The FCA has continuously supported the UK’s crypto assets ecosystem by hosting regulatory “sandboxes” which allow participating businesses to test innovative propositions in the market with real consumers in a controlled regulatory environment. In April 2019, it was reported that 20|30, a London based blockchain startup with the ambition of tokenising equity and other securities (and a participant of the 4th cohort of the FCA’s sandbox), raised £3 million by selling tokenised shares and settling them in a test environment on the London Stock Exchange’s Turquoise platform. This is understood to be the first share issue of its kind using blockchain technology.
A feature of security tokens that distinguishes them from other crypto assets (such as utility tokens issued via initial coin offerings) is that they have to be backed by a tangible asset and this has led to the prediction that ownership of other assets can be tokenised (i.e. fractionalised digitally) including real estate. In this particular example, tokenisation could benefit property developers as in theory it would facilitate the fundraising process for a new building project by creating lower thresholds for minimum investment in tokens that can subsequently be sold on a secondary market. In turn, this boosts the liquidity of the property market and opens up investment opportunities to a wider range of interested parties.
On the downside, it is not yet clear how tokenisation will work with existing property law or, with respect to the tokenisation of shares, company law. In our view, these flaws have limited the expansion of tokenisation beyond firms whose business is to issue tokens. In July 2019, TokenMarket announced that its STO had successfully completed under the FCA’s regulatory sandbox, raising 158% of its funding goal across a two-week period. Whether this early success will prompt companies in other sectors to tokenise equity and assets remains to be seen as very few such STOs appear to have been publicised (possibly due to confidentiality concerns with respect to planned STOs). Likewise there appears to be very limited secondary market trading of tokens in the investment community. This could soon change with strategic investment in security tokens infrastructure. For example, it has been reported that earlier this year, Archax, a developing security token exchange in London, received investment from SPiCE VC (a tokenised venture capital fund).
Overall the paucity of successfully closed STOs in the UK (and trading of such tokens on secondary markets) during 2019 demonstrates that the STO market in this jurisdiction hasn’t developed as quickly as many thought at the start of the year.
What’s next for tokenisation?
One would expect more UK-based startups to experiment with tokenisation as its popularity grows overseas. According to reports, the US is believed to be home to the majority of infrastructure providers (who tokenise assets), issuance providers (who issue tokens on a blockchain), global investors in security tokens (61%) and secondary markets (such as Kraken, a trading platform for tokens).
A curious test case for a niche use of security tokens also recently emerged in the US where it has been reported that a patent was filed in December 2019 by Nike suggesting that the company plans to tokenise the ownership of trainers. The idea is that owners can verify the authenticity of their shoes and track prior ownership using blockchain technology. The technology should help to reduce the trade in counterfeit trainers in the limited-edition resale market and it is also thought that it can be used to grant rights to third parties to mix shoe designs. It remains to be seen whether Nike will exploit its patent and bring ‘cryptokicks’ to the market, thereby thrusting the concept of security tokens into the mainstream.
It’s clear that 2019 cannot be dubbed the ‘year of the security token’ in this jurisdiction. Widespread embrace of tokenisation in the UK seems likely to be dependent on the successful tokenisation of widely used or sought after assets, whether in the investment space (e.g. shares or property) or the consumer product space (e.g. Nike’s Cryptokicks). If, as hoped, tokenisation stimulates the trading of tokens on secondary markets, the breakthrough will be complete. It remains to be seen as to whether 2020 will be the year of that breakthrough.
If you would like to find out more about security tokens or if you are interested in investing in crypto assets, please do get in touch with our Corporate and Commercial team. You may also be interested in reading our crypto assets blogs from the Dispute Resolution Crypto assets: That was the year that was 2019 and Family Law Cryptoassets and divorcing a ‘Cryptoqueen’: Part l - Identification, valuation and preservation teams.
About the authors
Alex Torpey is an Associate in the corproate and commercial department. Alex advises technology, startup and established companies as well as entrepreneurs on a variety of legal issues for commercial contracts including data protection compliance, licensing and ownership of intellectual property rights, confidentiality and liability.
Andrew Solomon is a Senior Associate in the corporate and commercial department. Andrew's commercial practice is focussed on drafting and negotiating technology contracts, although he also advises in relation to a wide range of commercial issues, such as intellectual property, branding, data protection and sponsorship arrangements.
Latest blogs & news
With the price of crypto assets generally making a good recovery from the Covid-19 related decline of 2019 contrasted with the very recent volatility following issues with the adoption of the cryptocurrency as legal tender in El Salvador, investors in cryptocurrencies might be considering realising some of their gains to try to help minimise any further instability.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), in its annual business plan published today, sets out its areas of focus for the year ahead. It is, as ever, essential reading for all those in the regulated sector.
Keeping the crypto market on its toes? The FCA publishes latest cryptoasset consumer research and takes regulatory action against Binance Markets Limited
For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.
A Director at the National Crime Agency recently voiced concern about crypto assets being used to fund property purchases in the UK. The NCA’s Nigel Leary was quoted by The Times as saying: “Anything purchased with crypto assets I’d be slightly sceptical about. I’d like to see why they’re being done in that way and what the requirement is for that anonymity, and why it needed to be done in a crypto transaction.”
Despite the Covid-19 pandemic, 2020 was an incredible year for crypto assets. Largely driven by the increased demand from institutional investors, Bitcoin shattered its previous price records. However, its pseudonymous nature and the ease with which it allows users to instantly send funds anywhere in the world makes crypto assets appealing to criminals.
Hot on the heels of its consultation on bringing cryptoasset inside the scope of the financial promotions regime at the tail end of last year, the FCA has launched a further consultation on the UK’s regulatory approach to cryptoassets and stablecoins.
As of 10 January 2021, all cryptoasset firms are required to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under the Money Laundering Regulations.
Research recently undertaken by the FCA has found that 5.35% of the UK population hold (or have previously held) cryptoassets where in 2019 this figure was 3%. For several years now the Government, the Bank of England and the FCA have been consulting on and considering how best to regulate this burgeoning market.
The year 2019 started with plenty of optimism regarding the growth of Security Token Offerings (STOs). Many articles at the start of the year suggested, like one on TokenMarket, that “it’s looking very likely that 2019 will be the year of the security token offering”. In this blog we look back on some of the key moments of 2019 with regard to STOs and consider whether 2019 really was the dawning of a new era worthy of the revolutionary hype back at the start of the year. However, if you would first like to take a step back and digest a user-friendly introduction to the concept of security tokens, please listen to our podcast or read our earlier crypto assets blog.
In just ten years, cryptoassets have become a £100 billion industry. We now face the alarming prospect that millions of pounds can be hidden behind a few lines of computer code without ever touching a bank account. If your soon-to-be ex-partner has made a fortune with Bitcoin, how do you get a share?
The tenth anniversary of the first ever BitCoin transaction will fall in April 2020. Not many people are using cryptoassets for everyday transactions, such as a takeaway pizza order and as such Satoshi Nakamoto’s vision of a stateless peer to peer electronic currency is yet to be realised, but in the last few years cryptoassets have certainly entered the public consciousness, even if that does mostly relate to the huge spike in the value of BitCoin in December 2017.
Security tokens are a digital representation of ownership rights in real world assets (such as property or shares) and have captured the curiosity of entrepreneurs, startups and investors. This blog summarises the potential benefits and pitfalls of security tokens and is part of our wider crypto assets blog.
The Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) case of B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd  SGHC(I) 03 considers how the law relating to mistake could apply to contracts formed on an automated basis by computers using algorithmic software.
Whether you are in the market for short-term profit or making long-term investments, adequate planning is certainly a worthwhile (and small) investment of your time and money. If you’ve been savyy enough to successfully invest in crypto-assets, make sure you are smart enough to ensure your loved ones can benefit, should the worst happen.
“Cryptoassets have attracted significant and growing attention from consumers, markets, governments and regulators globally”, stated the FCA earlier this year in launching its consultation on its Guidance on Cryptoassests. Jill Lorimer has previously commented on the Cryptoassests guidance.
The aim of the Guidance is to “provide regulatory clarity for market participants carrying on activities in this space” and it appears to do just that.
The recent confirmation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that it is investigating 18 firms involved in the sale of crypto assets, such as Bitcoin, indicates a ramping up of regulatory focus on the controversial sector.
The Treasury Committee’s inquiry into economic crime is one of the most wide-ranging of the committee’s current workstreams, and its conclusions are keenly awaited.
As well as assessing the effectiveness of the anti-money laundering regime in the UK, MPs have been examining the impact of economic crime on consumers.
Earlier this month, the Lord Chancellor David Gauke confirmed that a new 18 courtroom legal centre is to be built on the site of Fleetbank House in London which will focus on issues such as economic crime (including fraud) and cyber crime. Due to be established in 2025, this “state-of-the-art court” is to give the message to the world that Britain “stands ready to deal with the changing nature of 21st century crime”.
On 11 June, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a “Dear CEO” letter on how banks should deal with the financial crime risks associated with “cryptoassets”. The FCA defines cryptoassets as publicly available mediums of exchange that feature a distributed ledger and decentralised system for exchanging value, such as Bitcoin and Ether. These assets are more commonly known as cryptocurrencies.
Regulators around the world are calling for cryptocurrencies to be brought within the remit of financial regulation. To date, the focus has largely been on Bitcoin, which was the predominant cryptocurrency traded on some of the largest dark web markets. However, in light of the call for better oversight, the value of Bitcoin plummeted and evidence suggests that users are moving towards alternatives that afford greater anonymity.