Blog
Deepfakes to Deletion Orders: Tackling technology enabled sexual offending in the Crime and Policing Act 2026
Sophie Tang
The CMA has published its Annual Plan for 2024 to 2025 (the “New Plan”), following engagement with more than 70 businesses and other organisations across the UK.
Financial sanctions and, in particular, targeted asset freezes, impact not only the sanctioned individual but also their family and close associates. The UK sanctions regime recognises there are circumstances where otherwise prohibited transactions or activities should be permitted. There are now many different sanctions regulations but they all broadly contain similar exceptions and the power for the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) to issue general and specific licences where the relevant grounds apply (for example, to enable the basic needs of a designated person or financially dependent family members to be met).
The programme The Jury: Murder Trial being broadcast on Channel 4 is already proving to be fascinating viewing. The programme in 4 parts follows the deliberations of two juries as they observe a murder trial.
Insider dealing has long been a serious topic for financial services firms and their regulator, and continues to be a widespread issue across the sector. In the UK, activities which can amount to insider dealing have been criminalised since the 1980s, and are now covered by Criminal Justice Act 1993 (“CJA”), as amended most recently by The Insider Dealing (Securities and Regulated Markets) Order 2023.
In England and Wales, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) is empowered by section 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to prosecute criminal offences of insider dealing under the CJA. There is also a parallel civil regime under the Market Abuse Regulation, as set out in the MAR module of the FCA’s Handbook, pursuant to which the FCA can also take enforcement action.
Cases relating to historic sexual offences seem to have dominated the media in recent times. Some difficult and sensitive issues can arise when the courts are dealing with such cases. When sentencing offenders convicted of historic sexual offences, relatively recent case law provides some helpful guidance (in particular, the cases of R v Limon [2022] EWCA Crim 39; R v Ahmed and others [2023] EWCA Crim 281; and, R v A (Whitelam) [2023] EWCA Crim 1204).
Sophie Tang
Louise Hodges
Jemma Garside
Legal Notices | Privacy Notice | Fraud Warning | Modern Slavery Statement | Complaints | Website Terms | Cookie Policy | Accessibility | Site Map
© 2026 Kingsley Napley LLP. All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, registration number 500046.
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility