Blog
When can organisations rely on “consent” under data protection laws? The Court of Appeal clarifies in RTM v Sky Betting and Gaming
Caroline Sheldon
Discovered on Thursday 12 March, Companies House suspended its WebFiling system from Friday 13 March until the morning of Monday 16 March. Andy King, Chief Executive of Companies House, has since issued a statement (Update on Companies House WebFiling security issue - GOV.UK) explaining the issues discovered and outlining the steps companies should now take.
The flaw in the Companies House WebFiling service allowed a logged-in user to access the internal dashboard of any of the other five million companies registered on Companies House by entering another company number and simply pressing the back key a few times. Although not accessible to the general public (as you need a Companies House account), Companies House serves over 5 million registered companies, many of whom use the WebFiling service. The statement from the CEO Andy King, suggests that this issue has been present since Companies House updated their WebFiling systems in October 2025, which is a 5 month window.
A company's dashboard contains sensitive, private information about its directors including, their residential addresses, email addresses and dates of birth. Unauthorised access also allows a user to make filings or amend company records. Therefore, modifications could have been made to various company details including its registered address, accounts filings or changes of directors. In his statement, Andy King has now confirmed that unauthorised filings could therefore have been made by an unauthorised individual. Looking at the most serious scenario, UK companies were potentially exposed to company hijacking by bad actors and corporate identity fraud.
As of Monday, 16 March 2026, CEO Andy King reported that Companies House had not yet received any confirmed cases of a company’s data having been accessed or changed without permission. However, investigations are ongoing.
It is very important that companies take the following steps as a matter of urgency:
The period to review is between 1 October 2025 and Friday, 13 March.
The CEO has issued an apology to all registered companies and confirmed that they took immediate action to fix the issue. They have also reported the incident to the Information Commissioner's Office and the National Cyber Security Centre. To ensure all businesses have taken the above precautionary steps, Companies House will be emailing every company’s registered email address to explain how to check their details and what steps to take if they have concerns.
If you have any questions regarding this blog, please contact our Corporate, Commercial & Finance team.
Bethany Hall is a trainee solicitor currently in her fourth seat with the Corporate, Commercial and Finance team.
Roberta Draper advises startup founders, angel investors and established businesses on a variety of corporate and commercial legal matters. She advises on early stage investments, share option schemes, shareholder agreements, share buybacks and company sales and acquisitions.
The Court of Appeal's recent decision in RTM v Bonne Terre Limited & Hestview Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 488 is an important one for any business/controller that relies on consent as a lawful basis for processing personal data or sending direct marketing communications. In short, the legal test for consent under data protection legislation is an objective one, not a subjective inquiry into the data subject’s internal state of mind.
A significant number of employment law reforms are coming into effect in 2026 and 2027 following the introduction of the Employment Rights Act 2025 at the end of last year.
In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal allowed the UK Information Commissioner's appeal against the decision of the Upper Tribunal in proceedings involving DSG Retail Limited ("DSG"). The case arose from a nine-month cyber-attack in 2017-2018 on DSG’s systems, during which the attackers scraped transaction data from point-of-sale terminals from over 5.6 million payment cards. The compromised data included card numbers and expiry dates but not cardholders' names, meaning the attackers could not directly identify individuals from the data alone.
The UK Government has now published its March 2026 Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, following its 2024–25 consultation on the use of copyright protected works in AI training. The outcome is significant - not for what it introduces but for what it postpones.
The UK Government has confirmed a major package of reforms to tackle late payments, a persistent pressure point for small businesses, costing the economy £11 billion a year and contributing to 38 business closures every day.
The professional services industry faces rapid change
A serious security vulnerability affecting the five million registered companies on Companies House was recently discovered. More on this below, but we would urge all companies to check their records carefully and ensure there is nothing unexpected in their Companies House filings and dashboard.
At our recent Tech Briefing, 'What tech businesses need to know in 2026', we explored how the EU’s Digital Omnibus package and the UK’s Employment Rights Act will reshape compliance for UK tech SMEs.
Most commercial disputes don’t come from exotic legal issues - they come from everyday contract weaknesses that could have been avoided with a few smart tweaks
2026 is shaping up to be the most consequential year for UK data protection enforcement since the introduction of the EU/UK GDPR regime. With record fines issued in late 2025, a new enforcement playbook on the horizon, and shifting legislative and regulatory expectations, the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) is signalling a marked transformation in how it supervises, and sanctions, organisations.
Too often, limitation of liability clauses are treated as standard boilerplate - something to tidy up at the end of a negotiation once the “real” commercial points are agreed.
What are these megatrends that could pose a threat to brands in 2026?
In this article, we share 7 key considerations to help tech founders navigate the journey from seed funding to Series A and beyond.
In November 2025, the European Commission unveiled its Digital Omnibus package – a set of proposals aimed at simplifying (not deregulating) EU rules on data protection, cybersecurity and AI.
In a recent decision on the UK GDPR’s global scope, the Upper Tribunal in The Information Commissioner v Clearview AI Incorporated and Privacy International [2025] UKUT 319 (AAC) confirmed that the UK’s data protection regime can extend well beyond its borders.
Founders and teams across the country are looking for signals that the UK still backs its innovators. Here’s what’s top of the wish-list:
For founders, investors and anyone involved in the tech sector, understanding who owns your software and how to prove it is critical. Whether you’re seeking investment, planning an exit or simply aiming to protect your IP, clarity on ownership can make or break a deal
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important decision in respect of data protection law considerations in Farley & Others v Paymaster (trading as Equiniti) [2025] EWCA Civ 1117, providing clarity on the scope of infringement and compensation data protection claims under the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 (“DPA”). The judgment will be of particular interest to any service provider dealing with and processing large volumes of customer personal data.
At some point in their history, businesses commonly have need for external funding to help their growth trajectory.
In tech, the law often arrives after something has gone wrong. Here are three cautionary tales* and the lessons every founder, CTO and in-house counsel should take away.
Caroline Sheldon
Christopher Perrin
Christopher Perrin
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print