Blog
When can organisations rely on “consent” under data protection laws? The Court of Appeal clarifies in RTM v Sky Betting and Gaming
Caroline Sheldon
Too often, limitation of liability clauses are treated as standard boilerplate - something to tidy up at the end of a negotiation once the “real” commercial points are agreed.
In reality, they are one of the most important provisions in any commercial contract.
I recently contributed to a Lexology Pro article on limitation of liability clauses and what corporate counsel need to know to minimise risk. The discussion reinforced something I see regularly in practice: when these clauses are drafted or negotiated badly, they can expose businesses to precisely the risks they were intended to manage.
A poorly calibrated liability regime doesn’t just increase litigation risk. It can undermine funding prospects by raising red flags in due diligence. Would you want to invest in a business that hasn’t adequately protected itself from a liability perspective?
From a practical standpoint, three themes come up time and again:
- Understand the real risks before negotiating the cap. Liability limits should never be plucked from the air or justified solely by “market standard” language. They need to reflect the losses that could realistically arise if things go wrong, the parties’ ability to manage those risks and the wider commercial context of the deal.
- Don’t concede carve‑outs by default. Some customers, particularly those with stronger bargaining power, will seek to leverage their market position to negotiate more favourable terms, attempting to exclude certain types of claims from liability caps altogether. These exclusions can punch enormous holes in an otherwise sensible agreement. Push back on familiar “try‑ons” like “we’ve never agreed to this before”. If the deal matters enough, there is always a first time!
- Clarity and conspicuousness are non‑negotiable. Courts will not rescue vague drafting that fails to communicate the parties’ intentions. Ambiguous language risks either being struck down entirely or construed against the party relying on it.
The key takeaway? Limitation of liability clauses are not administrative afterthoughts. They are central risk‑allocation tools that deserve early, careful and commercially informed attention.
You can read the full Lexology Pro article on this topic by clicking here. Please note this this link requires a subscription.
further information
If you have any questions regarding this blog, please contact Christopher Perrin in our Corporate, Commercial & Finance team.
about the author
Christopher Perrin is a highly experienced solicitor who leads the Corporate, Commercial and Finance team’s general Commercial & Technology Contracts, Outsourcing & Data legal advisory services.
Latest blogs & news
When can organisations rely on “consent” under data protection laws? The Court of Appeal clarifies in RTM v Sky Betting and Gaming
The Court of Appeal's recent decision in RTM v Bonne Terre Limited & Hestview Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 488 is an important one for any business/controller that relies on consent as a lawful basis for processing personal data or sending direct marketing communications. In short, the legal test for consent under data protection legislation is an objective one, not a subjective inquiry into the data subject’s internal state of mind.
“Recruitment Rewired”: what employers need to know about automated recruitment
On 31 March 2026, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) published its Report, “Recruitment Rewired: an update on the ICO’s work on the fair and responsible use of automation in recruitment”, setting out its findings and regulatory expectations for employers using AI‑enabled or automated tools in recruitment.
Employment law changes tech businesses need to know about
A significant number of employment law reforms are coming into effect in 2026 and 2027 following the introduction of the Employment Rights Act 2025 at the end of last year.
Court of Appeal confirms scope of data controllers’ security obligations
In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal allowed the UK Information Commissioner's appeal against the decision of the Upper Tribunal in proceedings involving DSG Retail Limited ("DSG"). The case arose from a nine-month cyber-attack in 2017-2018 on DSG’s systems, during which the attackers scraped transaction data from point-of-sale terminals from over 5.6 million payment cards. The compromised data included card numbers and expiry dates but not cardholders' names, meaning the attackers could not directly identify individuals from the data alone.
Copyright & artificial intelligence: Progress, pause and persistent uncertainty
The UK Government has now published its March 2026 Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, following its 2024–25 consultation on the use of copyright protected works in AI training. The outcome is significant - not for what it introduces but for what it postpones.
Government announces tough new late payment laws – what happens next?
The UK Government has confirmed a major package of reforms to tackle late payments, a persistent pressure point for small businesses, costing the economy £11 billion a year and contributing to 38 business closures every day.
Business Development: Playing The Right CARD
The professional services industry faces rapid change
Companies House security issue: What your business should do now
A serious security vulnerability affecting the five million registered companies on Companies House was recently discovered. More on this below, but we would urge all companies to check their records carefully and ensure there is nothing unexpected in their Companies House filings and dashboard.
What tech businesses need to know in 2026
At our recent Tech Briefing, 'What tech businesses need to know in 2026', we explored how the EU’s Digital Omnibus package and the UK’s Employment Rights Act will reshape compliance for UK tech SMEs.
Five common contract weaknesses – and how to fix them
Most commercial disputes don’t come from exotic legal issues - they come from everyday contract weaknesses that could have been avoided with a few smart tweaks
2026 marks a turning point for data governance in the UK
2026 is shaping up to be the most consequential year for UK data protection enforcement since the introduction of the EU/UK GDPR regime. With record fines issued in late 2025, a new enforcement playbook on the horizon, and shifting legislative and regulatory expectations, the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) is signalling a marked transformation in how it supervises, and sanctions, organisations.
Why limitation of liability clauses deserve more attention than they get
Too often, limitation of liability clauses are treated as standard boilerplate - something to tidy up at the end of a negotiation once the “real” commercial points are agreed.
2026 brand threats that could be opportunities: Polarisation, AI, NextGen, and Saturation
What are these megatrends that could pose a threat to brands in 2026?
From Seed to Series A and Beyond: 7 Key Insights for Tech Founders
In this article, we share 7 key considerations to help tech founders navigate the journey from seed funding to Series A and beyond.
Biggest EU Digital Shake-Up Since GDPR? What Businesses Need To Know
In November 2025, the European Commission unveiled its Digital Omnibus package – a set of proposals aimed at simplifying (not deregulating) EU rules on data protection, cybersecurity and AI.
Clearview AI ruling confirms UK GDPR applies beyond borders
In a recent decision on the UK GDPR’s global scope, the Upper Tribunal in The Information Commissioner v Clearview AI Incorporated and Privacy International [2025] UKUT 319 (AAC) confirmed that the UK’s data protection regime can extend well beyond its borders.
UK Tech SMEs & the November Budget
Founders and teams across the country are looking for signals that the UK still backs its innovators. Here’s what’s top of the wish-list:
Why does software ownership matter? Six key legal takeaways for tech businesses
For founders, investors and anyone involved in the tech sector, understanding who owns your software and how to prove it is critical. Whether you’re seeking investment, planning an exit or simply aiming to protect your IP, clarity on ownership can make or break a deal
Court of Appeal clarifies data protection claims for non-material damage: A win for claimants - But what are the implications for controllers and processors?
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important decision in respect of data protection law considerations in Farley & Others v Paymaster (trading as Equiniti) [2025] EWCA Civ 1117, providing clarity on the scope of infringement and compensation data protection claims under the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 (“DPA”). The judgment will be of particular interest to any service provider dealing with and processing large volumes of customer personal data.
5 Reasons Why Fundraising can Go Wrong
At some point in their history, businesses commonly have need for external funding to help their growth trajectory.
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print