Services A-Z     Pricing

Why limitation of liability clauses deserve more attention than they get

15 January 2026

Too often, limitation of liability clauses are treated as standard boilerplate - something to tidy up at the end of a negotiation once the “real” commercial points are agreed.

In reality, they are one of the most important provisions in any commercial contract.

I recently contributed to a Lexology Pro article on limitation of liability clauses and what corporate counsel need to know to minimise risk. The discussion reinforced something I see regularly in practice: when these clauses are drafted or negotiated badly, they can expose businesses to precisely the risks they were intended to manage.

A poorly calibrated liability regime doesn’t just increase litigation risk. It can undermine funding prospects by raising red flags in due diligence. Would you want to invest in a business that hasn’t adequately protected itself from a liability perspective?

From a practical standpoint, three themes come up time and again:

  • Understand the real risks before negotiating the cap. Liability limits should never be plucked from the air or justified solely by “market standard” language. They need to reflect the losses that could realistically arise if things go wrong, the parties’ ability to manage those risks and the wider commercial context of the deal.
  • Don’t concede carve‑outs by default. Some customers, particularly those with stronger bargaining power, will seek to leverage their market position to negotiate more favourable terms, attempting to exclude certain types of claims from liability caps altogether. These exclusions can punch enormous holes in an otherwise sensible agreement. Push back on familiar “try‑ons” like “we’ve never agreed to this before”. If the deal matters enough, there is always a first time!
  • Clarity and conspicuousness are non‑negotiable. Courts will not rescue vague drafting that fails to communicate the parties’ intentions. Ambiguous language risks either being struck down entirely or construed against the party relying on it.

The key takeaway? Limitation of liability clauses are not administrative afterthoughts. They are central risk‑allocation tools that deserve early, careful and commercially informed attention.

You can read the full Lexology Pro article on this topic by clicking here. Please note this this link requires a subscription.

further information 

If you have any questions regarding this blog, please contact Christopher Perrin in our Corporate, Commercial & Finance team.

about the author

 Christopher Perrin is a highly experienced solicitor who leads the Corporate, Commercial and Finance team’s general Commercial & Technology Contracts, Outsourcing & Data legal advisory services.

Latest blogs & news

Why limitation of liability clauses deserve more attention than they get

Too often, limitation of liability clauses are treated as standard boilerplate - something to tidy up at the end of a negotiation once the “real” commercial points are agreed.

From Seed to Series A and Beyond: 7 Key Insights for Tech Founders

In this article, we share 7 key considerations to help tech founders navigate the journey from seed funding to Series A and beyond.

Biggest EU Digital Shake-Up Since GDPR? What Businesses Need To Know

In November 2025, the European Commission unveiled its Digital Omnibus package – a set of proposals aimed at simplifying (not deregulating) EU rules on data protection, cybersecurity and AI.

Clearview AI ruling confirms UK GDPR applies beyond borders

In a recent decision on the UK GDPR’s global scope, the Upper Tribunal in The Information Commissioner v Clearview AI Incorporated and Privacy International [2025] UKUT 319 (AAC) confirmed that the UK’s data protection regime can extend well beyond its borders.

UK Tech SMEs & the November Budget

Founders and teams across the country are looking for signals that the UK still backs its innovators. Here’s what’s top of the wish-list:

Why does software ownership matter? Six key legal takeaways for tech businesses

For founders, investors and anyone involved in the tech sector, understanding who owns your software and how to prove it is critical. Whether you’re seeking investment, planning an exit or simply aiming to protect your IP, clarity on ownership can make or break a deal

Court of Appeal clarifies data protection claims for non-material damage: A win for claimants - But what are the implications for controllers and processors?

The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important decision in respect of data protection law considerations in Farley & Others v Paymaster (trading as Equiniti) [2025] EWCA Civ 1117, providing clarity on the scope of infringement and compensation data protection claims under the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 (“DPA”). The judgment will be of particular interest to any service provider dealing with and processing large volumes of customer personal data.  

5 Reasons Why Fundraising can Go Wrong

At some point in their history, businesses commonly have need for external funding to help their growth trajectory.

Three Cautionary Tales for UK Tech Companies

In tech, the law often arrives after something has gone wrong. Here are three cautionary tales* and the lessons every founder, CTO and in-house counsel should take away.

Top five takeaways from the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025

The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (the “DUAA”), which received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025, introduces targeted reforms to the UK data protection legal framework — particularly the UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (“PECR”).

Modern industrial strategy: updates to National Security and Investment Act under review

Many of you will know that the Government published, on 23 June, its Modern Industrial Strategy paper and, with it, committed to creating a “predictable, proportionate, and transparent investment screening framework” and launching a 12-week consultation on updating the definitions of the 17 sensitive sectors of the economy as set out in the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA).

A game changer for data processors? The ICO issues a significant fine against a processor

The recent cyberattacks on major UK retailers have put cybersecurity back in the spotlight. But a more significant development for data protection practitioners has been flying under the radar: the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a notable fine directly against a data processor for breaching UK GDPR security obligations - an important shift in enforcement focus.

Basis Period Adjustments

The 2023/24 tax year marks a major shift in the way unincorporated businesses are taxed. It is a transition year, with HMRC moving from the traditional “current year basis” to a “tax year basis” from 6 April 2024. While this change is intended to simplify the system in the long run, it introduces some short-term complexities (and often tax expense) during the transition year which partners and other sole traders ought to be alive to.

Angel investing and how we can help

We have a wealth of experience acting for high net worth individuals at the outset of their angel investing journey and for seasoned angel investors who need the occasional bit of legal input. 

Key takeaways: What recent consumer law reforms mean for service providers

On 6 April 2025, the first wave of consumer protection provisions under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (“DMCC Act”) came into force, marking the most significant overhaul of UK consumer protection law in over a decade. 

Boosting cybersecurity: New Software Security Code of Practice for software vendors

In the wake of recent high-profile cyber-attacks on major retailers like Marks & Spencer and Co-op, the UK government has launched a new voluntary Code of Practice for software vendors at its flagship cyber security event, CyberUK 2025. This initiative sets a dynamic baseline for software security and resilience, aiming to help prevent such breaches in the future.

Ofcom’s new draft guidance for ‘a safer life online for women and girls’ as part of its OSA consultation process

The Office of Communications, commonly known as ‘Ofcom’ (the regulator for communication services) is calling on tech firms to make ‘the online world safer for women and girls’. 

Five things to know about criminal risk in M&A transactions

Criminal risk isn’t the first thing that comes to mind when considering the commercial drivers behind a merger or acquisition. But our recent roundtable discussion at our offices made clear that criminal liability—however peripheral it might seem—can have very real consequences for deal viability and post-completion exposure. Here are five key takeaways from a discussion that brought together legal and business perspectives on how economic crime intersects with transactional work.

Share Buybacks: Tackling Challenges and Managing Dissent

In this blog, we dive into the essentials of share buybacks, explore common issues that arise when shareholders object, and uncover creative workarounds to navigate conflicts while staying compliant and maintaining trust.

Reflections from an Exclusive Roundtable at The Ivy: Top 10 Takeaways on AI Regulation

Last week, I had the pleasure of hosting an insightful roundtable dinner at The Ivy in Covent Garden, London, bringing together thought leaders, industry experts, and business owners to discuss one of the most pressing topics of our time - AI regulation. Co-hosted by the brilliant Fred Becker, CAO of Unlikely AI, the conversation was rich with diverse perspectives, practical concerns and strategic insights.

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility