Blog
Making gifts and providing for others’ needs – OPG guidance
Sameena Munir
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides deputies with authority to make gifts or provision on behalf of P:
The gift must be reasonable and affordable in all the circumstances and in relation to the size of P’s estate. It must also be in their best interests, the definition of this term is set out below.
A standard deputyship order will usually include authority for the standard gifting and provision or maintenance of a person related or connected to P. Gifting and maintaining a person are two different powers.
Normally the Court’s authority is not needed where a deputy makes provision for a connected or related person’s needs. However, where there are circumstances which blur between provision and gifting, it is strongly recommended that an application for permission is made. This is particularly important where the person in need is the deputy or attorney to avoid a conflict of interest arising.
Before making any gift, a deputy must consider whether P has the mental capacity to understand the decision to make a gift and whether they can take part in the decision-making process. P might be able to communicate their wishes and feelings about the proposed gift.
When capacity is in doubt, P’s capacity to make the gift in question should be assessed by a qualified practitioner. If they lack capacity and the proposed gift falls outside of the usual provisions above, then an application to Court would be required.
Outside of the customary gifts or making provision to a person in need, the Court of Protection can authorise gifts / payments which include:
When considering if a gift is reasonable, the deputy should take into account:
It is important that any proposed gift is in P’s best interests. A deputy will need to consider:
A deputy should consider whether the proposed gift would cause P’s family members to be treated equally and if not, whether there is a good reason to cause this inequality.
A deputy should also consider whether they are acting in a conflict of interests by making gifts to themselves or to their family and, as a result, whether they are unable to consider making gifts to other people.
P may have previously made similar gifts to the recipient before they lacked mental capacity. If a deputy is able to show a pattern of gifting this will support any application they make to the Court.
It is important to consider P’s wishes and feelings in decisions being made on their behalf and it can be an important factor when deciding if making the gift is in their best interests. If P lost their capacity as an adult, did they previously make their wishes and feelings known? For example, they could have done this in their Lasting Power of Attorney (“LPA”), their Will or letter of wishes. This evidence would need to be weighed against other circumstances including affordability and reasonableness.
If you are acting as an attorney, you will need to check if there are any specific restrictions or conditions in the Enduring Power of Attorney (“EPA”) or LPA about gifts. The Court of Protection has made it clear that a donor of an EPA or LPA cannot include an instruction that authorises a gift that falls outside of the usual gifts or provision. A donor can make their wishes and feelings known about gifts under the preference section of an LPA. Attorneys would consider this as part of the best interests process but they are not obliged to follow preferences set out in LPAs.
Making provision for others is not considered to be a gift under the Mental Capacity Act.
A deputy may provide for the needs of P’s family if they are legally obliged to maintain them. This is clearly seen with a spouse/civil partner or a dependent child. Again, any payments made must be in P’s best interests and also affordable.
A deputy will need to apply to the Court of Protection to make any provision for people who P is not legally obliged to maintain.
Deputies do not have authority to make loans from P’s funds and must apply to the Court of Protection for authorisation. If a loan has been made without authorisation, this would be treated as an unauthorised gift. The OPG may request that the amount is immediately repaid, or it can apply to the Court of Protection for the attorney/deputy to be removed.
The Court of Protection recognises that sometimes a gift goes beyond a deputy’s authority but to such a minor degree that an application to Court is not required. These are called ‘de minimis exceptions’ and only apply if P’s estate is £325,000 or greater.
When considering if a gift falls within the de minimis exception, the deputy must consider:
In any case, the de minimis exception does not apply to the following and an application to the Court of Protection would still be required in these circumstances:
When in doubt about making a proposed gift that falls outside of the usual gifting and provision circumstances, it is best to make an application to the Court of Protection. We are experienced in making these applications and would be happy to assist. Please contact our Court of Protection team for enquiries and/or further information.
Making gifts on behalf of a protected party (“P”) can be seen as carrying out their wishes and feelings and/or helping a person closely connected or related to them. However, an attorney/deputy has specific powers which do not extend to making all types of gifts unless authorised by the Court of Protection. If an unauthorised gift is made, the attorney/deputy may face severe penalties including removal of their role, order to immediately return the funds/gift or referral to the police. It is important therefore that the correct procedure is followed before making a gift. The Office of the Public Guardian (“OPG”) recently issued updated guidance about making gifts, which we consider in this blog. The guidance applies to both attorneys and deputies. Reference to deputies in this blog also includes attorneys.
In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.
This case study highlights the inspiring journey of a young man, Louis who was born with cerebral palsy (CP) and with the support of his Deputy, Deputyship team and family has transformed his passion for dogs into a small business, overcoming numerous challenges and creating a successful venture. His story not only exemplifies the power of perseverance and support but also showcases how individuals with disabilities can thrive in the business world with the right resources and mindset.
The Child Brain Injury Trust reports that every 90 seconds, someone in the UK is admitted to hospital with an acquired brain injury, and every 15 minutes, a child in the UK acquires a brain injury. While many will make a full recovery, for others, this may impact on their ability to make certain decisions as adults.
For a Will to be valid, amongst other things, the person making the Will (known as the “testator”) must be of “sound mind”.
The test for capacity to enter a prenuptial agreement is the same as the normal test for capacity (mentioned in Blog 1) and the individual must be capable of understanding their assets and the nature and effects of the contract they are entering into.
An executor/executrix is a person named in a Will who is responsible for carrying out the instructions in a person's Will and administering their estate. Executors can have a number of responsibilities following someone’s death, including: securing, insuring and clearing the deceased’s property, collecting in all the deceased’s assets, paying outstanding bills, distributing the estate, arranging the funeral and applying for probate.
When a trust is created, the person setting-up the trust (known as the “settlor”) usually appoints trustees who become the legal owners of the assets in the trust, which they hold for the benefit of others (known as the “beneficiaries”). For example, when a person dies, a trustee may distribute capital and income from the deceased’s assets that are held in a Will trust, to the people named as beneficiaries in the deceased’s Will.
Capacity to litigate involves an adult who is a party (or intended party) to proceedings in court.
A Lasting Power of Attorney (“LPA”) is a formal document that, once registered by the Office of the Public Guardian (“OPG”) authorises others, known as “attorneys”, to act on behalf of another who is unable to make decisions for themselves.
A gift can be anything of value, such as cash, personal possessions and property. If a person chooses to dispose of an asset for less than it is worth this is also considered to be a fit. The act of giving a gift is typically done to express care, appreciation, celebration or goodwill. Gifts are often exchanged during special occasions such as birthdays, weddings, anniversaries and customary occasions, but they can also be given spontaneously as a gesture of kindness or generosity.
An assessment to determine whether an individual has capacity to manage their property and financial affairs is required when an individual’s capacity is in doubt and they need to make decisions relating to their property and finances. For example, they may want to sell or purchase a property, need to manage an award of damages or need to manage their overall affairs.
The question of how care for a parent is funded can be a pressing one that has the potential to cause stress and concern.
Now you have an idea of the full scope of your role as deputy, here are a few cautionary comments based on our years of experience of working within the field of Court of Protection.
It is not unreasonable for gifts to be made to those close to the Protected Party ("P") during their life time and this can be in a number of ways, whether this be customary, practical or just a one-off gesture.
Buying and selling property is one of the biggest tasks a deputy may be faced with whilst managing the Protected Party’s (‘P’) affairs. The selling of a property may be the only way to access funds that are so desperately needed to pay for P’s ongoing expenses. P may be downsizing and both the sale and purchase of a property may be required. P may need to purchase a more suitable property for their needs as their condition evolves. The property may not only be for P but for partners, children, other family members, carer’s and those involved in P’s daily lives.
If P owns a property, there are a number of additional factors to consider and matters that may arise throughout the management of the deputyship.
In additional to the initial set up tasks and ongoing annual requirements, a deputy may want to consider the bigger picture to ensure P’s ‘estate’ (essentially everything that they legally own; including cash, property, land, investments etc.)
Your application to be a deputy is successful and you have now received the final Order from the Court of Protection (“COP”) appointing you as such. You have/have been provided with a catalogue of documents and financial paperwork; or you may have been provided with nothing at all. You may have already been contacted by various organisations asking for information, or even payment for services. One of the first questions that I am sure may be crossing your mind - where do I start?
Firstly, I must point out that there are two types of deputyship. The distinction between them is important as there are clear rules as to the decisions that can be made under each.
Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Sameena Munir
Paul Davidoff
James Ward
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print