Blog
HMRC Covid scheme amnesty: action by 31 December 2025
Waqar Shah
Capacity is a nuanced issue. An individual may lack capacity to do some things or make certain decisions at one point in time but be able to make that same decision at a later point in time. This is known as fluctuating capacity. Where a person has fluctuating capacity, they should be supported to make as many of their own decisions as possible (and if possible delay big decisions from a time when the individual lacks capacity to a time when they do).
In the context of big decisions - like making a will - it is important to have a firm grip on the specific requirements for the decision in question in order to ensure that there are no concerns as to the validity of those documents.
Tests for capacity are issue specific. The general test for capacity in respect of decisions covered by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is that the individual must be able to:
While the Law Commission has recently recommended that the same test should apply when assessing someone’s capacity to make a will, the current test set out in the case of Banks v Goodfellow, is whether the individual:
Additional caution should be exercised when assisting someone with a brain injury to make a will and it is advisable to arrange for a medical professional to assess the individual’s testamentary capacity. This is not a legal requirement but if the will were to be subsequently challenged it would serve as valuable evidence that the will was made at a time when the individual had the capacity to make the decisions in their will.
Given the sometimes unpredictable nature of fluctuating capacity, and the need to provide the best possible support for the individual making the will, other measures to support them, and to avoid later disputes, might include:
The most common grounds for contesting a will are a lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence (where someone coerced the individual making the will which often comes hand in hand with the question of capacity and vulnerability more generally). It is therefore incredibly important to ensure that as many protections as possible are in place to best protect against a challenge after death.
→ Contact us today for further information.
Katherine is a Partner in the Dispute Resolution Team who specialises in Trust and Estate Disputes.
Katherine’s experience in the field of Trusts and Inheritance Disputes covers challenging the validity of wills (including claims for lack of testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval, fraud, forgery and undue influence), claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, removal of executors and trustees, breach of trust claims, fraud cases involving trust structures and professional negligence claims relating to wills and trusts.
The Child Brain Injury Trust reports that every 90 seconds, someone in the UK is admitted to hospital with an acquired brain injury, and every 15 minutes, a child in the UK acquires a brain injury. While many will make a full recovery, for others, this may impact on their ability to make certain decisions as adults.
Once referred to as a “secret court”, the Court of Protection is increasingly limiting its privacy and is arguably becoming more open.
It is sometimes assumed that a will cannot be valid if it was made by a person who suffers from dementia. However, many people retain capacity to make a will for a significant period following their diagnosis.
People often consider executing a Lasting Power of Attorney (“LPA”) when they reach their later years, and their chances of suffering from a condition which may affect their cognitive ability increases. It is necessary for a donor (the person granting the LPA) to have capacity at the time it is signed pursuant to section 9(2)(c) of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (“the 2005 Act”). If someone’s capacity has started to fluctuate, this can result in uncertainly as to whether the LPA was validly executed.
People with dementia are at higher risk of financial abuse and in our experience, the majority of allegations of financial abuse and misappropriation of monies against vulnerable individuals are against the very people trusted to look after their affairs. Sadly, the volume of those allegations is on the rise.
Mental Health Awareness Week, with its focus this year on the theme of loneliness, is a timely reminder of our duty to protect loved ones and elderly clients who might be vulnerable to financial abuse and undue influence.
Financial abuse of older and vulnerable adults is sadly becoming more prevalent
The self-isolation and social distancing bought about as a result of the coronavirus pandemic leaves the elderly and incapacitated even more vulnerable to financial abuse. It is has been well reported that fraudsters are seeking to take advantage of the current situation whether via the internet, on the phone or in person but it also seems likely that this period will sadly see a rise in abuse of power of attorney by those closer to home.
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in the much publicised case of Re: AB (Termination of Pregnancy)[2019] EWCA CIV 1215.
Last month it was reported by the BBC that a consultant psychiatrist, Zholia Alemi, had been found guilty of four fraud and theft charges (and subsequently jailed for five years) having “redrafted [an elderly patient’s] will and fraudulently applied for power of attorney” in an effort to benefit from her estate. Alemi is said to have met the patient at a dementia clinic.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Waqar Shah
Dale Gibbons
Waqar Shah
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print