Services A-Z     Pricing

FCA’s Enforcement Watch 1 and what it means for the financial services industry

9 February 2026

The FCA has recently released its newsletter ‘Enforcement Watch 1’ (‘EW1’) – a new online publication providing legal practitioners and others involved in the financial services industry an invaluable insight into the regulatory body’s enforcement priorities, aims and policies.
 

The FCA’s regulatory scope is broad and complex, encompassing a wide range of activities and different markets, although as an organisation it is often criticised for a lack of transparency. The recent publication of EW1 signals a positive step toward the FCA achieving greater clarity regarding its enforcement appetite and regime.

The FCA’s enforcement focus
 

The first edition of EW1, published on 28 January 2026, covers (i) the FCA’s updated enforcement policy; (ii) the regulator’s case priorities; and (iii) its international partnerships.

With respect to the FCA’s enforcement priorities, EW1 reveals that, between June and December 2025, the FCA opened 23 new cases. Of those 23 cases, 18 are regulatory investigations, four are dual track criminal and regulatory investigations, and one is a pure criminal investigation. This portfolio of new case work spans a multitude of alleged misconduct across the sector, including:

  • suspected fraud, misappropriation of funds, and the provision of false information to the FCA;
  • market disclosure issues;
  • suspected unauthorised business, with a particular focus on the cryptoasset sector and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (for more detail about the regulation of cryptoassets, please see our previous article here);
  • Consumer Duty breaches by companies, with a particular focus on fair value for consumers;
  • inadequate oversight at authorised firms – EW1 notes that these new cases involved suspected system and controls failings where authorised firms may have caused harm through inadequate system oversight or by relying on third party providers;
  • the adequacy of firms’ financial crime controls; and
  • investigations into the consumer investment and asset management sectors, with a focus on misleading consumers and failing to recognise conflicts of interest.

As anticipated, EW1 stresses the importance of proactivity on the part of both individuals and firms to deal with problems quickly and effectively and to be transparent with the regulator. This is unsurprising given the FCA’s increasingly assertive supervisory approach and clear supervisory expectation that firms properly manage and mitigate risk and maintain an open and constructive relationship with the FCA.

The FCA also reiterated the factors that would support a decision to open a formal investigation, including: (i) repeated failures to be open about concerns; (ii) failing to address issues promptly; (iii) deliberately misleading the regulator, consumers or markets; and (iv) causing significant harm to consumers.

The FCA’s international partnerships
 

The FCA’s membership to the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (‘IOSCO’), as highlighted in the first edition of EW1, may signal a more prominent enforcement focus on cross-border information sharing and investigations. Notably, EW1 reveals that the FCA sent and received 476 requests for information via IOSCO. The FCA also highlighted its ability to receive electronic data from the U.S. more effectively, through leveraging the Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Act 2019.

The FCA has clearly indicated its aim to strengthen international partnerships with law enforcement agencies and other regulators through multiple channels – these moves take place in the context of the increasingly cross-border nature of financial crime, for example, growing cases of international online financial fraud schemes as reported by Europol’s Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (2024). Indeed, the FCA’s EW1 highlighted online frauds and scams, noting that ‘bad actors and platform providers are often based outside the UK.’ For more information about the FCA’s recent crackdown on illegal ‘finfluencers’, please see our previous article here.

What can we take from this?
 

It is particularly interesting to see that the FCA now has six investigations open in relation to potential breaches of the Consumer Duty. When this came into force in 2023, the FCA was very clear that it considered it to be a significant regulatory development that would drive improvements across the industry and it would not be shy about enforcing against firms that fell short of its – admittedly – high standards. This approach now appears to be bearing fruit. In addition, it also appears that the FCA remains interested in criminal or quasi-criminal issues and is certainly willing to use its full suite of powers to tackle such behaviours when required.

More generally, in the six-month period from June to December 2025, the FCA opened 23 new enforcement operations across its wide-ranging criminal and regulatory remit compared to 23 across the whole 12-month period from March 2024 – March 2025. After a significant downturn in new case openings between 2023 – 2025, whilst it attempted to clear the backlog of cases that had built up under enforcement’s previous leadership, it appears that the division is once again open for new business. EW1 may well be the FCA’s way of signalling that fact to the wider market.

Please contact Jill Lorimer and James Alleyne in our Financial Services group if you have questions about the topic raised in this blog. Our team of expert lawyers has an impressive track record of successfully advising regulated firms on supervisory issues as well defending both individuals and institutions facing regulatory or criminal investigations conducted by the FCA.

About the authors

James is a Partner in the firm’s Financial Services Group. He advises clients on the full spectrum of financial services and FCA-related matters, including on authorisation and approval applications, perimeter and supervisory issues, internal and enforcement investigations as well as cases before the Regulatory Decisions Committee and Upper Tribunal.

Isabella McDonnell is a trainee solicitor at Kingsley Napley and is currently in her third seat with the Criminal Litigation team.

 

Latest blogs & news

FCA’s Enforcement Watch 1 and what it means for the financial services industry

The FCA has recently released its newsletter ‘Enforcement Watch 1’ (‘EW1’) – a new online publication providing legal practitioners and others involved in the financial services industry an invaluable insight into the regulatory body’s enforcement priorities, aims and policies.

New UK crypto regime takes a step closer

HM Treasury has published a draft statutory instrument which, when brought into force, will introduce a new regulatory regime for cryptoassets in the UK.

Is the FCA’s name and shame policy now dead in the water?

On 6 February the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee published its response to the latest iteration of the FCA’s proposals to “name and shame” firms under investigation by the regulator.

Finfluencers – in the FCA’s sights

In March 2024 the FCA published a clear warning to those advertising trading and investments on social media about the risks of doing so, making it clear that it will “will take action against those touting financial products illegally.” Just two months later, in May 2024, the regulator announced that it had commenced criminal proceedings against a number of individuals for advertising foreign trading schemes on their social media platforms.

Motor finance: FCA drives towards formal redress scheme

The FCA is conducting a review into whether motor finance customers were overcharged as a result of the widespread use of discretionary commission arrangements in the motor finance industry. It had expected to set out its next steps in light of this review in September 2024. However, it has announced that it will not now do so until May 2025.

Market abuse letters - an increasingly used tool

Maintaining the integrity and cleanliness of the financial markets remains a key FCA priority and, indeed, is a statutory legal obligation on the regulator. Against that, however, is the fact that FCA’s track record in taking enforcement action against insider dealing and other forms of abusive behaviour is relatively poor. Since 2017 it has only achieved three criminal convictions for insider dealing, whilst its record for imposing civil fines on firms and individuals for breaches of the Market Abuse Regulation (“MAR”) is also unimpressive.

FCA's Anti-Greenwashing Rule Takes Effect: What It Means for Compliance and ESG Accountability

The FCA’s long awaited anti-greenwashing rule came into force on 31 May 2024. This rule is part of the wider Sustainability Disclosure Requirements regime and reflects the FCA’s strong commitment to ESG and to supporting the Government’s commitment to achieving net zero by 2050.

FCA’s plan to “name and shame” firms should be urgently reconsidered

The FCA’s recent consultation (CP24/2) on changes to its enforcement process has provoked what appears to be unanimous opposition from government and industry bodies. Of particular concern is the proposal in consultation paper (“the CP”) that the FCA will publish information about its enforcement investigations, including the identity of the subject of the investigation, where it assesses it to be in the public interest to do so. 

 

Immigration issues and the regulatory consequences for financial services firms

For firms regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), it is vital that the business – and its relevant employees – ensure that its conduct is without reproach in order to avoid supervisory or regulatory difficulties. This extends to issues of governance and administrative matters, as well as more obvious issues of conduct (such as, for example, financial misconduct) which often receive more press.

Bankers’ bonuses uncapped

This article first featured in Employee Benefits in November 2023. 

Three recent cases raise questions over FCA enforcement strategy

A recent sequence of adverse decisions by the Upper Tribunal could have significant implications for future Financial Conduct Authority cases.

The senior managers certification regime (SMCR) – fitness and propriety

Under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (“SMCR”), which was introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) to seek to remedy perceived industry wide failings following the 2008 financial crash, regulated staff must meet certain standards of fitness and propriety and will be personally accountable to the FCA for any failure to do so.

Firms covered by the SMCR are required to assess, both at the point of recruitment and on an annual basis, whether SMCR staff are fit and proper to perform their role. In the case of senior managers, firms that are covered by the regime must also seek approval from the FCA prior to appointment and in many cases the FCA may wish to closely scrutinise any such application.

Non-financial misconduct under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime

Non-financial misconduct has been an area of increasing regulatory focus for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over the last five years. To date, published regulatory outcomes have focused on the most egregious end of the spectrum, with the FCA handing out bans and fines for those already convicted in the criminal courts of serious sexual offences. However, these cases provide little guidance for FCA-regulated firms grappling with allegations of more nuanced conduct, such as the inappropriate use of social media on a personal

Deadline looms for previously passported firms to apply for UK authorisation

Pre-Brexit, some 8,000 financial services firms based in the EA or EEA relied on the mutual passporting regime to do business in the UK. Since 1 January 2021, such firms have been able to operate under a transitional temporary permissions regime (TPR). While some of those firms have now exited the UK market, most of those intending to continue to operate here are required to apply for full UK authorisation. The deadline for applications is 31 December 2022.

The FCA’s new regulatory approach to consumer protection

The FCA’s transformation to becoming an assertive, front footed regulator has been accelerated by three recent developments, all of which prioritise the protection of consumers.

FCA Enforcement Half Year Update: H1 2022

This half-year update provides an overview of recent enforcement activity by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the period from January to June 2022.

The FCA and consumer credit: Update

As the cost of living continues to rise, and subsequent demand for credit increases, the FCA has been clear with lenders as to its expectations for their treatment of customers. Indeed, with inflation predicated to reach 14%, consumers will see a significant reduction in disposable income and many may experience financial vulnerability for the first time. In this context, the FCA has clearly identified that a potential increase in dependence on credit poses significant risks to consumers.

Regulatory compliance, trust and confidence in the financial services sector

In a case that attracted national media coverage and emphasises the crucial importance of regulatory compliance and the highest standards of professional conduct in the financial services sector, the High Court dismissed a breach of contract claim brought by an investment manager.

Keeping the crypto market on its toes? The FCA publishes latest cryptoasset consumer research and takes regulatory action against Binance Markets Limited

For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.

The discontinuation of LIBOR and phasing in of SONIA in the Sterling Markets, what do we know so far?

Global financial markets are preparing to transition away from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and adopt an appropriate alternative risk free rate (“RFR”) by the end of 2021. What are the reasons for the move away from LIBOR, the progress to date in terms of identifying the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the most appropriate alternative rate in the Sterling markets, and the steps still required to be taken to ensure such markets are ready for the phasing out of LIBOR by the end of the year

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility