Promoting a good working culture in law firms - Part 2: The importance of wellbeing in the workplace
Julie Norris
One of the key responsibilities for any employer is to create an inclusive workplace culture where all individuals feel respected and supported. To be clear, the responsibility in respect of EDI does not stop at mere compliance with relevant legislative requirements, as these only set the basic minimum standard employers should be seeking to achieve. Nonetheless, it is helpful to set out, briefly, what these legal obligations are.
First, there is the overarching Equality Act 2010, which brought together extant legislation previously covering a range of EDI areas, such as race relations and sex and disability discrimination. The Equality Act now provides a comprehensive legal framework to protect the rights of individuals and advance equality of opportunity for all.
In relation to the legal services sector, there are further key obligations in relation to EDI.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), which regulates law firms and those working within them, also sets out key obligations in respect of encouraging EDI and prohibiting discriminatory behaviour in its recently launched Standards and Regulations (StaRs):
Legislation sets the minimum legal obligations, those being to ensure that your firm takes steps to remove potential discrimination, harassment and victimisation. It is clear however, that your regulatory obligations extend beyond mere compliance with the law: not only is an inclusive approach increasingly recognised as a commercial imperative for businesses, but it is also a fundamental component of promoting an optimal workplace culture.
What firms choose to put in place, in terms of appropriate policies and procedures relating to EDI, will no doubt be proportionate to, and dependent upon, the nature of the business and the size of the firm. Accordingly, to give effect to these obligations in the day-to-day running of your firm, and with the intention of improving your firm’s culture, you may want to think about the types of EDI policies and procedures you want to implement, or at least update, in order to achieve fair outcomes. As we discussed in our first blog , culture is not static and this means your EDI policies and initiatives cannot be set in stone. They will need regular re-visiting and updating and will need to reflect the firm’s regulatory obligations in addition to the basic requirements set out in the underpinning legislation.
Here are some key steps you might want to consider implementing:
This does not need to be complicated, but will need to be a comprehensive statement about what EDI means for your workforce, clients and other third parties you deal with. This document is not to be confused with your actual EDI Policy. This policy statement might include information about your commitment to the principles of EDI as well as setting out any legislative requirements. Such a statement usually states that you have a workplace culture which does not, for example, tolerate harassment or bullying (often referred to as a “zero-tolerance” approach).
or review the one you have in place - the Policy should outline your approach to key issues such as recruitment, retention and progression and be outward-facing so that clients understand how you are seeking to encourage equality of opportunity and respect for diversity within your workforce – ultimately these are the individuals acting for your clients.
in light of the LSB’s statutory guidance. You will need to be thinking about how you collect, monitor, analyse and report (this includes publishing) diversity of both your own workforce and of your clients. You must not see this simply as a tick-box exercise to comply with the requirements set by your oversight regulator and implemented by the SRA, but rather, as an opportunity to better understand the needs of your staff and clients. It might also highlight areas where you need to improve your performance and the quality of service you are providing to your clients.
from the data you have collected and analysed. Again, you will want to explore presenting this information in a way which works best for your firm, particularly with regard to any highlighted weaknesses or areas for improvement. These initiatives are likely to be different depending on your firm, but examples might relate to increasing representation of female and/or BAME solicitors at more senior levels in your firm, or recruiting trainees or apprentices from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds.
or review the one you have in place. In terms of recruitment, everyone wants to attract the best individuals, so you will want to think about adopting an approach to recruitment which is fair and encourages promotions, in order to maximise the chances of getting and retaining the best people for each role. Recruiting a diverse workforce is likely to increase employee wellbeing (and in turn increase productivity by enhancing motivation) and could reduce your recruitment costs (if you have less staff turnover). A further benefit is that a diverse workforce will better understand the needs of diverse clients, enabling you to be better placed to provide a quality service to those clients.
As we set out in our first blog, managers will have a key role in promoting EDI within their firm, and to drive forward a workplace culture which is built upon trust, two-way engagement and loyalty. This responsibility will extend to identifying and removing barriers, for example in recruitment, promotion and progression.
Julie Norris is a Partner in the Regulatory department and specialises in advising law firms and legal professionals on legal ethics, investigations, and public law matters.
Jessica Clay is a Senior Associate in the Regulatory department and specialises in legal services regulation, with a focus on regulatory compliance, legal ethics, investigations and public law matters.
Ensuring the safety and health of employees is a cornerstone of responsible business practice in the UK. At the heart of this responsibility lies the legal requirement to carry out workplace risk assessments—a duty enshrined in the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR). This article sets out the legal framework surrounding risk assessments, outlines practical steps for compliance, and includes expert insights from Andrew Sanderson of Kingsley Napley and Craig Lydiate of Eighty20 Risk Systems.
Pursuing a career in law is already a significant challenge without the added stress of worrying whether past mistakes could block your path to becoming a solicitor. Early-life convictions, cautions, academic disciplinary actions, or financial issues may all impact your eligibility for admission by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
On 18 November 2024, the SRA published its updated and now finalised guidance on internal investigations.
There has been a lot of media coverage about the benefits and dangers of artificial intelligence, and the speed of its development. Jessica Clay considers the challenges of regulation and whether it is keeping pace.
We are already half-way through 2024 and, as predicted, the fast-paced world of AML shows no signs of stagnation, with the key front line regulators such as the SRA frequently updating its AML guidance, as well as recent legislation from the European Commission, and specifically the creation of a new European AML agency in Germany. This blog continues our series of updates for legal practitioners and law firms on the key developments from recent months.
The Lawyer profiles our legal regulatory team who provide services and advice to law firms and lawyers.
At the start of November, the government will host the first global summit on artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on the safe use of AI. The AI Safety Summit will be at Bletchley Park, a venue representing innovation and pioneering, and once the top-secret home of WW2 codebreakers.
Last week the BSB issued new Social Media Guidance, which seeks to help barristers understand how their duties under the BSB Handbook may apply to their use of social media.
The government has today laid before parliament regulations further extending the prohibition of the facilitation of sanction breaches, limiting access to advice from UK lawyers by individuals and businesses tied to the Russian regime, even where they have no underlying nexus with the UK.
The High Court has provided welcome guidance on what exactly constitutes the conduct of litigation: Iain Miller & Charlotte Judd examine this perilously grey area of the law
It’s been over a year since the government launched its call for evidence on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), seeking the views of the public on introducing legislation to address this perceived problem.
This blog covers some important developments in the AML world since our last update for legal practitioners and law firms.
Updates to Legal Sector Affinity Group (“LSAG”) AML guidance
The LSAG AML guidance for the legal sector, designed to help legal professionals and firms comply with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (as amended), was updated on 28 March 2023.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given the green light by the Legal Services Board (LSB) to amend the SRA Codes of Conduct in respect of treating colleagues fairly and with respect.
The LSB’s Decision Notice states the SRA’s intention to update the Codes immediately, “without further publicity or allowing [firms and individuals] time to prepare for the alterations”.
Indeed, these changes have already taken effect, introducing in the Codes explicit requirements for individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, for managers to challenge behaviour that does not meet this standard, and for firms to treat those who work for and with them fairly and with respect, and to require their employees to meet that standard.
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
The government is on a path to introduce legislation that will enable the Solicitors Regulation Authority to take greater action against the ‘facilitators’ of money laundering; law firms will soon need to brace themselves for unlimited fines from the SRA for ‘economic crimes’.
Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are legal actions that are taken not necessarily with the goal of winning in court, but which instead aim to intimidate, to induce fear, to tire and consume the financial and psychological resources of the target.
Jessica Clay, Iain Miller, and Lucinda Soon are delighted to have contributed a chapter in the new title by Globe Law and Business “Risk Management in Law Firms”, published in October 2022. The chapter, republished here, discusses the SRA’s increased spotlight on ethical culture in law firms, its origins and evolution through the years, where we are now, and what is on the horizon.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Julie Norris
Julie Norris
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print