The outbreak of COVID-19 in the UK has caused unprecedented disruption and uncertainty across all aspects of our society. Workers are being encouraged to work from home where they can, to play their vital part in social distancing to prevent the spread of the infection, with self-isolation required if you, or a member of your household, are displaying symptoms of the virus.
In guidance issued last week by the Lord Chancellor, despite an unprecedented public health emergency, he remained clear that our courts across England and Wales have a critical role to play and should go on sitting where possible. Indeed, the Lord Chief Justice announced last Tuesday that new trials are able to start in the Crown Court provided they are expected to finish within three days or less. Cases estimated to last longer than three days listed to start before the end of April 2020 would be adjourned. Trials currently underway would generally proceed in the hope they can be completed.
Today’s guidance: what is happening to criminal trials?
However, in a statement issued this morning last week’s guidance has changed: the Lord Chief Justice Lord Burnett has now confirmed:
Today no new trials are to start. Jurors summoned for this week are to be released, if possible without entering the building, and told that they will be asked to return for trials where specific arrangements to ensure safety have been put in place.
All other hearings in the crown court that can lawfully take place remotely should do so."
The new edict is that:
- As of today, no new jury trials are to start until safety measures have been put in place;
- Jury trials that have already started should continue if possible with strict social distancing procedures ‘at all times and at all places within the court building’ and accordingly, on-going trials must be adjourned, if necessary, to allow these safety measures to be put in place.
What safety measures might we expect?
Precisely what the proposed safety measures might look like is unclear. No further information has been made available on how social distancing at court (and in court) is expected to look. How jury members are supposed to deliberate at 2 metres apart remains to be seen… it may well be that courts do not see jury trial running for some time to come.
In the event that safety measures are developed and deployed, barristers will then have to make decisions about whether those measures are sufficient to protect them for contracting Coronavirus.
Could E-trials work?
Whilst digital courts may well (technology dependent) be viable for many (interlocutory or non-trial) hearings, trials in the Crown Court do not lend themselves so readily to being conducted electronically. The physical presence of a range of different participants including the judge, jury, lawyers, defendants, witnesses and court staff, makes it difficult to see how they could be sensibly orchestrated online.
Guidance on attending court/returning instructions
According to Government guidance if you qualify as an older person or vulnerable adult at particular risk of COVID-19 (i.e. you are over 70, have an underlying health condition or are pregnant) you are not required to appear in person in hearings.
The Bar Standards Board (‘BSB’) issued a statement on Tuesday last week making clear that those individuals who withdrew from cases or refused instructions on the basis of following Government or Public Health England guidance would not be in breach of the BSB Handbook. Presumably, although not expressly stated, the return of instructions in these circumstances would fall within the ambit of rule C26.3.b of the Code of Conduct which permits the return of instructions (by self-employed barristers) if:
illness, injury, pregnancy, childbirth, a bereavement or a similar matter makes you unable reasonably to perform the services required in the instructions"
Failing which, the catch all, rC26.8 might be deployed to cover this situation, namely that
there is some other substantial reason for [returning your instructions]"
(Some) Barristers are key workers
That position appears to be reflected in the Government’s guidance - key worker/critical worker status and schools- also issued last week, which under ‘Key public services’ includes ‘those essential to the running of the justice system’. The Criminal Bar Association reported -
it has been confirmed that criminal barristers (and indeed duty solicitors, fee paid judges and others in critical roles essential to the running of the justice system) required to be at court are to be considered critical workers. It applies if one parent is a critical worker’"
Accordingly, barristers will fall within that limited pool of parents whose children will still be able to attend school from today so that they can continue to attend court. However if it’s at all possible for children to be at home, then they should be.
Today's guidance: do barristers have to go to court?
The answer is- it depends on what work you are doing.
If you are due to start a new jury trial today, that will not take place until specific arrangements have been put in place to ensure safety. Precisely what those measures are and how they will work in practice remain to be seen.
If you are halfway through a jury trial, Resident Judges along with HMCTS staff, will make a decision as to whether that trial can safely continue. It may be necessary to adjourn trials already underway for a short period of time to put those safety measures in place.
All other hearings that can lawfully take place remotely should do so.
The Bar's response
No doubt many members of the Bar will welcome the Lord Chief Justice’ decision today. Just last week, the Bar Council issued a statement in which they questioned how proceedings conducted in person (but particularly jury trials) could be consistent with the Government’s health advice. Today’s shift in approach is a sensible one because, let’s face it, on what basis do short jury trials present less of a health risk to those involved than longer ones? Given the risk of infection, it is only right that action is taken to ensure all courts have adequate access to soap, sanitising hand-gel and regular cleaning of conference rooms. Those preventative measures ought also to extend to security checks. We wouldn’t be surprised if, going forward, it will be mandatory for all security staff to wear gloves to reduce the risk of infection being passed on.
What does remain unclear is whether we will see any change in policy regarding prison visits. One can well understand a barrister’s reluctance to attend a conference in prison at the moment given that such environments can be vulnerable to pandemic outbreaks. There is already one confirmed case of coronavirus at HMP Manchester and another at HMP High Down. It will be interesting to see whether, following today’s shift in policy, prison visits will be put on hold for the foreseeable.
Regulatory compliance
If you are following Government or Public Health England guidance and are planning on retuning instructions before or even part way through a trial, you must ensure that you are complying with all other requirements in the Handbook:
- If you need to cease to act and return instructions, you should clearly explain to your client, the professional client and (if during a trial) the judge, the reasons for doing so (rC27); and
- You should take all appropriate steps to protect your client’s interests (rC18), which in the current circumstances, puts a greater emphasis on making sure a case is ‘trial ready’ so that when the courts are able to hear a case there are no further, unnecessary delays.
COVID-19 has shone a spotlight on the need for consistency between the Ministry of Justice, the BSB and those they regulate. For many, it will be a wake-up call for the Criminal Courts to invest in better technology so that should a similar catastrophic event happen in the future, the justice system will not creak to a halt.
About the authors
Kathryn Sheridan is a barrister in the Regulatory team. She is an experienced regulatory and criminal law advocate.
Julie Norris is a Partner in the Regulatory department and specialises in advising in the health, professional services, legal and financial fields.
Latest blogs & news
Workplace risk assessments: understanding legal duties under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
Ensuring the safety and health of employees is a cornerstone of responsible business practice in the UK. At the heart of this responsibility lies the legal requirement to carry out workplace risk assessments—a duty enshrined in the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR). This article sets out the legal framework surrounding risk assessments, outlines practical steps for compliance, and includes expert insights from Andrew Sanderson of Kingsley Napley and Craig Lydiate of Eighty20 Risk Systems.
Law students: academic misconduct and the SRA early character & suitability assessment
Pursuing a career in law is already a significant challenge without the added stress of worrying whether past mistakes could block your path to becoming a solicitor. Early-life convictions, cautions, academic disciplinary actions, or financial issues may all impact your eligibility for admission by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
SRA Guidance – internal investigations and guidance for in-house advisers
On 18 November 2024, the SRA published its updated and now finalised guidance on internal investigations.
AI Regulation – where next for law firms?
There has been a lot of media coverage about the benefits and dangers of artificial intelligence, and the speed of its development. Jessica Clay considers the challenges of regulation and whether it is keeping pace.
AML update for Lawyers and Law Firms
We are already half-way through 2024 and, as predicted, the fast-paced world of AML shows no signs of stagnation, with the key front line regulators such as the SRA frequently updating its AML guidance, as well as recent legislation from the European Commission, and specifically the creation of a new European AML agency in Germany. This blog continues our series of updates for legal practitioners and law firms on the key developments from recent months.
The Lawyer: Focus on our Legal Regulatory Services team
The Lawyer profiles our legal regulatory team who provide services and advice to law firms and lawyers.
Client confidentiality— to disclose or not disclose?
The global rise of AI: opportunities and challenges
At the start of November, the government will host the first global summit on artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on the safe use of AI. The AI Safety Summit will be at Bletchley Park, a venue representing innovation and pioneering, and once the top-secret home of WW2 codebreakers.
BSB issues new Social Media Guidance
Last week the BSB issued new Social Media Guidance, which seeks to help barristers understand how their duties under the BSB Handbook may apply to their use of social media.
Law firms: radical reform on the cards for the future supervision of AML
- Most England and Wales based law firms are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), including for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter terrorism (CT) purposes.
- Under reforms currently being considered, responsibility for the supervision of AML and CT could be taken away from the SRA (and other legal regulators UK-wide), and given to a new body, meaning firms could be subject to dual regulation in future.
- The consultation on this issue closes on 30 September 2023 and given the potential implications for law firms UK wide, is worth responding to.
SANCTIONS: UK lawyers restricted from advising in transactional/non-contentious matters for those tied to the Russia regime: new regulations coming into force on 30 June 2023
The government has today laid before parliament regulations further extending the prohibition of the facilitation of sanction breaches, limiting access to advice from UK lawyers by individuals and businesses tied to the Russian regime, even where they have no underlying nexus with the UK.
Navigating litigation: what’s reserved?
The High Court has provided welcome guidance on what exactly constitutes the conduct of litigation: Iain Miller & Charlotte Judd examine this perilously grey area of the law
When will I be SLAPPed? Lawyers need to know
It’s been over a year since the government launched its call for evidence on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), seeking the views of the public on introducing legislation to address this perceived problem.
AML Update For Legal Practitioners and Law Firms - May 2023
This blog covers some important developments in the AML world since our last update for legal practitioners and law firms.
Updates to Legal Sector Affinity Group (“LSAG”) AML guidance
The LSAG AML guidance for the legal sector, designed to help legal professionals and firms comply with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (as amended), was updated on 28 March 2023.
Fair treatment of colleagues: what you need to know about the SRA’s updated Codes of Conduct
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given the green light by the Legal Services Board (LSB) to amend the SRA Codes of Conduct in respect of treating colleagues fairly and with respect.
The LSB’s Decision Notice states the SRA’s intention to update the Codes immediately, “without further publicity or allowing [firms and individuals] time to prepare for the alterations”.
Indeed, these changes have already taken effect, introducing in the Codes explicit requirements for individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, for managers to challenge behaviour that does not meet this standard, and for firms to treat those who work for and with them fairly and with respect, and to require their employees to meet that standard.
New rules for judges to tackle counter-inclusive behaviours
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
Our ‘at a glance’ guide for law firms: SRA guidance on effective supervision
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
Unlimited SRA fines on the horizon
The government is on a path to introduce legislation that will enable the Solicitors Regulation Authority to take greater action against the ‘facilitators’ of money laundering; law firms will soon need to brace themselves for unlimited fines from the SRA for ‘economic crimes’.
SRA issues Warning Notice on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation
Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are legal actions that are taken not necessarily with the goal of winning in court, but which instead aim to intimidate, to induce fear, to tire and consume the financial and psychological resources of the target.
Culture matters: a new era for law firm risk management
Jessica Clay, Iain Miller, and Lucinda Soon are delighted to have contributed a chapter in the new title by Globe Law and Business “Risk Management in Law Firms”, published in October 2022. The chapter, republished here, discusses the SRA’s increased spotlight on ethical culture in law firms, its origins and evolution through the years, where we are now, and what is on the horizon.
You may also be interested in:
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
You may also be interested in:
COVID-19 – another opportunity to prioritise but not panic
A review of ethical standards for RICS Chartered Surveyors: avoiding conflict when carrying out Red Book valuations
Julie Norris
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print