Lost Will - Lost Inheritance?

16 July 2020

On the death of a person known to have made a Will, it’s pretty rare that the Will can’t be found.

The original will is usually, (in order of likelihood)

  • In the strong-room of the law firm that prepared it; or
  • At home; or
  • At the bank

Most people lodge the Will with their solicitors keeping a copy of the Will amongst their papers at home. After they’ve died, the executors will contact the solicitors and secure the release of the original Will.

If neither original Will nor copy can be found, then the likelihood is that no Will was made. A surprisingly large number of people share their intention to make a Will with their family - or imply that a Will has already been made - but never get round to it. In that case, before making an assumption that there’s no Will and that the “Intestacy Rules” thus govern the distribution of the estate the family might sensibly;

  • Check with the deceased’s regular solicitors to see if any Will was made.
  • Check with other law firms in the area to see if they were ever instructed.
  • Insert an advert in the “Wills and Whereabouts” section of the Law Society Gazette.
  • Contact the Probate Service in case they hold it (although you would normally expect to see a trace to the will being there such as a dated certificate of deposit).
  • Consider paying a small fee to a search organisation to handle the search steps.

Where a copy of the Will can be found but no original, then the question is whether the original has been merely lost or was “revoked”.

If it’s assumed that the original Will has simply been mislaid, then it’s possible to admit the copy of the Will to Probate provided the Probate Registry is satisfied there’s sufficient evidence to rebut the “presumption of revocation”.  The law assumes that if an original Will, previously in the possession of the deceased, can’t be found, then it’s been revoked. Although compliance with strict legal formalities is required to create a valid will, there are next to no formalities for revoking one. Tearing up the Will or otherwise destroying it “with the intention” of revoking it will suffice.

Generally, is should be noted;

  • Revocation of a Will doesn’t revive an earlier Will ;and
  • Revocation of a Will on the assumption  that an earlier Will revives means the revocation is ineffective.
  • The presumption of revocation does not arise if the Will was  not in the possession of the deceased but a third party- for example the firm of solicitors with whom the will was lodged.

In my experience, very few Wills are simply revoked with the intention that the terms of the Will would be replaced with the intestacy rules.  In almost every case, a Will is revoked only because a new Will is being signed. So where a copy will only can be found, and that Will is made within a few years of death, and reflects what the deceased might be expected to have wanted, then, while the law might “presume” revocation, the family might sensibly presume that the original has merely been lost.

In many cases, the issue of whether or not a “lost” Will was revoked is not, in practice, and in the family context, a big issue if, say:

  • The Will merely reflected the intestacy distribution (e.g. on the death of a surviving party to a marriage, a Will that left everything to the children equally).
  • The family members who inherit on intestacy are entirely willing to enter into  a deed of variation to meet any legacies contained in the lost Will.

Problems arise where the contents of the lost Will are wholly at odds with the distribution on intestacy. An elderly person who has never married may well, for example, have executed a Will leaving everything to charity or to beloved godchildren. It’s unlikely that they would have revoked that Will shortly before death so that the estate passed on intestacy, perhaps, to a whole raft of distant relatives with whom there was no contact (not even a Christmas card). But, clearly, those distant relatives have a vested interest in the application of the presumption of revocation rather than see the copy Will admit to probate.

In a recent matter we handled, the copy Will of an elderly lady provided that her entire estate pass to her late husband’s children (i.e. her step-children) save for a few small legacies to charity and friends. The affidavit that supported the (successful) application to admit the copy Will to probate confirmed:

  • That the contents of copy Will followed a pattern of similar Wills made over the years (the legacies to friends and charity changed slightly with each successive Will but the gift of residue to step children was a constant).
  • That there was no change in the warm relationship with the step children.
  • That there was no contact with the grandchildren of her late brother who would take on intestacy and no challenge by them to admission of the copy Will to probate.

Contested applications to admit a copy Will to Probate are rare. They rarely involve distant relations who might not, in usual circumstances, have expected to have benefited from the deceased’s estate. More likely is a case where children, who would inherit on intestacy, challenge a copy Will that leaves a substantial part of the estate to someone else. This was the situation in Blyth v. Sykes [2019] where the terms of the copy Will provided for a quarter of the estate to pass to the ex-husband of one of the deceased’s daughters. There was a similar, recently reported,  case in America, where a brother (who would take everything under the American intestacy rules) argued against the admission to probate of a copy  Will which left a house to the deceased’s ex-wife.

The essential message of this blog is clear; it’s important to keep your original Will in a safe place where your executors can find it. A law firm strong-room might well be the safest option. The will is less likely to be lost and there’s no risk of the will being dishonestly destroyed by a person who would otherwise take on intestacy (and one assumes this occasionally happens!). If the law firm holding the Will loses it (which, definitely, has occasionally happened!), then the “presumption of revocation" doesn’t arise.

Further information

If in doubt, and in the interests of peace of mind, please do contact Jim Sawer or the Private Client team.


ABout the author

Jim Sawer is a partner in our Private Client team. He has a broad private client practice and has advised families in the UK and overseas, including those with commercial and landed interests, for over 30 years.  Clients appreciate his ability to identify the true crux of a matter promptly and his results-orientated approach to resolving private client issues in the family context.


Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility