Allegations of workplace bullying are sadly all too common. Media reports this year of high-profile individuals such as the Duchess of Sussex and Priti Patel being accused of bullying are just a few examples.
Employers have duties to take reasonable care of the health and safety of their employees. These duties arise under common law, health and safety legislation and are also an implied term of the employment contract. It extends to mental as well as physical health and encompasses workplace bullying given the impact such behaviour can have on employees’ mental health and wellbeing.
It is important to remember that employers owe these duties to all their employees, including those accused of bullying. It goes without saying that victims of bullying should be protected. However, employers also need to protect those accused of bullying and be mindful of the difficulties they may face when such allegations are made, including the potential damage to their wellbeing, reputation and employment/career, particularly where it turns out that they were wrongly accused. Failing to do so could leave employers exposed to claims by the accused employee of, for example, unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination.
Steps employers can take when dealing with allegations of bullying to ensure that they do not breach their obligations towards the accused employees include the following:
- Referring to their relevant internal policies and procedures (such as bullying and harassment, grievance and disciplinary policies) and ensuring they are complied with.
- Considering with the parties involved whether the matter can be resolved informally before instigating any formal process. For example, it may be possible to resolve the matter by having a private discussion with the parties without the need for formal action.
- If a formal process is instigated, carrying out a fair and reasonable investigation into the allegations promptly and giving the accused employee a proper opportunity to respond.
- Dealing with the matter sensitively, while keeping an open mind (not making any assumptions) and remaining impartial. Reassuring the accused that no conclusions have been reached during the course of any investigation.
- Carefully considering how the working relationship between the complainant and the accused will be managed while any process remains ongoing. Employers should avoid knee-jerk reactions like automatically suspending the accused employee or making other changes to their working arrangements (eg. transferring them to another department) as this could give the impression that the outcome of any investigation is predetermined. Instead, employers should consider whether any such action is reasonable, appropriate or necessary in the particular circumstances of the case.
- Considering whether it would be appropriate to offer workplace mediation with an independent third party to help repair the working relationship and resolve any conflicts, particularly in cases where an investigation does not result in a finding of bullying but there is clearly a damaged working relationship. Other alternatives which may be appropriate include changing the duties, work location or reporting lines of one or both parties (with their consent).
- Maintaining confidentiality throughout the matter (including the names of the parties involved and the details of the allegations) and keeping to a minimum the number of people involved, where possible, to reduce any negative impact on the parties concerned.
- Considering whether the bullying complaints have been made in good faith or could be false or even malicious (eg. retaliation by a disgruntled employee or a case of ‘upward bullying’). If a complaint is found to be made in bad faith, the employer will need to consider whether action ought to be taken against the complainant. However, it is important to bear in mind the potential exposure to complaints of whistleblowing or victimisation by the complainant if such action is taken against them.
- If a complaint of bullying is upheld, consider whether there are any mitigating factors and ensure that any formal action taken against the accused employee is proportionate and appropriate to the circumstances.
- Ensuring that the accused employee is provided with appropriate support during any process. For example, by providing access to confidential helplines and counselling or employee assistance programmes.
Dealing with workplace bullying can be very challenging for employers who will be keen to demonstrate a ‘zero-tolerance’ approach to such behaviour. However, such allegations are also immensely stressful for the accused employee and it is important for employers not to overlook their duties towards those individuals in order to avoid exposure to claims.
This article was first published by People Management, you can also read in full by clicking here.
About the Author
Bina is an employment law specialist with considerable experience in dealing with all aspects of the employment relationship. She particularly enjoys dealing with equality and discrimination matters. She acts for both employers and senior executives across various sectors with particular expertise in the legal, financial and other professional services and higher education sectors as well as with luxury brands. Bina is a tough negotiator and a formidable litigator and regularly deals with claims in the Employment Tribunal helping to achieve the best results for her clients.
Latest blogs & news
Progressive developments in immigration law have become a rare phenomenon, so the Home Office’s new policy – which halves the route to settlement for certain young people who have resided in the UK for more than half of their lives – is welcome news.
In 2012, as a recently elected MP, Kwasi Kwarteng co-authored “Britannia Unchained: Global Lessons for Growth and Properity”, a political pamphlet which championed risk-taking and innovation in the UK economy, and which ever since has led some to label him a fervent Brexiteer. Appointed as the Business Secretary in January 2021, only a few months later his department (BEIS) published one of the longest and most ambitious government White Papers in recent years.
Cate Maguire looks at how the Barder principle has been applied in cases involving 'known unknowns'
World Menopause Day was held on 18 October 2021. It is an opportunity to break the stigma and taboo that still exists around menopause and to encourage open dialogue about what is a natural and very significant transition in a woman’s life.
Coronavirus is having a serious impact on businesses and the global economy. Sadly, many businesses have been impacted to the extent that they have or will have to put cost-cutting measures in place. For some individuals this will result in their role being put at risk of redundancy.
In light of the announcement that an independent inquiry into the Government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic will begin in spring 2022, Kingsley Napley hosted a webinar last week on the theme of Preparing for Public Inquiries in conjunction with Blackstone Chambers and FTI Consulting. For anyone who missed this event, a recording is available here (LINK) and we have also prepared the summary below.
The Youth Mobility Scheme allows employers to access younger workers from countries such as India and Iceland for two years. With skills shortages afflicting critical sectors, now might be the time for the government to consider a youth visa agreement with the EU.
In revised guidance first published in July, the Government stated that it is no longer instructing people to work from home if they can. In line with that, many employers have planned and begun implementing a return to the workplace. However, as the latest figures and the Government’s recently published Autumn and Winter Plan seem to indicate, it is clear that the risk of contracting COVID-19 will continue to be a genuine and serious one for some time.
From being the centrepiece of England’s post-Covid recovery with ‘eat out to help out’, the hospitality sector is now struggling to rebuild after lockdowns, furlough and rising food prices. At the same time many restaurants, cafes and pubs are coming up against the hard realities of a post-Brexit immigration policy and discovering what it means for their business.
Earlier this year it was announced that the Government had plans to consult on changes to our flexible working regime. The Government’s Consultation Paper has now been published and illustrates the Government’s intentions regarding how flexible working rights will operate in future.
A recent case has highlighted a trend that that we have seen over recent years, with Employment Tribunals finding that the dismissal of a senior executive can be fair where there has been a breakdown in relations amongst a management team and one director / executive is considered to be more at fault (Moore v Phoenix Product Development Ltd EAT/0070/20). Also, the procedural requirements for such dismissals may be more limited, in this case, the fact that no right of appeal was offered did not render the dismissal unfair.
You may be surprised to learn that, without realising it, you may be a whistleblower. If you are a manager, you could easily come across a situation in which you are expected to manage (or even dismiss) a whistleblower, without anyone warning you of the dangers.
Employers have a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of their staff and this includes those facing such allegations, says Bina Patel
In recent weeks, a number of commentators have predicted the “Great Resignation”—a mass exodus of employees leaving their jobs following the wake-up call the pandemic has afforded them. Microsoft research has indicated that almost half of the worldwide workforce is ready to resign this year, with just under 40% of UK and Irish workers saying they are ready to quit. Many have had cause to re-evaluate their careers during COVID and with lockdown restrictions set to ease further, people are considering their options. If the “Great Resignation” is upon us, there are a few things employers and employees should bear in mind.
“Freedom Day”, and what it actually means in practice, is not proving to be as straightforward as some had hoped (and arguably as the Government had initially led the business community to believe). Employers can be forgiven for feeling confused as to what is expected of them and what they should be doing in terms of bringing their employees back into the workplace. We are by no means at the end of the debate, but we summarise below, the latest developments
We have seen examples of people being ‘outed’ for posting racist comments online by individual bystanders who have been able to find their LinkedIn profiles and then contact relevant employers calling for the employee in question to lose their job. Unfortunately, this is nothing new. But what can an organisation do in these circumstances, if it wants to demonstrate that it stands against racism and discrimination?
Most disputes between partners of professional services firms are settled either through confidential negotiations or arbitration. A public resolution of the matter through a full hearing and reported judgment is a rare occurrence. A recent example of such a case involving an ex-partner of a law firm is a useful reminder that it is difficult to challenge profit share or bonus decisions as an irrational exercise of discretion.
In a case that attracted national media coverage and emphasises the crucial importance of regulatory compliance and the highest standards of professional conduct in the financial services sector, the High Court dismissed a breach of contract claim brought by an investment manager.
So the Prime Minister has announced that most restrictions in place due to the coronavirus pandemic will be lifted on 19 July, despite acknowledging that the pandemic itself is far from over and that case numbers are expected to continue rising.