Services A-Z     Pricing

HMRC Covid scheme amnesty: action by 31 December 2025

23 September 2025

The COVID pandemic was a difficult time for businesses, and many legitimately relied on financial support provided through government schemes to help them to survive and retain employees. However, it is estimated by HMRC that circa £10 billion was also lost as a result of incorrect applications and outright fraud.
 

Which Covid schemes are included in the amnesty?

The repayment window is designed to allow businesses to return funds they believe may have been claimed in error. It is an opportunity to resolve any uncertainties and avoid enforcement action being taken in respect of payments made incorrectly. This scheme applies to a wide range of COVID-era support, including the:

  • Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme;
  • Self Employed Income Support Scheme;
  • Eat Out to Help Out Scheme;
  • Cultural Recovery Fund;
  • Business support grants;
  • Grants from the Department for Health & Social Care; and
  • Business Loan Guarantee Schemes.

Whistleblower website

A website has been set up by HMRC to allow people to report suspected fraud relating to Covid funds. It is not clear whether any reward will be offered to incentivise making such a report, given HMRC announced its intention to launch an enhanced reward scheme earlier this year. 

The reporting website states that “there are no personal or legal repercussions if we find that no fraud was committed”. Regardless of whether a complaint has merit, lack of disclosure may result in businesses having to cooperate in complex  and costly investigations by HMRC to demonstrate that any sums received were properly claimed.

What should business owners do?

During the pandemic, many businesses acted swiftly to secure support amid rapidly changing guidance and eligibility criteria. In some cases, payments may have been made based on misunderstood rules or evolving circumstances. Given the risk of enforcement action following the amnesty period, or investigations arising from unmeritorious reports, businesses should consider:

  1. Reviewing the accuracy of claims made and ensuring that proper records are kept;
  2. Seeking professional advice on eligibility; and
  3. Making voluntary repayments during the amnesty period if appropriate.

Taking proactive steps and obtaining advice now may help to avoid reputational issues, mitigate potential penalties and interest, and demonstrate good governance.

About the authors

Waqar is a Partner in the Dispute Resolution department, focusing on the resolution of complex tax matters. He acts for high net worth individuals and corporate clients across all sectors in respect of HMRC disputes and investigations across the full range of taxes. This typically includes VAT disputes, employment tax matters (including 'IR35'/off-payroll working), customs/excise duty issues, tax fraud investigations, and more recently, National Minimum Wage enquiries.

Andreas is a partner in our employment team. He has substantial litigation experience, with a particular focus on complex and high value employment and partnership disputes.

 

Latest blogs & news

Civil Fraud Case Update: Q1 2026

This quarterly civil fraud update provides a summary of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period of January - March 2026.

“Recruitment Rewired”: what employers need to know about automated recruitment

 On 31 March 2026, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) published its Report, “Recruitment Rewired: an update on the ICO’s work on the fair and responsible use of automation in recruitment, setting out its findings and regulatory expectations for employers using AIenabled or automated tools in recruitment. 

Cross-border tax scrutiny: what non-residents need to know about UK tax investigations

Many people mistakenly believe that once they've established residency outside the UK, HMRC's authority over their tax affairs ceases to exist. However, HMRC retains the power to examine historical matters stretching back up to two decades in the most serious cases, and UK-situated assets remain within their jurisdiction regardless of where the owner physically resides. 

Spring statement 2026: What it really means for taxpayers

The 2026 Spring Statement, delivered on 3 March 2026, was intentionally modest in ambition and delivery. Reflecting the government’s stated preference for a single major fiscal event each year, the Spring Statement was used primarily to set out the economic context and respond to the Office for Budget Responsibility’s latest forecasts, rather than to announce wide ranging tax reform. Stability and predictability were clearly prioritised over new policy intervention.

Employment law changes tech businesses need to know about

A significant number of employment law reforms are coming into effect in 2026 and 2027 following the introduction of the Employment Rights Act 2025 at the end of last year. 

When does tax litigation cross the line? Indemnity costs outcome in the First-tier Tax Tribunal

Costs in tax litigation often catch even experienced advisors off guard. Unlike other areas of civil litigation, where costs consequences are ever-present and a continuous strategic consideration, proceedings before the First-tier Tax Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (“FTT”) are often approached with less emphasis on potential costs exposure.

Managing reputation in tax disputes

Privacy and confidentiality in tax cases have always been important, particularly where the taxpayer is someone in the public eye. Whilst a tax enquiry, or indeed litigation, does not mean that the taxpayer has ‘done something wrong’, there are certain negative inferences made by the public and media which could impact future opportunities for the individual or corporate involved.

Court of Appeal confirms strict approach to late tax appeals: What taxpayers need to know

One of the benefits of an appeal before the First-tier Tax Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) is that it is seen as less formal than an appeal in the Higher Courts.  However, the Court of Appeal's recent ruling in HMRC v Medpro Healthcare [2026] is a reminder in case it was needed that deadlines matter in tax disputes and securing permission for a late appeal is not guaranteed.

No time limit on shareholders’ rights to petition for unfair prejudice

Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 provides one of the most important protections available for shareholders - allowing a shareholder to apply to the court by petition for relief where “the company’s affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members generally or of some part of its members (including at least himself),…”. These claims are often termed as “corporate divorce”.

What tech businesses need to know in 2026

At our recent Tech Briefing, 'What tech businesses need to know in 2026', we explored how the EU’s Digital Omnibus package and the UK’s Employment Rights Act will reshape compliance for UK tech SMEs. 

The Olympic Games: Swift justice through the CAS Ad Hoc Division

The 2026 Winter Olympic Games in Italy are in full swing, showcasing athletic excellence on the world stage. At the time of writing, British hopes remain high despite some agonisingly close finishes, with Kirsty Muir, Mia Brookes, Jen Dodds and Bruce Mouat all delivering thrilling performances that placed them just outside the medals.

2025 in review: International arbitration

2025 was a notable year for arbitration in England & Wales, marked by legislative change, technological advances, and significant judicial developments that continue to shape the arbitration landscape.

Reform of UK Employment Law: A 2026 guide for french employers in the UK

As 2026 begins, the UK is entering a period of the most substantial reform of employment rights in a generation. The Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA 2025”) became law in December 2025 following extensive Parliamentary debate and marks a decisive shift in the balance between employers and workers. Overall, ERA 2025 represents a material strengthening of workers’ rights in the UK, bringing employment protections closer to European standards in several key respects. 

2025 in review: Trust and estate disputes

2025 produced many interesting decisions in trust and estate disputes in the courts of England & Wales. We consider just a few of those key decisions below, which illustrate that the outcome in cases of this nature remains highly dependent on the particular facts of the case and available evidence.  

Data protection v defamation as a means to protect reputation – where are we now and what can we expect in 2026?

There has been a trend in recent years of seeking to use data protection claims as a means of obtaining redress for reputational harm, which would traditionally have been sought through defamation proceedings.

Civil Fraud Quarterly Round-Up: Q4 2025

This quarterly civil fraud update provides a summary of reported decisions handed down in the courts of England and Wales in the period of October - December 2025.

2025 in review: Under construction - Tax investigations

In Rachel Reeve’s Budget on 26 November 2025, the Chancellor set out plans, among other things a to tackle fraud within the Construction Industry Scheme (“CIS”) and announced a technical consultation “aimed at simplifying and improving the administration of the scheme”.

HMRC’s strengthened reward scheme for whistleblowers of tax avoidance and evasion

The Chancellor has announced the terms of the financial incentive for those who report serious tax avoidance or evasion, the Strengthened Reward Scheme. Between 2023 and 2024, there is estimated to be a tax gap of £46.8 billion between the amount of tax recovered by HMRC and the amount of tax due to HMRC. With a minimum threshold of £1.5 million in unpaid tax, the scheme aims to address the tax gap by specifically targeting large-scale tax evasion by companies, wealthy individuals, and offshore or avoidance schemes.

Under construction: Tax investigations

In Rachel Reeve’s Budget on 26 November 2025, the Chancellor set out plans, among other things a to tackle fraud within the Construction Industry Scheme (“CIS”) and announced a technical consultation “aimed at simplifying and improving the administration of the scheme”.

Whistling in the Wind

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in the important whistleblowing cases Wicked Vision and Barton Turns highlights the need for legislative reform of the UK’s outdated and ineffective rules on workplace whistleblowing.  To quote from its final sentence:

Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

Contact us today

Get in touch

Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility