Services A-Z     Pricing

Dispute Resolution Law Blog

27 January 2014

Anti-social media – how the law can tackle online abuse and harassment

The issue of online abuse, particularly aimed at celebrities and high profile people, has come to the fore again this week. Former footballer and sports pundit, Stan Collymore,accused Twitter of not doing enough to protect its users having been subjected to racial abuse and threats of violence (seemingly because he gave his opinion that Luis Suarez dived to win a penalty for Liverpool), and Isabella Sorley and John Nimmo were jailed after they subjected Caroline Ciado-Perez, a high-profile feminist, and Stella Creasy, an MP, to online abuse after their campaign for a woman to appear on a Bank of England note. 

Ryan Mowat

20 January 2014

High Court examines the interrelationship between Inheritance Act and the Insolvency Act

In the case of B v IB [2013] EWHC 3755 (Fam) the High Court has determined the status of an application made under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 issued during divorce proceedings where the husband had died during the process and the wife intended to commence new proceedings under s.10 of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. 

Katie Allard

16 January 2014

How can I challenge a freezing order over my assets?

The purpose of a freezing order is to prevent you from disposing or dealing with your assets so that you cannot put your assets beyond the claimant’s reach should the claimant obtain and wish to enforce a judgment against you.

Fiona Simpson

30 December 2013

Expert shopping is not for the privileged

The use of experts in litigation cases to support evidence, and more specifically the act of shopping for experts has brought the issue of legal professional privilege under the Court’s spotlight again.  

9 December 2013

Disputing a Will based on undue influence – a challenge for Claimants?

In England & Wales, you have the right to leave your estate to whoever you choose – but a surprise beneficiary or unexpectedly large gift may cause alarm bells to ring for those left behind. At a time when emotions are high, suspicions surrounding the reasons why a Will may have been changed to add a new beneficiary or alter significantly the size of a gift, are likely to be rife. However, while there may be elements of mistrust, it can be very hard to effectively prove that the deceased’s decision making process in executing the Will was undermined by the influence of another person and that the Will is invalid on the grounds of undue influence.

Katherine Pymont

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility