So, you're a founder of a start up business, you've worked hard to get it off the ground and you have even found investors who are willing to provide the funds you need to grow your business and achieve your goals.
Sounds perfect doesn’t it? However, what you don’t want to do is end up in a situation whereby once the investment round has closed you lose all the rights and control you had before the investment was made. To prevent that from happening, there are certain terms which can be incorporated into the investment documents to help ensure that your rights as a startup founder are protected post-investment.
It goes without saying that the terms of each investment and the documentation containing those terms will usually be negotiated in one way or another before they are signed up to. Although there is no guarantee that investors will be willing to accept some or any of the terms you request as a startup founder, you will need to balance the potential of the investment to transform your business alongside the chances of you losing control, and perhaps even the value in your equity.
With that in mind, this blog aims to set out some of the terms which founders should be looking to secure in order to protect themselves:
Right to be a director (or to appoint one)
Directors are responsible for most of the day to day management of a company, and directors should be able to access all relevant financial and other information. As a founder you will most likely already be a director of the company and this is a right you will want to ensure you retain for so long as you are holding shares in the company. You will want to make sure that the right covers the ability to appoint yourself or someone of your choosing. Including this right will mean that you continue to have influence, and remained fully informed in relation to the business.
In all likelihood, post-investment you will be required to have a service agreement in place with the company (if you haven’t already got one). Included in your service agreement will be a number of restrictive covenants which will apply to you both during your employment and for a certain period of time after you cease to be employed.
These restrictive covenants typically restrict you from working with or being involved in another business which competes with the startup and from poaching clients or employees. Whilst it is entirely usual for an investor to require these terms to be included, as a founder you will obviously want to ensure that they are limited in terms of time, location and business sector, so that you are able to work in another business if you leave (or are forced to leave) earlier than you have anticipated. We therefore recommend thinking seriously about what is realistic, according to your personal circumstances.
Shares and leaver provisions
It is often the case that employees who hold shares will, upon their employment ceasing, be forced to offer up some or all of their shares (usually initially to the other shareholders, or to the company itself), in accordance with certain provisions in the company’s articles of association (see our related blog, Articles of Association, Shareholders’ Agreements and Investors’ Agreements – what’s the difference?). As a founder, ideally any such provisions would not apply to you at all, but it is increasingly common for them to apply to some degree. If they do apply, then ideally some or all of your shares will “vest” over a certain period of time, ie they will no longer be subject to the provisions, and there will then be less impact should you leave in the future. It may be that your investors expect you to remain active in the business for an agreed period (for example 4 years), and that a quarter of your shares then vest at the end of each year.
If I am forced to sell my shares, what will I be paid?
Leaver provisions will also specify the price to be paid to a departing founder for their shares in the company. The departing founder will usually be categorised as a “good leaver” or a “bad leaver”, according to the circumstances in which they leave.
The definition of a good leaver is often very limited and sometimes it is only possible to be a good leaver as a result of death or serious illness, but ideally it would also include where you are unfairly dismissed by the company. The definition of bad leaver, in contrast, is often very wide and will generally cover all circumstances, save for where the shareholder is a good leaver.
If the shares are sold, the difference in the price payable in these two circumstances may be very different. The price for good leaver shares is usually linked to a mechanism calculating their “fair value” (ie as if they were sold at arm’s length terms to a third party) and the price payable for bad leaver shares will usually be the total nominal value of the shares (ie the value into which each share is denominated), or the total value which was paid by the original shareholder when they were issued (ie the nominal value, plus any premium).
Leaver provisions may be complex, and we would strongly recommend that you take advice on the drafting of all relevant documentation.
As time goes on and as further investment rounds close, you may find your shareholding in the company diluted which can have an effect on your ability to influence decisions at shareholder level. However, if you are likely to remain as the majority shareholder for a period post -investment, you should ensure that a “drag right” is included in the articles.
In the event that an offer is made to buy the company by a third party purchaser, a drag right will allow the majority shareholder to compel the remaining shareholders to sell their shares to the purchaser, on the same terms as have been offered to him.
All shareholders will be entitled to receive the same price per share for their shareholding and so this does not disadvantage the minority shareholders, but equally it will enable the majority shareholder to proceed with the sale and not miss out on what could be a highly favourable offer.
The above is not an exhaustive list but does give an indication of some of the usual startup founder protections you may expect to find in the investment documentation.
If you require advice or assistance in relation to the drafting and / or negotiation of any investment documentation, please contact a member of our startup investments team who will be happy to help you.
About the author
James Fulforth is a Partner and Head of the Corporate and Commercial department. James advises on corporate transactions, including angel, VC and PE investments, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and re-organisations. He is an advisory board member of Angel Academe, the angel investor group, and regularly acts for founders of and those investing in early-stage and startup ventures.
Partner and Head of Department
Latest blogs and news
In the last instalment we talked about the ways in which the founders of KNow Wear Limited could protect the intellectual property in their business. Since then, the business has been progressing well and our founders have been working on developing a prototype.
In our last instalment our founders, Sarah and Chris, considered the basics in establishing their tech startup and they incorporated a company under the registered name ‘KNow Wear Limited’.
Many companies in the tech sector will be aware of the new immigration system and Skilled Worker category opening in a couple of weeks on 1 December. For those companies without a sponsor licence, they will need to apply for one in order to recruit both non-EU and EU citizens. EU citizens resident in the UK before 11pm on 31 December 2020 can apply to the EU Settlement Scheme.
Welcome back to the blog series covering the lifecycle of a tech startup, from a legal perspective.
Alex (tech), Andy (tech), Emer (investments) and I (investments) work alongside startups and founders day to day and thought it might to helpful to some of you out there to bring together our expertise on the legal issues that tend to arise and how we deal with them.
This blog will explore the difficulties currently facing tech coworking spaces in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, how providers can keep tenants engaged and what the future may hold for these spaces. For an audio introduction to this topic, please listen to episode 7 of our Tech in Two Minutes podcast.
In recent years there has been lively discussion about artificial intelligence revolutionising the way we work and live our lives. In its policy paper on the AI Sector Deal, the UK government predicted that the development of AI technology could have the same dramatic impact on society as the invention of the printing press.
The Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) has today (18 December 2019) given the tech sector an early Christmas present by publishing its interim report on its market study, commenced earlier this year, into online platforms and digital advertising.
If you are a trader selling to consumers online, whether that is through a web-based platform or a mobile app, it is important that you understand and comply with relevant consumer protection laws. Eager to launch, many traders fail to satisfy the key legal requirements of fairness and transparency in their online consumer terms despite serious consequences for non-compliance.
After a 13 year legal battle, the Supreme Court has awarded £2m in compensation to a professor for an invention he created during his employment, nearly forty years ago. This ruling poses the question; will Shanks v Unilever open the floodgates to future compensation claims from disgruntled employees?
Security tokens are a digital representation of ownership rights in real world assets (such as property or shares) and have captured the curiosity of entrepreneurs, startups and investors. This blog summarises the potential benefits and pitfalls of security tokens and is part of our wider crypto assets blog.
Whether you are in the market for short-term profit or making long-term investments, adequate planning is certainly a worthwhile (and small) investment of your time and money. If you’ve been savyy enough to successfully invest in crypto-assets, make sure you are smart enough to ensure your loved ones can benefit, should the worst happen.
Trust is the cornerstone of commercial activity and can be enhanced in the online world by the use of e-signatures and trust services. In this blog we review the different types of e-signature and consider their legal validity and security for executing contracts and deeds.
Website development agreements – consider the content of your contract as well as the content on your site
A strong online presence is often a crucial component of a business’ marketing strategy. If your business doesn’t have sufficient resources to develop its website in-house, it will need to engage a website developer. It is imperative to enter into a carefully drafted legally binding contract with your website developer from the outset of the project in order to protect your business interests and minimise the risk of any future disputes.
On 11 June, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a “Dear CEO” letter on how banks should deal with the financial crime risks associated with “cryptoassets”. The FCA defines cryptoassets as publicly available mediums of exchange that feature a distributed ledger and decentralised system for exchanging value, such as Bitcoin and Ether. These assets are more commonly known as cryptocurrencies.
Last month the National Crime Agency (‘NCA’) published its annual strategic assessment of Serious and Organised Crime (‘SOC’) in the UK. The data has come from a variety of law enforcement agencies and other sources including the National Cyber Security Centre (‘NCSC’).
Bitcoin, Ehtereum, Litecoin... cryptocurrencies are all over the press. Most of us are now broadly aware that cryptocurrencies are digital currencies which use blockchain technology. But how many people actually understand how the underlying technology works, what it means to ‘invest’ in a cryptocurrency, and appreciate the risks behind them? For anyone thinking about investing in cryptocurrencies, set out below is a summary of the main concerns, which should hopefully encourage you to stop and think before jumping on the crypto band wagon.
Increasingly, facts and figures about the negative effects of social media are being reported in the press. Recent statistics have shown that three-quarters of children aged 10-12 already have social media accounts, and that the amount of time children aged 12-15 spend online has more than doubled in a decade. Just last week, the Children’s Commissioner announced that schools should be playing a bigger role in preparing children for social media’s “emotional demands”. Such reports are understandably very concerning, and raise questions about the morality of social media giants benefiting at the expense of the emotional wellbeing of children. However, thought should also be given to the legal aspect of these relationships, and in particular, the terms and conditions that children are signing up to when creating social media accounts.
One in five NHS Trusts were hit by a cyber-attack known as “Wannacry” on 12 May 2017 leading to PCs and data being locked up and held for ransom. The malicious ransomware known as WanaCrypt0r has hit companies and other organisations, from Russia to Australia, and Europol estimated there had been 200,000 victims in at least 150 countries. It was alleged that NHS networks were left vulnerable because they were using outdated Windows XP software, which is no longer supported by Microsoft, and therefore security upgrades had not been installed. The National Cyber Security Centre warned that more cases of the ransomware were expected to come to light beyond the NHS and “possibly at a significant scale”.
We published a blog last year about Uber’s pilot and driverless cars and, at that point, it seemed straight out of the pages of a science fiction novel, but driverless cars are now well and truly amongst us, and it seems that everyone is jumping on the band wagon.