Services A-Z     Pricing

Regulatory Blog

24 April 2017

Does treating a family member or close friend automatically lead to serious professional misconduct?

Joseph Onwude –v- General Medical Council (GMC) [2017] EWHC 601 (Admin)

Facts

The Appellant is a gynaecologist.  Aside from his practice in gynaecology he maintained an interest in other areas of medicine.  The concerns in this case related to patients known as A and B who were husband and wife.  Patients A and B were friends of the Appellant and they were also connected with him by way of a business venture.  The three parties entered into a venture to complete the building of a hospital in which the Appellant would be the main doctor.  Unfortunately the venture was not successful and the friendship between the Appellant and Patients A and B broke down.  

Shannett Thompson

24 April 2017

Press Round-Up: Regulatory April 2017

Recent news relating to the British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC), Bar Standards Board (BSB), General Medical Council (GMC), General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC), Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC).

21 April 2017

Court considers standards regulating conduct in professionals’ private lives

R (on the application of Pitt and another) v General Pharmaceutical Council ([2017] EWHC 809 (Admin))

19 April 2017

The Courts remind us of the principle of proportionality at sanction stage

Craig v Farriers Registration Council [2017] EWHC 707 (Admin)

Louise Murphy-King

18 April 2017

The relevance of retirement and future risk in fitness to practise proceedings

Clarke v General Optical Council [2017] EWHC 521 (Admin)

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility