Blog
Rayner my parade! The importance of specialist advice.
Jemma Brimblecombe
7 November 2011
E-Regulator: R (on the application of Kaur) v Institute of Legal Executives Appeal Tribunal [2011] EWCA Civ 1168
This was an application by K, who was a student member of the Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX), against a decision refusing to grant her judicial review application concerning allegations of apparent bias by ILEX and its appeal tribunal.
7 November 2011
E-Regulator: Nursing and Midwifery Council v David Miller [2011] EWHC 2601 (Admin)
Registered Nurse, David Miller, was initially made subject to an interim suspension order in May 2009 in relation to allegations of dishonesty and aggressive conduct towards patients and members of the public.
7 November 2011
E-Regulator: Shah v General Dental Council
Shah v General Dental Council was an appeal by S against an order imposed by the General Dental Council removing his name from the register.
31 October 2011
The Regulator, Autumn 2011 - Costs in Regulatory Proceedings
The approach to costs amongst regulatory bodies varies and can be a source of some debate. It has also given rise to a growing body of case law, which has seen some further development of late arising from a case originally heard before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.
31 October 2011
The Regulator, Autumn 2011 - Developers Beware!
In December 2005, when the Government announced the introduction of the Asset Recovery Incentive Scheme (the Scheme) under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (the Act), it could hardly have been envisaged that confiscation proceedings would be brought in respect of the range of offences that routinely now trigger financial investigations.