Blog
New Diversity, Equity and Inclusion changes to the Actuaries’ Code and Guidance
Jenny Higgins
This article was first published by The Times on 25 March 2021 which you can read in full by clicking here (subscription required).
The solicitors’ watchdog is right to take charge of misconduct cases but it needs firmer guidance to succeed .
Compared with other watchdogs, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been one of the most vocal and active on so-called #MeToo issues.
However, its approach is still a jumble after Ryan Beckwith, a former partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, last November overturned a disciplinary tribunal for misconduct. As a result, the profession urgently needs clarity.
The authority has rightly formed the view that sexual misconduct in law firms is a regulatory matter. This move was critical to bolster and support its role in encouraging and enforcing diversity and equality.
But however justified that stance, it came in an area where there were no existing principles that indicated what the parameters of any misconduct would be. This arena was, and still is, such new territory that a policy view would have been helpful at the outset, setting out the SRA’s position on what behaviour should be categorised as misconduct, where the line falls in respect of public and private life and what distinguishes serious and less serious cases.
The SRA has produced warning notices on various closely linked topics including the use of non-disclosure agreements. It is not clear why it has not done so in relation to sexual misconduct in the workplace.
If guidance had been issued and cases strategically selected to illuminate the boundaries, then policy from the SRA coupled with subsequent disciplinary tribunal decisions would have provided clarity.
The SRA has still not issued any detailed policy guidance and the cases it has brought have not brought clarity. While some cases have succeeded, Beckwith clearly did not and the High Court ruling in November muddied the water further.
Three key areas were engaged by the facts of the case: consent, the private life boundary and abuse of power. On consent, the SRA did not, for reasons that are not entirely clear, allege any wrongdoing. As to abuse of power, no evidence was advanced. As a consequence of this approach, the High Court clearly was reluctant to find professional misconduct without a sound basis.
The decision in Beckwith, the first to reach the High Court on this important topic, did not take the issues any further forward and if anything is a backward step for the SRA. But anyone that thinks it will stop the regulator from investigating and referring matters to the tribunal is mistaken.
Firms and individuals need to understand where the boundaries lie so that they can make informed decisions on reporting obligations. Understanding the boundaries will also help drive forward the cultural change that is necessary in some parts of the profession.
The SRA must consider the lessons from the cases it has brought, as well as those it has not, and share that learning with the profession.
FURTHER INFORMATION
If you have any questions about the issues discussed in this article, please contact Iain , Julie or a member of our regulatory team.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Iain Miller is a Partner in the Regulatory department and specialises in advising law firms and the legal professionals on legal ethics, investigations, and public law matters. He is General Editor of the leading textbook on legal services regulation, Cordery on Legal Services as well as Chair of the Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers.
Julie is a partner in the Regulatory Team. She predominantly acts in the professional services sector, advising lawyers, accountants and built environment professionals on regulatory compliance, investigations, adjudication, enforcement and prosecutions.
You can also download our recently published white paper summarising the points highlighted in this article and key insights discussed during the teams Spotlight Series webinar , Insights into Legal Services Regulation in 2021: The Impact of Beckwith v SRA, using the form below.
5f9fea43aec9a90ca1d3a104542a6e39deef6b40
The white paper produced following on from this webinar forms part of a series that Kingsley Napley will be running through 2021, covering a range of some of the most important regulatory issues and/or developments facing the legal professions in 2021.
We are delighted that a number of thought leaders in the sector will be joining us during the series to share their insights. If you would like to be kept informed in relation to these events please click here.
Latest blogs & news
Fire Safety Awareness: A Shared Responsibility Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005
Fire safety is not just a compliance issue—it is a matter of protecting lives, assets, and reputations. Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (FSO), employers, landlords, and those in control of premises have a legal duty to ensure adequate fire safety measures are in place. Failure to comply can lead to severe legal and financial consequences, but more importantly, it puts people at unnecessary risk.
Workplace risk assessments: understanding legal duties under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999
Ensuring the safety and health of employees is a cornerstone of responsible business practice in the UK. At the heart of this responsibility lies the legal requirement to carry out workplace risk assessments—a duty enshrined in the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR). This article sets out the legal framework surrounding risk assessments, outlines practical steps for compliance, and includes expert insights from Andrew Sanderson of Kingsley Napley and Craig Lydiate of Eighty20 Risk Systems.
SRA Guidance – internal investigations and guidance for in-house advisers
On 18 November 2024, the SRA published its updated and now finalised guidance on internal investigations.
AI Regulation – where next for law firms?
There has been a lot of media coverage about the benefits and dangers of artificial intelligence, and the speed of its development. Jessica Clay considers the challenges of regulation and whether it is keeping pace.
AML update for Lawyers and Law Firms
We are already half-way through 2024 and, as predicted, the fast-paced world of AML shows no signs of stagnation, with the key front line regulators such as the SRA frequently updating its AML guidance, as well as recent legislation from the European Commission, and specifically the creation of a new European AML agency in Germany. This blog continues our series of updates for legal practitioners and law firms on the key developments from recent months.
The Lawyer: Focus on our Legal Regulatory Services team
The Lawyer profiles our legal regulatory team who provide services and advice to law firms and lawyers.
Client confidentiality— to disclose or not disclose?
When it comes to client confidentiality, does the profession draw the line in the right place?
Historically, the paramountcy of client confidentiality, to the exclusion of all else, has been instilled in us from the early days of our legal careers. We think, it’s fair to say, that many of us faced with a request to disclose would instinctively formulate a response that erred on the side of caution and favoured non-disclosure.
The global rise of AI: opportunities and challenges
At the start of November, the government will host the first global summit on artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on the safe use of AI. The AI Safety Summit will be at Bletchley Park, a venue representing innovation and pioneering, and once the top-secret home of WW2 codebreakers.
BSB issues new Social Media Guidance
Last week the BSB issued new Social Media Guidance, which seeks to help barristers understand how their duties under the BSB Handbook may apply to their use of social media.
Law firms: radical reform on the cards for the future supervision of AML
- Most England and Wales based law firms are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), including for anti-money laundering (AML) and counter terrorism (CT) purposes.
- Under reforms currently being considered, responsibility for the supervision of AML and CT could be taken away from the SRA (and other legal regulators UK-wide), and given to a new body, meaning firms could be subject to dual regulation in future.
- The consultation on this issue closes on 30 September 2023 and given the potential implications for law firms UK wide, is worth responding to.
SANCTIONS: UK lawyers restricted from advising in transactional/non-contentious matters for those tied to the Russia regime: new regulations coming into force on 30 June 2023
The government has today laid before parliament regulations further extending the prohibition of the facilitation of sanction breaches, limiting access to advice from UK lawyers by individuals and businesses tied to the Russian regime, even where they have no underlying nexus with the UK.
Navigating litigation: what’s reserved?
The High Court has provided welcome guidance on what exactly constitutes the conduct of litigation: Iain Miller & Charlotte Judd examine this perilously grey area of the law
When will I be SLAPPed? Lawyers need to know
It’s been over a year since the government launched its call for evidence on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), seeking the views of the public on introducing legislation to address this perceived problem.
AML Update For Legal Practitioners and Law Firms - May 2023
This blog covers some important developments in the AML world since our last update for legal practitioners and law firms.
Updates to Legal Sector Affinity Group (“LSAG”) AML guidance
The LSAG AML guidance for the legal sector, designed to help legal professionals and firms comply with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (as amended), was updated on 28 March 2023.
Fair treatment of colleagues: what you need to know about the SRA’s updated Codes of Conduct
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given the green light by the Legal Services Board (LSB) to amend the SRA Codes of Conduct in respect of treating colleagues fairly and with respect.
The LSB’s Decision Notice states the SRA’s intention to update the Codes immediately, “without further publicity or allowing [firms and individuals] time to prepare for the alterations”.
Indeed, these changes have already taken effect, introducing in the Codes explicit requirements for individuals to treat colleagues fairly and with respect, for managers to challenge behaviour that does not meet this standard, and for firms to treat those who work for and with them fairly and with respect, and to require their employees to meet that standard.
New rules for judges to tackle counter-inclusive behaviours
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
Our ‘at a glance’ guide for law firms: SRA guidance on effective supervision
In January 2023, the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary released a Statement of Expected Behaviour (“the Statement”) setting out the standards of behaviour expected from all judicial office holders. The Statement expands on the existing Guide to Judicial Conduct and covers behaviour in and outside of court, between judicial office holders and with staff and court users.
Unlimited SRA fines on the horizon
The government is on a path to introduce legislation that will enable the Solicitors Regulation Authority to take greater action against the ‘facilitators’ of money laundering; law firms will soon need to brace themselves for unlimited fines from the SRA for ‘economic crimes’.
SRA issues Warning Notice on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation
Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) are legal actions that are taken not necessarily with the goal of winning in court, but which instead aim to intimidate, to induce fear, to tire and consume the financial and psychological resources of the target.
Culture matters: a new era for law firm risk management
Jessica Clay, Iain Miller, and Lucinda Soon are delighted to have contributed a chapter in the new title by Globe Law and Business “Risk Management in Law Firms”, published in October 2022. The chapter, republished here, discusses the SRA’s increased spotlight on ethical culture in law firms, its origins and evolution through the years, where we are now, and what is on the horizon.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
You may also be interested in:
Blog
Why does software ownership matter? Six key legal takeaways for tech businesses
Christopher Perrin
Blog
Enhancing Public Accountability: Key Elements of the Public Office (Accountability) Bill 2025
Kirsty Cook
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print