Blog
Kingsley Napley’s Medical Negligence Team ‘walks together’ with the Dame Vera Lynn Children’s Charity
Sharon Burkill
High Court gives guidance on the proper process by which a Tribunal should determine sanction and the level of fine to be imposed.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Adesina & Baines v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWCA Civ 818 represented a clear shift in the previously immovable time limits of regulatory appeals.
This highly anticipated judgment from the High Court on the admissibility of anonymous hearsay evidence in professional disciplinary proceedings holds that “it is difficult to conceive of circumstances in which the admission of potentially significant evidence which is both anonymous and hearsay will not infringe the requirement of fairness” and finds that in the present cases arising from the Francis Inquiry, the evidence of anonymous members of staff was inadmissible and “should not have been relied on probatively”.
Sharon Burkill
Natalie Cohen
Caroline Sheldon
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility