Blog
Has the Supreme Court opened the gates to costs being awarded against regulators?
Shannett Thompson
A recent county court ruling is potentially very bad news for landlords and purchasers of a dwelling house which is subject to an assured shorthold tenancy.
In a county court appeal against an order for possession on a point of law, (Byrne v Harwood-Delgado[1]), HHJ Bloom sitting in the County Court at Luton, found that a s.21 ‘no-fault’ notice under the Housing Act 1988 is not available as a means of ending a tenancy if a landlord has not procured a relevant gas safety certificate[2] “GSC” (or gas safety record as described in the regulations)) prior to the commencement of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy and that the situation cannot be remedied.
Regulation 2 of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015 reg.2(1) provides that for the purposes of s.21A (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 (‘the Act’) a notice pursuant to s.21 of the Act may not be given at a time when the landlord is in breach of a prescribed requirement relating to the condition and energy performance of dwelling houses and the health and safety of the occupiers.
The above includes the requirement for a landlord to obtain and provide the tenant with a GSC and an energy performance certificate. There is a dispute as to whether the tenant in this case actually received a GSC prior to the commencement of the AST - there were subsequent renewals of the AST and GSCs appear to have been obtained and provided to the tenant.
On appeal HHJ Bloom referred to the Trecarrell House[3] case and found:
The upshot of this decision is that if a landlord did not obtain a GSC prior to the commencement of the tenancy the position is irremediable and the landlord cannot serve a s.21 notice to end the tenancy.
This is potentially very bad news for landlords and purchasers of a dwelling house which is subject to an assured shorthold tenancy.
While as a judgment of a county court circuit judge it is not binding, it will be useful ammunition for tenants who are opposing s.21 ‘no-fault’ based claims for possession and may therefore influence another judge’s decision.
We will have to wait and see if this case goes to the court of appeal, or indeed another case does. Presently, unless the landlord in this case is seeking to occupy the dwelling house itself or the tenant is in breach of its covenants in the tenancy, then there may be limited opportunities to determine an Assured Shorthold Tenancy unless a s.8 ground for possession (schedule 2) of the Housing Act 1988 exists.
[1] Dean Byrne -and-Thomas John Harwood-Delgado – 21 June 2022
[2] The Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998
[3] Trecarrell House Ltd -and- Rouncefield [2020] EWCA Civ 760 - looked at the situation where a landlord had a valid gas certificate but failed to provide it to the tenant prior to the commencement of the AST. In that case, this failure was not fatal to the validity of the landlord’s s.21 notice.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Shannett Thompson
Daniel Staunton
Sophie Wood
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print