Blog
Proposed inheritance tax reforms and pre-Budget planning
James Ward
In many estates, the deceased’s home is the principal asset whose value often tips the estate over the inheritance tax (IHT) threshold.
The status of the deceased’s house/flat as “family home“ attracts little special tax treatment beyond the additional “residence nil rate band” for IHT purposes if it is left to “direct descendants”. But a house within an estate does illustrate well the main issues of valuation for IHT on death and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) implications when the property is sold by the personal representatives.
Where IHT is chargeable on death, the market value at that point will need to be agreed with HMRC so the liability can be calculated. Personal representatives should not be lazy or penny pinching. A formal valuation should be obtained from a suitably qualified surveyor – so doing will win most of any valuation battle. The District Valuer (D.V.) engaged by HMRC is more likely to accept a value returned on the back of a professional valuation, even if they consider it a little on the low side. Nothing is gained by plucking a low figure out of the air and hoping for the best. All you will do is prompt protracted negotiations with the D.V. on value. It is a myth that “probate” value is something less than the correct IHT standard of “market” value.
A sale shortly after death will prompt HMRC to argue that the sale price, if higher, should be substituted for the value returned; the price achieved on a sale to third party is real evidence of true market value. It may be possible to successfully argue that the price achieved is the product of a marked recent increase in house prices in the area where the property is situated and that the returned value should stand. The increase in value would then, instead, be charged to Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Because CGT is charged at 28% (and on the net proceeds rather than the gross value) with the benefit of an annual exemption for personal representatives (currently £12,300*), there is a saving if the increase in value is charged to CGT rather than to IHT (at 40%).
Conversely, if the personal representatives sell the property at less than the value returned for IHT within 4 years of death, then they can claim to substitute the sale price for the returned value and reclaim IHT. No allowance is given for disposal costs (estate agents/solicitors). Furthermore, if the deceased owned any other real estate and that was sold in the estate, that transaction also needs to be brought into account for IHT at its gross post death sale price.
IHT attributable to a property can be paid by annual instalments over 10 years with interest (currently 6.5%). When the property is sold, the remaining instalments become immediately due.
Any property value agreed for IHT purposes will then also be fixed as the “base value” for CGT purposes on subsequent sale by personal representatives, by the person to whom the property was specifically left in the Will, or to a residuary beneficiary to whom the property was “appropriated” on account of their residuary share.
Appropriation can result in substantial tax savings. If my mother leaves her estate to me and my brother and sister equally and her house is to be sold, we and the personal representatives may resolve not simply to sell the house as part of the estate but to appropriate the property to the three of us as part of our entitlement to residue. It will be put into our names – and if the three of us are also the personal representatives (as is likely) then we will need to formally transfer the title of property (as personal representatives) to ourselves (as beneficiaries).
For CGT purposes, our “base value” will similarly be the date of death value (not the value at the date of appropriation). When we sell, not only do we each have a CGT annual exemption (as opposed to just one for the personal representatives), but, if we are lower rate taxpayers, part of the gain might be charged to CGT at 18%. Further, if any one or more of us has been living in the property as our main residence since father’s death, the whole gain may be tax free under Private Residence Relief (PPR). PPR is not available to personal representatives on a sale from the estate- even if, individually, one or more of them is in occupation- there needs to be a formal appropriation and transfer if PPR is to be claimed by such occupier.
In considering whether the deceased’s property should be sold or appropriated to residuary beneficiaries, the impact of owning that property needs to be considered if the beneficiary is currently thinking of buying a property – he/she may find themselves liable for the additional 3% stamp duty surcharge on buying what will be a second property. Though there is an exemption from the additional 3% on buying within 3 years of inheriting a less-than-50% share in a deceased’s property, that will still not allow the buyer to benefit from any “first time buyer” rates.
A final point on CGT:
On any chargeable disposal of residential property (including a disposal by personal representatives) a CGT return needs to be made and tax paid within 60 days of completion of the sale.
* The CGT annual exemption is available to personal representatives for two-and-a-part tax years post death. It will fall to £6,000 for the 2023/24 tax year and £3,000 from 6 April 2024 onwards.
If in doubt, and in the interests of peace of mind, please do contact Joseph Austin or the Private Client team.
A YouGov poll* commissioned by law firm Kingsley Napley shows 54% - over half of the British public - now want a complete abolition of Inheritance Tax (IHT), up from 49% a year ago.
With significant changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) reliefs for agricultural and business property due to take effect in approximately seven months, affected individuals are exploring every available planning strategy to mitigate the impact. For those who are asset-rich but cash-poor, the prospect of a 20% IHT charge on death is deeply concerning and threatens the continuity of long-held family assets.
The English trust has a fascinating history. It dates back to medieval times, when knights heading off on crusade would hand over their land to someone they trusted to manage it in their absence. This practice laid the foundation for what we now know as the legal split between ownership and benefit: trustees hold the legal title, but the real value belongs to the beneficiaries.
There have been a flurry of media reports that the Treasury is considering changes to the IHT regime at the next Budget in the form of a gifting cap or amending the tapering rules on gifting. The reports make clear nothing has been decided but the kite-flying will no doubt focus minds on estate planning in the weeks ahead.
Is your camel’s back broken yet? Or will this year’s Autumn Budget be the proverbial last straw?
Rachel Reeves’ Autumn Budget in 2024 not only brought in an immediate increase to capital gains tax (CGT) rates, but also announced a swathe of changes to the taxation of international individuals which mostly took effect on the 6th April this year.
In this blog we consider whether a pre-nuptial agreement is a good option to help protect the estates of vulnerable individuals in the event that their marriage should come to an end.
This case study highlights the inspiring journey of a young man, Louis who was born with cerebral palsy (CP) and with the support of his Deputy, Deputyship team and family has transformed his passion for dogs into a small business, overcoming numerous challenges and creating a successful venture. His story not only exemplifies the power of perseverance and support but also showcases how individuals with disabilities can thrive in the business world with the right resources and mindset.
The Child Brain Injury Trust reports that every 90 seconds, someone in the UK is admitted to hospital with an acquired brain injury, and every 15 minutes, a child in the UK acquires a brain injury. While many will make a full recovery, for others, this may impact on their ability to make certain decisions as adults.
The increase in the value of cryptoassets has undoubtedly contributed to the continued interest and adoption of this still relatively new asset class across organisations and individuals. The ease of purchasing, selling or transferring a cryptoasset has improved significantly over the last few years (and which has in part stemmed from the development of the regulatory environment). However, there is still a technical barrier to entry. This presents a practical problem; if your assets pass to your loved ones on your death, how do you ensure that they are able to actually access and benefit from any cryptoassets that you hold?
Having poured blood, sweat and tears, not to mention money and time, into building a successful business, the loss of mental capacity of a shareholder, director or partner could be devastating for a business and that person’s wider family unless the necessary safeguards are put in place for these key individuals.
As a business owner, you need to think about what would happen to your business if you were unable to make decisions – would someone be able to authorise payments or enter into contracts and keep the business running day-to-day? If not, fundamental business decisions may not be possible and, within a very short period of time, the business may no longer be able to trade. This can have adverse consequences for your family finances if they are reliant on income from the business.
As family lawyers, we are used to meeting our clients at a time when they are at their most vulnerable. This is intensified when addiction is present within a family. Divorce or separation places an added burden upon everyone involved and those individuals are likely to have experienced or still be experiencing the destruction that addiction can cause, some of it obvious and some of it less so.
Being alive to the particular challenges which may present themselves in a divorce involving addiction is essential but this should be balanced with an understanding that the issues are likely to be different for each client and for each family.
We increasingly encounter situations where a vulnerable person may have been financially abused by a third party. A recent study by STEP found that financial abuse is increasing and it is most prevalent where there is uncertainty about whether a person lacks capacity or their decision-making ability is in decline.
Supporting a loved one with capacity issues can be very challenging, as well as emotionally distressing. In this article we explore some practical considerations and offer tips and advice to support a loved one in these circumstances.
For a Will to be valid, amongst other things, the person making the Will (known as the “testator”) must be of “sound mind”.
The test for capacity to enter a prenuptial agreement is the same as the normal test for capacity (mentioned in Blog 1) and the individual must be capable of understanding their assets and the nature and effects of the contract they are entering into.
An executor/executrix is a person named in a Will who is responsible for carrying out the instructions in a person's Will and administering their estate. Executors can have a number of responsibilities following someone’s death, including: securing, insuring and clearing the deceased’s property, collecting in all the deceased’s assets, paying outstanding bills, distributing the estate, arranging the funeral and applying for probate.
When a trust is created, the person setting-up the trust (known as the “settlor”) usually appoints trustees who become the legal owners of the assets in the trust, which they hold for the benefit of others (known as the “beneficiaries”). For example, when a person dies, a trustee may distribute capital and income from the deceased’s assets that are held in a Will trust, to the people named as beneficiaries in the deceased’s Will.
Capacity to litigate involves an adult who is a party (or intended party) to proceedings in court.
A Lasting Power of Attorney (“LPA”) is a formal document that, once registered by the Office of the Public Guardian (“OPG”) authorises others, known as “attorneys”, to act on behalf of another who is unable to make decisions for themselves.
A gift can be anything of value, such as cash, personal possessions and property. If a person chooses to dispose of an asset for less than it is worth this is also considered to be a fit. The act of giving a gift is typically done to express care, appreciation, celebration or goodwill. Gifts are often exchanged during special occasions such as birthdays, weddings, anniversaries and customary occasions, but they can also be given spontaneously as a gesture of kindness or generosity.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
James Ward
Diva Shah
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print