Whilst the prime minister's broadcast on 10 May did not open the floodgates to City employers requiring staff to "return to work" en masse, most firms are already drawing up plans for how that should be organised and many of us will have been thinking about what will happen when employers start to update their 'work from home' advice.
What if you do not want to return to work yet? If that is the case, you should consider the following:
- Crystalise why it is you do not wish to return and explain that to your employer as soon as returning is discussed. Preferably, do this in written correspondence.
- It may be that you or members of your household are clinically vulnerable or that you are pregnant. The Government has made clear that particular care is required to minimise any contact such people have with people outside their households.
- Point out to your employer that the Government has stated many times in guidance that “for the foreseeable future” workers should continue to work from home “wherever possible.”
- If you can, make clear in writing how well you have been working at home. Where possible, evidence this.
- If travel to work is an issue such as because it involves a long train journey, explain to your employer why, again in writing.
- Make enquiries about the specific Covid-19 Risk Assessment your Employer should have undertaken and published internally, what safe systems of work have been identified and whether these have been put in place.
- If you have concerns find out who your “Health & Safety” representative is and establish contact. Ultimately there are statutory protections available for employees who do not want to return to work because they believe it would be unsafe for them to do so.
- If you have a concern about your Employer breaching Health and Safety (or other statutory) obligations, think about raising this as a public interest disclosure which may make you a whistleblower with protection against suffering detriment or being dismissed.
- If you have a disability protected under the Equality Act 2010, you will be entitled to ask for reasonable adjustments to be made before you return to work. It may also be that you are a member of a particular ethnic group which renders you more susceptible to the effects of the virus. Whilst research in to this is on-going, this may be something that can be raised if this is a concern for you.
- Consider whether you are entitled to take advantage of any statutory leave arrangement or take holiday. If childcare is the issue, the Prime Minister has himself suggested this is a factor that may prevent an employee from being able to return to the workplace.
Conversely, what if you are anxious to get back to work but are not one of the first asked to do so? There is no statutory right to insist on returning to work at the current time, but there are factors you can call upon that may assist.
- Can you show you are a key worker and should be prioritised for return? A recent assessment undertaken by UBS apparently identified traders in this category.
- It maybe that you are finding it difficult to work at home for reasons that may not be obvious to your Employer. Explain the position and seek to demonstrate how your effectiveness will increase if you return.
- If appropriate, seek to reassure your Employer about the state of your health and lack of susceptibility to the virus.
- Reassure your Employer about your proposed transport arrangements to and from work.
- If you feel there is a discriminatory reason you are not being selected or because you reported a health and safety breach, you may want to consider whether to raise this.
Either way the reality is that this is a very dynamic area of law at the moment, so be alive to developments. There may be changes you can use to support your position. Ultimately however, safety will be king, and no sensible employer will want to take risks with an employee’s health, particularly if well-articulated and recorded. The risk of liability will mean Employers will want to tread carefully before pressuring an employee to return, or seeking to discipline those who have valid reasons for failing to comply with an instruction to return to work.
Further information
This article was first published in efinancialcareers on 20 May 2020, Your legal rights on returning to work during COVID-19.
If you would like any further information or advice about the issues explored in this blog, please contact Andy or another member of our employment law team.
Latest blogs & news
New UK crypto regime takes a step closer
HM Treasury has published a draft statutory instrument which, when brought into force, will introduce a new regulatory regime for cryptoassets in the UK.
Is the FCA’s name and shame policy now dead in the water?
On 6 February the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee published its response to the latest iteration of the FCA’s proposals to “name and shame” firms under investigation by the regulator.
Finfluencers – in the FCA’s sights
In March 2024 the FCA published a clear warning to those advertising trading and investments on social media about the risks of doing so, making it clear that it will “will take action against those touting financial products illegally.” Just two months later, in May 2024, the regulator announced that it had commenced criminal proceedings against a number of individuals for advertising foreign trading schemes on their social media platforms.
Motor finance: FCA drives towards formal redress scheme
The FCA is conducting a review into whether motor finance customers were overcharged as a result of the widespread use of discretionary commission arrangements in the motor finance industry. It had expected to set out its next steps in light of this review in September 2024. However, it has announced that it will not now do so until May 2025.
Market abuse letters - an increasingly used tool
Maintaining the integrity and cleanliness of the financial markets remains a key FCA priority and, indeed, is a statutory legal obligation on the regulator. Against that, however, is the fact that FCA’s track record in taking enforcement action against insider dealing and other forms of abusive behaviour is relatively poor. Since 2017 it has only achieved three criminal convictions for insider dealing, whilst its record for imposing civil fines on firms and individuals for breaches of the Market Abuse Regulation (“MAR”) is also unimpressive.
FCA's Anti-Greenwashing Rule Takes Effect: What It Means for Compliance and ESG Accountability
The FCA’s long awaited anti-greenwashing rule came into force on 31 May 2024. This rule is part of the wider Sustainability Disclosure Requirements regime and reflects the FCA’s strong commitment to ESG and to supporting the Government’s commitment to achieving net zero by 2050.
FCA’s plan to “name and shame” firms should be urgently reconsidered
The FCA’s recent consultation (CP24/2) on changes to its enforcement process has provoked what appears to be unanimous opposition from government and industry bodies. Of particular concern is the proposal in consultation paper (“the CP”) that the FCA will publish information about its enforcement investigations, including the identity of the subject of the investigation, where it assesses it to be in the public interest to do so.
Immigration issues and the regulatory consequences for financial services firms
For firms regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), it is vital that the business – and its relevant employees – ensure that its conduct is without reproach in order to avoid supervisory or regulatory difficulties. This extends to issues of governance and administrative matters, as well as more obvious issues of conduct (such as, for example, financial misconduct) which often receive more press.
Bankers’ bonuses uncapped
This article first featured in Employee Benefits in November 2023.
Three recent cases raise questions over FCA enforcement strategy
A recent sequence of adverse decisions by the Upper Tribunal could have significant implications for future Financial Conduct Authority cases.
The senior managers certification regime (SMCR) – fitness and propriety
Under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (“SMCR”), which was introduced by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) to seek to remedy perceived industry wide failings following the 2008 financial crash, regulated staff must meet certain standards of fitness and propriety and will be personally accountable to the FCA for any failure to do so.
Firms covered by the SMCR are required to assess, both at the point of recruitment and on an annual basis, whether SMCR staff are fit and proper to perform their role. In the case of senior managers, firms that are covered by the regime must also seek approval from the FCA prior to appointment and in many cases the FCA may wish to closely scrutinise any such application.
Non-financial misconduct under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime
Non-financial misconduct has been an area of increasing regulatory focus for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over the last five years. To date, published regulatory outcomes have focused on the most egregious end of the spectrum, with the FCA handing out bans and fines for those already convicted in the criminal courts of serious sexual offences. However, these cases provide little guidance for FCA-regulated firms grappling with allegations of more nuanced conduct, such as the inappropriate use of social media on a personal
Deadline looms for previously passported firms to apply for UK authorisation
Pre-Brexit, some 8,000 financial services firms based in the EA or EEA relied on the mutual passporting regime to do business in the UK. Since 1 January 2021, such firms have been able to operate under a transitional temporary permissions regime (TPR). While some of those firms have now exited the UK market, most of those intending to continue to operate here are required to apply for full UK authorisation. The deadline for applications is 31 December 2022.
The FCA’s new regulatory approach to consumer protection
The FCA’s transformation to becoming an assertive, front footed regulator has been accelerated by three recent developments, all of which prioritise the protection of consumers.
FCA Enforcement Half Year Update: H1 2022
This half-year update provides an overview of recent enforcement activity by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the period from January to June 2022.
The FCA and consumer credit: Update
As the cost of living continues to rise, and subsequent demand for credit increases, the FCA has been clear with lenders as to its expectations for their treatment of customers. Indeed, with inflation predicated to reach 14%, consumers will see a significant reduction in disposable income and many may experience financial vulnerability for the first time. In this context, the FCA has clearly identified that a potential increase in dependence on credit poses significant risks to consumers.
Regulatory compliance, trust and confidence in the financial services sector
In a case that attracted national media coverage and emphasises the crucial importance of regulatory compliance and the highest standards of professional conduct in the financial services sector, the High Court dismissed a breach of contract claim brought by an investment manager.
Keeping the crypto market on its toes? The FCA publishes latest cryptoasset consumer research and takes regulatory action against Binance Markets Limited
For the fourth year the FCA has published research on the changing relationship between consumers and cryptoassets. In spite of the pandemic, the strong upward trend in public engagement and media coverage has continued, with the FCA estimating 2.3 million adults now hold cryptoassets.
The discontinuation of LIBOR and phasing in of SONIA in the Sterling Markets, what do we know so far?
Global financial markets are preparing to transition away from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and adopt an appropriate alternative risk free rate (“RFR”) by the end of 2021. What are the reasons for the move away from LIBOR, the progress to date in terms of identifying the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) as the most appropriate alternative rate in the Sterling markets, and the steps still required to be taken to ensure such markets are ready for the phasing out of LIBOR by the end of the year
Breach of 2002 banking undertakings - the CMA writes to Danske Bank
At the end of last month, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a letter written to Danske Bank concerning its breach of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) Banking Behavioural Undertakings 2002, following loans it had offered under the ‘Bounce Back Loan Scheme’.
You may also be interested in:
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
You may also be interested in:
Blog
#BulliesBeKind – top tips for senior executives tackling workplace bullying
Bina Patel
Blog
Taking a pay cut - is it the right thing to do?
Corinne Aldridge
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print