The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?

16 August 2021

On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?

The strategy aimed to be a highly collaborative document. A programme of engagement, running since February 2020, included meetings with the Disability Charities Consortium (a group of 10 of the UK’s largest disability charities), meetings with the Disabled People’s Organisation Forum and meetings and discussions with disabled people about their experiences in daily life. The “UK Disability Survey” launched in January 2021 and ran until April, seeking responses from disabled people, families and carers. A conscientious start.

The project was (and continues to be) headed by the Government’s Disability Unit. Their vision for the impact of the strategy is ambitious; “to transform the everyday lives of disabled people by tackling the barriers people face”. A tantalising proposition and not necessarily an overstated aim; there are indeed a vast number of areas which central Government strategy could transform. So have The Disability Unit been able to deliver on this?

The strategy has been broken down into eight (quite sensible) themes. A helpful overview of each section can be found here:

  1. Rights and Perceptions: Removing barriers to participating fully in public and civic life and wider society 
  2. Home: Creating more accessible, adapted and safer homes
  3. Transport: Improving the accessibility and experience of everyday journeys
  4. Jobs:  Making the world of work more inclusive and accessible
  5. Education: Ensuring children and young people fulfil their potential
  6. Shopping: Creating more consumer choice and convenience
  7. Leisure: Widening access to arts, culture, sport and the great outdoors
  8. Public Services: Making access as smooth and easy as possible

After my own review, I would suggest that there are both pleasing and disappointing aspects to the strategy. I do not have the luxury of being able to list all of the “commitments” listed in the strategy (of which there are apparently over 100) but I would estimate that a fairly small number of those represent significant progress, in terms of new immediate or short term tangible benefits to the disability community.

Nonetheless, some of these actions are very welcome. To pick a few:

  • Funding for new public awareness raising campaigns in the context of tackling negative perceptions of disabled people and disability rights
  • Creation of an Access to Work Adjustments Passport to support disabled people with their transition into employment, including disabled students leaving education and allowing people to take equipment from one job to another
  • £30 million investment to accelerate the delivery of Changing Places facilities across the UK

However, important voices from the disability community have expressed their frustration at what had been predicted as a “once in a generation” strategy. The main criticisms centre on the fact that it lacks detail and rehearses ideas that already existed. Disability Rights UK CEO Kamran Mallick quite fairly said: “Disabled people have been waiting a long time for a Strategy that has meat on its bones. Despite being 120 pages long, the Strategy is disappointingly thin on immediate actions, medium-term plans and the details of longer term investment.” It is hard to argue with this. A lot of the actions are framed on the basis that proposals will be “explored”, that governmental departments will “work” towards goals and making commitments to “review” aspects of how government bodies are run.

To provide an example - one particular bugbear of mine (through the experiences of personal acquaintances and my clients) is the difficulty in accessing benefits and social welfare and healthcare more generally. Indeed, the UK Disability Survey found that 80% of disabled people who had accessed benefits and pension services said they had experienced at least some difficulties and 78% said the same in relation to accessing health services.

The strategy identified these things are a big problem - excellent. The Disability Unit said “We know that a bold response is required” - sounds good. But when we come to read the ‘next steps’, they include that the DWP is “exploring options to reduce the frequency of repeat Work Capability Assessments (WCA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments” and the Department for Health and Social Care will “work with disabled people and disability organisations at every stage of social care reform to ensure their voices are heard and needs reflected”. Not exactly a particularly ‘bold response’.

People may ask; wasn’t the strategy supposed to have completed the exploring and reviewing stage already? Shouldn’t the strategy have already found out the answers to these questions and set out concrete actions? The answer to these questions is probably ‘yes’ and it is hard to escape the feeling that the strategy has been rushed and is incomplete.

However, looking at this optimistically, I do not think we should consign the strategy to the already full rubbish tip of well-meaning but ultimately meaningless government policies just yet. It appears quite clear to me that The Disability Unit view this document and policy as a work in progress. It is described at numerous points as a “dynamic plan” that The Disability Unit “will refresh regularly in response to disabled people’s priorities”. Indeed, progress is to be reported on every 12 months and the Government says it will “step up” engagement with disabled people going forward and welcome feedback.   

So ultimately, whether this strategy has the power to “transform” lives, as touted, remains to be seen. At the moment, it shouldn’t be controversial to say that the strategy has fallen a long way short of the rather grandiose claims that were made in the build up to its publication. As Scope Chief Executive Mark Hodgkinson said “Unless we get clear detail beyond the next 12 months, it is difficult to see how life will be significantly different for the next generation of disabled people.”

I have no particular reason to doubt the intentions of The Disability Unit and those people within it who I am sure work hard to try to improve disability policy in the UK. But as ever, the ability to see their vision realised will inevitably come down to money. I will borrow again from Mr Hodgkinson, who puts it more eloquently that I can, but such an investment should require little consideration:

“Investing in disabled people can have a hugely positive impact to our country, to our economy and to disabled people’s living standards… The money earmarked to deliver the Strategy is sadly not sufficient for long term transformational change, and in many cases is not ‘new’ money… Therefore, further investment must be prioritised as part of the upcoming spending review.”

To look on the bright side, it is the first time in a long time that there is (what appears to be) a shared vision across Government on disability. Let us hope that the Government provide those in charge of developing and enhancing the strategy with the necessary tools to do so.

Further Information

If you have any questions or concerns about the topics raised in this blog, please contact Christopher James, or any member of the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team.


About the Author

Christopher James is an Associate and specialises in working with clients that have sustained a range of injuries through medical negligence and personal injury, including brain injuries, injuries arising from birth, cases of incorrect and delayed diagnosis’ and psychiatric injuries.


Latest blogs & news

Supporting You In Dealing With Trauma Why Trauma-Informed Lawyering is Crucial

Many people who contact us for advice have experienced life-changing events. Our clients include people who have suffered medical negligence and been involved in cases of sexual abuse. 

1982-1992 – Strength in Numbers

As part of our Pride month blog series, I have reviewed the period 1982 – 1992; the decade in which I was born. In the hope that I can still consider myself to be fairly young, to me, the 1980s do not seem that long ago. In researching the developments made during this decade, however, I was shocked reflecting on how out of touch and discriminatory the law, media and social views still were at the time.

North Bristol NHS Trust -v- White: Contempt of Court in a medical negligence claim

In my blog on 21 April 2022, I summarised the decision of the Court in the case of Natasha Colley, a contempt of Court committed by the Claimant’s mother and Litigation Friend. This blog focuses on a further judgment for contempt: North Bristol NHS Trust -v- White. The case concerns a claim for clinical negligence for Cauda Equina Syndrome where the Claimant exaggerated the extent of her injuries.

Refugee Week

Refugee Week seems like the perfect opportunity to celebrate and introduce CARAS, one of KN’s two newly nominated charities which we will be supporting for the years 2022-2024.

1992-2002: Mermaids, Consent, and Gaytime TV too

Pride 2022 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the first official UK Gay Pride Rally held in London. We are marking each decade from 1972 to 2022 with a blog every week throughout June.

The new standard of proof in asylum claims: a major step backwards for LGBTQI+ asylum seekers

The imminent change to the standard of proof in asylum claims risks imposing unreasonable expectations on LGBTQI+ asylum seekers and will make it more difficult for them to demonstrate their entitlement to refugee status.

2002-2012: A decade when Parliament put right two significant wrongs

Pride 2022 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the first official UK Gay Pride Rally held in London, and we are marking each decade from 1972 to 2022 with a blog each week throughout Pride Month. This weeks blog covers the decade of of 2002-2012.

2012-2022: Why Pride Still Needs to be a Protest

Pride 2022 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the first official UK Gay Pride Rally held in London, and we are marking each decade from 1972 to 2022 with a blog each week throughout Pride Month. 

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust -v- Natasha Colley: Contempt of Court

This blog summarises the position when a Defendant submits an application to commit a Claimant’s Litigation Friend for contempt of Court for false statements made in a document verified by a statement of truth.

Cojanu -v- Essex Partnership University NHS Trust: Update on Fundamental Dishonesty

On 2 February 2022 Mr Justice Richie gave Judgment on Cojanu, a clinical negligence claim where the Defendant advanced a defence of fundamental dishonesty.

Requesting Medical Records after a death

Losing a loved one when you think it may be because they received poor medical care is incredibly stressful at a time when family and friends are grieving their loss.  Often, people want to see a written record of the final days of their loved one and what happened to them, or they might want to go through years of records to ascertain whether there was diagnosis that may have been missed, such as cancer.

Ockenden Report: inadequate investigations into deaths of mothers and babies and a culture of silence

Last week the Ockenden report was finally published. A team of Midwives and Doctors, headed by Midwife, Donna Ockenden reviewed the maternity care given to 1,148 families between 2000 – 2019. The report made for shocking reading.

Celebrating Trans Day of Visibility - A Kingsley Napley Q & A

We were recently excited and grateful to announce that Kingsley Napley was named in Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index 2022 of Top 100 Employers List for LGBTQ+ people. While it is vital for workplaces to commit to inclusion and create a welcoming environment for their LGBTQ+ staff, the annual celebration of Trans Day of Visibility (TDoV) importantly draws attention to the critical need for more meaningful visibility in the media and beyond in order to pave the way for trans liberation in wider society.

Hidden from History; Why We Should Rediscover The True Stories Behind Queer Art & Culture

Few would disagree with the suggestion that, in order to really understand an artwork and the full extent of its cultural resonance, one needs to know something about the artist who made it. 

Our Diversity & Inclusion Report 2022

Our 2022 report provides an overview of our activities and initiatives across the broad spectrum of diversity. It also includes our statistics for gender, ethnicity, and disability, which reflect our aim of creating a workforce that is fully representative of UK society, at all levels of the business.

Banning conversion therapy: how the UK Government proposals fall short and risk criminalising gender identity counselling services

The UK Government proposals to ban conversion therapy fall short and risk criminalising gender identity counselling services. 

On 29 October 2021 the Government launched a consultation on restricting conversion therapy. Although the Government proposals are a step in the right direction, it only limits conversion therapy rather than banning it outright.

Progress on our pledge to increase diversity and inclusion within Kingsley Napley

When I became Senior Partner of Kingsley Napley in 2018, I made a very clear pledge to the firm – that I would make it one of my key objectives to increase diverse talent and foster a culture of inclusivity.

Black History Month – I don’t have a story as it was normal

Marcia Longdon was recently asked about her journey into law and whether she had a story to share. Marcia initially thought that she didn't have a story. However, as the interview unfolded, the interviewer looked over the camera and said, er, are you sure? So here it is.

Breast Cancer: The Most Common Cancer in the UK

Breast cancer accounts for almost 15% of all new cancer cases and affects both men and women.  There are an estimated 150 new cases every day.  Sarah Harding’s death earlier this year was a tragic reminder that breast cancer also affects young and premenopausal women.

Brownlie v Four Seasons Group

Today the Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in this long-running case, and in plain terms, Lady Brownlie has won the Appeal.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility