The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?

16 August 2021

On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?

The strategy aimed to be a highly collaborative document. A programme of engagement, running since February 2020, included meetings with the Disability Charities Consortium (a group of 10 of the UK’s largest disability charities), meetings with the Disabled People’s Organisation Forum and meetings and discussions with disabled people about their experiences in daily life. The “UK Disability Survey” launched in January 2021 and ran until April, seeking responses from disabled people, families and carers. A conscientious start.

The project was (and continues to be) headed by the Government’s Disability Unit. Their vision for the impact of the strategy is ambitious; “to transform the everyday lives of disabled people by tackling the barriers people face”. A tantalising proposition and not necessarily an overstated aim; there are indeed a vast number of areas which central Government strategy could transform. So have The Disability Unit been able to deliver on this?

The strategy has been broken down into eight (quite sensible) themes. A helpful overview of each section can be found here:

  1. Rights and Perceptions: Removing barriers to participating fully in public and civic life and wider society 
  2. Home: Creating more accessible, adapted and safer homes
  3. Transport: Improving the accessibility and experience of everyday journeys
  4. Jobs:  Making the world of work more inclusive and accessible
  5. Education: Ensuring children and young people fulfil their potential
  6. Shopping: Creating more consumer choice and convenience
  7. Leisure: Widening access to arts, culture, sport and the great outdoors
  8. Public Services: Making access as smooth and easy as possible

After my own review, I would suggest that there are both pleasing and disappointing aspects to the strategy. I do not have the luxury of being able to list all of the “commitments” listed in the strategy (of which there are apparently over 100) but I would estimate that a fairly small number of those represent significant progress, in terms of new immediate or short term tangible benefits to the disability community.

Nonetheless, some of these actions are very welcome. To pick a few:

  • Funding for new public awareness raising campaigns in the context of tackling negative perceptions of disabled people and disability rights
  • Creation of an Access to Work Adjustments Passport to support disabled people with their transition into employment, including disabled students leaving education and allowing people to take equipment from one job to another
  • £30 million investment to accelerate the delivery of Changing Places facilities across the UK

However, important voices from the disability community have expressed their frustration at what had been predicted as a “once in a generation” strategy. The main criticisms centre on the fact that it lacks detail and rehearses ideas that already existed. Disability Rights UK CEO Kamran Mallick quite fairly said: “Disabled people have been waiting a long time for a Strategy that has meat on its bones. Despite being 120 pages long, the Strategy is disappointingly thin on immediate actions, medium-term plans and the details of longer term investment.” It is hard to argue with this. A lot of the actions are framed on the basis that proposals will be “explored”, that governmental departments will “work” towards goals and making commitments to “review” aspects of how government bodies are run.

To provide an example - one particular bugbear of mine (through the experiences of personal acquaintances and my clients) is the difficulty in accessing benefits and social welfare and healthcare more generally. Indeed, the UK Disability Survey found that 80% of disabled people who had accessed benefits and pension services said they had experienced at least some difficulties and 78% said the same in relation to accessing health services.

The strategy identified these things are a big problem - excellent. The Disability Unit said “We know that a bold response is required” - sounds good. But when we come to read the ‘next steps’, they include that the DWP is “exploring options to reduce the frequency of repeat Work Capability Assessments (WCA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments” and the Department for Health and Social Care will “work with disabled people and disability organisations at every stage of social care reform to ensure their voices are heard and needs reflected”. Not exactly a particularly ‘bold response’.

People may ask; wasn’t the strategy supposed to have completed the exploring and reviewing stage already? Shouldn’t the strategy have already found out the answers to these questions and set out concrete actions? The answer to these questions is probably ‘yes’ and it is hard to escape the feeling that the strategy has been rushed and is incomplete.

However, looking at this optimistically, I do not think we should consign the strategy to the already full rubbish tip of well-meaning but ultimately meaningless government policies just yet. It appears quite clear to me that The Disability Unit view this document and policy as a work in progress. It is described at numerous points as a “dynamic plan” that The Disability Unit “will refresh regularly in response to disabled people’s priorities”. Indeed, progress is to be reported on every 12 months and the Government says it will “step up” engagement with disabled people going forward and welcome feedback.   

So ultimately, whether this strategy has the power to “transform” lives, as touted, remains to be seen. At the moment, it shouldn’t be controversial to say that the strategy has fallen a long way short of the rather grandiose claims that were made in the build up to its publication. As Scope Chief Executive Mark Hodgkinson said “Unless we get clear detail beyond the next 12 months, it is difficult to see how life will be significantly different for the next generation of disabled people.”

I have no particular reason to doubt the intentions of The Disability Unit and those people within it who I am sure work hard to try to improve disability policy in the UK. But as ever, the ability to see their vision realised will inevitably come down to money. I will borrow again from Mr Hodgkinson, who puts it more eloquently that I can, but such an investment should require little consideration:

“Investing in disabled people can have a hugely positive impact to our country, to our economy and to disabled people’s living standards… The money earmarked to deliver the Strategy is sadly not sufficient for long term transformational change, and in many cases is not ‘new’ money… Therefore, further investment must be prioritised as part of the upcoming spending review.”

To look on the bright side, it is the first time in a long time that there is (what appears to be) a shared vision across Government on disability. Let us hope that the Government provide those in charge of developing and enhancing the strategy with the necessary tools to do so.

Further Information

If you have any questions or concerns about the topics raised in this blog, please contact Christopher James, or any member of the Medical Negligence and Personal Injury team.


About the Author

Christopher James is an Associate and specialises in working with clients that have sustained a range of injuries through medical negligence and personal injury, including brain injuries, injuries arising from birth, cases of incorrect and delayed diagnosis’ and psychiatric injuries.


Latest blogs & news

Banning conversion therapy: how the UK Government proposals fall short and risk criminalising gender identity counselling services

The UK Government proposals to ban conversion therapy fall short and risk criminalising gender identity counselling services. 

On 29 October 2021 the Government launched a consultation on restricting conversion therapy. Although the Government proposals are a step in the right direction, it only limits conversion therapy rather than banning it outright.

Progress on our pledge to increase diversity and inclusion within Kingsley Napley

When I became Senior Partner of Kingsley Napley in 2018, I made a very clear pledge to the firm – that I would make it one of my key objectives to increase diverse talent and foster a culture of inclusivity.

Black History Month – I don’t have a story as it was normal

Marcia Longdon was recently asked about her journey into law and whether she had a story to share. Marcia initially thought that she didn't have a story. However, as the interview unfolded, the interviewer looked over the camera and said, er, are you sure? So here it is.

Breast Cancer: The Most Common Cancer in the UK

Breast cancer accounts for almost 15% of all new cancer cases and affects both men and women.  There are an estimated 150 new cases every day.  Sarah Harding’s death earlier this year was a tragic reminder that breast cancer also affects young and premenopausal women.

Brownlie v Four Seasons Group

Today the Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in this long-running case, and in plain terms, Lady Brownlie has won the Appeal.

How can I celebrate BHM if I’m not Black?

A question that emerges for Black people all over Britain every October is “How can I celebrate the stories of those that have come before me?” In contrast the question that naturally comes to mind for those who are not of Black origin is “If I’m not Black how do I participate in Black History?” Whilst the questions appear to be different there is a common theme – both query how people can do Black History month justice, both have a desire to adequately celebrate a rich history that means so much to so many. But rest assured you should feel comfortable and welcome to celebrate the history of another culture.

Black History Month – why do I care?

Celebrating this year’s Black History Month (BHM) with is powerful campaign, “Proud to Be”, is an apt time for us all to consider why we (should) care about Black history and culture.

Black History Month - The Power of Diverse Storytelling

When Black History Month was established in the United States, over a century ago, it was intended as a way to celebrate and give national recognition to black stories and perspectives.

At Kingsley Napley, we believe in the power of diverse and representative stories and we have found some wonderful and effective ways to share them that you might like to try too.

Maternity Services in England

On 6 July 2021, the Health and Social Care Committee published its report into maternity care in England. The report looks at maternity care across the country and analyses the progress of the Government so far in its commitments to improving maternity care.

Proposed changes to the Highway Code: will they improve safety for cyclists and other vulnerable road users?

Over the summer, the government suggested changes to the Highway Code to improve road safety for vulnerable road users. If the proposals are approved, they will change how pedestrians, cyclists and motorists are expected to behave on Britain’s roads.

Celebrating Bisexuality Visibility Day!

The visibility of the “B” in our LGBTQ+ umbrella is marked every year on 23 September. At Kingsley Napley, we are proud to have bisexual members of our LGBTQ+ and Allies Network and strive for everyone to feel like they can be themselves and bring their whole selves to work. Outside KN, and in this year alone, Robin has come out as bisexual in the new Batman comic, more awareness has been raised about bisexuality with celebrities, such as Megan Fox, Lily Cole, speaking out and there is more representation of bisexual people in mainstream shows, such as Sex Education, Brooklyn Nine-Nine.

Breaking the Stigma: September is Urology Awareness Month

According to the Urology Foundation, one in two of us will be affected by a urological condition in our lifetime.

World Suicide Prevention Day – how can you get involved?

10th September is World Suicide Prevention Day. Each year, on the same date, communities and organisations campaign on a global scale to raise awareness of the tragedy of suicide and explore ways in which we can all help to prevent it.

World Suicide Prevention Day

To mark Suicide Prevention Day and raise awareness of the prevalence of deaths by suicide in the UK, Kingsley Napley is set to host a mental health panel discussion on 10 September 2021.

Who can bring a claim when someone dies?

When a loved one dies, grief is difficult and there can be a lot to deal with.  If someone dies as a result of medical negligence or personal injury, then it’s important to consider who can bring a claim. 

Clarity on costs for consumers of legal services: the guideline hourly rates

Whether the claimant or defendant, successful parties to civil litigation can be disappointed to hear that they are highly unlikely to recover all of their legal spend.  The losing party is only required to pay what is considered reasonable and proportionate.  A key feature in what is recovered is the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged by the successful litigant’s solicitors.

What happens when medics miss a serious heart complaint?

An aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Sadly, classic symptoms are often misdiagnosed or dismissed, which quickly lead to the patient’s death. We have experience of successfully investigating claims of this nature.

Swift v Carpenter: and another thing…

Much has been said about the 2020 Court of Appeal judgment in Swift dealing with the disputed method by which claims for the cost of special accommodation following severe injuries are calculated, and rightly so; it was a privilege for one of the authors of this article to work on a case of such wide application and with such benefit for so many Claimants. 

Case note: Malik -v- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

The recent decision in the case of Malik -v- St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust provides a further example of this approach.  Mr Malik required emergency spinal surgery in the form of a laminectomy and discectomy at T10/11.  No criticism was made of the performance of the surgery.  Post-operatively Mr Malik experienced ongoing numbness and weakness in his left leg.  His surgeon recommended further revision decompression surgery which unfortunately left Mr Malik with an incomplete paraparesis.  He was classified as a T7 ASIA D paraplegic.

The National Disability Strategy: the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan ever. Is it really?

On the 28 July 2021, the Government unveiled the highly anticipated National Disability Strategy (‘the strategy’). Pledged in the Government’s 2019 manifesto, the aim is to “improve the everyday lives of disabled people”. The Prime Minister described the strategy as the most comprehensive, concerted, cross-government plan relating to disability ever. A bold claim, but is it justified?

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility