Blog
Malicious prosecution and the risk to private prosecutors
Melinka Berridge
We often act for businesses who have been the victims of crime. The Code of Practice for Victims of Crime (‘the Victims’ Code’) allows an opportunity for the voice of the business to be heard by way of an Impact Statement for Business (ISB).
The purpose of an ISB is to provide businesses, enterprises and charities with the opportunity to address the effect a crime has had on their organisation. This can be an extremely important tool, especially where money has been lost which has had a detrimental effect on the running of the respective organisation. An ISB does not have the same purpose as a witness statement; nevertheless an ISB may be considered by a court, if deemed appropriate, when the judge is determining the sentence to impose on the offender.
An ISB can be made during the police investigation, at the point when witness statements are being taken. An ISB can also be prepared at a later stage by completing an ISB form and sending it to the police contact. It is of note that if an organisation does not take the opportunity to complete an ISB when it is initially offered, the chance to do so later on may be lost. However, in cases that take longer time to bring to the offender to trial an organisation may wish to take their time to provide a comprehensive account in their ISB, and so should make this intention clear to the Police when first asked rather than refusing the offer.
An ISB must:
The ISB should include information about the direct cost the crime has had, in addition to information regarding the wider costs and impact such as reputational damage and the effect on employees. It should only contain information relating to that specific crime, but the exception to this is if the crime is part of repeat offending by the same criminal or organised crime gang. On the contrary, the statement should not include any personal opinion on the sentence that should be imposed.
Once an ISB has been made it cannot be amended, however additional statements may be made where appropriate. The ISB will then be forwarded to the Crown Prosecution Service (‘CPS’) by the police, and if the case reaches court, the ISB will be disclosed to the defence.
The nominated representative can also elect to have all or part of the ISB read out in court by a CPS advocate, and in some cases, the nominated representative may be questioned on the statement at the hearing.
An ISB provides businesses and enterprises with the opportunity to be part of the criminal justice process by allowing their voice to be heard. The ISB may also assist the judge with making a better informed decision on sentencing by considering the overall effect the crime has had on those involved. Furthermore, as Victim Personal Statements only detail the personal effect of a crime on an individual, an ISB allows the Court to take into account the important impact of a crime on an organisation.
At Kingsley Napley we have a team of criminal and civil litigation specialists with expertise in assisting victims of crime to comprehend the criminal justice system. We can assist you with preparing your ISB, helping you understand your rights in the Victims’ Code and support you through the entire criminal case.
In addition to this, the team can support you with other aspects in relation to reporting a crime, seeking the recovery of financial loss through the civil course and commencing a private prosecution in circumstances when the police or CPS are unwilling to act.
Shannett Thompson is a Senior Associate who specialises in helping individuals and organisations who have been the victim of crime hold offenders to account.
A recent High Court decision Whitehead v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2024] EWHC 2868 (Admin) serves as a helpful reminder of the steps that one must take to establish valid grounds before a summons can be issued in a private prosecution.
Whatever its cause, a backlog of over 73,000 Crown court cases is not acceptable. Delays for complainants, defendants and witnesses all impede justice. In the third quarter of 2024, the Crown court received over 31,683 new cases and disposed of 29,502. The passage of time will not solve the problem. Change is inevitable.
Artificial intelligence, and its use on social media, is making it continuously harder to distinguish between real and fake information online. Although fact checking is often required when considering written or spoken words, with the advent of so-called “deepfakes”, we now also need to fact check some of the images or videos we see online.
Sextortion is a form of blackmail where victims receive threats that intimate images of them will be shared or distributed unless they meet the blackmailer’s demands to pay money (or other financial demands). Law enforcement agencies have reported an epidemic of such cases with global figures “more than doubling” in 2023. This reported increase is reflected in the number of clients seeking our advice on how to deal with this particularly distressing form of criminality.
Mr Jonathan Fisher KC’s ongoing Independent Review of Disclosure & Fraud Offences recently published its “Preliminary Findings & Direction of Travel” report for part one of the review, which relates to the criminal disclosure regime. The report can be found here.
On 1 April 2024, a number of new and amended sentencing guidelines came into effect, following publication of the results of a consultation by the Sentencing Council which ran during Autumn 2023.
In a landmark case, Nicholas Hawkes, from Basildon, Essex, has become the first person to be convicted and imprisoned in England and Wales for the criminal offence of cyber-flashing. This historic verdict marks a significant moment in the life of the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA), which aims to combat digital harassment and safeguard online communities.
The police are undertaking the first reported investigation into a “virtual rape”, which is said to have taken place in the metaverse. This case brings to the forefront a number of questions around the adequacy of the UK’s current legislation surrounding sexual offences, and whether it can cater to behaviours taking place in the metaverse.
In a long-overdue announcement by the Home Office, women who were in the past unjustly convicted of same-sex consensual sexual activity will be able to apply for their convictions to be disregarded or pardoned for the first time. This is a significant step forward for queer rights in the UK.
Channel 4’s, Consent, appeared to be a show with something to say; a show that would draw attention to the complexity of sexual allegations involving school aged children as well as the emotional trauma for all caught in its wake.
The Online Safety Bill hit the headlines last week, following its third and final reading in the House of Commons on 17 January 2023. Since its early stages the Bill has provoked an ongoing debate between social media safety groups, who call for the law to do more to protect children, and civil liberties campaigners, who argue that the proposed legislation impinges on the freedom of speech. The latest proposed amendment would make senior managers criminally liable for platforms’ persistent failure to protect children online. Magda Zima considers the potentially wide-ranging impact of this amendment on both companies and senior individuals.
A damning report published by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) has found police forces to be “overwhelmed and ineffective” in relation to digital forensics. The HMICFRS found that there were more than 25,000 devices waiting to be examined – and this is without taking into account all the devices already in the system.
This blog follows the virtual launch of the Youth Justice Legal Centre Legal Guide on children facing sexual offences. During this event, Maeve Keenan discussed Kingsley Napley's contribution to the report, including recommendations on how to appropriately handle these complex cases and protect the child's welfare.
The recent case of Geoffrey Driver V Crown Prosecution Service [2022] EWCH 2500 (KB) serves as an interesting illustration of the potential pitfalls for the CPS of disclosing information about cases that are still at the pre-charge, investigative stage.
The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 ‘the Act’ has correctly attracted much criticism since it was first introduced as a Bill to the House of Commons in the March of 2021. There are numerous and alarming issues raised for civil liberties raised by this legislation which are beyond the scope of this post (see here for further commentary). Nonetheless, there is one aspect of the Act (which received Royal Assent on 28 April 2022) that can be welcomed: the expansion of the scheme for disregarding convictions or cautions received for historical consensual same-sex sexual activity.
Celebrating its 25th anniversary this year, Criminal Law Week is proud to have launched its bi-annual seminar series. The inaugural event took place on 24 May 2022, hosted by Kingsley Napley LLP and chaired by Matt Hardcastle.
News broke last month that megastars Jay-Z, Meek Mill, Big Sean, Kelly Rowland and Fat Joe (among others) were supporting the introduction of a New York state law that aims to prevent the prosecution using rap lyrics in criminal trials.
Last month, the High Court handed down judgement in R (on the application of T M Eye Ltd) v Southampton Crown Court reinforcing the correct approach to applications for an award from central funds for the costs of a private prosecution. Despite clear ‘Jurisdictional error’ on the part of the Crown Court, the appellant court took the opportunity to warn private prosecutors; applications will not be approved ‘on the nod’.
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether having an ulterior motive in starting a private prosecution can lead to problems down the line.
Private prosecutions provide an effective way to seek justice; and particularly in circumstances when the traditional prosecuting agencies are unable or unwilling to act. Conducted appropriately they can be a useful, efficient and cost-effective tool to secure punishment of the guilty. Conducted badly they can be an expensive mistake with far reaching consequences.
In this blog series we draw on our experience of both bringing and defending private prosecutions to help clarify some of the common myths and misunderstandings about private prosecutions. In this blog we look at whether the private prosecutor is entitled to recover their full investigation and legal fees at the end of the case.
We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.
Melinka Berridge
Melinka Berridge
Melinka Berridge
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print