COVID-19 EXPERT LEGAL INSIGHTS

Has the S.O.S from startups been answered?

22 April 2020

Since the start of the coronavirus outbreak, the UK government has launched a number of schemes offering financial support for businesses. This support includes the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, the Small Business Grant Fund, the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme and the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (“CBILS”).
 

However, there have been growing calls from the UK startup community for more targeted support for the UK’s startup and high growth businesses. Over the past few weeks a new campaign, “Save Our Startups”, was launched with backing from prominent entrepreneurs and from industry bodies, and a petition to the government had attracted 6,000 signatures. 

The three points outlined in the S.O.S campaign were:

  1. The Government needs to provide an equity based liquidity package suitable to save startups at risk.
  2. The Government must fast track payments to startups from public funding schemes - in particular R&D tax credits and Innovate UK funding grants.
  3. The Government must change EIS, SEIS and VCTs to stimulate private equity investment into startup and high growth businesses.

Well, in the words of the singer Meat Loaf, “two out of three ain’t bad” and the UK government has now announced £1.25 billion in support for startups. This includes:

  1. Launching a new £500 million loan scheme for high growth companies called the Future Fund. This will comprise £250 million of government funding, on the basis that the amount advanced is matched by private investors. The scheme will provide UK-based early stage companies with convertible loans of between £125,000 and £5 million.
  2. £750 million of grants and loans targeted at small and medium sized businesses focusing on research and development. This will mostly be by way of accelerated payments and additional loans to existing Innovate UK customers, with some support offered to new applicants.

Why is extra support needed for startups?

As Rishi Sunak said in his announcement “It is critical that we don’t just maintain jobs and companies that already exist but we also encourage the businesses, jobs and technologies of the future”. Startups and high growth companies have become a critical part of the UK economy. They account for 30,000 businesses which employ 3.3 million people and some of the UKs most successful businesses have followed this high growth model, including the likes of Deliveroo and Citymapper.

While government support from the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme is helpful to reduce costs, CBILS, which is meant to provide support to smaller businesses in the UK, is available to very few startups and scaleups. As explored in our blog coronavirus business interruption loan scheme a lifeline or a distraction because startups and high growth businesses focus on growth rather than short-term profitability, they are often not eligible for CBILS. CBILS is designed to benefit established businesses that can show that, were it not for the current coronavirus outbreak, they would be “viable”. In contrast, startups are often yet to make a profit and so would have difficulty satisfying the scheme’s criteria. In addition, the general criticism around banks being slow to process loan applications and banks focusing primarily on their existing clients, could disproportionately affect startups that may not already have a relationship with a bank.  

The new support for startups announced by the government also reflects similar support given to the sector by other European governments. The French government announced a €4 billion liquidity support plan for startups which includes a short-term bridging loans aimed at companies in need of refinancing between fund raises, the early payment of some research tax credits and cash loans from banks backed by government guarantees. The German government announced €2 billion in financial assistance, which includes public venture capital investors being provided with additional public funds to co-invest in startups alongside private investors, and access to existing loan financing being simplified.

Future Fund – what do startups need to know? 

The Future Fund will launch in May 2020. Further details of the scheme are still to be published but so far the government have released some headline terms. Some of the key points coming out of this are:   

  • Eligibility – the business must be an unlisted UK registered company that has raised at least £250,000 in aggregate from private investors in the last five years and has a “substantive economic presence in the UK”. Detail as to what is meant by substantive economic presence and how that will be measured by the government is yet to be confirmed.
  • Matched Funding – the government loan has to be matched by private third party investors. At a time like this raising investment from new investors could be difficult. Institutional investors and angel investors will want to focus on supporting their existing portfolio companies, at least to start with. So businesses are likely to look to their existing investors for the matched funding. Therefore the likelihood of a startup being able to access this scheme may depend on whether its existing investors have deep pockets. If a startup has only raised investment from friends and family or angel investors, the likelihood that they are able to provide matched funding of a minimum £125,000 may be slim.
  • Matched Funding – although we know that the government funding will be by way of convertible loan note there is no detail as to how the matched funding will need to be structured. If the matched funding is also required to be by way of convertible loan note this would be a disincentive to angel investors, as convertible loans are not SEIS or EIS eligible.
  • Conversion – the loan will automatically convert into the most senior class of equity on the company’s next qualifying funding round at a minimum conversion discount of 20% to the price set by the funding round (the “Discount Rate”). A qualifying funding round is where the company raises equity funding equal to the amount of the bridging financing. On a non-qualifying funding round the loan may convert at the Discount Rate at the election of the holders of the majority of the matched investors.
  • Redemption – On maturity of the loan (which is after a maximum 36 months), at the election of the holders of the majority of the matched investors, the loan shall either convert into equity at the Discount Rate or be repaid by the company. If repaid, the redemption premium is equal to 100% of the principal of the bridge funding. Such a high redemption premium is to ensure that the taxpayers receive a good return on the investment.
  • Interest – a minimum interest of 8% per annum will be charged on the loan and will be payable on maturity of the loan.
  • Transfer rights - the government will have the right to transfer the loan without restriction to an institutional investor. Having no visibility as to the identity of the institutional investor, which might well become a substantial shareholder in the company, may make startups uncomfortable.  

Should I apply?

As with any investment the devil will be in the detail and, as we saw with CBILS, there is likely to be some refining of the scheme over the next few weeks.

The S.O.S campaign had attracted some scepticism from others in the startup community, who felt that too generous a scheme might only prop up ventures which otherwise would fail. And even in the most favourable economic conditions, many startups will always fail. The Future Fund feels like a reasonable compromise. At a time when the Bank of England base rate is so low, the interest rate and Discount Rate are reasonably substantial, so there is a definite upside for the UK taxpayer. Furthermore, the requirement for a company to have already raised in the last 5 years and the further requirement for the matching funding, mean that the more flaky startups will not qualify.

For startups, as with all investments, you will need to balance the need your startup has for the money now, against the terms on offer and the potential dilution to existing shareholdings should the loan convert into equity. How will your existing investors react to an investment which may convert at what is a reasonably substantial discount, and also gives rights to the matched investors (which may well not include your existing investors) to determine whether the loan is repaid or converted?

If you do need money, explore other options that are available to you first, which could potentially be on more favourable terms. Remember, even under the Future Fund you will still need to raise the match funding, so if you are able to raise the whole amount needed from third party investors that may be preferable.

Contact us for more information and advice

If you would like further information or advice on whether this support is right for your startup, or any other corporate or commercial issue, please contact a member of the startups and investments team.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Emer Hughes is a Senior Associate in the corporate and commercial department. She advises small to medium-sized organisations across a range of sectors and industries, including startups and charities on a broad range of corporate and commercial transactions.

 

Latest blogs and news

The future of the City: An insight into the effect of coronavirus on commercial tenants

On 16 March 2020 Number 10 advised those living in the UK against “non-essential travel” in order to curb the growing outbreak of Coronavirus. This encouraged many office-based businesses to communicate to their employees that they should work from home until further notice. 

Back to the workplace – the new guidance and key considerations for employers

With lockdown restrictions moving to “Stage 4” of the Government’s roadmap to recovery, one of the key questions will be what this means with regard to returning to the workplace and, in a recent article, we considered the rights of employees on this issue.

COVID-19 Fraud: HMRC ramps up its investigations activity

In March 2021 the Chancellor announced the establishment of a taskforce to investigate those who may have fraudulently made use of government schemes set up to protect individuals and businesses against the economic impact of COVID-19 – such as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) (widely referred to as the Furlough scheme), the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) and the ‘Eat Out to Help Out’ Scheme.

Mandatory Covid-19 Vaccinations for Care Home Workers

This week, the Government announced that Covid-19 vaccinations will be made compulsory for care home staff, raising strong emotions on both sides of the argument.

How immune are COVID-19 relief scheme fraudsters from law enforcement action?

The devastating economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented levels of government support aimed at keeping jobs intact and businesses afloat. Although the news is beginning to promise a path out of lockdown and a gradual return to some degree of normality, equally as prominent are reports of fraudulent abuse of the COVID-19 support schemes and the government’s planned response.

Arrests of care home workers following COVID-19 outbreaks: a review of criminal liability

In late February 2021 a news article reported that a care home worker had been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter after a patient died of COVID-19. In late March 2021, two further care home workers were arrested on suspicion of wilful neglect. We look at how those working in care homes can potentially face criminal liability in respect of COVID-19 cases.

COVID-19 Fraud: New Taxpayer Protection Taskforce

In the Budget 2021, presented to Parliament on 3 March, the Chancellor announced that HMRC will establish a taskforce to investigate those who have fraudulently made use of government schemes set up to protect individuals and businesses against the economic impact of COVID-19 – such as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) (widely referred to as the Furlough scheme) and the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS).

Coaching, Teaching and Support Work in Lockdown: Safeguarding and Data Protection considerations when working with children online

The COVID-19 crisis has forced sports clubs, schools, universities and charities to rapidly change their approaches to coaching, teaching and support work. The regulations on social distancing have forced organisations to innovate; services which had previously been offered mostly or wholly in person were rapidly shifted online during “lockdown 1” and will return online at least for the duration of “lockdown 3”.  If the vaccine rollout has the desired effect there will no doubt be some return to “traditional” methods, but it seems very unlikely that the changes brought about by the pandemic will be completely reversed.  In this blog, Claire Parry from Kingsley Napley’s Regulatory team and Fred Allen from the Public Law team look at the challenges organisations face engaging with children online.

As Lockdown Ends – Updated Guidance on General Meetings During Covid

On 30 March 2021 the provisions of the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (“CIGA”) which allowed purely virtual general meetings will lapse, and the normal rules will apply.  ICSA have produced some useful guidance to assist companies in dealing with their general meetings in the light of this change.

£26 billion fraud: The other side of the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes

We have previously examined how the Government’s Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Schemes (the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CLBILS)(together the “Schemes”) work. A report issued by the Public Accounts Committee on 10 December 2020 highlights the darker side of the Schemes and what it is costing the UK taxpayer. 

Will There be Covid Compensation Claims?

In this blog Terence Donovan discuss legal issues arising from the pandemic when considering compensation claims.

FCA sets expectations for firms to record communications when working from home

FCA focuses on risks associated with unmonitored communications, including the use of unencrypted apps, such as WhatsApp, for sharing potentially sensitive or confidential information when working from home.

Regulation and Uptake of the COVID-19 Vaccine

The government has now approved the supply of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The reason they have been able to do this so quickly is because they have taken advantage of the temporary authorisation regime laid out by the Human Medicine Regulations of 2012 and 2020. The 2012 Regulations were updated in 2020 specifically to facilitate the smooth rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the public consultation preceding the introduction of these updated regulations, several respondents raised concerns regarding unlicensed vaccines and immunity from civil liability. In practice, very little is known about these regulations and their application. This article seeks to shed some light on the temporary authorisation regime and suggest a means of alleviating concerns in the context of “vaccine hesitancy”.

The question of Christmas: How far can employers go in telling employees where to spend it?

The Government's latest announcement reducing quarantine requirements for travellers returning to England from 14 to 5 days post-15 December 2020 (providing they can provide a negative test result for COVID-19) once again raises questions for employers on what right they have to influence employees' overseas holiday and travel plans over the Christmas period.

Firms brace for negligence impact

Accounting firms should be bracing themselves for a rise in professional negligence claims as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Justice delayed is justice denied for clients in lockdown limbo

The top five most stressful events in life are commonly regarded as death of a loved one; divorce; major illness or injury; job loss; and moving house (in that order). Some might argue that the Covid-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns should be a new addition to this list. Not only does it make life more stressful but also the first four events more likely.

Parliamentary scrutiny in the time of Coronavirus

As a new nationwide lockdown comes into effect, Stephen Parkinson and Charlie Roe from our Public Law team, consider the often limited role of Parliament in scrutinising restrictive regulations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fraud and opportunism during COVID-19

The current global pandemic has provided and will continue to provide plentiful opportunities for fraud and opportunism.

Insolvency and furlough fraud – directors beware!

There has been much mention in the press in recent times about the amount of allegedly incorrect or fraudulent claims made by employers under the Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) (furlough scheme).

COVID-19 puts the spotlight on the UK’s Statutory Sick Pay

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of statutory sick pay (“SSP”) in our society.  As other countries around the globe have improved SSP in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus and help workers stay at home, we examine the SSP regime in the UK, the changes the government has made and whether SSP will be increased as we continue to live with the pandemic.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility