Police Appeals Tribunals: Fit for purpose?

2 April 2012

Last week the High Court sent an unequivocal message to Home Secretary, Theresa May, calling for revision of the powers available to Police Appeal Tribunals (PAT) (Chief Constable of Hampshire v Police Appeals Tribunal [2012] EWHC 746).

The PAT had been forced to reinstate a police officer after finding that his disciplinary hearing was unfair because of the panel’s refusal to call crucial witnesses. The relevant statutory framework governing appeals did not permit the PAT to remit the case back to the disciplinary panel for fresh consideration. This was far from satisfactory in a case involving evidence of serious inappropriate sexual behaviour by the officer concerned.

The High Court had no option but to uphold the PAT’s finding and reject the Chief Constable’s challenge. In view of the serious nature of the allegation it could not fault the PAT’s reasoning that where a dispute turns on one person’s word against another, the evidence of one of them cannot be preferred without hearing from them both.

The High Court found itself in the same difficult position as the PAT.  That is, forced to recognise the serious procedural irregularity, but unable to afford the parties effective justice. It clearly troubled the court that an officer had to be reinstated on a ‘technicality’ rather than a proper evaluation of the evidence.

The message it sent the Home Secretary is a blunt one: The Police Act 1996 and The Police Appeals Tribunal Rules 2008 must be amended to give the PAT a clear power to remit a case back to the disciplinary panel for fresh consideration or be given a power to re-determine the case itself.

Unfortunately for the Home Secretary, the bad news did not end there. The court also found that Home Office Guidance issued in 2008 – which had informed the disciplinary panel chair’s refusal to call witnesses – has no statutory force since the Police Act 1996 (namely section 87(1)) does not provide the Home Secretary power to administer such guidance, despite the claim made in its introduction.

Share insightLinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email to a friend Print

Email this page to a friend

On March 31st 2015 Ben Summers commented:

Readers should note that subsequent to this decision and Sophie's blog post, the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2012 [SI 2630/2012] were passed, revoking the 2008 Rules and providing a power for the PAT to remit a case back to a fresh panel for redetermination.

On March 3rd 2013 patricia hodgson commented:

this is typical of the whole system within the law if a hearing is one sided then any policeman or policewomen have the right an appeal but people just do not read the home office guidelines and interpret them correctly

We welcome views and opinions about the issues raised in this blog. Should you require specific advice in relation to personal circumstances, please use the form on the contact page.

Leave a comment

You may also be interested in:

Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility