Blog
Using the Skilled Worker route to recruit students on visas - tips for employers
Emma Fowler
The Action Plan recommended that the Government "explore how the existing immigration system can be used to attract graduates from universities producing some of the world’s top AI talent."
Yet, the Government only “partially” accepted the Action Plan recommendation, saying:
The Industrial Strategy will set out [in Summer 2025] how the UK will attract highly skilled AI workers from abroad. The UK offers internationally competitive visas that can support a range of individual needs, including for talent to join UK-based organisations or to start their own business. Talented AI graduates from institutions not on the HPI [High Potential Individual] eligibility lists can enter the UK through any one of a number of other visa routes, including Skilled Worker, Innovator Founder, Government Authorised Exchange and Global Talent.”
The idea that the UK’s immigration offering is internationally competitive now is already a stretch. The High Potential Individual (HPI) category only applies to graduates from a small number of universities; the Skilled Worker category does not allow for entrepreneurship and flexible working arrangements; Innovator Founder is not fit for purpose and hardly used; Global Talent has a 50% refusal rate; and Government Authorised Exchange won’t help much aside from for internships. The UK immigration system is also increasingly expensive to use.
The immigration policy white paper released last month draws into even sharper focus the UK’s offering for AI (and other tech-related) talent. The Government says it wants to attract top talent but in the white paper shows its intent to shutdown much of the immigration system.
Some changes pinpointed in the white paper included:
Top AI talent may not be affected by the increase in Skilled Worker job skill level (assuming they will be filling highly specialised roles). But the mood music in the white paper is off putting to say the least. Young people coming to study for degrees in the UK can already generally not bring dependent family members and now the white paper suggests limiting Graduate visas. The threat of doubling the qualifying period for settlement could also be hugely disconcerting for AI and tech talent.
In contrast to the overall tone of further immigration restrictions in the white paper it does also include that “As part of our mission to promote growth, we will go further in ensuring that the very highly skilled have opportunities to come to the UK and access our targeted routes for the brightest and best global talent”.
The white paper says it will achieve that by:
The government response to the Action Plan opens with “Artificial Intelligence is the defining opportunity of our generation.” The UK’s ability to recruit international talent will be crucial.
The white paper does not sit well against that. It is unknown when the changes highlighted in the white paper will come into effect – some are likely in the coming weeks and others are subject to consultation later in the year.
One size fits all policies are unhelpful. Carveouts should be created for crucial industries and sectors for growth – none more so than AI and tech.
If you have any queries on the issues raised above or any other Immigration matter, please contact a member of the Immigration team.
This blog draws on themes originally shared in a LinkedIn post by Nicolas Rollason.
With lots of students finishing their exams at this time of year, we often receive queries from hiring teams, looking to understand the Student visa category and how these candidates could transition into longer-term roles.
We set out below the different stages at which a Student visa holder might be hired, and how this impacts their right to work and the future process to join the business longer-term.
Comments from Chancellor Rachel Reeves in January at Davos have materialised into two new schemes to attract more high-growth businesses to the UK.
Announced as part of London Tech Week, the two new ‘concierge service’ schemes include visa fee reimbursements and a fast-track for Office for Investment-backed overseas businesses.
These schemes are announced as migrants, employers and prospective inward investors continue to hold their breath over whether the government will follow through on its drastic earned settlement proposals, as early as this Autumn. Uncertainty is exacerbated by the possible leadership contest in the near future which could mean a change in direction on immigration policy.
The start of Pride Month in the UK provides an opportunity for immigration lawyers to reflect on the challenges facing LGBTQ+ asylum-seeking clients.
Still fresh in our minds is April’s BBC investigation, which suggested the existence of a shadow industry of legal advisers encouraging migrants to falsely claim to be gay in order to make asylum claims that would enable them to remain in the UK. While allegations of abuse of the asylum system should be investigated, the way sexuality‑based asylum claims are discussed in public debate matters. Focusing on isolated examples of alleged abuse risks misrepresenting how these claims are actually assessed and reinforcing assumptions that cause real harm to LGBTQ+ people seeking protection.
This type of reporting raises concerns as it obscures the reality of the system. It exaggerates the prevalence of fraud and risks embedding a culture of disbelief that already presents significant barriers for genuine claimants.
One question clients often ask is whether an employer can lawfully pay a sponsored worker more than a non-sponsored worker doing the same role, particularly given the increases to minimum salary thresholds under the Skilled Worker route.
The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) wants to know what needs to change for the UK to be competitive about attracting Global Talent.
The MAC has launched a call for evidence on the Global Talent and Innovator Founder visa routes. The deadline is 11:59pm on 1 May 2026. Here's why this matters - and why you should respond
Historically, a non domiciled divorcing couple have been able to mitigate their UK tax liabilities when making a lump sum payment to the other party to the divorce. Following guidance from HMRC in 2025, however, it seems that this particular tax mitigation strategy is no longer available and advice needs to be taken in respect of each party’s tax status, the timing and mechanism of payments and the likely tax liability.
The UK government’s new “earned settlement” proposals reveal a stark divide in how people can secure their right to live permanently in the UK. For EU, EEA nationals and Swiss nationals and their families who were living in the UK before Brexit, the EU Settlement Scheme increasingly seems a beacon of fairness. For everyone else, the future looks far less certain—and much harder.
The UK Government’s Earned Settlement consultation proposes a fundamental shift in how migrants achieve Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Instead of a time-based system, settlement would be earned through measurable contributions and integration. For the tech sector—one of the UK’s fastest-growing industries—these changes could have far-reaching consequences.
As I mentioned previously, I am still trying to get my head around the issues that continue to arise from the recent announcement made by the Home Secretary in relation to the settlement provisions. For now, I want to unpack one part of the change.
The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025 (which has just completed the parliamentary process by receiving Royal Assent on 2 December 2025) will introduce significant changes to right to work checks. The law hasn’t been implemented yet but employers need to be aware of the implications.
The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) will increase by 32% from £1,000 per year of the visa to £1,320 per year of the visa. For small sponsors the ISC will increase from £364 to £480 per year.
The immigration policy white paper was released on 12 May 2025 and there were subsequent Skilled Worker rule changes on 22 July. On 14 October the Home Office released a statement of changes to the Immigration Rules setting out further upcoming rule amendments flowing from the white paper. There was also a Home Office press release.
We focus here on two updates - one on travel to the EU and one on the Temporary Shortage List for Skilled Worker applications based on lower skilled roles.
I’ll acknowledge, it is a little edgy - in the current climate - to argue for a more nuanced approach to historic criminality in the immigration system. Sounds like the sort of thing that would feed a tabloid journalist with everything they think they need to know about an immigration lawyer.
The issue of indefinite leave to remain (ILR) has been a hot topic in the UK press. The Reform Leader Nigel Farage has suggested that his party would abolish the status and force people with ILR to return to some form of lesser immigration status which would block access to a range of rights which those who obtained the status acquire - access to welfare benefits, free NHS care and home student University fees for young people.
From UKVI’s published statistics on immigration applications, in the most recent reported quarter (March to June 2025) UKVI received 938,527 visit visa applications – the highest ever reported in at least the last 20 years. In that quarter, UKVI also refused 156,659 visit visa applications (and issued 790,708 visas), unsurprisingly, also the highest number reported. The refusal rate for this quarter (which will not cover all applications received) was just shy of 20%.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”) Yvette Cooper has trained her crosshairs squarely on foreign national families in her recent announcement, declaring the suspension and reform of the refugee family reunion scheme and a review of “the application of Article 8 in the immigration and asylum system.” The suspension came with a statement of changes to the Immigration Rules today at 3pm.
UKVI can issue a whopping fine of up to £60,000 to a company that is alleged to have employed someone illegally in the UK. The size of the fine is partly determined by whether the breach is a first for the business or not.
As political and economic uncertainties continue to shape the global landscape, a growing number of Americans are setting their sights on the United Kingdom, not just for travel or business, but for a new life altogether.
Or call +44 (0)20 7814 1200
Emma Fowler
Tim Richards
Libby Klinke
Skip to content Home About Us Insights Services Contact Accessibility
Share insightLinkedIn X Facebook Email to a friend Print